NU 631 Week 4 Assignment 1 Start Your Literature Review Matrix

NU 631 Week 4 Assignment 1 Start Your Literature Review Matrix

APA Reference

 

 

 

Research Question Type of Study Research Design Sample, Sample Size, and How Selected Instruments Used, Reliability and Validity, Data Collection Methods Results (including statistical analysis

Consistent with other Literature)

Limitations
Samuriwo, Ray (PhD. Student) October 2010,

 

Effects of education and experience on nurses’ value of ulcer prevention,

 

British Journal of Nursing (Tissue Viability Supplement) volume 19 Number 20 (2010)

What value do nurses place on pressure ulcer prevention? /To determine the value that nurses place on pressure ulcer prevention.

 

Qualitative

 

 

 

Welsh Straussian grounded theory study Female Nurses ranging from second year nursing student to senior nurse managers recruited from a non-acute medical ward of 14 hospitals in one NHS trust and a university

n=16

-Convenience sampling. No specific information given.

-Indirect measures with, semi-structured focus group interviews.

-Instrument reliable because values are ambiguous and mean different things to different people.

-Nurses talked about their experiences about looking after patients with pressure ulcers, and the researcher elicited their values from what they said.

-Data was collected in a two stage process and interpreted through the Straussian grounded theory.

-Results were positive, as all the participants revealed how the value they placed on pressure ulcer prevention had gone from low to high.

-All identified the same key landmarks even though they had different levels of education and experience, become more proactive in preventing pressure ulcers

-The key point in the transition being an encounter with a patient with a high-grade pressure ulcer caused the nurses to reappraise their values.

-Education that nurses receive on pressure ulcer, prevention only appears to alter their value when they have some experience of looking after patients with pressure ulcer.

 

-Sample size small, non- randomized  not statistically significant, high concern for bias, minimum requirement is 20-30 individuals

-Lack of hands on of the participants, most interventions delegated to health care assistants and students.

-Values are primarily established by personal experience, an old weaker derived source of evidence. -Researcher is a student not an expert on the subject.

-Gender exclusive participants all women in.

-No statistical information given provided for comparison of high or low values.

 

 

 

 

Jeff Poss, et al.,

20 September 2010,

 

Development of the inter RAI (Resident Assisted Instrument) Pressure Ulcer Risk Scale (PURS) for use in long-term care and home setting,

 

BioMed Central (BMC) doi:10.1186/1471-2318-10-67

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The purpose of this study was to examine the potential of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, mandated for use in Ontario LTC homes, to inform the risk of Pressure Ulcers (PU).

 

 

 

 

Quasi-experimental non-equivalent group design study.

 

 

 

 

Comparative correlations design, using independent and dependent variables

 

 

 

 

-Included an admission or baseline MDS assessment of residents having a stay of 14 days or longer (median time 91 days)

-Three LTC homes with n=257 with MDS and Braden Scale assessments; n=12,896 from eight LTC homes with baseline/ reassessment of MDS data, n=13,062 from Complex Continuing Care Hospital (CCC) and n=73,183 from long stay home care clients. All assessed during the same time, restricted to those with no recorded pressure ulcer.

-All assessments were done by trained clinical staff.

 

 

 

 

 

 

-Assessment using the RAI, data collection and analysis

-spearman Rank Correlation (all significant at p<0.0001

Logistic regression of new Pressure ulcers was used to determine those MDS items was statistically significant (at p=0.05 or below) in a multivariable, parsimonious model.

MDS items higher numbers more impairment

 

Instrument was valid but unreliable according to previously collected data

 

 

 

 

-LTC homes the Braden scale was tested for its predictive ability with PU down to 1%from 9% with a c-statistic of

0.676. In CCC patients, distribution skewed towards the high-risk end of 9.7% with a c-statistic 0.607. In long stay home care, inter RAI PURS leaned more towards low risk much lower that, in LTC and CCC at 2.6% with c-statistic of 0.629 data analyzed using the   SAS and SAS enterprise Miner Tree Desktop version 9.1.3 were used for all data analyses

-consistent with other literatures such as quality improvement in nursing homes (Abel RL 2005) and A longitudinal study of risk factors associated with the formation of PU (Brandeis GH et al 1994

 

 

 

 

-Risk assessment tools, including the Braden Scale, have been criticized for their generally

weak properties

D. Anthony et al (JCN 2008)

-No information available for palliative and hospital

Study not randomized controlled

-Demographic information was unavailable for Braden scale sample.

-Sample presented predominantly elder female residents.

Possibility of under reporting pressure ulcers such as stage I

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Week 4 Assignment 1: Start Your Literature Review Matrix

NU 631 Week 4 Assignment 1 Start Your Literature Review Matrix

Value: Complete at 100 points / Incomplete at 0 points

Due: Day 7

Grading Category: Assignments

Overview

You will be starting your own this week. Based on your investigation of the literature from the library and online resources, you will identify two articles that you will use to support your research question and work towards development of your Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal due in Week 15.

Important information for writing discussion questions and participation

Welcome to class

Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to

I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.

Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.

If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.

Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.

Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.

I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!

Hi Class,

Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.

Contact me if you have any questions.

Important information on Writing a Discussion Question

  • Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
  • There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
  • Include in-text citations in your response
  • Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
  • Follow APA-7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed

Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor

  • A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
  • Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
  • Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
  • Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
  • Follow APA 7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
  • Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
  • Here are some helpful links
  • The is a great resource

 

 

Assignment Instructions

  • Using your two selected journal articles, you will complete the first two rows in the literature matrix using the template provided.
  • Read your two journal articles and extract the necessary information needed to complete each row for each article.
  • Thus, at the end of this week, you will have two out of the eight rows of the literature review matrix completed. You will return to the literature review matrix in future weeks.

Please refer to the for details on how this activity will be graded.

To Submit Your Assignment:

  1. Select the Add Submissions button.
  2. Drag or upload your file to the File Picker.
  3. Select Save Changes.

Submission status

 

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *