NR 509 Week 2 Assignment: Shadow Health HEENT Physical Assessment
Debriefing
Faculty will lead virtual debriefing sessions during Weeks 1-6. The date, time, and duration of the weekly debriefing session will be posted by the course faculty. Students must register to attend the debriefing session.
Students reflect on their simulation experience and revisit their evaluations, interventions, observations, and patient responses during the debriefing phase. Faculty help students analyze patient data and reflect on the treatments they made in response to the clinical circumstances they were provided with during the simulation. This method allows students to examine their own mental processes and aids in the transfer of knowledge learned from simulations to actual clinical practice.
Welcome to Health Assessment
Hello class: my name is, and I will be the instructor for this class. For more information on how to get a hold of me, please go under my profile for specific information. However, my email is: ***The best way to contact me though, is through the Private forum***
This course will focus on methods of health history taking, physical examination skills, documentation, and health screening. The course emphasizes the individual as the client, functional health patterns, community resources, and the teaching learning process. This course will take us through infancy to an older adult.
To find course material, go under your Dashboard, then you will see PATH. There are two links to find information regarding this course; course material and syllabus.
- The course material tab shows what textbook is used for this class.
- The syllabus will show what this course is, the assignments for the course, the topics of the course, the grading system, and how to refer to the student policy handbook. **there has been some problems downloading the syllabus, thus the PATH is also the syllabus…but 1 week and topic at a time.
Under your Assignments, will have the due date and the rubric posted to look at.
Under the Planner tab, assignments are listed along with the due dates. Clicking the collaborative reminder within the calendar tab will show the assignment, any information that is needed for the assignment, and give the rubric of how the assignment will be graded.
Please refer to all other announcements for Class Policies and Week 1 class.
Feel free to contact me anytime. I look forward to this 5 week journey with each of you
The goals of each debriefing session are to:
- Answer questions
- Address perspectives, perceptions, and concerns
- Emphasize and reinforce learning objectives and clinical outcomes
- Create linkages to the “real world”
- Assess and validate what was learned
Each student is expected to contribute to the debriefing session by:
- Reflecting on personal strengths, limitations, beliefs, prejudices, or values
- Identify improvement goals and strategies
- Discuss the simulation experience and provide comments and suggestions to student peers
- Transfer knowledge from the simulation experience to actual clinical practice
Please refer to the Debriefing Session Guidelines and Grading Rubric located in the Course Resource section.
NR 509 Week 2 Assignment Alternate Writing Assignment
NOTE: You will complete this alternate writing assignment ONLY if you had not participated or do not plan to participate in a debriefing session for the given week.
As a family nurse practitioner, you must possess excellent physical assessment skills. This alternate writing assignment mirrors the discussion content of the debriefing session and will allow the student to expand their knowledge of physical health assessment principles specific to the advanced practice role.
The purposes of this assignment are to: (a) identify and articulate advanced assessment health history and physical examination techniques which are relevant to a focused body system (CO 1), (b) differentiate normal and abnormal findings with regard to a disease or condition that impacts the body system (CO 2), and (c) adapt advanced assessment skills if necessary to suit the needs of specific patient populations (CO 4).
Please refer to the Alternate Writing Assignment Guidelines and Grading Rubric located in the Course Resource section.
NR 509 Week 2 Assignment : Shadow Health Respiratory Concept Lab
Learn about the differences between normal and abnormal lung sounds with the Respiratory Concept Lab.
NR 509 Week 2 Assignment: Shadow Health HEENT Physical Assessment Assignment
Pre-Brief
For the last week, Tina has experienced sore, itchy throat, itchy eyes, and runny nose. She states that these symptoms started spontaneously and have been constant in nature. She has treated her throat pain with occasional throat lozenges which has “helped a little”. She states that her nose “runs all day” and has clear discharge. She denies cough and recent illness. She denies fevers, chills, and night sweats. This case study will allow you to use standard office equipment to physically examine the patient’s eyes, ears, nose, and throat. You will need to document what you find in the Electronic Health Record (EHR). Be certain to use medically appropriate terminology, such as “erythematous” to describe redness of the skin, mucous membranes, or conjunctiva.
Reason for visit: Patient presents complaining of nose and throat symptom.
NR 509 Week 2 Assignment Rubric
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subjective Data, Organization, Communication, and Summary (DCE Score or transcript) |
|
|||||
|
Objective Data, Physical Examination, Interpretation of Findings, Assessment, and Documentation |
|
|||||
|
Self-Reflection |
|
|||||
|
Total Points: 50.0
|
||||||
N 518 Module 2: THE GENERAL SURVEY AND HEENT
Module 2: Discussion Question
Start by reading and following these instructions:
You are responsible for minimally at least 3 posts for each question in your discussion boards; your initial post and reply to two of your classmates. Your initial post(s) should be your response to the questions posed in the discussion question. You should research your answer and cite at least one scholarly source when appropriate, and always use quality writing.The discussion board is never a place to use text language or emoticons. You will also be asked to respond to your classmates. This is designed to enhance the academic discussion around the topic. It is all right to disagree with something posted by another, however your responses should always be thoughtful and respectful and reflect your opinions professionally.
Discussion Question:
In your professional opinion, what is the difference between chronic and acute pain? How is the assessment for each type of pain different? What must you keep in mind when assessing acute pain? What must you keep in mind when assessing chronic pain? Reflect upon a time when you assessed a patient in pain. What did you do well? What points could you have improved upon? How did the pain impact the patient? What specific treatments could have lessened the impact of the pain on the patient?
Your initial posting should be 200 to 300 words in length and utilize at least one scholarly source other than the textbook. Please reply to at least two classmates. Replies to classmates should be at least 100 words in length. To properly “thread” your discussion posting, please click on REPLY.
When you are ready for the discussion, do the following:
- Click on the discussion link above.
- Start your answer by clicking “Start a New Thread” button with the title of your answer and the body of text following the guidance above.
- To properly post your answer, please click on the “Post” button.
- After posting your contribution, you must read what others have posted, reply to at least two of those posts, and respond (when appropriate) to those you have responded to you.
To reply to a classmate’s post:
- Click on the title of another student’s post.
- Click “Reply to Thread” and type your response to the student.
- Click the “Post” button to post your reply.
N 581 Module 2: Assignment
Remember to submit your work following the file naming convention FirstInitial.LastName_M01.docx. For example, J.Smith_M01.docx. Remember that it is not necessary to manually type in the file extension; it will automatically append.
Start by reading and following these instructions:
1. Quickly skim the questions or assignment below and the assignment rubric to help you focus.
2. Read the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.
3. Consider the discussion and the any insights you gained from it.
4. Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling.
Assignment:
Exercises:
- Complete the Shadow Health HEENT assessment.
Professional Development
- Write a reflection essay of your experience with the Shadow Health virtual assessment. At least two scholarly sources in addition to your textbook should be utilized. Please be sure to address each of the following prompts:
- What went well in your assessment?
- What did not go so well? What will you change for your next assessment?
- What findings did you uncover?
- What questions yielded the most information? Why do you think these were effective?
- What diagnostic tests would you order based on your findings?
- What differential diagnoses are you currently considering?
- What patient teaching were you able to complete? What additional patient teaching is needed?
- Would you prescribe any medications at this point? Why or why not? If so, what?
- How did your assessment demonstrate sound critical thinking and clinical decision making? What could you change to make it better?
N 581: SHADOW HEALTH ASSIGNMENT
SubjectiveHPI: Ms.Jones is a 28 years olf african american women who is presented to the clinic with complaints of sore, itcy throat and running nose that wont stop for one week . She states that the throat pain is bad and rates it a 4/10 . she states that she has treated her throat pain with occcasional throat lozenges which has ” helped her a little” . patient mentions that it hurts to swallow and that her eyes are itchy . she denies taking anything to stop her nasal irritation and ichy eyes. patient denies exposure to sick individuals , denies symptoms of fever and chills. patient has never been diagnosed with seasonal allerges but states that her sister has ” hay fever” Social History: patient is unaware of any environmental exposure / irritants . she mention that she keeps the house ” pretty clean” . patient mentions that she used” pot when in highschool,and after highschool but definitely dont anymore ” she states she hasnt smoked pot since she was twenty one. patient does not excersie however is on her feet most of the time at work . Review systems : General – denies changes in weight, fever and chills. Head: denies history of trauma but mentions headches due to studying that last a few hours, takes Tylenol to help allivate pain. Eyes- patient denies wearing glasess or contacts however notes the vision is sort of blurry when reading and is currently getting worse Ears- denies hearing loss, tinnitus,vertigo or discharge. patieny states that her ears are ” fine” Nose- Denies any problems with nose proior to this issues, denies getting stuffiness, sneezing, previous allergies prior Mouth- denies bleeding gums, hoarseness, swollen lymph nodes Respirtory- patient denies shorness of breath, cough, history of tuberculosis, or bronchitis, patient has asthma and uses inhaler 2-3 times per week . He last chest x-ray wass in highschool . |
HPI: Ms. Jones is a pleasant 28-year-old African American woman who presented to the clinic with complaints of sore, itchy throat, itchy eyes, and runny nose for the last week. She states that these symptoms started spontaneously and have been constant in nature. She does not note any specific aggravating symptoms, but states that her throat pain seems to be worse in the morning. She rates her throat pain as 4/10 and her throat itchiness as 5/10. She has treated her throat pain with occasional throat lozenges which has “helped a little”. She states that she has some soreness when swallowing, but otherwise no other associated symptoms. She states that her nose “runs all day” and is clear discharge. She has not attempted any treatment for her nasal symptoms. She states that her eyes are constantly itchy and she has not attempted any eye specific treatment. She denies cough and recent illness. She has had no exposures to sick individuals. She denies changes in her hearing, vision, and taste. She denies fevers, chills, and night sweats. She has never been diagnosed with seasonal allergies, but does note that her sister has “hay fever”. Social History: She is not aware of any environmental exposures or irritants at her job or home. She changes her sheets weekly and denies dust/mildew at her home. She denies use of tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drugs. She does not exercise. Review of Systems: General: Denies changes in weight, fatigue, weakness, fever, chills, and night sweats. • Head: Denies history of trauma or headaches. • Eyes: She does not wear corrective lenses, but notes that her vision has been worsening over the past few years. She complains of blurry vision after reading for extended periods. Denies increased tearing or itching prior to this past week. • Ears: Denies hearing loss, tinnitus, vertigo, discharge, or earache. • Nose/Sinuses: Denies rhinorrhea prior to this episode. Denies stuffiness, sneezing, itching, previous allergy, epistaxis, or sinus pressure. • Mouth/Throat: Denies bleeding gums, hoarseness, swollen lymph nodes, or wounds in mouth. No sore throat prior to this episode. • Respiratory: She denies shortness of breath, wheezing, cough, sputum, hemoptysis, pneumonia, bronchitis, emphysema, tuberculosis. She has a history of asthma, last hospitalization was age 16 for asthma, last chest XR was age 16. Her current inhaler use has been her baseline of 2-3 times per week. |
Objectivepatient c/o 4/10 pain in her throat, has been using drops and tylenol ovet the counter for pain patient also c/o headaches when reading or doing homework, hasn’t had an eye exam in years. Patient’s head normocephalic, acne bialaterally to cheeks. Eyes watery with clear drianage, PERRLA. Vision 20/20 in left and 2/30 in the right eye. patent reports blurry vision at times, when reading, denies glasses or contacts. Nares appear to be swollen, patient denies diffculty breathing, states that hher norse has been “runny” with clear drainage. patient denies any issues with hearing. Tympanci memrane intact and pink bilaterally. Mouth erythrmic with cabblestoning, gag reflex intact. Visible drainage- Clear. Denies dizziness, problems with gum, sinus infection or any recent cold symptoms. Patient denied any neck pain or stiffness- no palpable nodes on exam. Lungs sounds clear. Denies any shortness of breath/ diffculty breathing General : Patient Ms. Joes is a 28 year old aferican american women. o acute distress identified. Patient is alert and oriented. She maintains eye contact throughout examination/asessment Head: head is normocephalic and atraumatic. Scalp has no masses , normal hair distribution. Eye: Bilateral with equal hair distriibution,no lesions, no ptosis, no edma, conjectivia clear and injected. Extraocular movements intact bilateral. Pupils equal, round nad reactive bilaterally. Normal convergence. Left fundoscopic exam revals mild retinopathic changes. Left eys vision:20/20. Right eye vision :20/40 Ears: Ear shape equal bilaterally. External canals without inflammation bilaterally. Tympanic membranes pearly grey and intact with positive light reflex bilaterally. Reinne, weber and wisper test was normal bilaterally. Nose: Septum is midline, nasal mucosa is boggy and pale bilaterally. No pain palpations of frontal or maxillay sinuses Mouth/ throat – Moist buccal muccosa, no wounds identified. Adequate dental hygiene. Uvula midline. Tonsils 1 + and without evidence of inflammations. Posterior pharynx is slightly erythematous with mild cobblestoning Neck : No cervical, infraclavicular lymphadenopathy. Thyriods is smooth without nodules or goiter carotid pulses 2, no thrill . Jaw with no clicks, full range of motion. Bilateral carotid arty auscultation without bruit . Respirtory : Chest is symmetricall with respirations. Lungs sounds clear to ausculttion without wheezes, crackles or cough. No evidence of shortness of breath |
General: Ms. Jones is a pleasant, obese 28-year-old African American woman in no acute distress. She is alert and oriented. She maintains eye contact throughout interview and examination. • Head: Head is normocephalic and atraumatic. Scalp with no masses, normal hair distribution. • Eyes: Bilateral eyes with equal hair distribution, no lesions, no ptosis, no edema, conjunctiva clear and injected. Extraocular movements intact bilaterally. Pupils equal, round, and reactive to light bilaterally. Normal convergence. Left fundoscopic exam reveals sharp disc margins, no hemorrhages. Right fundoscopic exam reveals mild retinopathic changes. Left eye vision: 20/20. Right eye vision: 20/40. • Ears: Ear shape equal bilaterally. External canals without inflammation bilaterally. Tympanic membranes pearly grey and intact with positive light reflex bilaterally. Rinne, Weber, and Whisper tests normal bilaterally. • Nose: Septum is midline, nasal mucosa is boggy and pale bilaterally. No pain with palpation of frontal or maxillary sinuses. • Mouth/Throat: Moist buccal mucosa, no wounds visualized. Adequate dental hygiene. Uvula midline. Tonsils 1+ and without evidence of inflammation. Posterior pharynx is slightly erythematous with mild cobblestoning. •Neck: No cervical, infraclavicular lymphadenopathy. Thyroid is smooth without nodules or goiter. Acanthosis nigricans present. Carotid pulses 2+, no thrills. Jaw with no clicks, full range of motion. Bilateral carotid artery auscultation without bruit. • Respiratory: Chest is symmetrical with respirations. Lung sounds clear to auscultation without wheezes, crackles, or cough. |
Assessmentpatient was acessed for sore throat and runny nose Inspection of the Head, eyes, nasal cavities, Ears, Mouth, Neck Palpation of the scalp, sinuses, temporal arteries, carotid arteries, Jaw, Lymph nodes, Thyroid Ascultation of breath sounds, Temporal arteries, and carotid arteries |
Allergic Rhinitis |
PlanRefer patient for medical specialist examinination. Refer patient to ophthaltmologist for eye exam Rapid strep test obtained and throat culture for strep throat Possible need for antibitics however lab results required (culture and sensitivity rerquired ) Encourage Ms. Jones continues to monitor symptoms and cahrt episodes of allergic symptoms and other associated factors Start LORATADNE 10MG PO per MD order. Encourage fluid intake and proper hand hygiene Educate patients of techiques to aviod triggers and signs and symptoms to report Educates patient to seek advane care for worsening headaces or fever Refer patient for follow up evaluation in two weeks after reassessment by the physcian . |
NR 509 Week 2 Quiz
- A mother brings her two month old daughter in for an examination says “my daughter rolled over against the wall and now I have noticed that she has the spot soft on the top of her head, is there something terribly wrong?” The FNP‘s best response would be:
- During percussion the FNP knows that a dull percussion note elicited over a lung lobe. This most likely results from:
- The patient is unable to differentiate between sharp and dull stimulation to both sides of her face. The FNP suspects Damage to:
- When examining the face, the FNP is aware that the two pairs of salivary gland‘s that are accessible to examination are the _____ glands
- A patient comes to the clinic complaining of neck and shoulder pain and is unable to turn her head. The FNP suspects damage to cranial nerve ____ and proceeds with the examination by____
- When examining a patient’s cranial nerve function, the FNP remembers that the muscles in the neck that are innervated by CN XI are the:
- The patient’s laboratory data reveal an elevated thyroxine level. The FNP would proceed with an examination of the _____ gland
- A patient says that she has recently noticed a lump in the front of her neck below her “Adams apple” that seems to be getting bigger. During the assessment, the finding that leaves the FNP to suspect that this may not be a cancerous thyroid nodule is that the lump:
- The FNP notices that the patient’s submental lymph nodes are enlarged. In an effort to identify the cause of the node enlargement, the FNP would assess the patient’s:
- The FNP is aware that the four areas in the body were lymph nodes accessible are the:
- A 52-year-old patient describes the presence of occasional floaters or spots moving in front of his eyes. The FNP should know that floaters are usually not significant and are caused by:
- The FNP is preparing to assess the visual acuity of a 16-year-old patient. How should the FNP proceed?
- A patient’s vision is recorded as 20/30 when the Snellen eye chart is used. The FNP interprets these results to indicate that:
- A patient is unable to read even the largest letters on the Snellen chart. The FNP should take which action next:
- A patient’s vision is reported as 20/80 in each eye. The FNP interprets this finding to mean that
- When performing the corneal light reflex assessment, the FNP notes that the light is reflected at 2 o’clock in each eye. The FNP should
- The FNP is performing the diagnostic positions test. Normal findings would be which of these results?
- During an assessment of the sclera of an African-American patient, the FNP would consider which of these an expected finding?
- A 60-year-old man is at the clinic for an examination. The FNP suspects that he has ptosis of one eye. How should the FNP check for this?
- The FNP is doing an assessment on a 21-year-old patient and notices that his nasal mucosa appears pale gray and swollen. What would be the most appropriate question to ask the patient?
- The FNP is palpating the sinus areas. If the findings are normal, then the patient should report which sensation?
- During an oral assessment of a 30-year-old African-American patient, the FNP notices bluish lips and a dark line along the gingival margin. What would the FNP do in response to these findings
- During an assessment of a 20-year-old patient with a three day history of nausea and vomiting the FNP notices dry mucous and deep vertical fissures on the tongue. These findings are reflective of:
- The FNP is reviewing the technique of palpating for tactile fremitus with a new graduate. Which statement by the graduate FNP reflects a correct understanding of tactile fremitus?
- The FNP student is reviewing physical assessment findings of the HEENT system associated with pregnancy. Which statement by the graduate FNP reflects a correct understanding of expected HEENT changes associated with pregnancy? During pregnancy:
Participation for MSN
Participation Guidelines
The weekly case study discussion is worth up to 120 points. Students are expected to participate a minimum of two times (once in part one by Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. MT and responds to peer/instructor posts by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT).
Grading Rubric
| Criteria | Exceptional
Outstanding or highest level of performance |
Exceeds Very good or high level of performance |
Meets Satisfactory level of performance |
Needs Improvements Poor or failing level of performance |
Developing Unsatisfactory level of performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Points Possible= 120 | |||||
| 35 Points | 31 Points | 28 Points | 13 Points | 0 Points | |
| Application of Course Knowledge | Post contributes unique perspectives or insights consistent with current standards of practice applicable to the results from the case study. | Post contributes unique perspectives or insights, but may be lacking some applicability to the case presentation. | Post has limited perspectives or insights and limited application to case presentation. | Post perspectives are not consistent with current practice. | Post offers no insight or application to the case study presentation. |
| 35 Points | 31 Points | 28 Points | 13 Points | 0 Points | |
| Support from Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) | Discussion posts are supported by evidence from appropriate sources published within the last 5 years. In-text citations and full references are provided. | Discussion posts partially supported by evidence from appropriate sources published within the last 5 years. In-text citations and full references are provided. Evidence-based, peer reviewed journal article cited but may not fully support the main post. |
Discussion posts partially supported by evidence. Sources may not be scholarly in nature or may be older than 5 years. In-text citations and/or full references may be incomplete or missing. |
Citations to non-scholarly websites given as rationale to support differential diagnoses and/or treatment plan.
No evidence-based, peer reviewed journal article cited. |
Discussion posts contain no evidence-based practice reference or citation.
*Students should note that factitious sources, sources that are clearly not read by the student and used, or sources that have incorrect dates will result in an automatic ZERO for this section for the week. |
| 10 Points | 9 Points | 8 Points | 4 Points | 0 Points | |
| Organization | Post presents case study findings (SOAP note) in a logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence; clearly relevant to topic. | Post presents case study findings that are sometimes unclear and difficult to follow. | Presents information in a logical and understandable method but the information has limited relevance to the discussion. | Post presents case findings that are sometimes unclear to follow and may not always be relevant to topic. | Post is not relevant to discussion question. |
|
35 Points |
31 Points |
28 Points |
13 Points |
0 Points |
|
| Interactive Dialogue | Presents findings and responds substantively to at least one topic-related post of a student peer and respond to all faculty questions posted by Sunday.A substantive post adds content or insights to the discussion and is supported by references and citations as appropriate.
Does include evidence from appropriate sources.
|
Responds to a student peer and all faculty questions, but the posts to either add limited content or insights to the discussion.
Does include evidence from appropriate sources. |
Responds to a student peer and all faculty questions but one or both of the responses does not contain evidence from appropriate sources.
|
Responds to a student peer, but does not respond to all faculty questions by Sunday (there may be some instructor question responses, but not all questions were answered in the discussion).
OR Responds to all or some faculty questions, but does not respond to a student peer.
|
Does not respond to a topic-related peer post and/or does not respond to faculty questions posted by Sunday. |
|
5 Points |
4 Points |
3 Points |
2 Points
|
0 Points |
|
| Grammar, Syntax, APA | APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero to one errors. | Two to four errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. | Five to seven errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. | Eight to nine errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. | Post contains greater than ten errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation or repeatedly makes the same errors after faculty feedback. |
| 0 Points Deducted | Late or Omitted Deductions per Discussion Part | ||||
| Participation
Enters first post to thread by 11:59 p.m. MT on Tuesday; responds to peer/instructor posts by 11:59 MT on Sunday. |
Enters first post to thread by 11:59 p.m. MT on Tuesday; responds to peer/instructor posts by 11:59 MT on Sunday. | 85 points deducted if Part 1 is not submitted by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT of the week it is due.
Ten percent (10%) per day for each late discussion post. *See Calculating Late Posting Penalty Document Written submissions of Part One and Two will not be accepted after Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT of the week they are due. |
Webliography Disclaimer
The purpose of the Webliography is to provide students with annotated bibliographies of world wide websites relevant to their courses. These websites are not meant to be all inclusive of what is available for each course’s subjects and have not been sanctioned as academically rigorous or scholarly by Chamberlain College of Nursing. Please exercise caution when using these websites for course assignments and references.


Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!