SOCW 6510 week 11
SOCW 6510 week 11
MSW Foundation Field Evaluation
Evaluatee Abioye, Titilope Class group 1 Evaluator OLUSESAN KUFORIJI, Matanmi LCSW-C Team 1
Rotation Hebron House, Inc. MD Course MSW Foundation 2 Academic Year 2019/2020
Period 2 From 2019-11-25 To 2020-02-09
Log Date & Time 1/13/2020 1:05:46 PM
Dear Field Instructor: Below are questions regarding the field experience performance of the Walden University MSW student you have been working with this term. Please complete all of the questions and, if a student receives a rating of 1 or 2 on any items in the section, also please give written feedback on what improvement needs to occur. If you have not had the opportunity to observe a student’s performance on one or more of the items please note that in the survey. Please note however that students must have the opportunity to do all of the items indicated in the evaluation by the end of their 2nd term of Field Experience. If you wish to leave the survey and come back to it later, please use the “Save Draft” button at the bottom of the page. Please note that once you submit the evaluation using the “Save Final” button, it will close and you will not be able to make changes. As part of this process you need to review the evaluation with your student. The student can log in under his/her account, review the evaluation, enter comments, and save them. If you have any questions about completing this evaluation feel free to contact field.coordinator@waldenu.edu. Thank you again for all that you do.
Please summarize the student’s primary responsibilites:
Works with patients in outpatient mental health clinic, participates in intake processing, psychosocial evaluation and assessments of patients, diagnostic interviews, interdisciplinary treatment plans, therapeutic interventions (individual, family and group), participates in discharge processes and policy formulations.
Please rate the student on each of the following competencies using the following scale:
| 5 | Demonstrates a high level of competency |
| 4 | Clearly demonstrates competency |
| 3 | Demonstrates minimal level of competency |
| 2 | Demonstrates inadequate level of competency |
| 1 | Fails to demonstrate even minimal competency |
| NA | Have not had an opportunity to observe (Only use this choice if the student has not had the opportunity to demonstrate the skill. Do not use if the student has had an opportunity but did not demonstrate the skill—this would be rated as “1”.) |
5 = highly competent, 4 = clearly competent, 3 = minimally competent, 2 = inadequately competent, 1 = fail, NA = not observed
| Score | Criteria | |||||
| Competency 1 – Demonstrate Ethical and Professional Behavior Please rate the student on each of the following | ||||||
| 4 | 1. Make ethical decisions by applying the standards of the NASW Code of Ethics, relevant laws and regulations, models for ethical decision-making, ethical conduct of research, and additional codes of ethics as appropriate to context | |||||
| 5 | 2. Use reflection and self-regulation to manage personal values and maintain professionalism in practice situations | |||||
| 5 | 3. Demonstrate professional demeanor in behavior; appearance; and oral, written, and electronic communication | |||||
| 5 | 4. Use technology ethically and appropriately to facilitate practice outcomes | |||||
| 4 | 5. Use supervision and consultation to guide professional judgment and behavior | |||||
Please provide over-all feedback on this competency:
Highly enthusiastic and ready to learn
5 = highly competent, 4 = clearly competent, 3 = minimally competent, 2 = inadequately competent, 1 = fail, NA = not observed
| Score | Criteria | |||||
| Competency 2 – Engage Diversity and Difference in Practice Please rate the student on each of the following | ||||||
| 5 | 6. Apply and communicate understanding of the importance of diversity and difference in shaping life experiences in practice at the micro, mezzo, and macro levels | |||||
| 5 | 7. Present themselves as learners and engage clients and constituencies as experts of their own experiences | |||||
| 4 | 8. Apply self-awareness and self-regulation to manage the influence of personal biases and values in working with diverse clients and constituencies | |||||
Please provide over-all feedback on this competency:
Engages with patients professionally without difficulties
5 = highly competent, 4 = clearly competent, 3 = minimally competent, 2 = inadequately competent, 1 = fail, NA = not observed
| Score | Criteria | |||||
| Competency 3 – Advance Human Rights and Social, Economic, and Environmental Justice Please rate the student on each of the following | ||||||
| 5 | 9. Apply their understanding of social, economic, and environmental justice to advocate for human rights at the individual and system levels | |||||
| 5 | 10. Engage in practices that advance social, economic, and environmental justice | |||||
Please provide over-all feedback on this competency:
Excellent
5 = highly competent, 4 = clearly competent, 3 = minimally competent, 2 = inadequately competent, 1 = fail, NA = not observed
| Score | Criteria | |||||
| Competency 4 – Engage In Practice-informed Research and Research-informed Practice Please rate the student on each of the following | ||||||
| 4 | 11. Use practice experience and theory to inform scientific inquiry and research | |||||
| 4 | 12. Apply critical thinking to engage in analysis of quantitative and qualitative research methods and research findings | |||||
| 4 | 13. Use and translate research evidence to inform and improve practice, policy, and service delivery | |||||
Please provide over-all feedback on this competency:
Consults with clinicians and makes use of resources within the clinic to improve knowledge
5 = highly competent, 4 = clearly competent, 3 = minimally competent, 2 = inadequately competent, 1 = fail, NA = not observed
| Score | Criteria | |||||
| Competency 5 – Engage in Policy Practice Please rate the student on each of the following | ||||||
| 4 | 14. Identify social policy at the local, state, and federal level that impacts well-being, service delivery, and access to social services | |||||
| 4 | 15. Assess how social welfare and economic policies impact the delivery of and access to social services | |||||
| 4 | 16. Apply critical thinking to analyze, formulate, and advocate for policies that advance human rights and social, economic, and environmental justice | |||||
Please provide over-all feedback on this competency:
Highly commendable
5 = highly competent, 4 = clearly competent, 3 = minimally competent, 2 = inadequately competent, 1 = fail, NA = not observed
| Score | Criteria | |||||
| Competency 6 – Engage with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities Please rate the student on each of the following | ||||||
| 5 | 17. Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment, person-in-environment, and other multidisciplinary theoretical frameworks to engage with clients and constituencies | |||||
| 5 | 18. Use empathy, reflection, and interpersonal skills to effectively engage diverse clients and constituencies | |||||
Please provide over-all feedback on this competency:
Excellent rapport with patients and families
5 = highly competent, 4 = clearly competent, 3 = minimally competent, 2 = inadequately competent, 1 = fail, NA = not observed
| Score | Criteria | |||||
| Competency 7 – Assess Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities Please rate the student on each of the following | ||||||
| 4 | 19. Collect and organize data, and apply critical thinking to interpret information from clients and constituencies | |||||
| 4 | 20. Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment, person-in-environment, and other multidisciplinary theoretical frameworks in the analysis of assessment data from clients and constituencies | |||||
| 4 | 21. Develop mutually agreed-on intervention goals and objectives based on the critical assessment of strengths, needs, and challenges within clients and constituencies | |||||
| 4 | 22. Select appropriate intervention strategies based on the assessment, research knowledge, and values and preferences of clients and constituencies | |||||
Please provide over-all feedback on this competency:
5 = highly competent, 4 = clearly competent, 3 = minimally competent, 2 = inadequately competent, 1 = fail, NA = not observed
| Score | Criteria | |||||
| Competency 8 – Intervene with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities Please rate the student on each of the following | ||||||
| 4 | 23. Critically choose and implement interventions to achieve practice goals and enhance capacities of clients and constituencies | |||||
| 4 | 24. Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment, person-in-environment, and other multidisciplinary theoretical frameworks in interventions with clients and constituencies | |||||
| 4 | 25. Use inter-professional collaboration as appropriate to achieve beneficial practice outcomes | |||||
| 4 | 26. Negotiate, mediate, and advocate with and on behalf of diverse clients and constituencies | |||||
| 4 | 27. Facilitate effective transitions and endings that advance mutually agreed-on goals | |||||
Please provide over-all feedback on this competency:
5 = highly competent, 4 = clearly competent, 3 = minimally competent, 2 = inadequately competent, 1 = fail, NA = not observed
| Score | Criteria | |||||
| Competency 9 – Evaluate Practice with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities Please rate the student on each of the following | ||||||
| 4 | 28. Select and use appropriate methods for evaluation of outcomes | |||||
| 4 | 29. Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment, person-in-environment, and other multidisciplinary theoretical frameworks in the evaluation of outcomes | |||||
| 4 | 30. Critically analyze, monitor, and evaluate intervention and program processes and outcomes | |||||
| 4 | 31. Apply evaluation findings to improve practice effectiveness at the micro, mezzo, and macro levels | |||||
Please provide over-all feedback on this competency:
Please rate the student’s overall performance. Excellent
Please add any additional comments that you may have about the student and his or her performance.
Tuesday, February 4, 2020
Top of Form
I have reviewed this evaluation
Comments:
Please enter your password for authentication, then click Submit.
Bottom of Form
Meditrek® — HSoft Corporation © 2000 – 2020
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!