Assessment 3 Scaffolding Guide – Leadership in Practice
Assessment 3 Scaffolding Guide – Leadership in Practice
Word Length: around 2000 words
Weighting:45%
Overview
This assessment invites you to explore leadership in Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) either through a real-life interview or through analysing a leadership role based on research and professional frameworks. The task is designed to help you connect theory, policy, and practice while developing a deeper understanding of leadership challenges and approaches in the ECEC context.
Step 1: Choose Your Approach
You may complete this task using one of the two options below:
- Option 1 – Real Interview (for students who are currently working or can access a leader):
Conduct a one-on-one interview with a leader in the ECEC sector (e.g., Centre Director, Pedagogical Leader, Preschool Coordinator, Policy Advisor). Discuss their leadership philosophy, daily practices, challenges, and advocacy roles. Include a short Interview Guide (5–7 open-ended questions) in the appendix. - Option 2 – Leadership Role Analysis (for students not currently working or unable to find a leader):
Select a specific leadership role (e.g., Centre Director, Pedagogical Leader, Preschool Coordinator, Policy Advisor). Analyse this role using scholarly literature, professional frameworks (e.g., NQS, EYLF, NQF), and relevant policies. Include a short Interview Guide (5–7 open-ended questions) in the appendix to demonstrate your understanding of leadership inquiry.
Step 2: Structuring Your Report
A 1500–2000-word report typically includes the following sections:
🔹 Introduction (150–200 words)
– Introduce the importance of leadership in ECEC.
– State which approach (Interview or Leadership Role Analysis) you have chosen and why.
– Provide a brief overview of the leadership role or interviewee.
– Outline the purpose and structure of your report.
🔹Leadership Insights or Role Analysis (600–700 words)
– Summarise key findings from your interview or literature review.
– Discuss leadership styles, challenges, and strategies.
– Identify connections to ECEC frameworks and leadership theories.
🔹Critical Discussion (600–700 words)
– Compare your findings with relevant scholarly literature.
– Critically evaluate leadership practices or perspectives.
– Discuss implications for leadership in the Australian ECEC context.
🔹Reflection (200–300 words)
– Reflect on what you have learned about effective leadership.
– Discuss how this understanding will influence your future professional practice.
🔹Conclusion (100–150 words)
– Summarize the key insights and implications from your analysis.
– End with a forward-looking statement on leadership development.
Step 3: Referencing
– Use APA 7th edition in-text citations and the reference list.
– Minimum: Three peer-reviewed journal articles.
– Stronger papers will integrate additional sources (policy documents, frameworks, scholarly works).
Step 4: Appendix
Please include a short Interview Guide (5–7 open-ended questions) in the appendix. These should demonstrate your understanding of leadership inquiry and align with the report’s focus areas:
– Leadership roles and responsibilities
– Leadership models or theories
– Daily leadership practices
– Challenges and barriers
– Advocacy and professional values
Checklist Before Submission
- Have I clearly identified which option I chose (Interview or Leadership Role Analysis)?
2. Have I linked my findings to leadership theories and ECEC frameworks?
3. Have I critically discussed challenges, values, and implications for practice?
4. Have I included the appendix?
5. Is my report within the word limit (1500–2000 words)?
6. Is my reference complete and accurate (APA 7th edition)?
Introduction
Effective leadership in Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) is essential for ensuring high-quality learning environments, promoting equitable outcomes for children, and supporting the professional growth of educators. Contemporary ECEC leadership extends beyond administrative duties to encompass pedagogical guidance, advocacy, and the creation of collaborative learning cultures (Waniganayake, Cheeseman, Fenech, Hadley, & Shepherd, 2017). Within the Australian context, leadership is deeply embedded in national frameworks such as the National Quality Standard (NQS), the Early Years Learning Framework (EYLF), and the National Quality Framework (NQF), all of which emphasise reflective practice, shared decision-making, and continuous improvement (ACECQA, 2020).
For this report, I have chosen Option 2: Leadership Role Analysis, focusing on the Pedagogical Leader—a role pivotal in shaping curriculum practice, mentoring educators, and translating policy into meaningful pedagogical action. This approach allows for an in-depth exploration of leadership through the lens of scholarly research and professional frameworks, rather than a single individual’s experience. The purpose of this report is to analyse the pedagogical leader’s responsibilities, leadership styles, challenges, and contributions to quality improvement within ECEC. The discussion will connect leadership theory with Australian policy contexts, critically evaluate leadership approaches, and conclude with reflections on my evolving understanding of effective, ethical, and transformative leadership in early childhood settings.


Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!