Paralegal Certification Exam

Paralegal Certification Exam

Complete the “professional paralegals lexis advance master exam” by watching the five videos on the website linked above. Once the exam is passed screenshot the certification and send it to me as the assignment. The mastery exam needs to be passed with an 80% in order to get the certification with only 2 attempts.

There are 5 videos that needs to be watched to be able to answer the questions to the Mastery exam.

The videos are linked as follow:

Paralegal Student #1 intro to Lexis Advance 2019, Paralegal Student #2 Secondary sources on lexis on lexis advance 2019, Paralegal Student #3 Case opinions and agency decisions on lexis advance 2019, Paralegal Student #4 statues and regulations, Paralegal Student #5 Cite checking

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

BUSINESS LAW ASSIGNMENT

BUSINESS LAW ASSIGNMENT

Please answer question 3 and 4 , short answer responses.

Question 3

 

Fred Sanguine is a New York City produce broker. Ned Santini is a 19-year-old college student who works for Sanguine from 4:00 A.M. until 7:00 A.M. each weekday before he attends classes at Pace University. Fred has instructed Ned on the proper packing of produce as follows: “Look, put the bad and small cherries at the bottom. Do the same with the strawberries and blueberries. Put the best fruit on top and hide the bad stuff at the bottom. This way I get top dollar on all that I sell.” Ned is uncomfortable about the instructions, but, as he explains to his roommate, “It’s not me doing it. I’m just following orders. Besides, I need the job.

Should Ned just follow instructions? Is the manner in which the fruit is packed unethical?

 

Would you do it? Why or why not? Is anyone

really harmed by the practice?

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

Question 4 

 

Alan Gellen is the facilities manager for the city of Milwaukee and makes all final decisions on purchasing items such as chairs, lights, and other supplies and materials. Alan also makes the final decisions for the award of contracts to food vendors at event sites. Grand Beef Franks has submitted a bid to be one of the city ’s vendors. Alan went to school with Grand Beef ’s owner, Steve Grand, who phones Alan and explains that Grand Beef owns a condominium in Maui that Alan could use. Steve’s offer to Alan is: “All it would cost you for a vacation is your airfare. The condo is fully stocked with food. Just let me know.”

 

Should Alan take the offer? Would you? Be sure to determine which category of ethical values this situation involves and to apply several models as you resolve the question of whether Alan should accept the invitation.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

Please respond in 150-250 word count on case example below

Ann Elkin, who works for Brill Co., has been sent out to conduct two customer evaluations, which have gone much more quickly than Ann anticipated. Her supervisor does not expect Ann back until after lunch. It is now 10:30 A.M., and Ann would like to run some personal errands and then go to lunch before returning to work at 1:00 P.M.

Please answer the following questions related to the above-mentioned scenario:

(1) Should Ann take the time? Would you? Why or why not?

(2) Is this any different than if Ann was sitting at her office desk using a work computer to access her personal email, surf the internet, check social media or make personal phone calls on her work phone?

(3) Please consider the categories of ethical values and apply one or two models before reaching your conclusion. The model(s) must be mentioned in your post.

 

You must post an original comment of 150-250 words with citation to sources used, such as eText page references and/or credible websites)

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

Legal Envir Business Essay

Legal Envir Business Essay

Write a paragraph or more for each numbered question below (and for each lettered sub-question where applicable).  Do not copy directly from the book–explain in your own words.  Do not use Google–do not plagiarize–use the material from the book.  PLEASE ATTACH ONLY ONE FILE FOR ALL QUESTIONS, and please label the question numbers/sub-questions.

(Chapters 16 and 17)

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

1. Describe the three classifications of franchises–remember to use your own words/detail/examples per the instructions.

2. Discuss when and how members of an LLC can lose their limited personal liability as described in the book (meaning, when personal liability can be imposed on members of an LLC).

3. Discuss the different ways dissolution can come about for an LLC.

4. Discuss the process of “winding up” when an LLC is dissolved.

(Each numbered question is worth 25 points)

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

Covert Action and Intelligence

Covert Action and Intelligence

Introduction
Choose a covert operation from those listed in chapter 2 and refer to the ProQuest Guide listed in the resources above.

Activity Instructions
Write an essay and analyze the operation you chose according to the categories listed on pages 20 and 21, technology, secrecy, oversight, and managing the community. How does the operation fit with the descriptions of the text and relate to the working concept of intelligence on page 10 in chapter 1?

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

Writing Requirements (APA format)

  • 2-3 pages (approx. 300 words per page), not including title page or references page
  • 1-inch margins
  • Double spaced
  • 12-point Times New Roman font
  • Title page with topic and name of student
  • References page

Grading and Assessment
This activity will be graded based on the Written Analysis Grading Rubric.

Learning Outcome(s): 6
6.   Identify and explain the intelligence cycle and apply the cycle to various situations.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

11397 Deliver within 30 Hrs

11397 Deliver within 30 Hrs

Assignment Instructions

 

Week 6 Project Assignment

Individual Paper– Each student will choose three cases, each from a different chapter, from the readings in weeks 3 and 4 (Chapters 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12). No students on a team will choose the same cases and there should be no duplicate cases.  A Reference page should be provided.

  • Your responses should be well-rounded and analytical, and should not just provide a conclusion or an opinion without explaining the reason for the choice. For full credit, you need to use the material from the week’s lectures, text and/or discussions when responding to the questions.
  • Utilize the case format below:
      1. Read and understand the case. Show your Analysis and Reasoning and make it clear you understand the material. Be sure to incorporate the concepts of the chapter we are studying to show your reasoning. Dedicate at least one sub-heading to each following outline topic:
        • Facts [Summarize only those facts critical to the outcome of the case]
        • Issue [Note the central question or questions on which the case turns]
        • Explain the applicable law(s). Use the textbook here. The law should come from the same chapter as the case. Be sure to use citations from the textbook including page numbers.
        • Holding [How did the court resolve the issue(s)? Who won?]
        • Reasoning [Explain the logic that supported the court’s decision]
      1. Dedicate 1 sub-heading to each of the case questions immediately following the case. First, restate the question and then fully answer.
      2. Conclusion. This should summarize the key aspects of the decision and also your recommendations on the court’s ruling
      3. Include citations and a reference page with your sources. Use APA style citations and references.

 

Group Presentation– The group will meet and create a team presentation using narrated power point (or live for onsite classes). This will be a summary in order to contrast and compare the various cases selected by all team members and the law applied. Each student should participate in the Narrated Power Point. This requires each group member to pick a legal argument and use a case from the cases you have worked on to give context for your legal argument. Requires only two PPT slides. The legal concept you will use is Title VII to defend religious discrimination from chapter 11.

Chapter 7 Case: Vega v. Hempstead Union Free Sch. Dist.

Chapter 9 Case: Faragher v. City of Boca Raton

Chapter 11 Case: Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hardison (PPT case)

 

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

Paper Rubric: 100 points (Each student graded separately).

Category Points Description:

  • Use of Case Format: 60 Points (20 points per case). Paper is clear and fully contains the facts, issues, applicable law, holding, reasoning and conclusion. The presentation contains well rounded and analytical, and should not just provide a conclusion or an opinion without explaining the reason for the choice. The paper incorporates the concepts of the chapter from which the case was chosen.
  •  Case Questions: 30 Points (10 points per case). Dedicates 1 subheading to each of the case questions immediately following the case. Restates the question and then fully answers.
  • APA Format: 10 Points.  Includes citations and a reference page with your sources. Use APA style citations and references

 

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

Presentation Rubric (50 points). Group Grade will be assigned.

Category Points Description:

  • Learning Points Presentation: 30 Points. 10 Points per learning point or concept.  Presentation is clear, concise, professional, and easy to follow.  The presentation is well-rounded and the analysis reflects higher order thinking. The presentation should not just provide a conclusion or an opinion without explaining the reason therefore.
  • Research:10 Points
    Incorporate the concepts of the chapters we are studying and demonstrates research based on Internet and/or DeVry Library resources.
  • Project Format: 10 Points
    Presentation contains no spelling, grammar, typographical or formatting errors, graphics and charts are clear and legible. Writing quality is excellent – clear, organized and professional.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

 

Case Analysis #1 IDH

Case Analysis #1 IDH

1. What are Sherry Hunt’s values and motivations in this case? Do you share these values and motivations? How important (from the perspective of both personal well-being and organizational effectiveness) do you think it is for organizations to allow and encourage employees to voice their values and live their values in the workplace?

2. If you were Hunt at the end of the case, what course of action would you pursue? What person or what entity would you tell, how (e.g., by email, in person), and why? Be mindful of what motivates different stakeholders and therefore the resistance with which they may respond.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

3. Draft a short script of what you would say to that stakeholder that considers the promising arguments or action levers you might use in response to potential pushback.

  1. Situation (need to know in order to ask the right questions)
  2. Questions (not included in written response…but ask yourself these questions as you draft your essay)
    1. What’s the problem?
    2. What are the decision options?
    3. Who or what is being evaluated?
      1. What’s at stake?
      2. What’s the most important criteria for this sort of evaluation?
  • Hypothesis (not included in written response…but ask yourself these questions as you draft your essay)
    1. Tentative explanation that accounts for the set of facts/situation
    2. Can be tested by further investigation
    3. Which do you have most confidence in?
    4. Your Arguments
    5. Expresses WHY
  1. Position (pick a side)
    1. Expresses a conclusion
    2. Answers WHAT
  2. Proof & Action (prove your point & provide steps to accomplish)
    1. Prove something, not look for something to prove
      1. Supporting evidence for your position
      2. Persuade
    2. Action Plan
      1. HOW would you implement the decision you’re recommending?
        1. Short-term
        2. Long-term
      2. What are the risks?
        1. Discuss main risk & measures to manage
      3. Alternatives (what other views are out there?)
        1. Every position has a weakness
          1. What’s the strongest alternative to your position?
            1. Problem
              1. Can you define the problem differently?
            2. Decision
              1. What’s the biggest downside to your recommended decision?
  • Evaluation
    1. What’s another way to evaluate your overall assessment?
  1. What’s the weakest alternative to your position?
    1. Brief statement (1-2 lines)
  • Conclusion (restate your position and plan)

 

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

 

Case Study – Assignment – LAW-101: Legal Environment of Business.

Case Study – Assignment – LAW-101: Legal Environment of Business.

Question for Case Study1.

Q1) What will be the result?

Q2) How could this dispute have been avoided in the first place?

Question for Case Study2.

What advice would you give Deidre?

Solve these 3 questions

the words between 500 to 700

it should have at least three (3) reference

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

Case Study1

John, Lesa, and Trevor form a limited liability company. John contributes 60 percent of the capital, and Lesa and Trevor each contribute 20 percent. Nothing is decided about how profits will be divided. John assumes that he will be entitled to 60 percent of the profits, in accordance with his contribution. Lesa and Trevor, however, assume that the profits will be divided equally. A dispute over the profits arises, and ultimately a court has to decide the issue.

Q1) What will be the result?

Q2) How could this dispute have been avoided in the first place?

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

Case Study2

Deidre McFadden came to the offices of Webber & Associates seeking help in organizing her business, Fashion Angels, a toy-making enterprise focusing on dolls with multiple outfits. She wants to run the business and has few personal assets so is not worried about personal liability. Deidre’s aunt, Penelope, is elderly, wealthy, and adores her only niece. Penelope is willing to invest $500,000 to start the business, and Deidre has $10,000 to contribute on her own. Deidre expects to do all the work without compensation as it will take at least a year before Fashion Angels will make any profit. Penelope will sign any agreement terms, with one condition. Penelope is insisting that Deidre cannot leave the company, stating “I don’t want my money going to a stranger, it’s for Deidre.”

Deidre is looking for your advice as to the type of entity that would suit her best. “I don’t want my aunt to become the target for bill collectors if I fail. And to be honest, I really don’t want her interfering in the business because she can be quite aggressive.”

Q1) What advice would you give Deidre?

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

Debate 7- 450 words

Debate 7- 450 words

Debate: Takeovers

From Business Law II

 

  • Debate This: Takeovers
  • Chapter 35, p.838

Mario Bonsetti and Rico Sanchez incorporated Gnarly Vulcan Gear, Inc. (GVG), to manufacture windsurfing equipment. Bonsetti owned 60 percent of the corporation’s stock, and Sanchez owned 40 percent. Both men served on the board of directors. Hula Boards, Inc., owned solely by Mai Jin Li, made a public offer to buy GVG stock. Hula offered 30 percent more than the market price per share for the stock, and Bonsetti and Sanchez each sold 20 percent of their stock to Hula. Jin Li became the third member of the GVG board of directors. An irreconcilable dispute soon arose between Bonsetti and Sanchez over design modifications of their popular Baked Chameleon board. Despite Bonsetti’s dissent, Sanchez and Jin Li voted to merge GVG with Hula Boards under the latter name, Gnarly Vulcan Gear was dissolved, and production of the Baked Chameleon ceased. Using the information presented in the chapter, answer the following questions.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

  1. What rights does Bonsetti have (in most states) as a minority shareholder dissenting to the merger of GVG and Hula Boards?
  2. Could the parties have used a short-form merger procedure in this situation? Why or why not?
  3. What is the term used for Hula’s offer to purchase GVG stock?
  4. Suppose that after the merger, a person who was injured on the Baked Chameleon board sued Hula (the surviving corporation). Can Hula be held liable for the injury? Why or why not

Debate This:
Corporate law should be changed to prohibit management from using most of the legal methods currently used to fight takeover

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

Analytical Paper: Ethics

Analytical Paper: Ethics

After reading Chapter 2 of the textbook, watch the 2000 feature film “Boiler Room” (written and directed by Ben Younger), which is available on Amazon Prime Video, You Tube, Vudu, iTunes, etc. Plan ahead to ensure you have time to view the film at least once before beginning your paper.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

Essay Prompt:  

There are numerous examples of ethically ambiguous practices featured in the film. These practices may include actions, affirmative statements, omissions and/or schemes. Identify and explain one specific ethically ambiguous practice, including a brief description of the parties involved and how the practice worked. Then, utilizing the ethics material discussed in class and Chapter 2 of the textbook, analyze the ethics of the one specific practice you are focusing onYour analysis should:

(1) Include two of the “Theories of Ethics” (you must choose from Utilitarianism, Deontology, and Justice) and two of the “Ethics Traps” presented in Chapter 2.

(2) Define and explain the theories and traps you are utilizing.

(3) Apply the theories and traps to analyze the ethics of the one specific practice you are focusing on.

(4) Use specific conversations and evidence from the film to assist in your analysis.

Your paper must be written in essay format; in other words, it should not be divided into individual answers to the above questions. Your paper must include an introduction and a conclusion, and the bulk of your paper should focus on analysis, not recitation of facts. There is no need to consult sources beyond your textbook, your class notes, and the film itself (outside research is, in fact, discouraged). Your paper must be a minimum of 800 and a maximum of 1200 words, and must be double-spaced, utilizing Times Roman 12-point font and 1 inch margins. In the upper left-hand corner of the first page of your paper, list your name, the course (BSL 212), the date, and the exact word count of your paper. Direct quotes from the film or the textbook must be placed in quotation marks and the source should be noted in parentheses directly after the quote (Boiler Room for the film, and Mann, Roberts, followed by the page number, for the textbook). Failure to comply with these specific instructions will negatively impact your grade, as reflected in the Analytical Paper Grading Rubric posted on Blackboard. Your Analytical Paper must be submitted in Word format on Blackboard under the designated “Assignments” tab no later than the start of class on June 7, 2021.  Please note that the papers will be run through Safe Assignment, which will compare them against the entire Internet and our internal database to help detect plagiarism.  There is no makeup for this Analytical Paper; it is not subject to the quiz make up policy articulated in the course syllabus.  

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

Analytical Paper:  Ethics

After reading Chapter 2 of the textbook, watch the 2000 feature film “Boiler Room” (written and directed by Ben Younger), which is available on Amazon Prime Video, You Tube, Vudu, iTunes, etc. Plan ahead to ensure you have time to view the film at least once before beginning your paper.

Essay Prompt: 

There are numerous examples of ethically ambiguous practices featured in the film. These practices may include actions, affirmative statements, omissions and/or schemes. Identify and explain one specific ethically ambiguous practice, including a brief description of the parties involved and how the practice worked. Then, utilizing the ethics material discussed in class and Chapter 2 of the textbook, analyze the ethics of the one specific practice you are focusing on. Your analysis should:

  • Include two of the “Theories of Ethics” (you must choose from Utilitarianism, Deontology, and Justice) and two of the “Ethics Traps” presented in Chapter 2.
  • Define and explain the theories and traps you are utilizing.
  • Apply the theories and traps to analyze the ethics of the one specific practice you are focusing on.
  • Use specific conversations and evidence from the film to assist in your analysis.

Your paper must be written in essay format; in other words, it should not be divided into individual answers to the above questions. Your paper must include an introduction and a conclusion, and the bulk of your paper should focus on analysis, not recitation of facts. There is no need to consult sources beyond your textbook, your class notes, and the film itself (outside research is, in fact, discouraged). Your paper must be a minimum of 800 and a maximum of 1200 words, and must be double-spaced, utilizing Times Roman 12-point font and 1 inch margins. In the upper left-hand corner of the first page of your paper, list your name, the course (BSL 212), the date, and the exact word count of your paper. Direct quotes from the film or the textbook must be placed in quotation marks and the source should be noted in parentheses directly after the quote (Boiler Room for the film, and Mann, Roberts, followed by the page number, for the textbook). Failure to comply with these specific instructions will negatively impact your grade, as reflected in the Analytical Paper Grading Rubric posted on Blackboard. Your Analytical Paper must be submitted in Word format on Blackboard under the designated “Assignments” tab no later than the start of class on June 7, 2021.  Please note that the papers will be run through Safe Assignment, which will compare them against the entire Internet and our internal database to help detect plagiarism.  There is no makeup for this Analytical Paper; it is not subject to the quiz make up policy articulated in the course syllabus.  

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

 

Debate 8- 450 words

Debate 8- 450 words

Debate: Admin Law

  • Debate This: Admin Law
  • Chapter 37, p. 888

Assume that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has a rule under which it enforces statutory provisions prohibiting insider trading only when the insiders make monetary profits for themselves. Then the SEC makes a new rule, declaring that it has the statutory authority to bring enforcement actions against individuals even if they did not personally profit from the insider trading. The SEC simply announces the new rule without conducting a rulemaking proceeding. A stockbrokerage firm objects and says that the new rule was unlawfully developed without opportunity for public comment. The brokerage firm challenges the rule in an action that ultimately is reviewed by a federal appellate court. Using the information presented in the chapter, answer the following questions.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

  1. Is the SEC an executive agency or an independent regulatory agency? Does it matter to the out-come of this dispute? Explain.
  2. Suppose that the SEC asserts that it has always had the statutory authority to pursue persons for insider trading regardless of whether they personally profited from the transaction. This is the only argument the SEC makes to justify changing its enforcement rules. Would a court be likely to find that the SEC’s action was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA)? Why or why not?
  3. Would a court be likely to give Chevron deference to the SEC’s interpretation of the law on insider trading? Why or why not?
  4. Now assume that a court finds that the new rule is merely “interpretive.” What effect would this determination have on whether the SEC had to follow the APA’s rulemaking procedures?

Debate This:
Because an administrative law judge (ALJ) acts as both judge and jury, there should always be at least three ALJs in each administrative hearing.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW