Core115 week6 assignment

Core115 week6 assignment

Here They Stand Paper

Introduction

Whenever the topic of education arises, the majority of us consider that the quickest way to advance learning is through technology. However, the opposing argument is quite strong that technology can actually do more harm to students than good. This opposing view is significant in that it makes us go beyond the enthusiasm surrounding the availability of new tools and reflect on the facts occurring within the classrooms. Most educators and researchers fear that more use of technology is making inequality bigger, lessening meaningful teacher-student interaction, and making students less deep in the learning process. This opinion is important, as it compels us to take a step back and give consideration to the question of whether we are resolving issues or causing them. The knowledge of this stance preconditions a discussion on more honest grounds regarding what students actually require to succeed.

Thesis Statement

The counterargument to this is that technology is not to be viewed as the driving force behind education. Rather, they assume that providing students with more devices and software can give conflicting or counterproductive outcomes. This position holds that learning is supported by strong teachers, stable communities and even equal resources, rather than technology. They also claim that digital devices may increase inequalities in achievement, overload teachers, as well as decrease attention and motivation among students. In this view, education must put less emphasis on technology and more on human support systems.

Evidence

Experience:

Most instructors give real-life examples that technology is a hindrance rather than a supplement. To illustrate the point, educators in low-resource schools frequently have to deal with the inability to have a steady internet connection, ageing devices, or applications that they were never trained to operate (Microsoft, 2017). These issues result in increased pressure in the classroom and a waste of time in the classroom. In his article, Nadella even admits that technology is meant to assist, not to dishearten teachers, but classrooms all over the world are reporting the contrary. Students lose precious learning time when their teachers are too busy fixing technical problems, contributing to the thesis that human resources are more important than technology.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

Testimony:

This opinion is supported by numerous recent research works. According to studies, students who spend over moderate time on digital devices at school tend to do poorly on reading and math tests (Miah, 2024). Likewise, a 2022 article published in Educational Researcher demonstrated that the growth in the use of devices tends to increase achievement disparities due to the fact that schools with greater wealth can afford technology more than those that are underfunded (Langer et al., 2021). Another study also discovered that continuous device usage leads to distractions and a lack of the capability of students to focus in the long term (Microsoft, 2017). These results confirm the argument that technology is not the solution to overcoming profound educational issues and can even aggravate them.

Logic:

The main reasoning behind the opposing argument is that education is a process that is human-based. Technology can bring about convenience, but learning is a matter of relationship, motivation and emotional support. When schools pay too much attention to technology, they will fail to recognize the critical role of teachers in the development of the thinking of students. There is also an argument that, due to the rapid technology change, more costly tools become obsolete, and money that could otherwise fund the training of teachers, mental health services, or reduced class sizes is spent (Langer et al., 2021). Lastly, opponents claim that providing students with more equipment is not the answer to opportunity; it is the ability to guide and teach students well and provide them with equal access to resources.

Conclusion

The counterargument has good arguments for being wary of excessive dependence on technology in education. Their argument captures actual classroom issues, valid research and logical reasoning. Even though technology has its positive side, it shows that it cannot substitute the talents of teachers, communities that support, and resources that are provided fairly. Their position is valuable to understand since it helps us avoid simplifying educational issues. Listening to this opinion, we see a bigger picture of what students require to succeed. It teaches us to see past technology and technology devices and focus on people as a starting point of meaningful learning.

References

Langer, M., Landers, R. N., Langer, M., & Landers, R. N. (2021). The future of artificial intelligence at work: A review on effects of decision automation and augmentation on workers targeted by algorithms and third-party observers. Computers in Human Behavior, 123, 106878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106878

Miah, M. (2024). Digital inequality: the digital divide and educational outcomes. ACETJCER, 2023.

Microsoft. (2017, June 23). CEO Satya Nadella on the importance of education [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejfsN8xOEoU 

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW