Assignment: Health Organization Evaluation

Assignment: Health Organization Evaluation

Assignment: Health Organization Evaluation

Health Organization Evaluation

The evaluation of health organizations allows stakeholders to develop effective responses to meet patient needs and remain sustainable. These organizations comprise of individuals with a common goal guided by regulations and responsibilities to help them succeed in their operations. Further, these entities can use a host of theories to attain their needs and have effective organization. The organizations can also develop strategies to resolve issues and culture with the aim of enhancing quality of care and patient satisfaction (Berger, 2019). The essence of this paper is to evaluate Providence Health Care as a healthcare organization. With operations in more than five states, the non-profit Catholic-based healthcare system comprises of more than 50 multiple facilities and over 800 non-acute care entities that supports several patient and health populations and communities to attain quality and affordable health care.

Description of Providence Health & Services

Providence is a healthcare organization operating across Alaska, California, Montana, New Mexico, Oregon, Texas and Washington. The non-profit Catholic-based organization operate 51 hospitals and over 1,000 clinics in the seven states. The organization’s mission statement is expressing God’s healing love, witnessed through Jesus Christ, and being steadfast in service to all, particularly the needy and vulnerable (Providence Health, 2021). The organization asserts that it uses its voice in advocating for the vulnerable population and required reforms in health care through pursuit of innovative ways to transform the sector by ensuring that people are healthy and making services more convenient, accessible and affordable.

The organization delivers care that is consistent with the values of the populations that it serves. The core values include compassion, justice, excellence, dignity and integrity. These values ensure that patients get assessed, diagnosed and treated in their community settings. The organization values communities and patients it serves to assist improve novel pathways for care, innovate new products and service and assist in the provision of better digital experience for increased patient satisfaction and quality outcomes (Providence Health, 2021). The organization collects data through surveys and analyzes it to develop best practices and policies to enhance patient satisfaction and promote better healthcare.

Organization’s Overall Readiness Based On Findings

As a comprehensive health care entity, Providence serves more people, advances best practices and continues its over 100-year tradition of providing services to poor and vulnerable in community. The organization delivers services in seven states, demonstrating its readiness to transform lives and enhance the health of Americans in the West to change care for the future generations. Providence Health works with different social and government agencies to assist in identification and assessment of specific needs within the community (Providence Health, 2021). Further, ir works with charitable foundations, community-based organizations and universities to offer effective solutions for particular needs based on their community health improvement plan. The organization has different community initiatives that include housing for homeless, provision of mental health services, increased access to health care services and increased investment in education.

The wide-ranging programs at Providence Health enhance community outreach and demonstrate its readiness to reach the needs of different communities and health populations. Their activities offer access to health care for present and future patients and education required to train compassionate and highly trained employees and members of community to enhance overall care quality and patient outcomes (Berger, 2019). The organization has 12 different entities offering education that comprise of a university, schools, child development centers and programs associated with healthcare provision. Based on its investment in communities and its workforce, the organization can make changes within the health care system to address various challenges and health disparities that impact low-income and vulnerable families, individuals and communities.

Strategic Plan in Addressing Issues Related to Network Growth, Nurse Staffing, Resource Management, Patient Satisfaction

Providence Health operates more than 50 facilities providing a wide-range of healthcare services in different areas and specialties targeted at various demographics, especially the vulnerable and poor. The organization is committed to offering high-quality, compassionate health to everyone irrespective of their coverage abilities. Therefore, the organization needs to address issues about its expansion by focusing on its caregivers and providers to reduce the turnover rates. Providence Health can allocate resources to expanding its network and locations through channeling funds meant to train and develop new employees (Dukhanin et al., 2018). The organization can also grow by partnering with community organizations in different areas of healthcare provision like mental health and substance use disorders. Focusing on expanded care provision and services will ensure that the organization grows sustainably to meet patient demands.

Sufficient nurse staffing levels are essential in improving the quality of care and enabling patients to attain better outcomes. Strategic planning for sufficient staffing levels can occur through effective assessment of patient acuity and having more staff through elaborate recruitment and training. Nurses impact patient satisfaction and sufficient levels ensure that patients access health services at affordable cost. The implication is that the facilities and their management can evaluate the level of patient satisfaction based on their interactions with nurses to ascertain if there is need for additional staff.

Health care organizations should embrace a culture of accountability to enhance effective use of resources. Accountability will ensure effective resource allocation and help the organization to meet its set healthcare delivery goals (Pan & Shen, 2018). Holding employees accountable improves their performance and overall organizational productivity. Accountability leads to effective communication and deployment of resources to train employees so as to attain require competencies that include expert knowledge and skills and application of best practices in care delivery. Therefore, the organization can enhance its resource management through effective accountability mechanisms like performance appraisal approaches.

Patient satisfaction is an essential aspect of healthcare delivery and assists in enhancing the health of individuals, families and communities served by a health organization. Positive patient experience leads to acceptance of the organization within the community. The organization can enhance patient satisfaction through effective adoption and deployment of technology (Berger, 2019). These include embracing technological trends like telehealth and telemedicine to enhance patient experience. Telehealth aspects like clinical decision support systems and electronic prescribing reduce susceptibility to adverse patient events like medication errors and hospital acquire infections (HAIs). Therefore, Providence can enhance patient satisfaction by adapting effective communication protocols and leveraging health information technologies based on feedback from health users and its providers.

Potential Issues within the Organizational Culture and Its Effects on Strategic Plan

The most prominent issue about the organization that affects its culture is its religious affiliation. Providence Health is a Catholic-based non-profit organization whose operations are founded on the faith’s doctrines and teachings. This may affect individuals from different religious faiths and organizations from accessing its services due to the differences. Patients have various religious and cultural affiliations and beliefs that contradict the organization’s perspective on different issues of care delivery; right from issue like abortion to same sex marriages (Yanow & Adams, 2018). The Catholic church is against these issues and individuals belonging to certain health populations like the lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transgender, (LGBT) may shy away from accessing its services. The issue of religious background and affiliation of the organization hinders its expansion to more communities and treating patients that may have different perspectives.

Theory to Support the Implement of the Strategic Plan for the Organization

Organizations base the implementation of their strategic plans on existing theoretical perspectives as these models offer directions and guidance on how to execute change for effective and targeted goals and outcomes. In this case, Providence Health can use systems theory to support its strategic plans. The system theory entails basing decisions on feedback loops to evaluate the current policies and procedures. The system model also allows the organization to seek opportunities to enhance its service provision for its target health population (Yanow & Adams, 2018). Through its response to feedback and views from patients and other stakeholders, Providence will attain future success and remain sustain in the healthcare industry. The model is essential for healthcare organization that seek better ways to enhance their operations and meet growing consumer demands.

Conclusion

Health organizations like Providence should focus on quality care improvement as the primary goal to meet the growing demand from diverse patient population. Through the approach, the organization will succeed and meet the rising needs of its stakeholders that include communities and patients that it serves. The evaluation of Providence Health demonstrates an entity keen on attaining its goals through effective service provision aimed at reducing health disparities, cost of health care and improving access by different patient populations.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

Berger, Z. (2019). Metrics of Patient, Public, Consumer, and Community Engagement in

Healthcare Systems: How Should We Define Engagement, What Are We Measuring, and Does It Matter for Patient Care? Comment on” Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization-and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review”. International journal of health policy and management, 8(1), 49. DOI: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.94

Dukhanin, V., Topazian, R., & DeCamp, M. (2018). Metrics and evaluation tools for patient

engagement in healthcare organization-and system-level decision-making: a systematic review. International journal of health policy and management, 7(10), 889.

doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.43.

Pan, J., & Shen, H. (2018). Analysis of mass incident diffusion in Weibo based on self-

organization theory. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 491, 835-842.  DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2017.09.033

Providence Health (2021). About Us. .

Yanow, D., & Adams, G. B. (2018). Organizational culture. In Defining public administration

(pp. 137-146). Routledge.

Assessment Description

Research a health care organization or network that spans several states with in the United States (United Healthcare, Vanguard, Banner Health, etc.). Assess the readiness of the health care organization or network you chose in regard to meeting the health care needs of citizens in the next decade.

Prepare a 1,000-1,250 word paper that presents your assessment and proposes a strategic plan to ensure readiness. Include the following:

  1. Describe the health care organization or network.
  2. Describe the organization’s overall readiness based on your findings.
  3. Prepare a strategic plan to address issues pertaining to network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction.
  4. Identify any current or potential issues within the organizational culture and discuss how these issues may affect aspects of the strategic plan.
  5. Propose a theory or model that could be used to support implementation of the strategic plan for this organization. Explain why this theory or model is best.

ou are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be appropriate for the assignment and relevant to nursing practice.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Research a health care organization or network that spans several states with in the United States (United Healthcare, Vanguard, Banner Health, etc.). Assess the readiness of the health care organization or network you chose in regard to meeting the health care needs of citizens in the next decade.

Prepare a 1,000-1,250 word paper that presents your assessment and proposes a strategic plan to ensure readiness. Include the following:

Describe the health care organization or network.
Describe the organization’s overall readiness based on your findings.
Prepare a strategic plan to address issues pertaining to network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction.
Identify any current or potential issues within the organizational culture and discuss how these issues may affect aspects of the strategic plan.
Propose a theory or model that could be used to support implementation of the strategic plan for this organization. Explain why this theory or model is best.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Health Organization Evaluation – Rubric

Health Care Organization or Network

Criteria Description

Health Care Organization or Network

5. Excellent

27 points

Health care organization or network is clearly and accurately described.

4. Good

22.95 points

Health care organization or network is described. Some detail is needed for clarity.

3. Satisfactory

20.25 points

Health care organization or network is summarized. Some information is needed. There are minor inaccuracies related to the representation of the organization or network.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

17.55 points

Health care organization or network is partially presented. There are significant omissions and inaccuracies.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Health care organization or network is not described.

Assessment of Overall Organizational Readiness

Criteria Description

Assessment of Overall Organizational Readiness

5. Excellent

27 points

Assessment of overall organizational readiness is described in detail. Degree of organizational readiness is established. Strong evidence and rationale support the assessment.

4. Good

22.95 points

Assessment of overall organizational readiness is described. Degree of organizational readiness is generally established. Some evidence or rationale is needed for support.

3. Satisfactory

20.25 points

Assessment of overall organizational readiness is summarized. Degree of organizational readiness is partially established. More information, rationale, and support are needed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

17.55 points

Assessment of overall organizational readiness is partially presented. There are significant omissions. Degree of organizational readiness is not established.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Assessment of overall organizational readiness is omitted.

Strategic Plan

Criteria Description

Strategic Plan

5. Excellent

36 points

The strategic plan is well developed. Network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction are addressed in detail. The plan is supported with strong evidence and rationale.

4. Good

30.6 points

The strategic plan addresses network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction. Some evidence or rationale is needed for support.

3. Satisfactory

27 points

The strategic plan generally addresses network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction. More information, rationale, and support are needed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

23.4 points

Strategic plan is partially presented. Plan contains major omissions. The plan fails to address issues outlined in the assignment criteria.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Strategic plan is omitted.

Identification of Issues in Organizational Culture

Criteria Description

Identification of Current or Potential Issues in Organizational Culture and Impact of These to Strategic Plan

5. Excellent

27 points

Current or potential issues in the organizational culture are clearly identified. The potential impact of these on the strategic plan is thoroughly described and supported with evidence and rationale.

4. Good

22.95 points

Current or potential issues in the organizational culture and the potential impact of these on the strategic plan are discussed. Some evidence or rationale is needed.

3. Satisfactory

20.25 points

Current or potential issues in the organizational culture are generally discussed. The impact of these on the strategic plan is summarized. Evidence and rationale are needed to support claims.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

17.55 points

Current or potential issues in the organizational culture are partially summarized. The potential impact of these on the strategic plan is unclear. There are omissions and inaccuracies throughout.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Current or potential issues in the organizational culture and the impact of these to strategic plan are omitted.

Theory or Model to Support Implementation of Strategic Plan

Criteria Description

Theory or Model to Support Implementation of Strategic Plan

5. Excellent

27 points

Theory or model to support strategic plan implementation is proposed. The theory or model demonstrates strong support for implementation of the strategic plan for the organization. Compelling rationale supports why the theory or model is the best choice.

4. Good

22.95 points

Theory or model to support strategic plan implementation is proposed. The theory or model demonstrates support for implementation of the strategic plan for the organization. General rationale is provided for why the theory or model is the best choice.

3. Satisfactory

20.25 points

Theory or model to support strategic plan implementation is proposed. The theory or model demonstrates some support for implementation of the strategic plan for the organization. It is unclear why this theory or model is the best choice. More information is needed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

17.55 points

Theory or model to support strategic plan implementation is partially described. It is unclear how the theory or model would support implementation of strategic plan for the organization.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Theory or model to support strategic plan implementation is omitted.

Thesis Development and Purpose

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

5. Excellent

9 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

4. Good

7.65 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

3. Satisfactory

6.75 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

5.85 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Argument Logic and Construction

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

5. Excellent

9 points

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

4. Good

7.65 points

Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

3. Satisfactory

6.75 points

Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

5.85 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent

9 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good

7.65 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3. Satisfactory

6.75 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

5.85 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Criteria Description

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5. Excellent

3.6 points

All format elements are correct.

4. Good

3.06 points

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

3. Satisfactory

2.7 points

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

2.34 points

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Documentation of Sources

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent

5.4 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good

4.59 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory

4.05 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

3.51 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

Total 180 points

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.
Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.
APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.
LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

 

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *