Risk Factors for Child Maltreatment
Risk Factors for Child Maltreatment
Risk Factors for Child Maltreatment
Permalink:
What is child maltreatment? Any act or series of acts of commission
or omission by a parent or other caregiver that results in harm, potential for harm, or threat of harm to a child.
◦ Acts of Commission (Child Abuse) Physical abuse Sexual abuse Psychological abuse
◦ Acts of Omission (Neglect)
Types of Maltreatment
Physical abuse – nonaccidental injury inflicted by a caregiver
Sexual abuse – the use of a child for the sexual gratification of an adult
Emotional/psychological abuse Neglect – act of omission ◦ Physical neglect ◦ Medical neglect ◦ Educational neglect
Child Maltreatment: Etiological Theories
Many etiological theories have been proposed over the years to explain the development of child maltreatment: – Attachment theory – Ecological models – Research on specific risk factors
Each framework attempted to explain the specific conditions leading to abusive dynamics within families. These conditions may be associated with the child, the parents, and the broader environment; each theory emphasizes different factors
Attachment Theory
Attachment: any form of behavior that results in a person attaining or maintaining proximity to another preferred individual perceived as stronger or wiser
The attachment system is biological in nature, and is activated by stress (environmental or relational). Its evolutionary role is protection
The attachment figure serves as a “secure base” from which the child can explore the social and physical world
Children build “internal working models” of their own worthiness from experiences of caregiver ‘s availability and sensitivity. These models also guide expectations for future relationships
Attachment John Bowlby: was a British psychiatrist who defined attachment as “lasting
psychological connectedness between human beings” (Bowlby, 1969, p. 194). Bowlby shared the psychoanalytic view that early experiences in childhood have an important influence on development and behavior later in life. Our early attachment styles are established in childhood through the infant/caregiver relationship.
Bowlby believed that there are four distinguishing characteristics of attachment:
◦ Proximity Maintenance – The desire to be near the people we are attached to.
◦ Safe Haven – Returning to the attachment figure for comfort and safety in the face of a fear or threat.
◦ Secure Base – The attachment figure acts as a base of security from which the child can explore the surrounding environment.
◦ Separation Distress – Anxiety that occurs in the absence of the attachment figure
◦ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VAAmSqv2GV8
Secure Attachment Caregivers are sufficiently sensitive, responsive, and consistent. Children develop trust, and are able to experience and regulate negative emotions; develop working models of self as lovable and psychologically coherent
Children are able to separate from parents, seek comfort from parents when frightened, return of parents is met with positive emotions, prefers parents to strangers.
Adults have trusting, lasting relationships; tend to have good self-esteem; are comfortable sharing feelings with friends and partners; seek out social support.
Ambivalent Attachment Caregivers are distant, and emotionally unavailable when
the child is vulnerable. Children adapt by “downplaying” and inhibiting their feelings of need, exhibit apparent independence and self-sufficiency
Children may be wary of strangers; may become greatly distressed when the parent leaves and does not appear to be comforted by the return of the parent.
Adults may be reluctant to become close to others; may worry that their partner does not love them and may become very distraught when a relationship ends.
Ambivalent Attachment Children who are ambivalently attached tend to
be extremely suspicious of strangers. These children display considerable distress when separated from a parent or caregiver, but do not seem reassured or comforted by the return of the parent. In some cases, the child might passively reject the parent by refusing comfort, or may openly display direct aggression toward the parent.
Avoidant Attachment
Children may avoid parents; may not seek much comfort or contact from parents and shows little or no preference between a parent and a stranger.
Adults may have problems with intimacy; may invest little emotion in social and romantic relationships and may be unwilling or unable to share thoughts and feelings with others.
Disorganized Attachment
No consistent strategy, common in abusive families where children are afraid of their caregivers
Children show a mixture of avoidant and resistant behaviors; may seem dazed, confused or apprehensive.
At age 6 or so, children may take on a parental role and act as a caregiver toward the parent (Main & Cassidy, 1988)
Attachment Theory
How do we know the baby’s attachment style? – An experimental procedure called “The Strange
Situation”, and associated experimental procedures http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DH1m_ZMO7GU
Attachment styles during childhood affect attachment patterns to significant individuals in adulthood: – Secure———-Secure-autonomous – Avoidant——–Dismissing – Ambivalent—–Preoccupied – Disorganized—Disorganized
Attachment Theory
Attachment theory sheds light on the development of child maltreatment through intergenerational transmission of attachment patterns
The basic premise is that parents who experienced insensitive caregiving in their original families are more likely to be insensitive (and often maltreating) towards their own children
A number of studies support this premise: – Children who have been abused or neglected tend to exhibit insecure attachment patterns – Maltreating parents are more likely to report insensitive parenting, abuse, or rejection in their original families
Monkey Mothers Matter
Harlow’s Experiment In Harlow’s classic experiment, two groups of
baby rhesus monkeys were removed from their mothers. In the first group, a terrycloth mother provided no food, while a wire mother did, in the form of an attached baby bottle containing milk.
In the second group, a terrycloth mother provided food; the wire mother did not. It was found that the young monkeys clung to the terrycloth mother whether or not it provided them with food, and that the young monkeys chose the wire surrogate only when it provided food.
Harlow’s Experiment – The study found that monkeys who were
raised with either a wire mother or a cloth mother gained weight at the same rate. However, the monkeys that had only a wire mother had trouble digesting the milk and suffered from diarrhea more frequently.
– Harlow’s interpretation of this behavior, which is still widely accepted, was that a lack of contact comfort is psychologically stressful to the monkeys.
Attachment Theory
Critics of attachment theory: – Focuses on psychological factors only; does not include
environmental factors associated with child maltreatment (e.g. marital and financial problems may cause stress, which may lead to child maltreatment – even among parents who were securely attached themselves) – Excessive focus on mothers when attachment theory was first
developed (change has occurred in recent years) – Does not account for child’s temperament
Nonetheless, attachment theory contributed significantly to better understanding of intergenerational transmission of maltreatment
Types of Factors
Potentiating: increase risk for maltreatment
Compensatory: buffers, decreases risk —————————————————— Transient – temporary Enduring – ongoing; chronic —————————————————— Applied to each level of analysis
A look at the Ecological Model: Levels of Analysis of Each Instance of Maltreatment
Microsystems ◦ a person’s immediate
surroundings Mesosystem ◦ Interconnections between
microsystems Exosystems ◦ local institutions, such as
schools and churches Macrosystems ◦ larger social setting, including
cultural values, economic policies, and political processes
Ontogenic: factors within the individual
Ecological Models
The main advantage of the ecological models over the attachment theory is multidimensionality: factors contributing to the development of maltreatment may be environmental, rather than psychological only
Today, most child protection professionals relay on ecological models in their assessments: evaluate individual level characteristics, family environment, broader community environment, and cultural values and beliefs
The ecological model is particularly useful for organizing various risk factors into different levels, and considering multiple influences that may affect maltreatment
Specific Risk Factors Scholars often integrate research on specific risk factors into the
ecological model: – Child/parent personality characteristics can be viewed as part of the individual level – Characteristics of the family environment (e.g. marital discord) can be viewed as part of the microsystem – Community characteristics (e.g. unsafe neighborhoods) can be viewed as part of the exosystem -Values and beliefs about children’s rights and appropriate discipline strategies can be viewed as part of the macrosystem
Important: a risk factor may be associated with higher likelihood of maltreatment, without directly causing it
Macrosystemic Issues Acceptability of violence ◦ Levels of violent crime, presence of weapons ◦ Levels of violence in media ◦ Acceptance of corporal punishment
Sexualization of children Individualism ◦ Focus on nuclear family both fully responsible for and
controlling of children ◦ Geographical isolation of families with children
Values/definitions of work
Exosystemic Issue: Poverty
Poverty as a stressor: inadequate resources, feelings of disempowerment (becomes a microsystemic issue)
Poverty places individuals in less safe environments, requiring more parental effort to protect
Poverty places individuals in resource scarce environments
Increasingly poor urban areas are places to which people are not committed – less sense of community
Microsystemic Issues History of abuse in parents Mental illness in parents Substance abuse in parents Domestic violence Problematic parenting practices Lack of social support
History of Child Abuse in Parents
Child abuse in parents may result in mental health issues (depression, PTSD)
Attachment impairment Lack of modeling of appropriate parenting
behaviors
Mental Health Issues in Parents
Depression most common mental illness Mental illness impacts childrearing Mental health issues increase risk of
substance abuse, especially in women
Substance Abuse
Direct physical effects on fetus ◦ Critical issue: should prenatal maternal
substance abuse be considered maltreatment and subject to intervention prenatally?
Effects in terms of prenatal care Effects in terms of caregiving capacity
Prenatal Alcohol Use Fetal Alcohol Syndrome ◦ physical and cognitive abnormalities in children caused
by a pregnant woman’s heavy drinking ◦ FAS is defined by 4 criteria Maternal drinking during pregnancy Characteristic pattern of facial abnormalities Growth retardation Brain damage, often manifested by intellectual
difficulties or behavioral problems
Addictive Drugs Heroin, crack cocaine can lead to babies born
exhibiting withdrawal symptoms Babies must go through withdrawal Research is conflicting, but overall effects seem
to be “subtle but significant” Not clear regarding long-term neurological
problems; early studies did not differentiate prenatal from postnatal effects (raised in a home with drugs; poverty, etc)
Often the problems are associated with low birth weight and/or poor prenatal care
Postnatal Effects
Breast feeding—some drugs passed this way
Most important: ineffective caretaker ◦ dulled, sleepy, not responsive: impairment in
attachment ◦ Expose babies to others who are high: not
protective
Family Costs of Drug Use It is estimated that 1 in 10 U.S. children live with
at least one parent in need of treatment for drug or alcohol dependency.
Children of alcoholics are four times more likely to have alcohol or drug problems than children of nonalcoholics.
Nearly 5 million adults who abuse alcohol have children younger than age 18 living with them.
Family Costs of Drug Use
Children have higher probability of ◦ Abuse and neglect ◦ behavioral difficulties ◦ Absenteeism from school ◦ Decreased self-esteem ◦ Learning difficulties
Substance Abuse
Some national estimates indicate that between 50 – 60% of child abuse cases are linked to adult substance abuse behavior
CAPTA mandates notification of child protection staff if substance-exposed newborns are identified as being affected by illegal substance abuse However, states’ responses differ
Case in 12/95 involved 3 child deaths in a meth lab explosion in their home. Increased attention for the needs of children living in drug homes
Domestic Violence
Chronic v isolated; uni- v bi-directional Women get hurt more “Coercive control” is chronic and may be more
significant: ◦ Threats of physical violence ◦ Demeaning comments ◦ Isolation and control (jealousy, accountability of
whereabouts, financial dependency, restricting social contacts) ◦ Abuse of pets
Critical issue: Should victims of coercive control be held responsible for not protecting children?
“Witnessing” Domestic Violence
Seeing Hearing Hearing about it or seeing aftereffects Living in household with coercive control
dynamics
DV Raises Risk of Direct Child Abuse Children get caught in middle by accident or try
to intervene Physical abuse of child is more likely to occur by
both parents Sexual abuse of child is more likely to occur by
father Child is neglected as disempowered mother is
unable to attend to child or comfort child Witnessing domestic violence is viewed as a
type of psychological abuse of children (terrorizing)
Social Support
Lack of social support has been associated with risk of CA/N, re-referral, and recurrence of CA/N
Emotional support Concrete support Single parents
Childrearing Practices
Developmentally appropriate child development information
Empathy/attunement to child’s emotional needs
Views on discipline ◦ Alternatives to corporal punishment
Parent-child role reversal Views on child autonomy/independence
Ontogenetic Issues
Gender, age Temperament Disabilities, health issues Challenges of different ages Behavioral problems (can be caused by
past experiences, including abuse or neglect)
Specific Risk Factors
Research studies identified many factors associated with the occurrence of maltreatment: – Perpetrators` socioeconomic status: low SES (including educational attainment) was found to be associated with higher likelihood of maltreatment – Perpetrators` psychological factors: some studies revealed that abusers tended to report higher stress, marital problems, loneliness, and unhappiness – Community factors: unsafe and impoverished neighborhoods are associated with higher likelihood of maltreatment, as are factors such as high unemployment – Victims` characteristics: some studies reported that children with behavioral problems and certain medical conditions (e.g. learning disabilities, mental retardation) are at higher risk for maltreatment
- Risk Factors for Child Maltreatment
- What is child maltreatment?
- Types of Maltreatment
- Child Maltreatment: Etiological Theories
- Attachment Theory
- Attachment
- Secure Attachment
- Ambivalent Attachment
- Ambivalent Attachment
- Avoidant Attachment
- Disorganized Attachment
- Attachment Theory
- Attachment Theory
- Monkey Mothers Matter
- Harlow’s Experiment
- Harlow’s Experiment
- Attachment Theory
- Types of Factors
- A look at the Ecological Model: Levels of Analysis of Each Instance of Maltreatment
- Ecological Models
- Specific Risk Factors
- Macrosystemic Issues
- Exosystemic Issue:�Poverty
- Microsystemic Issues
- History of Child Abuse in Parents
- Mental Health Issues in Parents
- Substance Abuse
- Prenatal Alcohol Use
- Addictive Drugs
- Postnatal Effects
- Family Costs of Drug Use
- Family Costs of Drug Use
- Substance Abuse
- Domestic Violence
- “Witnessing” Domestic Violence
- DV Raises Risk of Direct Child Abuse
- Social Support
- Childrearing Practices
- Ontogenetic Issues
- Specific Risk Factors


Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!