N512-19A Module Five: Disorders of the Urinary System Across the Life Span
N512-19A Module Five: Disorders of the Urinary System Across the Life Span
N512-19A Module Five: Disorders of the Urinary System Across the Life Span
Discussion 5 – Louis Johnson, a 48 y.o., gay, partnered, Caucasian male presents to the emergency department with unremitting right flank pain. He denies dysuria or fever. N512-19A Module Five: Disorders of the Urinary System Across the Life Span. He does report significant nausea without vomiting. He has never experienced anything like this before. On examination he is afebrile, and his blood pressure is 160/80 mm Hg with a pulse rate of 110/min. He is writhing on the gurney, unable to find a comfortable position. His right flank is mildly tender to palpation, and abdominal examination is benign. Urinalysis is significant for 1+ blood, and microscopy reveals 10–20 red blood cells per high-power field. Nephrolithiasis is suspected, and the patient is intravenously hydrated and given pain medication with temporary relief.
In this discussion:
- Discuss with your colleagues the pathophysiological development of nephrolithiasis.
- Provide a rationale for whether this patient should be further evaluated for renal surgery at this time.
- Describe and discuss your plan of care for this patient until he leaves the hospital and for the first two weeks following discharge.
Include citations from the text or the external literature in your discussions.
Remember to respond to at least two of your peers. Please refer to the Course Syllabus for Participation Guidelines & Grading Criteria.
Permalink:
Example Discussion 5 Approach
Nephrolithiasis or renal colic is caused by calculi or stones to large pass through the structures of the renal system. These stones are formed primarily in the medulla of the kidney by crystallization of compounds due to abnormal urine pH that is either too alkaline or too acidic. (Dlugasch, & Story, 2019). The resulting stones will attempt to pass from the renal pelvis through the calyx and the ureter to the bladder and finally out the urethra where if the calculi are too large they will obstruct the passage ways causing damage, pain, inflammation and possibly infection (Dlugasch & Story, 2019).
Calcium, Uric Acid, Cystine and Struvite are the 4 major types of kidney stones, with calcium containing stones being the most common (Perlman & Heung, 2019) and the most likely culprit behind L.J.’s renal calculi. Where it was once thought that reducing dietary calcium intake would benefit patients prone to nephrolithiasis, Perlman & Heung (2019) explain how a diet high in animal protein and salt intake produces the environment that encourages calcium-type stone creation. Dehydration is also thought to contribute to the stone formation due to slow passage of the solute through the renal structures and the resulting calcification of the same solute (Perlman & Heung, 2019).
While many patients can pass stones without surgical intervention, there are other non-invasive or minimally invasive procedures available to facilitate the passage of the offending calculi to minimize further damage (Dlugash & Story, 2019). The size of the obstruction would be the major factor in determining which procedure or intervention would be the most beneficial for L.J. as stones greater than 4 mm will be difficult for the patient to pass (Dlugash & Story, 2019). Dlugash & Story (2019) recommend that all stones be identified at least once to ensure appropriate follow-up. Dave (2019) further recommends follow-up with a qualified health-care provider (HCP) if the stone has not passed within a month due to the increased likelihood of renal structural injury. At this point, radiologic or ultrasound imaging of the abdominal and pelvic structures should be used to determine size and site of nephrolithiasis and the complications from the same (Dlugash & Story, 2019). Furthermore, a metabolic and hematology panel and a urinalysis with a reflex culture if indicated should also be completed in determining the extent of the inflammation or infection (Dave, 2019).
A possible plan of care for L.J. if his stone was small enough and not causing an obstruction would have him sent home with a urine strainer and specimen cup with instructions to follow up with his primary HCP to have the stone elements identified (Dave, 2019). For those first two weeks following discharge, L.J. would be encouraged to increase his fluid intake by 2-3 L to facilitate stone passage, reduce his salt and animal protein intake to reduce stone reoccurrence, and have both rest and activity periods to ensure adequate urination (Dlugash & Story, 2019). He would also be given prescriptions for pain control, likely a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (if his kidney function values were sufficient), an anti-emetic for nausea associated with his flank pain, an alpha blocker to relax his ureters and an antibiotic if indicated (Dave, 2020).
If L.J. was unable to pass his stone due to size or obstruction, he would then be admitted for interventional stone removal. The intervention would depend on his stone size and whether it was obstructing major renal structures, for simplicity, his HCP decided on a Ureteroscopy with complete stone removal. The ureteroscope is used to visualize the stone and if it is to large to be retrieved intact, the stone would be split by a fragmentation device, laser, or shockwave and then retrieved with the stone basket to ensure complete removal (Dave, 2020). Recovery would be similar to the first scenario, in terms of dietary changes, increased fluid intake, pain control and rest. He would also require follow-up with his HCP to discuss measures to avoid future occurrences.
Dave, C.N. (13 January 2020). Nephrolithiasis: Treatment & management. Retrieved 13 August 2020 from
Dlugasch, L., & Story, L. (2019). Applied pathophysiology for the advanced practice nurse (1st ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC.
Perlman, R.L. & Heung, M. (2019). Renal Disease. In McPhee, S. J., & Hammer, G. D. (Eds.), Pathophysiology of disease: An introduction to clinical medicine (8th ed. pp.667-703). McGraw-Hill Education LLC.
725 words
In reply to Tammie
Re: Discussion 5 – N512-19A Module Five: Disorders of the Urinary System Across the Life Span
Hi Tammie,
Thanks for your post. As you said, smaller sized stones (<10 mm) with no complications, such as urosepsis, intractable pain, or obstruction, could pass easily. For these patients, conservative therapy can be done with a focus on pain control, hydration, and antiemetics (Antonelli & Maalouf, 2019). Medical expulsive therapy using alpha-blockers can be used for the smaller stones (<10 mm). Efficacy, however, has been questioned (Antonelli & Maalouf, 2019).
Dr. Reynaldo
Reference:
Antonelli, J., & Maalouf, N. (2019). Nephrolithiasis. Epocrates. https://online.epocrates.com/dx/indexprint?entire=true&iid=225&sid=41
91 words
In reply to Tammie Vandenberg
Re: Discussion 5
Great post, very informative. I was really surprised when I learned restricting calcium is not recommended as it can increase oxalate absorption and may not decrease urinary calcium excretion and consuming a low protein, low sodium diet is preferred over calcium restriction (Hammer, 2019). It is interesting that a good friend of mine, her husband just a renal stone (he ended up needing surgery) however prior to surgery the physician placed a stent to see if he could pass it. I do not remember reading about this but I found it very interesting. I agree he will need pain medication upon discharge and encouraging fluid intake will help possibly pass the stone.Amanda
Reference
Hammer, G., & McPhee, S. (2019). Pathophysiology of disease: An introduction to clinical medicine (8th ed). McGraw-Hill
131 words
In reply to Amanda
Re: Discussion 5 – N512-19A Module Five: Disorders of the Urinary System Across the Life Span
Hi Amanda,
Stenting is often paired with ureteroscopic lithotripsy and extracorporeal wave lithotripsy. This is most commonly used for stones that are found in the ureter instead of in the kidney (Wang et al., 2017). According to the meta-analysis, stenting does not really improve the stone-free rate for nephrolithiasis (Wang et al., 2017). Did it work well for your friend’s husband?
-Dr. Reynaldo
Wang, H., Man, L., Li, G., Huang, G., Liu, N., & Wang, J. (2017). Meta-analysis of stenting versus non-stenting for the treatment of ureteral stones. PloS one, 12(1), e0167670. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0167670
103 words
In reply to Faye
Re: Discussion 5
Thank you for the clarification. He did end up having surgery to removed the stone but I can not remember which procedure he had done. He’s doing much better since surgery and the stent being removed.Amanda
40 words N512-19A Module Five: Disorders of the Urinary System Across the Life Span


Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!