Case Report Health Care Informatics
DNP 805 Week 7 Assignment Case Report Health Care Informatics
Case Report: Health Care Informatics
The current health care system is characterized by massive utilization of technology to help in improving the quality of life by lessening recovery time in patient and help them to enjoy a healthy life. Consequently, in the recent years, several technology-based applications have been extensively used to help in preventing the fall incidences among the older adults in acute care settings. Essentially, falls among the older adults are associated with primary sources of disability and deaths. Falls have adversely affected many patients aged 65 years and above who are admitted in acute care inpatients (Matarese et al., 2015). Besides, falls in these settings are attributed to other factors such as medication side effects, polypharmacy, and acute diseases. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to explore how technology can be used to prevent the issue of falls among the elderly inpatients in acute care settings. In particular, the paper will delve into the virtual monitoring technology which comprises fall detection devices, in particular alarms.
Literature Review
A fall refers to accidental descent to the ground with or no injury to the patient (Toren & Lipschuetz, 2017). With the growing ageing population, the incidences of fall among the elderly people aged 65 years and above is increasing rapidly, causing a great public health problem not only in the US but also globally. The NCOA (2020) claim that falls are the major reasons for both fatal and non-fatal injuries in the older adults in the United States, which has compromised their independence and safety, including being associated with considerable personal and economic burdens. A similar argument is also advanced by Toren and Lipschuetz (2017) who claim that falls are primary causes of injuries that lead to pain, emotional distress, reduced quality of life, increased hospitalization days, loss of independence, and high morbidity and mortality rates. According to NCOA (2020), one in four elderly Americans fall annually. Besides, in every 11 seconds, at least one older person is admitted at the emergency room because of fall. Moreover, in every 19 minutes, an elderly person dies due to fall related issues. Generally, around 2.8 million fall related injuries are treated annually, with estimated 800,000 hospitalizations and 27,000 fatalities (NCOA, 2020). Besides, Toren and Lipschuetz (2017) project that by the year 2015, falls in older adults will reach 1.2 billion globally.
Falls in elderly persons in acute care settings are caused by various factors such as surgery, diagnostic testing conditions, and medications conditions which results in confusion or body weakness in patients (Galet, Zhou, Ten Eyck & Romanowski, 2018). These factors hamper functional autonomy leading to falls. As a result, older adults suffer poor functional outcomes and low quality of life. Owing to the adverse consequences, nursing interventions such as installation of bed alarms have been used to help in preventing the incidences of fall.
Case Report Health Care Informatics Details:
In this assignment, learners are required to write a addressing the personal knowledge and skills gained in the current course and potentially solving an identified practice problem.
Case Report Health Care Informatics General Guidelines:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Case Report Health Care Informatics Directions:
For a specific focus of patient practice (e.g., acute care hospital, clinic, primary care, long-term care, home health), select a particular disease process. Identify and fully describe the required technology elements that will be involved in providing care and define how these technologies will integrate treatment and/or monitoring from the identified care setting to the home and then to ongoing care.
Your case report must include the following:
Introduction with a problem statement
Brief literature review
Description of the case/situation/conditions
Discussion that includes a detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings
Summary of the case
Proposed solutions
Conclusion
Portfolio Practice Hours:
It may be possible to earn Portfolio Practice hours for this case report. Enter the following after the references section of your paper:
DNP 805 Topic 7 Discussion 1
Describe one technology that you use on a daily basis that you thoroughly like or appreciate. What features or elements does that technology provide to you that make it easy, enjoyable, or necessary to use? Name one element of the technology you would change to improve its functionality for your needs?
DNP 805 Topic 7 Discussion 2
Describe one technology that you use on a daily basis that you dislike or that is dissatisfying in some manner. What features or elements of that technology make it difficult, frustrating, or not enjoyable to use? Name one element of the technology you would change to improve its functionality for your needs?
Rubric Criteria
|
Criterion |
1. Unsatisfactory |
2. Less Than Satisfactory |
3. Satisfactory |
4. Good |
5. Excellent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Selection of a Specific Technology Explored in This Course Selection of a Specific Technology Explored in This Course |
0 points Selection of a specific technology explored in this course is not present. |
8.8 points Selection of a specific technology explored in this course is marginal or incomplete. |
9.68 points Selection of a specific technology explored in this course is perfunctory. |
10.12 points Selection of a specific technology explored in this course is present. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
11 points Selection of a specific technology explored in this course is present. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
|
Definition of Each Element of the Specified Technology Identified and Description of How Each Elemen Definition of Each Element of the Specified Technology Identified and Description of How Each Element Would Be Measured or Evaluated |
0 points A definition of each element of the specified technology identified and a description of how each element would be measured or evaluated are not present. |
13.2 points A definition of each element of the specified technology identified and a description of how each element would be measured or evaluated are present but are marginal or incomplete. |
14.52 points A definition of each element of the specified technology identified and a description of how each element would be measured or evaluated are present but at a perfunctory level. |
15.18 points A definition of each element of the specified technology identified and a description of how each element would be measured or evaluated are present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
16.5 points A definition of each element of the specified technology identified and a description of how each element would be measured or evaluated are present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
|
Documentation of Sources Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) |
0 points Sources are not documented. |
4.4 points Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. |
4.84 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. |
5.06 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. |
5.5 points Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
|
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) |
0 points Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. |
4.4 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. |
4.84 points Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. |
5.06 points Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. |
5.5 points Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
|
Argument Logic and Construction Argument Logic and Construction |
0 points Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. |
7.04 points Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. |
7.74 points Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. |
8.1 points Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. |
8.8 points Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
|
List With Support for Three Elements of the Specified Technology That Will Be Used to Evaluate the U List With Support for Three Elements of the Specified Technology That Will Be Used to Evaluate the User-Technology Interface Using the Course Content |
0 points A list with support of three elements of the specified technology that will be used to evaluate the user-technology interface using the course content is not present. |
13.2 points A list with support of three elements of the specified technology that will be used to evaluate the user-technology interface using the course content is present but is marginal or incomplete. |
14.52 points A list with support of three elements of the specified technology that will be used to evaluate the user-technology interface using the course content is present but at a perfunctory level. |
15.18 points A list with support of three elements of the specified technology that will be used to evaluate the user-technology interface using the course content is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
16.5 points A list with support of three elements of the specified technology that will be used to evaluate the user-technology interface using the course content is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
|
Purpose Purpose |
0 points Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. |
6.16 points Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. |
6.78 points Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. |
7.08 points Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. |
7.7 points Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
|
Proposal That Employs Support From the Literature to Provide Practicable Suggestions for Improvement Proposal That Employs Support From the Literature to Provide Practicable Suggestions for Improvement in the Use of Each Element of the Specified Technology |
0 points A proposal that employs support from the literature to provide practicable suggestions for improvement in the use of each element of the specified technology is not present. |
13.2 points A proposal that employs support from the literature to provide practicable suggestions for improvement in the use of each element of the specified technology is present but is marginal or incomplete. |
14.52 points A proposal that employs support from the literature to provide practicable suggestions for improvement in the use of each element of the specified technology is present but at a perfunctory level. |
15.18 points A proposal that employs support from the literature to provide practicable suggestions for improvement in the use of each element of the specified technology is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
16.5 points A proposal that employs support from the literature to provide practicable suggestions for improvement in the use of each element of the specified technology is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
|
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) |
0 points Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. |
4.4 points Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. |
4.84 points Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. |
5.06 points Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. |
5.5 points All format elements are correct. |
|
Assessment Performed Using Elements of User-Technology Interface or Human Factor Methods to Determin Assessment Performed Using Elements of User-Technology Interface or Human Factor Methods to Determine Existing Functionality of the Specified Technology |
0 points An assessment using elements of user-technology interface or human factor methods to determine existing functionality of the specified technology is not present. |
13.2 points An assessment using elements of user-technology interface or human factor methods to determine existing functionality of the specified technology is marginal or incomplete. |
14.52 points An assessment using elements of user-technology interface or human factor methods to determine existing functionality of the specified technology is present but at a perfunctory level. |
15.18 points An assessment using elements of user-technology interface or human factor methods to determine existing functionality of the specified technology is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
16.5 points An assessment using elements of user-technology interface or human factor methods to determine existing functionality of the specified technology is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!