The Impact of Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing Assignment Paper
The Impact of Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing Assignment Paper
The Impact of Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing Assignment Paper
1-There are many areas in nursing where evidence-based practice has improved care processes and patient outcomes including the bundles of checklist to prevent pneumonia related to mechanical ventilation and central line-associated blood stream infection or CLABSI.
Permalink:
To prevent healthcare-associated infection such as the ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) for patient who had been intubated for more than 48 hours, the VAP bundles of care are often used. Recommended bundle of interventions for the prevention of VAP includes elevation of the head of the bed at a 30° to 45° angle to prevent aspiration of gastric content, reducing the duration of mechanical ventilation by daily sedation interruption (DSI) and daily spontaneous breathing trials (SBT), peptic ulcer disease (PUD) prophylaxis, and deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis. Moreover, performing oral care every two hours and as needed, maintaining ET tube cuff pressure above 20 cm H20, and managing ventilator circuits and changing only when visibly soiled showed improvements in VAP in critically ill patients. The Impact of Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing Assignment Paper
Another area where evidence-based practice has improved patient outcome is through the use of bundles or interventions to prevent or decreased central line-associated blood stream infections. Those recommended bundle of interventions for the prevention of CLABSI includes proper hand hygiene, skin preparation using chlorhexidine solution greater than 0.5%, adhering to aseptic technique and use of sterile gloves, regular assessment and inspection of site, and daily evaluation whether the use of central line is still necessary. The Impact of Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing Assignment Paper
According to the ANA (2018), when patient received the optimal intervention bundle, the expected time for any ventilator-associated pneumonia to occur takes almost 3.5 times longer that those who did not. At the hospital I work for, when we chart our lines/drains/airways one of the question we are asked is if the patient still meets the criteria for continuing the line. When no longer necessary, it prompts immediate consideration for removal. The bundles/checklist does not only act as a learning tool but also serves as a guideline. By knowing the bundles of interventions we can better care for our patients and avoid unnecessary and preventable infections. The Impact of Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing Assignment Paper
References:
Stevens, K. (2013, May 31). “The Impact of Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and the Next Big Ideas” OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing Vol. 18, No. 2, Manuscript 4. Retrieved from http://ojin.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Vol-18-2013/No2-May-2013/Impact-of-Evidence-Based-Practice.html
American Nurse Today. (2018). Preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia: A nursing-intervention bundle. Retrieved from https://www.americannursetoday.com/preventing-ventilator-associated-pneumonia-a-nursing-intervention-bundle/ The Impact of Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing Assignment Paper
Perin, D. C., Erdmann, A. L., Higashi, G. D., & Sasso, G. T. (2016). Evidence-based measures to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infections: a systematic review. Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 24, e2787. doi:10.1590/1518-8345.1233.2787
The Impact of Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing Assignment Paper
2-In wound care it seems like new products are becoming available everyday and current products are continually evolving to improve patient outcomes. Thankfully, the clinic that I work in is smaller and there are only three nurses on staff, so our continuous education is typically done as a group. We usually meet with the product representative face to face and receive instant feedback regarding any questions and concerns we may have about the product. When information needs to be disseminated throughout the facility and to all nursing staff, the education happens is various forms. Least common is face to face in servicing as it is often difficult to get multiple staff members in the same location at the same time (due to staffing shortages). The most utilized form of education is online via an electronic learning forum (E-Learning) staff members can access the “assignments” 24 hours a day 7 days a week from most computers within the facility. Assignments are assigned with a due date and typically have a test following the educational portion in which the staff members must pass to receive credit and meet the educational requirement.
The Impact of Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing Assignment Paper
3-The implementation phase of any change can be difficult. In the nursing profession, evidence-based practices have been observed as the best and safest practices as there is proof in the research. However, there will always be those who question, or doubt said proof because some people are afraid of change, even if the change benefits them or others. To implement change, I would begin by addressing the following key factors: why, what, and how. First, the why- what is the issue that lead to the change. Next, the what- the research, the facts, the failures and successes that became the change. Lastly, the how- the demonstration or explanation of the change. Depending on the change and the aspects of our practice that would be affected determines the length of time the implementation phase would take. In my experience (when allowable) taking time to incorporate change over a period has proven least likely to create resistance from others.
Reply | Quote & Reply The Impact of Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing Assignment Paper
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Name: NURS_6052_Module06_Week11_Assignment_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Part 6: Disseminating Results
Create a 5-minute, 5- to 6-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation of your Evidence-Based Project:
· Be sure to incorporate any feedback or changes from your presentation submission in Module 5.
· Explain how you would disseminate the results of your project to an audience. Provide a rationale for why you selected this dissemination strategy. The Impact of Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing Assignment Paper
81 (81%) – 90 (90%)
The narrated presentation accurately and completely summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation is professional in nature and thoroughly addresses all components of the evidence-based project.
The narrated presentation accurately and clearly explains in detail how to disseminate the results of the project to an audience, citing specific and relevant examples.
The narrated presentation accurately and clearly provides a justification that details the selection of this dissemination strategy that is fully supported by specific and relevant examples.
The narrated presentation provides a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources related to the dissemination strategy explained. The narrated presentation fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the presentation.
72 (72%) – 80 (80%)
The narrated presentation adequately summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation is professional in nature and adequately addresses the components of the evidence-based project.
The narrated presentation accurately explains how to disseminate the results of the project to an audience; some specific examples may be provided.
The narrated presentation accurately provides a justification for the selection of this dissemination strategy and may be supported by specific examples.
The narrated presentation provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource related to the dissemination strategy explained. The narrated presentation integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support the presentation.
63 (63%) – 71 (71%)
The narrated presentation vaguely, inaccurately, or incompletely summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation may be professional in nature and somewhat addresses the components of the evidence-based project.
The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely explains how to disseminate the results of the project to an audience; inaccurate or vague examples may be provided.
The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely provides a justification for the selection of this dissemination strategy and may be supported by inaccurate or vague examples.
The narrated presentation provides a vague or inaccurate synthesis of outside resources reviewed related to the dissemination strategy explained. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the presentation.
0 (0%) – 62 (62%)
The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately summarizes the evidence-based project or is missing. The narrated presentation is not professional in nature and inaccurately and incompletely addresses the components of the evidence-based project or is missing.
The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately explains how to disseminate the results of the project to an audience, no examples are provided, or it is missing.
The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately provides a justification for the selection of this dissemination strategy, no examples are provided, or it is missing.
The narrated presentation provides a vague and inaccurate synthesis of outside resources reviewed related to the dissemination strategy explained or is missing. The presentation fails to integrate any resources to support the presentation.
Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. The Impact of Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing Assignment Paper
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated yet is brief and not descriptive.
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.
No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.
Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6052_Module06_Week11_Assignment_Rubric
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part 6: Disseminating Results
Create a 5-minute, 5- to 6-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation of your Evidence-Based Project: · Be sure to incorporate any feedback or changes from your presentation submission in Module 5. |
81 (81%) – 90 (90%)
The narrated presentation accurately and completely summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation is professional in nature and thoroughly addresses all components of the evidence-based project.
The narrated presentation accurately and clearly explains in detail how to disseminate the results of the project to an audience, citing specific and relevant examples. The narrated presentation accurately and clearly provides a justification that details the selection of this dissemination strategy that is fully supported by specific and relevant examples. The narrated presentation provides a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources related to the dissemination strategy explained. The narrated presentation fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the presentation. |
72 (72%) – 80 (80%)
The narrated presentation adequately summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation is professional in nature and adequately addresses the components of the evidence-based project.
The narrated presentation accurately explains how to disseminate the results of the project to an audience; some specific examples may be provided. The narrated presentation accurately provides a justification for the selection of this dissemination strategy and may be supported by specific examples. The narrated presentation provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource related to the dissemination strategy explained. The narrated presentation integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support the presentation. The Impact of Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing Assignment Paper |
63 (63%) – 71 (71%)
The narrated presentation vaguely, inaccurately, or incompletely summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation may be professional in nature and somewhat addresses the components of the evidence-based project.
The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely explains how to disseminate the results of the project to an audience; inaccurate or vague examples may be provided. The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely provides a justification for the selection of this dissemination strategy and may be supported by inaccurate or vague examples. The narrated presentation provides a vague or inaccurate synthesis of outside resources reviewed related to the dissemination strategy explained. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the presentation. |
0 (0%) – 62 (62%)
The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately summarizes the evidence-based project or is missing. The narrated presentation is not professional in nature and inaccurately and incompletely addresses the components of the evidence-based project or is missing.
The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately explains how to disseminate the results of the project to an audience, no examples are provided, or it is missing. The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately provides a justification for the selection of this dissemination strategy, no examples are provided, or it is missing. The narrated presentation provides a vague and inaccurate synthesis of outside resources reviewed related to the dissemination strategy explained or is missing. The presentation fails to integrate any resources to support the presentation. |
| Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated yet is brief and not descriptive. |
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.
No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. |
| Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
|
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
|
| Total Points: 100 |
|---|


Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!