HCR 576: Module 7 Assignment-Compare & Contrast Regulations

HCR 576: Module 7 Assignment-Compare & Contrast Regulations

  • Due Oct 7 by 11:59pm
  • Points 25
  • Submitting a file upload
  • Available Aug 20 at 12am – Oct 8 at 11:59pm
Step 1:  Prepare a table to compare and contrast the requirements for a new drug application to  FDA and EU. You may do this collectively or individually.
Step 1:  Create a table in excel or word.  Across the top list the requirements for
FDA – 21CFR211
Along the left side list the requirements for
EU – Annex 1
 
Step 2:  Place an “x” in the box where the 2 requirements are the same or similar.
Step 3:  Select another region to compare and contrast and add this to your table.  Other regions include ANVISA, PMDA, KFDA, TVA, SFDA, Health Canada, CoFEPRIS, SFDA, or any from this link
List these requirement on the right side of your table.
Step 4:  Put an “*” in the box where the requirement for FDA and your other HA requirement is the same or similar.
Step 5:  Under the table list the requirements that are the same or similar for each of the HAs – FDA, EU and other HA.
This activity is as an individual activity however you may work together in discussing the table and the elements of the table.  Each student MUST submit a table even if you worked with other students.  Each student must inform the instructor via email of the HA used for comparison in Step 3 and 4 to be compared.
This assignment is to submit a table comparing and contrasting regulations.  Add a cover page and a separate page for references.
This is worth up to 25 points.
Rubric
Compare & Contrast Regulations
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRegulation table
Demonstrates understanding of health authority regulations, their differences and similarities.
40 ptsFull MarksTable is clear, convincing and describes requirements.
0 ptsNo MarksDoes not meet criteria.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
Format, spelling, grammar, APA format.
20 ptsFull MarksOrganized and clear; presents strategies, provides justification, solid reasons and data to support choice. Addresses the complexities and expectations of various health authority requirements. Demonstrates contrast between health authorities.
0 ptsNo MarksDoes not do minimal and or does not data to support leadership.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpelling, grammar, format
10 ptsFull MarksSpelling, grammar and formatting are complete and without errors.
0 ptsNo Marks
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIndividual health authority
Specify health authority.
30 ptsFull MarksTable is updated with all relevant information. Additional row and columns are added to highlight the differences/contrasts.
0 ptsNo Marks
30 pts
Total Points: 100

Introduction

The regulation of pharmaceuticals differs across global health authorities, yet each framework shares the common goal of ensuring patient safety, product quality, and therapeutic effectiveness. In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates new drug applications under Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (21 CFR 211), which provides the framework for current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMPs). In contrast, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) governs new drug applications through Annex 1 of the EU GMP guidelines, focusing on sterile medicinal products and manufacturing standards applicable across all EU member states.

This assignment compares and contrasts FDA and EU regulatory requirements to highlight areas of similarity and divergence in the approval pathway for new drugs. In addition, a third regulatory authority is included to broaden the analysis and demonstrate the complexities of global compliance. The comparison underscores not only the technical and procedural differences but also the shared principles of quality assurance and regulatory oversight.

By preparing a side-by-side table of requirements and identifying areas of alignment, this project aims to deepen understanding of international regulatory frameworks and the challenges faced by pharmaceutical companies seeking global market access. Ultimately, this analysis demonstrates the critical role of regulatory harmonization in safeguarding public health while supporting innovation in drug development.

Place your Order Now

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *