NUR 674 Purpose Of Conducting Organizational Needs Assessment

NUR 674 Purpose Of Conducting Organizational Needs Assessment

NUR 674 Purpose Of Conducting Organizational Needs Assessment

DQ1
Your practicum location and project ideas should be presented and discussed.
The purpose of conducting an assessment of an organization’s needs is:
What are your priorities?
Are there any techniques or tools you used to determine the necessity?

DQ2
In your professional life, you have the power to help others

succeed.
Describe the relationship and what you’ve done or could do to help others in it.
Based on what you read in the textbook, how do your views of authority align with those of servant leaders?
Consider the secular view of authority and how it differs from your own.

A review of secondary data

Any evaluation must include a review of secondary data.
It entails going over all of the data that has already been collected in preparation for the evaluation.
Secondary data reviews can provide critical context and ensure that all existing data are incorporated before resources are allocated to primary data collection.
This framework is critical for capturing existing secondary data and identifying information gaps that may necessitate primary data collection in the health cluster context.
2

It is important to maintain an assessment repository that details all health-related assessments, including the organization that conducted them and the methodology they followed, in order to ensure a thorough secondary data review is carried out.

Paragraphs10.2.4
First-hand facts

Some of the most common methods for obtaining primary data are outlined below.
An assessment may use a combination of methodologies to fill in any information gaps that are found, including a mix of traditional and non-traditional approaches to data collection.

a direct look at

Collected data benefit from additional context and meaning provided by first-hand experience.
There are two ways to gather this information.

In a structured search, specific actions, things, or events are sought.

3

An example of this is checking to see if patients at a clinic where interpreters and translators are supposed to be available are getting them.
When determining the physical condition of objects, structured observation is frequently employed (such as buildings or health care facilities).

When a situation is observed to see if any problems exist, this is known as unstructured (looking at).
For instance, a clinic can track how men and women seek out medical care.
The observer can be presented with a set of questions to answer.

When gathering data, whether on purpose or by accident, it is common to conduct observations in order to get a better picture of the current situation.

Data can only be collected by trained observers who know exactly what to look for and when to pay attention to the unexpected.
It’s also prone to bias, since the observer’s own beliefs can skew what they see.
The presence of an observer, on the other hand, can lead to a shift in behavior.
While still requiring minimal resources, observation can be used in emergency situations to gather a variety of different types of data.

Through physical observation, driving past an area (drive-by), or looking over an area from the air, information can be gathered (fly-over).

Interview with a key informant

A key informant is a person who has a specific level of expertise in the subject matter of the assessment.
As “lay” key informants, these are often community or religious leaders who can speak on behalf of the entire community, or as “expert” key informants, who can speak to specific technical issues like water quality or access to health care.
It’s important to keep in mind that a single person can serve as both a key informant and a survey respondent.

A semi-structured or a structured interview with a key informant is a key informant interview.

Clearly defined.
For a particular subject, a predetermined set of questions is compiled in advance.
Answer choices may be included in the questions.
Data gathered through this method of interviewing is easily combined and compared.
Data collection and accuracy can both benefit from answer options.
In order to avoid misleading key informants, make sure not to read out all of the possible answers aloud.
Using a more open methodology may result in a loss of context, which may outweigh the advantages of using structured interviews for the analysis.
It is possible that structured interviews introduce bias by only focusing on topics that are presumed to be of the greatest importance.

Structured in a semi-structured way.
Open-ended questions are used to guide the conversation between the interviewer and the subject.
Because of this, interviewers who use semistructured interviews must exercise caution to avoid being judgmental or rigid in their preconceived notions.
In order to get the most out of this interview style’s rich data, interviewers must be well-versed in the subjects being discussed and be able to gauge when to press for more information.
Qualitative data takes longer to process and analyze because of the higher level of expertise required in data collection.

As an open-ended method, key informant interviews are useful for exploring new ideas and issues.
They are also quick and don’t necessitate a large number of people.
In addition, key informant interviews can be helpful in gathering data from remote or difficult-to-reach locations.
A key informant’s knowledge and objectivity are critical in determining the quality of data gathered, but the data are not measurable (quantitative).

Be aware that all data will have an individual and cultural bias that must be taken into account during analysis when using key informant interviews.