Assess the Musculoskeletal system of Tina Jones, a Digital Standardized Patient. Interview and examine the patient, and document your findings

Assess the Musculoskeletal system of Tina Jones, a Digital Standardized Patient. Interview and examine the patient, and document your findings

Please submit your post work to Canvas within 24 hours of the completion of your VCBC Experience.  Please refer to the Experiential Learning Orientation for further questions and a reminder on how to ensure your assignment is properly saved.

Please complete the Concept Notebook (Map) for the concept of Assessment linked to your clients for the day.

Rubric

205/225 Concept Notebook Rubric205/225 Concept Notebook RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRelated Concept1 ptsSatisfactoryDocumented at least 2 concepts, related to the client with a detailed explanation of each related concept and how the related concept is impacted by the main concept, and correct APA in-text citations (if used).0.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementDocumented at least 1 concept, 1 concept is related to the client, or only minimal explanation of each related concept and how the related concept is impacted by the main concept, or incorrect APA in-text citations (if used).0 ptsUnsatisfactoryDocumented no related concept, did not relate the concept to the client, no explanation of each related concept and how the related concept is impacted by the main concept, and no APA in-text citations (if used).1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExemplar1 ptsSatisfactoryDocumented at least 3 Exemplars, related to the client and correct APA in-text citations (if used).0.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementDocumented 1-2 Exemplars, 1-2 concepts are related to the client, or incorrect APA in-text citations (if used).0 ptsUnsatisfactoryDocumented no Exemplars , did not relate the concept to the client and no APA in-text citations (if used).1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssessment1 ptsSatisfactoryDocumented at least 3 assessments used to find and rule out alterations with the main concept and are all related to the client, a detailed explanation of each assessment and why one would do that assessment relating to the concept, and correct APA in-text citations (if used).0.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementDocumented 1-2 assessments used to find and rule out alterations with the main concept and 1-2 relate to the client, minimal explanation of why one would do that assessment relating to the concept, and incorrect APA in-text citations (if used).0 ptsUnsatisfactoryDocumented no assessments used to find and rule out alterations with the main concept and did not relate to the client, no explanation of why one would do that assessment relating to the concept, and no APA in-text citations (if used).1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLab & Diagnostic1 ptsSatisfactoryDocumented at least 3 lab or diagnostic test used to find and rule out alterations with the main concept and all related to the client, a detailed explanation of each lab/test and why one would do that lab/test relating to the concept, and correct APA in-text citations (if used).0.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementDocumented 1-2 lab or diagnostic test used to find and rule out alterations with the main concept, 1-2 relate to the client, minimal explanation of each lab/test and why one would do that lab/test relating to the concept, and incorrect APA in-text citations (if used).0 ptsUnsatisfactoryDocumented no lab or diagnostic test used to find and rule out alterations with the main concept and did not relate to the client, no explanation of each lab/test and why one would do that lab/test relating to the concept, and no APA in-text citations (if used).1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInterventions1 ptsSatisfactoryDocumented at least 3 nursing interventions needed to care for clients with alterations to the main concept and all related to the client, a detailed explanation of each intervention and why one would perform the interventions relating to the concept, and correct APA in-text citations (if used).0.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementDocumented 1-2 nursing interventions needed to care for clients with alterations to the main concept, 1-2 relate to the client, minimal explanation of each intervention and why one would perform the interventions relating to the concept, and incorrect APA in-text citations (if used).0 ptsUnsatisfactoryDocumented no nursing interventions needed to care for clients with alterations to the main concept and did not relate to the client, no explanation of each intervention and why one would perform the interventions relating to the concept, and no APA in-text citations (if used).1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMedications1 ptsSatisfactoryDocumented at least 3 medications administered to clients to treat or prevent alterations to the main concept and all related to the client, a detailed explanation of each medication and why one would administer the medication relating o the concept, and correct APA in-text citations (if used).0.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementDocumented 1-2medications administered to clients to treat or prevent alterations to the main concept, 1-2 relate to the client, minimal explanation of each medication and why one would administer the medication relating to the concept, and incorrect APA in-text citations (if used).0 ptsUnsatisfactoryDocumented no medications administered to clients to treat or prevent alterations to the main concept and did not relate to the client, no explanation of each medication and why one would administer the medication relating to the concept, and no APA in-text citations (if used).1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePotential Complications1 ptsSatisfactoryDocumented at least 2 potential problems that could occur if alterations to the main concept are not addressed/treated and all related to the client, a detailed explanation of each complication and how it could occur relating to the concept, and correct APA in-text citations (if used).0.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementDocumented 1 potential problem that could occur if alterations to the main concept are not addressed/treated, 1 concept is related to the client, minimal explanation of each complication and how it could occur relating to the concept, and incorrect APA in-text citations (if used).0 ptsUnsatisfactoryDocumented no potential problems that could occur if alterations to the main concept are not addressed/treated, did not relate the concept to the client, no explanation of each complication and how it could occur relating to the concept, and incorrect APA in-text citations (if used).1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCollaborative Care1 ptsSatisfactoryDocumented at least 1 department/ancillary staff that may be needed to treat clients who have or are at risk for alterations with the main concept and is related to the client, a detailed explanation of each how that department/ancillary staff could assist the client relating to the concept, and correct APA in-text citations (if used).0.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementDocumented at least 1 department/ancillary staff that may be needed to treat clients who have or are at risk for alterations with the main concept and is related to the client, minimal explanation of each how that department/ancillary staff could assist the client relating to the concept, and incorrect APA in-text citations (if used).0 ptsUnsatisfactoryDocumented no department/ancillary staff that may be needed to treat clients who have or are at risk for alterations with the main concept, did not relate the concept to the client, no explanation of each how that department/ancillary staff could assist the client relating to the concept, and no APA in-text citations (if used).1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpelling and Grammar1 ptsSatisfactory0- 2 mistakes in spelling or grammar.0.5 ptsNeeds Improvement3 -4 mistakes in spelling or grammar.0 ptsUnsatisfactory5 or more mistakes in spelling or grammar.1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences1 ptsSatisfactoryCorrect APA references.0.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementIncorrect APA references.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryNo APA references.1 pts
Total Points: 10PreviousNext

Introduction

The Concept Notebook for Assessment serves as a structured reflection and critical analysis tool that connects theoretical nursing concepts to real-world patient experiences observed during the VCBC clinical rotation. This assignment encourages the integration of classroom knowledge with hands-on practice, reinforcing the ability to recognize, interpret, and respond to alterations in patient health. Through this process, students deepen their understanding of how the concept of assessment influences clinical judgment, prioritization, and evidence-based decision-making.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

By documenting related concepts, exemplars, assessments, laboratory and diagnostic tests, nursing interventions, medications, potential complications, and collaborative care strategies, this Concept Map provides a comprehensive overview of the assessment process as it applies to the day’s assigned clients. Each section highlights the interrelationship between patient data, physiological systems, and the nurse’s role in identifying health deviations and promoting positive outcomes.

This exercise supports professional growth through the development of critical thinking, diagnostic reasoning, and reflective practice, all of which are vital components of nursing competency. It also aligns with the 205/225 Concept Notebook Rubric, emphasizing accuracy, organization, appropriate use of scholarly sources, and adherence to APA standards. Submitting the Concept Notebook within 24 hours of the VCBC experience ensures timely reflection while the clinical encounter remains relevant and detailed in the learner’s perspective.

Ultimately, the goal of this assignment is to strengthen the nurse’s ability to conduct comprehensive assessments, apply clinical knowledge to individualized care, and collaborate effectively within the interdisciplinary team to promote patient safety and quality outcomes.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

soap note “Hypertension”

soap note “Hypertension”

Soap notes will be uploaded to Moodle and put through TURN-It-In (anti-Plagiarism program)

Turn it in Score must be less than 50% or will not be accepted for credit, must be your own work and in your own words. You can resubmit, Final submission will be accepted if less than 50%. Copy paste from websites or textbooks will not be accepted or tolerated. Please see College Handbook with reference to Academic Misconduct Statement.

Example:

PATIENT INFORMATION

Name: Mr. W.S.

Age: 65-year-old

Sex: Male

Source: Patient

Allergies: None

Current Medications: Atorvastatin tab 20 mg, 1-tab PO at bedtime

PMH: Hypercholesterolemia

Immunizations: Influenza last 2018-year, tetanus, and hepatitis A and B 4 years ago.

Surgical History: Appendectomy 47 years ago.

Family History: Father- died 81 does not report information

Mother-alive, 88 years old, Diabetes Mellitus, HTN

Daughter-alive, 34 years old, healthy

Social Hx: No smoking history or illicit drug use, occasional alcoholic beverage consumption on social celebrations. Retired, widow, he lives alone.

SUBJECTIVE:

Chief complain: “headaches” that started two weeks ago

Symptom analysis/HPI:

The patient is 65 years old male who complaining of episodes of headaches and on 3 different occasions blood pressure was measured, which was high (159/100, 158/98 and 160/100 respectively). Patient noticed the problem started two weeks ago and sometimes it is accompanied by dizziness.He states that he has been under stress in his workplace for the last month.

Patient denies chest pain, palpitation, shortness of breath, nausea or vomiting.

ROS:

CONSTITUTIONAL: Denies fever or chills. Denies weakness or weight loss. NEUROLOGIC: Headache and dizzeness as describe above. Denies changes in LOC. Denies history of tremors or seizures.

HEENT: HEAD: Denies any head injury, or change in LOC. Eyes: Denies any changes in vision, diplopia or blurred vision. Ear: Denies pain in the ears. Denies loss of hearing or drainage. Nose: Denies nasal drainage, congestion. THROAT: Denies throat or neck pain, hoarseness, difficulty swallowing.

Respiratory:Patient denies shortness of breath, cough or hemoptysis.

Cardiovascular: No chest pain, tachycardia. No orthopnea or paroxysmal nocturnal

dyspnea.

Gastrointestinal:Denies abdominal pain or discomfort.Denies flatulence, nausea, vomiting or

diarrhea.

Genitourinary: Denies hematuria, dysuria or change in urinary frequency. Denies difficulty starting/stopping stream of urine or incontinence.

MUSCULOSKELETAL: Denies falls or pain. Denies hearing a clicking or snapping sound.

Skin: No change of coloration such as cyanosis or jaundice, no rashes or pruritus.

Objective Data

CONSTITUTIONAL: Vital signs: Temperature: 98.5 °F, Pulse: 87, BP: 159/92 mmhg, RR 20, PO2-98% on room air, Ht- 6’4”, Wt 200 lb, BMI 25. Report pain 0/10.

General appearance: The patient is alert and oriented x 3. No acute distress noted.NEUROLOGIC: Alert, CNII-XII grossly intact, oriented to person, place, and time. Sensation intact to bilateral upper and lower extremities. Bilateral UE/LE strength 5/5.

HEENT:Head: Normocephalic, atraumatic, symmetric, non-tender. Maxillary sinuses no tenderness. Eyes: No conjunctival injection, no icterus, visual acuity and extraocular eye movements intact. No nystagmus noted. Ears: Bilateral canals patent without erythema, edema, or exudate. Bilateral tympanic membranes intact, pearly gray with sharp cone of light. Maxillary sinuses no tenderness. Nasal mucosa moist without bleeding. Oral mucosa moist without lesions,.Lids non-remarkable and appropriate for race.

Neck: supple without cervical lymphadenopathy, no jugular vein distention, no thyroid swelling or masses.

Cardiovascular:S1S2, regular rate and rhythm, no murmur or gallop noted. Capillary refill < 2 sec.

Respiratory:No dyspnea or use of accessory muscles observed. No egophony, whispered pectoriloquy or tactile fremitus on palpation. Breath sounds presents and clear bilaterally on auscultation.

Gastrointestinal:No mass or hernia observed. Upon auscultation, bowel sounds present in all four quadrants, no bruits over renal and aorta arteries. Abdomen soft non-tender, no guarding, no reboundno distention or organomegaly noted on palpation

Musculoskeletal:No pain to palpation. Active and passive ROM within normal limits, no stiffness.

Integumentary:intact, no lesions or rashes, no cyanosis or jaundice.

Assessment

Essential (Primary) Hypertension (ICD10 I10): Given the symptoms and high blood pressure (156/92 mmhg), classified as stage 2. Once the organic cause of hypertension has been ruled out, such as renal, adrenal or thyroid, this diagnosis is confirmed.

Differential diagnosis:

Ø Renal artery stenosis(ICD10 I70.1)

Ø Chronic kidney disease(ICD10 I12.9)

Ø Hyperthyroidism (ICD10 E05.90)

Plan

Diagnosis is based on the clinical evaluation through history, physical examination, and routine laboratory tests to assess risk factors, reveal identifiable causes and detect target-organ damage, including evidence of cardiovascular disease.

These basic laboratory tests are:

· CMP

· Complete blood count

· Lipid profile

· Thyroid-stimulating hormone

· Urinalysis

· Electrocardiogram

Ø Pharmacological treatment:

The treatment of choice in this case would be:

Thiazide-like diuretic and/or a CCB

· Hydrochlorothiazide tab 25 mg, Initial dose: 25 mg orally once daily.

 

Ø Non-Pharmacologic treatment:

· Weight loss

· Healthy diet (DASH dietary pattern): Diet rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and low-fat dairy products with reduced content of saturated and trans l fat

· Reduced intake of dietary sodium: <1,500 mg/d is optimal goal but at least 1,000 mg/d reduction in most adults

· Enhanced intake of dietary potassium

· Regular physical activity (Aerobic): 90–150 min/wk

· Tobacco cessation

· Measures to release stress and effective coping mechanisms.

Education

· Provide with nutrition/dietary information.

· Daily blood pressure monitoring at home twice a day for 7 days, keep a record, bring the record on the next visit with her PCP

· Instruction about medication intake compliance.

· Education of possible complications such as stroke, heart attack, and other problems.

· Patient was educated on course of hypertension, as well as warning signs and symptoms, which could indicate the need to attend the E.R/U.C. Answered all pt. questions/concerns. Pt verbalizes understanding to all

Follow-ups/Referrals

· Evaluation with PCP in 1 weeks for managing blood pressure and to evaluate current hypotensive therapy. Urgent Care visit prn.

· No referrals needed at this time.

References

Domino, F., Baldor, R., Golding, J., Stephens, M. (2017). The 5-Minute Clinical Consult 2017 (25th ed.). Print (The 5-Minute Consult Series).

Codina Leik, M. T. (2014). Family Nurse Practitioner Certification Intensive Review (2nd ed.). ISBN 978-0-8261-3424-0

Introduction

The SOAP note assignment provides an essential opportunity to demonstrate clinical reasoning, patient assessment, and evidence-based decision-making within a structured documentation format. This exercise emphasizes accuracy, professional integrity, and the ability to synthesize subjective and objective data into a meaningful clinical plan. All documentation is expected to reflect the student’s own analysis and language to ensure originality and compliance with the College’s Academic Misconduct Policy.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

For this submission, the patient information and clinical data were gathered and organized according to the SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan) framework. The goal is to document patient encounters thoroughly while applying clinical judgment to identify differential diagnoses, justify the primary diagnosis, and design an appropriate management plan. Additionally, the reflection section offers an opportunity to evaluate the clinical encounter and identify strategies for improvement in future assessments.

This process strengthens essential skills in patient-centered care, clinical documentation, and diagnostic reasoning while reinforcing professional accountability. Maintaining a Turnitin score below 50% underscores the commitment to ethical scholarship and original work in clinical practice.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

Focused Exam: Cough Assignment

Focused Exam: Cough Assignment

Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide related to ears, nose, and throat.

  • Review the Shadow Health Resources provided in this week’s Learning Resources specifically the tutorial to guide you through the documentation and interpretation within the Shadow Health platform. Review the examples also provided.
  • Review the DCE (Shadow Health) Documentation Template for Focused Exam: Cough found in this week’s Learning Resources and use this template to complete your Documentation Notes for this DCE Assignment.
  • Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. How would the results be used to make a diagnosis?
  • Review the Week 5 Focused Exam: Cough Rubric provided in the Assignment submission area for details on completing tReview the Shadow Health Resources provided in this week’s Learning Resources specifically the tutorial to guide you through the documentation and interpretation within the Shadow Health platform. Review the examples also provided.
    Review the DCE (Shadow Health) Documentation Template for Focused Exam: Cough found in this week’s Learning Resources and use this template to complete your Documentation Notes for this DCE Assignment.
    Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. How would the results be used to make a diagnosis?

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

Introduction

The Shadow Health Focused Exam: Cough provided a realistic and interactive platform to strengthen my clinical assessment and diagnostic reasoning skills related to ears, nose, and throat (ENT) conditions. This simulation emphasized the importance of performing a detailed health history, targeted physical examination, and appropriate diagnostic testing to determine the underlying cause of a patient’s cough. By integrating knowledge from the week’s learning resources and applying it within the Shadow Health environment, I was able to practice evidence-based assessment strategies essential for accurate diagnosis and effective patient care.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

This focused exam required critical thinking and attention to detail in distinguishing between possible respiratory and upper airway causes of cough, such as viral infections, allergic responses, or more serious pulmonary conditions. The DCE (Digital Clinical Experience) Documentation Template guided the process of organizing subjective and objective findings, recording differential diagnoses, and outlining appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment plans. Through this exercise, I developed a deeper understanding of how systematic data collection and clinical interpretation lead to sound diagnostic decisions.

Furthermore, this assignment reinforced the significance of correlating subjective symptoms with objective physical findings, as well as using diagnostic tests to confirm clinical impressions. By applying structured reasoning and patient-centered communication, I was able to formulate a holistic and evidence-based care plan tailored to the patient’s presentation.

Ultimately, the Shadow Health Focused Exam: Cough enhanced my ability to synthesize assessment data, refine diagnostic accuracy, and demonstrate professional documentation skills consistent with advanced nursing practice. It also underscored the essential role of continual reflection and learning in delivering safe, effective, and compassionate patient care.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

Managed Care Organizations (MCOs) vs. Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs)

Managed Care Organizations (MCOs) vs. Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs)

Discuss the differences and similarities between Managed Care Organizations (MCOs) vs. Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs). Given the current health care environment, provide a solid speculation to how MCOs and ACOs may transform to meet the needs of its consumers. Be sure to support your thoughts and analysis with scholarly sources.

*Will also need to respond to 3 classmate’s post, will send that after you turn in assignment.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

Introduction

The U.S. healthcare system continues to evolve toward models that emphasize cost efficiency, quality improvement, and coordinated care delivery. Two major frameworks that have shaped this transformation are Managed Care Organizations (MCOs) and Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs). Both models were designed to improve health outcomes while controlling rising healthcare costs, yet they differ in structure, goals, and operational strategies. Understanding their similarities and differences is essential for evaluating their current roles and predicting how they might adapt in response to the dynamic healthcare landscape.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

MCOs emerged as a response to the escalating costs of healthcare in the late 20th century, primarily focusing on managing utilization, provider networks, and payment systems to ensure cost containment. In contrast, ACOs developed under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) with a greater emphasis on value-based care, promoting accountability among healthcare providers for the quality, cost, and overall outcomes of patient populations. Despite their distinct origins, both models share a common objective—enhancing the coordination of care while maintaining financial sustainability.

In today’s healthcare environment, marked by technological advancement, patient-centered care expectations, and policy reform, both MCOs and ACOs must evolve. Future transformations may include stronger integration of digital health tools, expanded use of data analytics, and increased focus on preventive and population health management. By comparing these two models and exploring their potential evolution, this discussion aims to highlight how they can better meet consumer needs, improve health equity, and sustain long-term value within the healthcare system.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

6551 WK 3 SOAP

6551 WK 3 SOAP

Gynecologic Health

Select a patient that you examined as a nurse practitioner student during the last three weeks of clinical on OB/GYN Issue. With this patient in mind, address the following in a SOAP Note 1 OR 2 PAGES :

Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding her personal and medical history?

Objective: What observations did you make during the physical assessment?

Assessment: What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses. List them from highest priority to lowest priority. What was your primary diagnosis and why?

Plan: What was your plan for diagnostics and primary diagnosis? What was your plan for treatment and management, including alternative therapies? Include pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters for this patient , as well as a rationale for this treatment and management plan.

Very Important:  Reflection notes: What would you do differently in a similar patient evaluation?

Reference

Gagan, M. J. (2009). The SOAP format enhances communication. Kai Tiaki Nursing New Zealand, 15(5), 15.

Tharpe, N. L., Farley, C., & Jordan, R. G. (2013). Clinical practice guidelines for midwifery & Women’s health (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers.

Chapter 6, “Care of the Well Woman Across the Life Span” ,“Care of the Woman Interested in Barrier Methods of Birth Control” (pp. 275–278)

Chapter 7, “Care of the Woman with Reproductive Health Problems”

“Care of the Woman with Dysmenorrhea” (pp. 366–368)

“Care of the Woman with Premenstrual Symptoms, Syndrome (PMS), or Dysphoric Disorder (PMDD)” (pp. 414–418)

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

Introduction

The Gynecologic Health clinical experience offered a valuable opportunity to apply theoretical knowledge to real-world patient care while developing advanced assessment and diagnostic skills. During the last three weeks of clinical practice, I encountered several patients with diverse OB/GYN concerns, each presenting unique challenges and learning opportunities. For this reflection, I have selected one patient case that allowed me to perform a comprehensive gynecologic evaluation, integrate clinical reasoning, and formulate an individualized care plan grounded in evidence-based practice.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

This SOAP note focuses on documenting the subjective data shared by the patient, the objective findings observed during the physical examination, the assessment process involving differential and primary diagnoses, and the plan for management and follow-up care. The goal is to demonstrate a systematic approach to evaluating and addressing women’s health issues, emphasizing both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions, as well as patient education and preventive care.

The case also highlights the importance of clinical judgment, communication skills, and cultural sensitivity when managing gynecologic concerns, particularly in fostering trust and ensuring patient comfort. Reflecting on this encounter provides an opportunity to assess what went well, identify areas for improvement, and consider alternative approaches for future practice.

Ultimately, this assignment reinforces the significance of comprehensive assessment, accurate diagnosis, and individualized care planning in gynecologic health. It also underscores the role of ongoing reflection as an essential component of professional growth and the continuous improvement of advanced nursing practice.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

Shadow Health Focused exams

Shadow Health Focused exams

  • Complete the ShadowHealth© Focused Exams – Special Populations: Chest Pain, Cough and Abdominal Pain assignments

After you have achieved at least 80% on the assignment(s) download, save and upload your LabPass document to the dropbox.

Professional Development

  • Write a 500-word APA reflection essay of your experience with the Shadow Health virtual assignment(s). At least two scholarly sources in addition to your textbook should be utilized. Answers to the following questions may be included in your reflective essay:
    • What went well in your assessment?
    • What did not go so well? What will you change for your next assessment?
    • What findings did you uncover?
    • What questions yielded the most information? Why do you think these were effective?
    • What diagnostic tests would you order based on your findings?
    • What differential diagnoses are you currently considering?
    • What patient teaching were you able to complete? What additional patient teaching is needed?
    • Would you prescribe any medications at this point? Why or why not? If so, what?
    • How did your assessment demonstrate sound critical thinking and clinical decision making?

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

Introduction

The Shadow Health Focused Exams – Special Populations: Chest Pain, Cough, and Abdominal Pain assignments provided an invaluable opportunity to strengthen my clinical reasoning, diagnostic accuracy, and patient communication skills in a virtual, evidence-based environment. These simulations allowed me to assess complex and often high-priority patient presentations that required careful history-taking, targeted questioning, and systematic physical assessment. Through this experience, I was able to practice integrating theoretical knowledge with clinical decision-making while identifying appropriate diagnostic pathways and interventions for patients presenting with acute and chronic conditions.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

The purpose of this reflective essay is to evaluate my learning experience during the Shadow Health virtual simulations, focusing on what aspects of my assessment went well and which areas require improvement. This reflection will examine the accuracy of findings, the effectiveness of the questions asked, and the clinical reasoning behind potential differential diagnoses. Additionally, it will discuss the diagnostic tests that would be appropriate based on the findings, as well as the patient education and possible pharmacological interventions considered during the assessment process.

Engaging in these focused exams not only enhanced my technical assessment skills but also deepened my understanding of patient-centered care, especially for individuals with complex or overlapping symptoms. The virtual platform encouraged the application of critical thinking, clinical judgment, and communication strategies that are essential for accurate diagnosis and effective treatment planning.

Ultimately, this reflection highlights how the Shadow Health simulations served as a bridge between theory and clinical practice, reinforcing the importance of continuous learning, self-assessment, and adaptability in providing safe, competent, and holistic care.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

 

Shadow Health Reflection: Musculoskeletal and Neurological : Review transcripts attached

Shadow Health Reflection: Musculoskeletal and Neurological : Review transcripts attached

  • Complete the ShadowHealth© Musculoskeletal and Neurological assignments

Professional Development

  • Write a 500-word APA reflection essay of your experience with the Shadow Health virtual assignment(s). At least two scholarly sources in addition to your textbook should be utilized. Answers to the following questions may be included in your reflective essay:
    • What went well in your assessment?
    • What did not go so well? What will you change for your next assessment?
    • What findings did you uncover?
    • What questions yielded the most information? Why do you think these were effective?
    • What diagnostic tests would you order based on your findings?
    • What differential diagnoses are you currently considering?
    • What patient teaching were you able to complete? What additional patient teaching is needed?
    • Would you prescribe any medications at this point? Why or why not? If so, what?
    • How did your assessment demonstrate sound critical thinking and clinical decision making?

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

Introduction

The Shadow Health Musculoskeletal and Neurological virtual simulation provided an engaging and realistic opportunity to apply clinical reasoning, patient assessment, and communication skills in a controlled learning environment. This virtual assignment was designed to enhance students’ ability to conduct comprehensive system-based assessments while integrating critical thinking and evidence-based decision-making into clinical practice. By interacting with the virtual patient, I was able to strengthen my understanding of musculoskeletal and neurological health patterns, refine my assessment techniques, and practice clinical documentation in a way that closely mirrors real-world patient encounters.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

The purpose of this reflective essay is to analyze my experience completing the Shadow Health assignments, focusing on the areas that went well and those that presented challenges. This reflection will explore key aspects of the assessment process, including the accuracy and completeness of findings, the effectiveness of patient questioning, and the formulation of potential differential diagnoses based on clinical evidence. Additionally, it will examine the diagnostic tests and patient education strategies that were considered or implemented during the session.

Through this reflection, I aim to demonstrate how the Shadow Health simulation contributed to my professional growth and development as a future clinician. Emphasis will be placed on how the exercise enhanced my critical thinking, clinical judgment, and decision-making abilities, while identifying specific areas for improvement in future assessments. By connecting theoretical knowledge with practical application, this experience underscored the importance of self-evaluation, ongoing learning, and patient-centered care in clinical practice.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

COUN6103: Person and Practice of the Therapist

COUN6103: PERSON AND PRACTICE OF THE THERAPIST

1. UNIT DESCRIPTION
This unit advances students’ understanding of self and their development, and the impact
of these on their professional development as counsellors and psychotherapists. Students
are provided with the opportunity to develop and apply foundational counselling skills
and processes. Significant emphasis is placed on building students’ self-awareness and
critical reflexivity, as they begin developing an evolving professional identity as
counsellors and psychotherapists.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

ACAP classes are an open space for the critical and civil exchange of ideas, and this Unit
will include topics that may be difficult for you to confront or discuss. If you feel
uncomfortable discussing certain content during class, please seek the support of your
educator or fellow students in the first instance. Additional free and confidential
counselling support is available on all ACAP campuses. Please visit
https://www.acap.edu.au/student-resources/support-services/counselling-support/ for
further information on the ACAP Counselling Support Service and external supports
including Lifeline, Beyond Blue, MensLine, and others.

Introduction

COUN6103: Person and Practice of the Therapist is a foundational unit that focuses on understanding the self as a central instrument in the therapeutic process. The course invites students to explore how their personal history, values, emotions, and worldview influence their developing identity as counsellors and psychotherapists. By emphasizing self-awareness, personal growth, and critical reflexivity, this unit helps students recognize that who they are profoundly affects how they engage, listen, and respond to clients in practice.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

Through experiential learning, reflective exercises, and skills-based training, students develop and apply core counselling competencies, such as active listening, empathy, and presence. These foundational abilities are not only technical but deeply relational, encouraging students to cultivate authenticity, compassion, and ethical awareness in every therapeutic encounter.

Additionally, the unit provides a safe and open environment for discussing sensitive and sometimes challenging topics related to human behavior and emotion. This approach strengthens emotional resilience, encourages openness, and supports professional maturity. Students are also guided to seek support when needed, reinforcing the value of self-care and emotional well-being as essential components of sustainable practice.

Ultimately, Person and Practice of the Therapist equip students with the insight and practical grounding to begin forming a professional identity rooted in self-knowledge, ethical integrity, and reflective practice, the hallmarks of an effective and empathetic therapist.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

Hot Topics in Cognitive Psychology

Hot Topics in Cognitive Psychology

The goal of this discussion forum is to offer you an introduction to the field of cognitive psychology. Cognitive psychology is a discipline within psychology that is concerned with the scientific study of the human mind. The mind is responsible for a variety of functions and abilities, including perception, attention, consciousness, memory, reasoning, and decision-making. Most of our mental life is unconscious. If the objects of our attention are equated to the objects of our consciousness, it is reasonable to assume that we are aware of only a limited number of events in our daily lives.

For your initial post, complete the following steps:

  • Watch the video entitled, The Magic of the Unconscious: Automatic Brain (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
  • Select a “hot topic” of cognitive psychology based on what you have heard and/or seen in the media and your personal interests.
  • Look for a report in the media (e.g., newspapers, magazines, web pages of professional organizations, etc.) that refers to the selected topic such as “defendant cannot remember what happened,” “false memories explain UFO abduction stories,” and so forth.
  • Describe the content of the selected report and offer your own perspective. Namely, use your critical-thinking skills to examine the extent to which the claims made in the report and the evidence upon which the report relies are to be trusted. Then, discuss the real-life consequences of the evidence reported.

In your post, include a link to the selected report, and explain to the members of the class why you have selected it. Support your points with evidence from at least one peer-reviewed research article. Your initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.

Reference:

https://fod.infobase.com/OnDemandEmbed.aspx?token=51893&wID=100753&plt=FOD&loid=0&w=560&h=315&fWidth=580&fHeight=365

Introduction

Cognitive psychology is a branch of psychology that focuses on understanding the internal mental processes that shape human behavior. It explores how people perceive, attend to, remember, think, and make decisions about the world around them. Unlike behaviorism, which emphasizes observable actions, cognitive psychology examines the unseen workings of the mind—many of which occur unconsciously. As highlighted in The Magic of the Unconscious: Automatic Brain, much of human cognition operates below the level of conscious awareness, influencing daily actions, judgments, and emotional responses without deliberate thought.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

The study of unconscious mental processes has become a “hot topic” in both scientific research and popular media, particularly regarding how memory, attention, and decision-making can be affected by hidden cognitive mechanisms. Media reports frequently highlight stories that draw from cognitive psychology—such as cases involving false memories, eyewitness testimony errors, unconscious bias, or the reliability of recovered memories—illustrating how cognitive processes can profoundly impact real-life outcomes in law, healthcare, and everyday decision-making.

This discussion will analyze one such media report related to a current issue in cognitive psychology, evaluate the credibility of its claims using critical thinking and evidence-based reasoning, and connect it to peer-reviewed research. By doing so, it will demonstrate how scientific insights into cognition not only deepen our understanding of the human mind but also challenge common assumptions about how accurately we perceive and remember the world.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

SOAP Note for Differential Diagnosis for Skin Conditions

SOAP Note for Differential Diagnosis for Skin Conditions

Differential Diagnosis for Skin Conditions

Properly identifying the cause and type of a patient’s skin condition involves a process of elimination known as differential diagnosis. Using this process, a health professional can take a given set of physical abnormalities, vital signs, health assessment findings, and patient descriptions of symptoms, and incrementally narrow them down until one diagnosis is determined as the most likely cause.

In this Discussion, you will examine several visual representations of various skin conditions, describe your observations, and use the techniques of differential diagnosis to determine the most likely condition.

Note: Your Discussion post should be in the SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan) note format, rather than the traditional narrative style Discussion posting format. Refer to Chapter 2 of the Sullivan text and the Comprehensive SOAP Template in this week’s Learning Resources for guidance.Remember that not all comprehensive SOAP data are included in every patient case.

To prepare:

·         Review the Skin Conditions document provided in this week’s Learning Resources, and select two conditions to closely examine for this Discussion.

·         Consider the abnormal physical characteristics you observe in the graphics you selected. How would you describe the characteristics using clinical terminologies?

·         Explore different conditions that could be the cause of the skin abnormalities in the graphics you selected.

·         Consider which of the conditions is most likely to be the correct diagnosis, and why.

A description of the two graphics you selected (identify each graphic by number). Use clinical terminologies to explain the physical characteristics featured in each graphic. Formulate a differential diagnosis of three to five possible conditions for each. Determine which is most likely to be the correct diagnosis, and explain your reasoning.

REMINDERS:

 

Please follow the Note above. Do SOAP note format and check it out on the uploaded file the SOAP template as your outline for your writings… No traditional essay on this assignment, again use SOAP note. Thank you.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

Required Resources

Note: Because the information in this course is so vital, a large number of resources are provided in various formats to facilitate your competence in diagnosing a wide variety of health conditions. When multiple resources are available on the same topic, select those that best meet your personal learning needs to prepare you to accurately diagnose patient health problems.

 

Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.

Readings

·         Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2015). Seidel’s guide to physical examination (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.

o    Chapter 8, “Skin, Hair, and Nails” (pp. 114-165)

This chapter reviews the basic anatomy and physiology of skin, hair, and nails. The chapter also describes guidelines for proper skin, hair, and nails assessments.

·         Dains, J. E., Baumann, L. C., & Scheibel, P. (2016). Advanced health assessment and clinical diagnosis in primary care (5th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.

o    Chapter 28, “Rashes and Skin Lesions” (pp. 325-343)

This chapter explains the steps in an initial examination of someone with dermatological problems, including the type of information that needs to be gathered and assessed.

Note: Download and use the Adult Examination Checklist and the Physical Exam Summary when you conduct your video assessment of the skin, hair, and nails.

·         Seidel, H. M., Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2011). Adult examination checklist: Guide for skin, hair, and nails. In Mosby’s guide to physical examination (7th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.

This Adult Examination Checklist: Guide for Skin, Hair, and Nails was published as a companion to Seidel’s guide to physical examination (8th ed.), by Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., & Flynn, J. A. Copyright Elsevier (2015). Fromhttps://evolve.elsevier.com/

·         Seidel, H. M., Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2011). Skin, hair, and nails physical exam summary. In Mosby’s guide to physical examination (7th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.

This Skin, Hair, and Nails Physical Exam Summary was published as a companion to Seidel’s guide to physical examination(8th ed.), by Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., & Flynn, J. A. Copyright Elsevier (2015). Fromhttps://evolve.elsevier.com/

·         Chadha, A. (2009). Assessing the skin. Practice Nurse, 38(7), 43–48.

Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

In this article, the author explains how to take a relevant skin health history. In addition, the article defines common terms used to describe skin lesions and rashes.

·         Ely, J. W., & Stone, M. S. (2010). The generalized rash: Part I. Differential diagnosis. American Family Physician81(6), 726–734.

Retrieved from http://www.aafp.org/afp/2010/0315/p726.html

This article focuses on common, uncommon, and rare causes of generalized rashes. The article also specifies tests to diagnose generalized rashes.

·         Ely, J. W., & Stone, M. S. (2010). The generalized rash: Part II. Diagnostic approach. American Family Physician, 81(6), 735–739.

Retrieved from http://www.aafp.org/afp/2010/0315/p735.html

This article revolves around the diagnosis of generalized rashes. The authors describe clinical features that may help in distinguishing generalized rashes.

·         Everyday Health, Inc. (2013). Resources for dermatology and visual conditions. Retrieved fromhttp://www.skinsight.com/ info/for_professionals 

This interactive website allows you to explore skin conditions according to age, gender, and area of the body.

·         Document: Skin Conditions (Word document)

This document contains five images of different skin conditions. You will use this information in this week’s Discussion.

·         Document: Comprehensive SOAP Exemplar (Word document)

·         Document: Comprehensive SOAP Template (Word document)

Media

Online media for Seidel’s Guide to Physical Examination

In addition to this week’s media, it is highly recommended that you access and view the online resources included with the course text, Seidel’s Guide to Physical Examination. Focus on the videos and animations in Chapter 8 that relate to the assessment of the skin, hair, and nails.

The following suturing tutorials provide instruction on the basic interrupted suture, as well as the vertical and horizontal mattress suturing techniques:

·         Tulane Center for Advanced Medical Simulation & Team Training. (2010, July 8). Suturing technique.Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-LDmCVtL0o

·         Mikheil. (2014, April 22). Basic suturing: Simple, interrupted, vertical mattress, horizontal mattress. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFP90aQvEVM

Optional Resources

·         LeBlond, R. F., Brown, D. D., & DeGowin, R. L. (2009). DeGowin’s diagnostic examination (9th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill Medical.

o    Chapter 6, “The Skin and Nails”

In this chapter, the authors provide guidelines and procedures to aid in the diagnosis of skin and nail disorders. The chapter supplies descriptions and pictures of common skin and nail conditions.

·         Ethicon, Inc. (n.d.a). Absorbable synthetic suture material. Retrieved fromhttp://academicdepartments.musc.edu/surgery/education/resident_info/supplement/suture_manuals/absorbable_suture_chart.pdf

·         Ethicon, Inc. (2006). Dermabond topical skin adhesive application technique. Retrieved fromhttp://academicdepartments.musc.edu/surgery/education/resident_info/supplement/suture_manuals/db_application_poster.pdf

·         Ethicon, Inc. (2001). Ethicon needle sales types. Retrieved fromhttp://academicdepartments.musc.edu/surgery/education/resident_info/supplement/suture_manuals/needle_template.pdf

·         Ethicon, Inc. (n.d.b). Ethicon sutures. Retrieved fromhttp://academicdepartments.musc.edu/surgery/education/resident_info/supplement/suture_manuals/suture_chart_ethicon.pdf

·         Ethicon, Inc. (2002). How to care for your wound after it’s treated with Dermabond topical skin adhesive. Retrieved fromhttp://academicdepartments.musc.edu/surgery/education/resident_info/supplement/suture_manuals/db_wound_care.pdf

·         Ethicon, Inc. (2005). Knot tying manual. Retrieved fromhttp://academicdepartments.musc.edu/surgery/education/resident_info/supplement/suture_manuals/knot_tying_manual.pdf

Introduction

Skin disorders are among the most frequent reasons for patient visits in primary care, and they often present a diagnostic challenge due to the broad range of possible causes and similar visual presentations. Properly identifying a skin condition requires more than simple observation—it involves a systematic process known as differential diagnosis, through which a clinician evaluates the patient’s symptoms, physical findings, and history to rule out less likely causes and determine the most probable diagnosis. Because many dermatologic disorders share overlapping features such as erythema, scaling, or vesiculation, the clinician’s ability to recognize subtle differences in morphology, distribution, and progression is essential to accurate assessment and management.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

This discussion focuses on the application of differential diagnosis in evaluating two selected skin condition graphics from the provided learning resources. By observing abnormal features—such as lesion color, shape, texture, and distribution—and describing them using clinical terminology, the analysis demonstrates how healthcare professionals systematically narrow down potential diagnoses. The approach is guided by evidence-based resources, including Seidel’s Guide to Physical Examination (2015) and Dains, Baumann, and Scheibel (2016), which emphasize structured observation, patient history, and diagnostic reasoning in dermatologic assessment.

The discussion will follow the SOAP note format (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan), allowing for an organized and clinically relevant presentation. Within this framework, each skin condition will be examined through a differential list of three to five possible diagnoses, supported by clinical reasoning that leads to the most likely condition. This method reinforces the critical thinking and diagnostic skills necessary in advanced nursing practice, ensuring that healthcare providers deliver accurate, patient-centered care.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW