Assignment: HLT 308V Organizational Risk Management Interview GCU
Assignment: HLT 308V Organizational Risk Management Interview GCU
Risk management is a top priority in our organization. The organization I work for is community based and risk management is critical to enhance patient safety and ensure the organization attains its strategic goals. Although risk management is a collective effort by all employees in the organization, risk management is headed by manager of quality assurance, who oversees the operations aimed at preventing occurrence of adverse events that could be injurious to the safety of both employees and the staff. This paper explores how risk management is undertaken in the organization. To deduce relevant information concerning risk management, the head of quality assurance, the employee in charge of risk management in the organization was interviewed and the responses noted.
The first question sought to identify the challenges that the organization faces in controlling infectious diseases. In response, the head of quality assurance admitted that controlling infections in the organization was indeed a challenge. The main challenge was that the organization mainly handles elderly patients. Empirical research evidence indicates that elderly patients are prone to infectious because of various factors. These include low immunity which increases susceptibility to infections. Secondly, prescription of a wide variety of drugs and poly pharmacy destabilizes the internal microbial environment, thereby increasing susceptibility to infections (Hollnagel, Braithwaite & Wears, 2014). Additionally, the effect of antibiotic resistance, which results from unregulated and indiscriminate intake of drugs becomes particularly more evident in old age (Spath & Kelly, 2017). This undermines the efficacy of the existing drugs applied to treat the infections, making it challenging to control the diseases in the community based setting.
The second question inquired about the existing risk management strategies applied in the organization’s infection control program. The head of quality assurance identified several strategies, including hand washing, promoting environmental hygiene and frequent surveillance. Hand washing strategies applied in the organization complies with the recommended hand washing guidelines and procedures. This includes hand rubbing using soap and running water, rinsing the hands and then drying the hands properly using a single use towel. In the organization, hand washing is a standard procedure used by the healthcare professionals before and after making direct contact with the patients; after removal of hand gloves and prior to handling invasive equipment or devices. Additionally, it is a standard procedure for the healthcare professionals to wash their hands after handling patient’s secretions, including saliva, blood and other body fluids. Promoting environmental hygiene and safety as a strategy of controlling infections entails thorough cleaning and drying of the surfaces using detergents. Additionally, the organization ensures proper cleaning and handling of used linen, proper disposal of waste and ensuring the facility is well ventilated (Balbir & Ghatala, 2012).
The third question inquired the extent at which the organization’s education risk management program addresses key professional issues, such as negligence, malpractice litigation and vicarious liability. In the healthcare facility, educational risk management program address the professional issues in various ways. These includes sensitizing the employees on the importance of observing the professional code of conduct and frequent training and retraining of the healthcare professionals on the various standard operation procedures to prevent medical errors and other adverse events that could undermine patient safety. In regards to malpractice litigation, the head of quality assurance revealed that the organization is yet to face malpractice litigation during his tenure. However, the organizations educational risk management program outlines the standard procedure and actions that a healthcare professionals face when confronted with malpractice charges. This includes suspension from work pending determination of the litigation and in some cases dismissal from the organization.
The policies that the organization has implemented in managing emergency triage in high risk areas of healthcare delivery include Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). In regards to the EMTALA policy, the organization is under obligation to deliver healthcare services to all patients and does not engage in patient dumping. However, compliance with the EMTALA depends on various conditions, including the setting in which the patient is situated and confirmation of the availability or lack of the emergency clinical condition as outlines in the EMTALA.
The main strategy that the organization uses to monitor and maintain its risk management program includes frequent review of the program by external agencies. In this case, the organization frequently reviews its program against the established standards set by regulatory bodies involved in monitoring patient safety in healthcare facilities across the country. Secondly, the organization frequently uses the recommended international standard safety guidelines to benchmark against its existing risk management program. Additionally, the organization uses the established professional code of ethics in monitoring and maintenance of the risk management program.
From the interview, it is evident that the organization has implemented pragmatic measures in its risk management program to address various hazards, particularly infections. One of the strengths of the risk management program is the implementation of policies that complies with the established regulations of promoting patient safety in the country. This includes guidelines of preventing infections and providing healthcare services in emergency settings. However, the main shortcoming of the program is that its education risk program does not involve key stakeholders, including patient and their families.
References
Balbir , S., & Ghatala , H.(2012). Risk management in hospitals. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 3(4): 417- 421.
Hollnagel, E., Braithwaite, J, & Wears, R. (2014). Resilient health care. Surrey, England: Ashgate.
Spath, P., & Kelly, D.(2017). Applying Quality Management in Healthcare: A Systems Approach, 4th Edition. AUPHA/HAP.
HLT 308V Topic 4 Organizational Risk Management Interview GCU
The purpose of this assignment is to gain real-world insight into how risk management programs operate within health care organizations.
Select a local health care organization where you can conduct an interview with an employee who is involved in risk management processes. This organization can be your current employer or a different health care facility in your community. Acute care, urgent care, large multi‐provider private medical clinics, assisted living facilities, and community/public health clinical facilities are all ideal options to complete the requirements of this assignment. Select an individual who can provide sufficient information regarding how their organization manages risk within its facility to answer the questions below.
Assignment: HLT 308V Organizational Risk Management Interview GCUIn your interview, address the following:
Risk management strategies used in the organization’s risk control program, along with specific examples.
How the facility’s educational risk management program addresses key professional, legal, and ethical issues, such as prevention of negligence, malpractice litigation, and vicarious liability.
Policies the facility has implemented that address how to manage emergency triage in high‐risk areas of health care service delivery (e.g., narcotics inventories, declared pregnancy policies, blood-borne disease sector, etc.).
Challenges the organization faces in managing and controlling high-risk health care (e.g., infectious diseases, nuclear medicine, abortion, class 4 narcotics/opioids, etc.).
Strategies the facility utilizes to monitor, evaluate, and maintain compliance within its risk management program.
After conducting the interview, compose a 750‐1,000 word summary analysis of the interview that includes the questions above, in conjunction with the interviewee’s responses. In addition, include the following elements in your response:
An assessment of the organization’s risk management program, including how it attends to high-risk health care and legal concerns.
Action steps you would take to improve one area of the organization’s risk management program, along with your rationale for doing so.
Cite appropriate references as needed to support your statements and rationale.
Assignment: HLT 308V Organizational Risk Management Interview GCUPrepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.
ourse Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | |||
HLT-308V | HLT-308V-O500 | Organizational Risk Management Interview | 150.0 | |||
Criteria | Percentage | 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | 2: Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) | 3: Satisfactory (75.00%) | 4: Good (85.00%) | 5: Excellent (100.00%) |
% Scaling | 100.0% | |||||
Risk Management Strategies Used in the Risk Control Program | 10.0% | Risk management strategies used in the risk control program are not included. | Risk management strategies used in the risk control program are partially incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. | Risk management strategies used in the risk control program are present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. | Risk management strategies used in the risk control program are described in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support. | Risk management strategies used in the risk control program are comprehensive. The submission incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. |
How the Risk Management Program Addresses Key Professional, Legal, and Ethical Issues | 10.0% | A description of how the risk management program addresses key professional, legal, and ethical issues is not included. | A description of how the risk management program addresses key professional, legal, and ethical issues is partially incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. | A description of how the risk management program addresses key professional, legal, and ethical issues is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. | A description of how the risk management program addresses key professional, legal, and ethical issues is complete. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support. | A description of how the risk management program addresses key professional, legal, and ethical issues is comprehensive, supported by detailed, relevant examples. Level of detail is appropriate. |
Facility Policies for Managing Emergency Triage in High-Risk Areas of Health Care Service Delivery | 10.0% | An explanation of the facility policies for managing emergency triage in high-risk areas of health care service delivery is not included. | An explanation of the facility policies for managing emergency triage in high-risk areas of health care service delivery is partially incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. | An explanation of the facility policies for managing emergency triage in high-risk areas of health care service delivery is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. | An explanation of the facility policies for managing emergency triage in high-risk areas of health care service delivery is described in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support. | An explanation of the facility policies for managing emergency triage in high-risk areas of health care service delivery is present and comprehensive. The submission incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. |
Challenges the Organization Faces in Managing and Controlling High-Risk Health Care | 10.0% | A description of the challenges the organization faces in managing and controlling high-risk health care is not included. | A description of the challenges the organization faces in managing and controlling high-risk health care is partially incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. | A description of the challenges the organization faces in managing and controlling high-risk healthcare is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. | A description of the challenges the organization faces in managing and controlling high-risk health care is complete. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support. | A comprehensive description of the challenges the organization faces in managing and controlling high-risk health care is provided. The submission incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. |
Strategies the Facility Utilizes to Monitor and Maintain Its Risk Management Program | 10.0% | A description of the strategies the facility utilizes to monitor and maintain its risk management program is not included. | A description of the strategies the facility utilizes to monitor and maintain its risk management program is partially incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. | A description of the strategies the facility utilizes to monitor and maintain its risk management program is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. | A description of the strategies the facility utilizes to monitor and maintain its risk management program is complete. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support. | A description of the strategies the facility utilizes to monitor and maintain its risk management program is comprehensive. The submission incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. |
Assessment of the Risk Management Program Inclusive of Health and Legal Concerns | 15.0% | An assessment of the risk management program inclusive of high-risk health care and legal concerns is not included. | An assessment of the risk management program inclusive of high-risk health care and legal concerns is partially incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. | An assessment of the risk management program inclusive of high-risk health care and legal concerns is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. | An assessment of the risk management program inclusive of high-risk health care and legal concerns is described in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support. | An assessment of the risk management program inclusive of high-risk health care and legal concerns is comprehensive. The submission incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. |
Proposed Action Steps to Improve the Risk Management Program Inclusive of Rationale | 10.0% | An inventory of the proposed action steps to improve the risk management program inclusive of rationale is not included. | An inventory of the proposed action steps to improve the risk management program inclusive of rationale is partially incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. | An inventory of the proposed action steps to improve the risk management program inclusive of rationale is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. | An inventory of the proposed action steps to improve the risk management program inclusive of rationale is described in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support. | An inventory of the proposed action steps to improve the risk management program inclusive of rationale is comprehensive. The submission incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. |
Thesis Development and Purpose | 5.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
Argument Logic and Construction | 5.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
Total Weightage | 100% |
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!