COUN6103: Person and Practice of the Therapist

COUN6103: PERSON AND PRACTICE OF THE THERAPIST

1. UNIT DESCRIPTION
This unit advances students’ understanding of self and their development, and the impact
of these on their professional development as counsellors and psychotherapists. Students
are provided with the opportunity to develop and apply foundational counselling skills
and processes. Significant emphasis is placed on building students’ self-awareness and
critical reflexivity, as they begin developing an evolving professional identity as
counsellors and psychotherapists.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

ACAP classes are an open space for the critical and civil exchange of ideas, and this Unit
will include topics that may be difficult for you to confront or discuss. If you feel
uncomfortable discussing certain content during class, please seek the support of your
educator or fellow students in the first instance. Additional free and confidential
counselling support is available on all ACAP campuses. Please visit
https://www.acap.edu.au/student-resources/support-services/counselling-support/ for
further information on the ACAP Counselling Support Service and external supports
including Lifeline, Beyond Blue, MensLine, and others.

Introduction

COUN6103: Person and Practice of the Therapist is a foundational unit that focuses on understanding the self as a central instrument in the therapeutic process. The course invites students to explore how their personal history, values, emotions, and worldview influence their developing identity as counsellors and psychotherapists. By emphasizing self-awareness, personal growth, and critical reflexivity, this unit helps students recognize that who they are profoundly affects how they engage, listen, and respond to clients in practice.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

Through experiential learning, reflective exercises, and skills-based training, students develop and apply core counselling competencies, such as active listening, empathy, and presence. These foundational abilities are not only technical but deeply relational, encouraging students to cultivate authenticity, compassion, and ethical awareness in every therapeutic encounter.

Additionally, the unit provides a safe and open environment for discussing sensitive and sometimes challenging topics related to human behavior and emotion. This approach strengthens emotional resilience, encourages openness, and supports professional maturity. Students are also guided to seek support when needed, reinforcing the value of self-care and emotional well-being as essential components of sustainable practice.

Ultimately, Person and Practice of the Therapist equip students with the insight and practical grounding to begin forming a professional identity rooted in self-knowledge, ethical integrity, and reflective practice, the hallmarks of an effective and empathetic therapist.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

Hot Topics in Cognitive Psychology

Hot Topics in Cognitive Psychology

The goal of this discussion forum is to offer you an introduction to the field of cognitive psychology. Cognitive psychology is a discipline within psychology that is concerned with the scientific study of the human mind. The mind is responsible for a variety of functions and abilities, including perception, attention, consciousness, memory, reasoning, and decision-making. Most of our mental life is unconscious. If the objects of our attention are equated to the objects of our consciousness, it is reasonable to assume that we are aware of only a limited number of events in our daily lives.

For your initial post, complete the following steps:

  • Watch the video entitled, The Magic of the Unconscious: Automatic Brain (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
  • Select a “hot topic” of cognitive psychology based on what you have heard and/or seen in the media and your personal interests.
  • Look for a report in the media (e.g., newspapers, magazines, web pages of professional organizations, etc.) that refers to the selected topic such as “defendant cannot remember what happened,” “false memories explain UFO abduction stories,” and so forth.
  • Describe the content of the selected report and offer your own perspective. Namely, use your critical-thinking skills to examine the extent to which the claims made in the report and the evidence upon which the report relies are to be trusted. Then, discuss the real-life consequences of the evidence reported.

In your post, include a link to the selected report, and explain to the members of the class why you have selected it. Support your points with evidence from at least one peer-reviewed research article. Your initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.

Reference:

https://fod.infobase.com/OnDemandEmbed.aspx?token=51893&wID=100753&plt=FOD&loid=0&w=560&h=315&fWidth=580&fHeight=365

Introduction

Cognitive psychology is a branch of psychology that focuses on understanding the internal mental processes that shape human behavior. It explores how people perceive, attend to, remember, think, and make decisions about the world around them. Unlike behaviorism, which emphasizes observable actions, cognitive psychology examines the unseen workings of the mind—many of which occur unconsciously. As highlighted in The Magic of the Unconscious: Automatic Brain, much of human cognition operates below the level of conscious awareness, influencing daily actions, judgments, and emotional responses without deliberate thought.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

The study of unconscious mental processes has become a “hot topic” in both scientific research and popular media, particularly regarding how memory, attention, and decision-making can be affected by hidden cognitive mechanisms. Media reports frequently highlight stories that draw from cognitive psychology—such as cases involving false memories, eyewitness testimony errors, unconscious bias, or the reliability of recovered memories—illustrating how cognitive processes can profoundly impact real-life outcomes in law, healthcare, and everyday decision-making.

This discussion will analyze one such media report related to a current issue in cognitive psychology, evaluate the credibility of its claims using critical thinking and evidence-based reasoning, and connect it to peer-reviewed research. By doing so, it will demonstrate how scientific insights into cognition not only deepen our understanding of the human mind but also challenge common assumptions about how accurately we perceive and remember the world.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

SOAP Note for Differential Diagnosis for Skin Conditions

SOAP Note for Differential Diagnosis for Skin Conditions

Differential Diagnosis for Skin Conditions

Properly identifying the cause and type of a patient’s skin condition involves a process of elimination known as differential diagnosis. Using this process, a health professional can take a given set of physical abnormalities, vital signs, health assessment findings, and patient descriptions of symptoms, and incrementally narrow them down until one diagnosis is determined as the most likely cause.

In this Discussion, you will examine several visual representations of various skin conditions, describe your observations, and use the techniques of differential diagnosis to determine the most likely condition.

Note: Your Discussion post should be in the SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan) note format, rather than the traditional narrative style Discussion posting format. Refer to Chapter 2 of the Sullivan text and the Comprehensive SOAP Template in this week’s Learning Resources for guidance.Remember that not all comprehensive SOAP data are included in every patient case.

To prepare:

·         Review the Skin Conditions document provided in this week’s Learning Resources, and select two conditions to closely examine for this Discussion.

·         Consider the abnormal physical characteristics you observe in the graphics you selected. How would you describe the characteristics using clinical terminologies?

·         Explore different conditions that could be the cause of the skin abnormalities in the graphics you selected.

·         Consider which of the conditions is most likely to be the correct diagnosis, and why.

A description of the two graphics you selected (identify each graphic by number). Use clinical terminologies to explain the physical characteristics featured in each graphic. Formulate a differential diagnosis of three to five possible conditions for each. Determine which is most likely to be the correct diagnosis, and explain your reasoning.

REMINDERS:

 

Please follow the Note above. Do SOAP note format and check it out on the uploaded file the SOAP template as your outline for your writings… No traditional essay on this assignment, again use SOAP note. Thank you.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

Required Resources

Note: Because the information in this course is so vital, a large number of resources are provided in various formats to facilitate your competence in diagnosing a wide variety of health conditions. When multiple resources are available on the same topic, select those that best meet your personal learning needs to prepare you to accurately diagnose patient health problems.

 

Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.

Readings

·         Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2015). Seidel’s guide to physical examination (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.

o    Chapter 8, “Skin, Hair, and Nails” (pp. 114-165)

This chapter reviews the basic anatomy and physiology of skin, hair, and nails. The chapter also describes guidelines for proper skin, hair, and nails assessments.

·         Dains, J. E., Baumann, L. C., & Scheibel, P. (2016). Advanced health assessment and clinical diagnosis in primary care (5th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.

o    Chapter 28, “Rashes and Skin Lesions” (pp. 325-343)

This chapter explains the steps in an initial examination of someone with dermatological problems, including the type of information that needs to be gathered and assessed.

Note: Download and use the Adult Examination Checklist and the Physical Exam Summary when you conduct your video assessment of the skin, hair, and nails.

·         Seidel, H. M., Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2011). Adult examination checklist: Guide for skin, hair, and nails. In Mosby’s guide to physical examination (7th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.

This Adult Examination Checklist: Guide for Skin, Hair, and Nails was published as a companion to Seidel’s guide to physical examination (8th ed.), by Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., & Flynn, J. A. Copyright Elsevier (2015). Fromhttps://evolve.elsevier.com/

·         Seidel, H. M., Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2011). Skin, hair, and nails physical exam summary. In Mosby’s guide to physical examination (7th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.

This Skin, Hair, and Nails Physical Exam Summary was published as a companion to Seidel’s guide to physical examination(8th ed.), by Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., & Flynn, J. A. Copyright Elsevier (2015). Fromhttps://evolve.elsevier.com/

·         Chadha, A. (2009). Assessing the skin. Practice Nurse, 38(7), 43–48.

Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

In this article, the author explains how to take a relevant skin health history. In addition, the article defines common terms used to describe skin lesions and rashes.

·         Ely, J. W., & Stone, M. S. (2010). The generalized rash: Part I. Differential diagnosis. American Family Physician81(6), 726–734.

Retrieved from http://www.aafp.org/afp/2010/0315/p726.html

This article focuses on common, uncommon, and rare causes of generalized rashes. The article also specifies tests to diagnose generalized rashes.

·         Ely, J. W., & Stone, M. S. (2010). The generalized rash: Part II. Diagnostic approach. American Family Physician, 81(6), 735–739.

Retrieved from http://www.aafp.org/afp/2010/0315/p735.html

This article revolves around the diagnosis of generalized rashes. The authors describe clinical features that may help in distinguishing generalized rashes.

·         Everyday Health, Inc. (2013). Resources for dermatology and visual conditions. Retrieved fromhttp://www.skinsight.com/ info/for_professionals 

This interactive website allows you to explore skin conditions according to age, gender, and area of the body.

·         Document: Skin Conditions (Word document)

This document contains five images of different skin conditions. You will use this information in this week’s Discussion.

·         Document: Comprehensive SOAP Exemplar (Word document)

·         Document: Comprehensive SOAP Template (Word document)

Media

Online media for Seidel’s Guide to Physical Examination

In addition to this week’s media, it is highly recommended that you access and view the online resources included with the course text, Seidel’s Guide to Physical Examination. Focus on the videos and animations in Chapter 8 that relate to the assessment of the skin, hair, and nails.

The following suturing tutorials provide instruction on the basic interrupted suture, as well as the vertical and horizontal mattress suturing techniques:

·         Tulane Center for Advanced Medical Simulation & Team Training. (2010, July 8). Suturing technique.Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-LDmCVtL0o

·         Mikheil. (2014, April 22). Basic suturing: Simple, interrupted, vertical mattress, horizontal mattress. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFP90aQvEVM

Optional Resources

·         LeBlond, R. F., Brown, D. D., & DeGowin, R. L. (2009). DeGowin’s diagnostic examination (9th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill Medical.

o    Chapter 6, “The Skin and Nails”

In this chapter, the authors provide guidelines and procedures to aid in the diagnosis of skin and nail disorders. The chapter supplies descriptions and pictures of common skin and nail conditions.

·         Ethicon, Inc. (n.d.a). Absorbable synthetic suture material. Retrieved fromhttp://academicdepartments.musc.edu/surgery/education/resident_info/supplement/suture_manuals/absorbable_suture_chart.pdf

·         Ethicon, Inc. (2006). Dermabond topical skin adhesive application technique. Retrieved fromhttp://academicdepartments.musc.edu/surgery/education/resident_info/supplement/suture_manuals/db_application_poster.pdf

·         Ethicon, Inc. (2001). Ethicon needle sales types. Retrieved fromhttp://academicdepartments.musc.edu/surgery/education/resident_info/supplement/suture_manuals/needle_template.pdf

·         Ethicon, Inc. (n.d.b). Ethicon sutures. Retrieved fromhttp://academicdepartments.musc.edu/surgery/education/resident_info/supplement/suture_manuals/suture_chart_ethicon.pdf

·         Ethicon, Inc. (2002). How to care for your wound after it’s treated with Dermabond topical skin adhesive. Retrieved fromhttp://academicdepartments.musc.edu/surgery/education/resident_info/supplement/suture_manuals/db_wound_care.pdf

·         Ethicon, Inc. (2005). Knot tying manual. Retrieved fromhttp://academicdepartments.musc.edu/surgery/education/resident_info/supplement/suture_manuals/knot_tying_manual.pdf

Introduction

Skin disorders are among the most frequent reasons for patient visits in primary care, and they often present a diagnostic challenge due to the broad range of possible causes and similar visual presentations. Properly identifying a skin condition requires more than simple observation—it involves a systematic process known as differential diagnosis, through which a clinician evaluates the patient’s symptoms, physical findings, and history to rule out less likely causes and determine the most probable diagnosis. Because many dermatologic disorders share overlapping features such as erythema, scaling, or vesiculation, the clinician’s ability to recognize subtle differences in morphology, distribution, and progression is essential to accurate assessment and management.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

This discussion focuses on the application of differential diagnosis in evaluating two selected skin condition graphics from the provided learning resources. By observing abnormal features—such as lesion color, shape, texture, and distribution—and describing them using clinical terminology, the analysis demonstrates how healthcare professionals systematically narrow down potential diagnoses. The approach is guided by evidence-based resources, including Seidel’s Guide to Physical Examination (2015) and Dains, Baumann, and Scheibel (2016), which emphasize structured observation, patient history, and diagnostic reasoning in dermatologic assessment.

The discussion will follow the SOAP note format (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan), allowing for an organized and clinically relevant presentation. Within this framework, each skin condition will be examined through a differential list of three to five possible diagnoses, supported by clinical reasoning that leads to the most likely condition. This method reinforces the critical thinking and diagnostic skills necessary in advanced nursing practice, ensuring that healthcare providers deliver accurate, patient-centered care.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

NURS 6050 Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief

NURS 6050 Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief

It may seem to you that healthcare has been a national topic of debate among political leaders for as long as you can remember.

Healthcare has been a policy item and a topic of debate not only in recent times but as far back as the administration of the second U.S. president, John Adams. In 1798, Adams signed legislation requiring that 20 cents per month of a sailor’s paycheck be set aside for covering their medical bills. This represented the first major piece of U.S. healthcare legislation, and the topic of healthcare has been woven into presidential agendas and political debate ever since.

As a healthcare professional, you may be called upon to provide expertise, guidance and/or opinions on healthcare matters as they are debated for inclusion into new policy. You may also be involved in planning new organizational policy and responses to changes in legislation. For all of these reasons you should be prepared to speak to national healthcare issues making the news.

In this Assignment, you will analyze recent presidential healthcare agendas. You also will prepare a fact sheet to communicate the importance of a healthcare issue and the impact on this issue of recent or proposed policy.

To Prepare:

  • Review the agenda priorities of the current/sitting U.S. president and the two previous presidential administrations.
  • Select an issue related to healthcare that was addressed by each of the last three U.S. presidential administrations.
  • Reflect on the focus of their respective agendas, including the allocation of financial resources for addressing the healthcare issue you selected.
  • Consider how you would communicate the importance of a healthcare issue to a legislator/policymaker or a member of their staff for inclusion on an agenda.

The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Comparison Grid, 1-Page Analysis, and 1-page Fact Sheet)

Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid

Use the Agenda Comparison Grid Template found in the Learning Resources and complete the Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid based on the current/sitting U.S. president and the two previous presidential administrations and their agendas related to the public health concern you selected. Be sure to address the following:

  • Identify and provide a brief description of the population health concern you selected and the factors that contribute to it.
  • Describe the administrative agenda focus related to the issue you selected.
  • Identify the allocations of financial and other resources that the current and two previous presidents dedicated to this issue.
  • Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.

(A draft of Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid should be posted to the Module 1 Discussion Board by Day 3 of Week 1.)

Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis

Using the information you recorded in Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid on the template, complete the Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis portion of the template, by addressing the following:

  • Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected?
  • How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda for the current and two previous presidents? How does it stay there?
  • Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected for the current and two previous presidents?

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

Part 3: Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief

Based on the feedback that you received from your colleagues in the Discussion, revise Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid and Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis.

Then, using the information recorded on the template in Parts 1 and 2, develop a 1-page Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief that you could use to communicate with a policymaker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue. You can use Microsoft Word or PowerPoint to create your Fact Sheet or Talking Point Brief. Be sure to address the following:

  • Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.
  • Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.

Introduction

Healthcare policy has remained a central topic of debate in the United States since the late eighteenth century. From President John Adams’s 1798 law mandating sailors to contribute a portion of their wages for medical care to today’s discussions surrounding equitable access, affordability, and quality of care, healthcare has consistently shaped national policy agendas. Each presidential administration has approached healthcare reform with differing philosophies, priorities, and strategies, reflecting the nation’s evolving social, economic, and political landscape. These variations demonstrate how healthcare policy is influenced not only by public health needs but also by administrative values, fiscal constraints, and the changing expectations of the American population.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

As healthcare professionals, nurses play a vital role in understanding, shaping, and advocating for policies that directly impact patient outcomes and population health. Nurses often serve as both advocates and informants, providing evidence-based insights that help policymakers design effective health legislation. Therefore, developing an informed perspective on how presidential administrations prioritize and address key health concerns is critical for influencing policy decisions that advance quality care and health equity.

This paper will analyze and compare how the current and two previous U.S. presidential administrations have addressed a selected population health concern within their healthcare agendas. Using the Agenda Comparison Grid, the discussion will identify each administration’s policy focus, financial allocations, and implementation strategies. The analysis will then examine which federal agencies are most responsible for addressing the selected issue and how that issue is sustained within the political agenda. Finally, a Fact Sheet will be developed to communicate the importance of the chosen health issue and demonstrate the nurse’s role in policy advocacy and agenda setting. By examining presidential approaches to healthcare reform, this analysis aims to highlight the ongoing importance of policy engagement and the nursing profession’s influence in shaping the future of U.S. healthcare.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

ASSESSMENT 1B – RESPONSE TO CASE STUDY (20%)

ASSESSMENT 1B – RESPONSE TO CASE STUDY (20%)

Due: Week 5

Word Count: 1,500 words (+/- 10%)

Task: For this assessment, you are required to demonstrate your understanding of key developmental theories and their application to real-life scenarios.

  1. Read the case study (provided below).
  2. Review Chapters 1 and 2 of the prescribed textbook: Sigelman, C. K., & Rider, E. A. (2017). Life-span human development.
  3. Select TWO developmental theories from the following list and apply them to the case study:

o Erikson’s Psychosocial Theory

o Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory

o Bandura’s Social Learning Theory

Assessment Questions 1. Comparative Analysis (example, 750 words): Identify and describe aspects of Kalina and Yara’s upbringing and environments that were similar, as well as those that differed. Use the two selected theories to analyse and support your discussion. 2. Impact on Development (example, 750 words): Discuss how these factors may have influenced the developmental trajectories of Kalina and Yara, and how they contribute to their current divergent lifestyles. Academic Requirements • Support your arguments with references from at least five recent scholarly journal articles (published within the last 7–10 years), in addition to the prescribed textbook. • Use APA 7th edition for in-text citations and the reference list. • Ensure your response demonstrates critical analysis, application of theory, and integration of evidence-based literature.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW  

Assessment 1B – Case Study Kalina and Yara are 22-year-old identical twin sisters who were born and raised in Dubbo, a large regional town in New South Wales. Their early childhood was unsettled. Their mum, who was raising them on her own, struggled with alcohol misuse and couldn’t provide consistent care. When the twins were three years old, they were placed in foster care and grew up in separate homes. Kalina was placed with foster parents who had no other children. They gave her a lot of one-on-one attention and supported her schooling by enrolling her in a private school in Dubbo. Her foster family also encouraged her to take part in community sports and activities. As a young adult, Kalina has continued on this path. She is now studying a Master’s degree at a university in Sydney, is very committed to her studies, and has built a close circle of supportive friends. She is active in student clubs, fitness groups, and sporting teams. While generally calm and well-mannered, Kalina often demonstrates vocal outbursts, particularly when faced with defeat in sporting matches. Yara went to live with foster parents in Dubbo who often cared for several foster children at once. The home was busy and at times unpredictable, with children coming and going. She went to the local public school, where she struggled academically and often clashed with teachers. Yara currently has no job and spends most of her day sleeping and her nights socialising with a group of local young adults, often engaging in excessive alcohol consumption. When drinking, she frequently becomes irritable with her friends, displaying aggressive behaviour and intimidating them with threats of violence.

Introduction

Human development is a lifelong process influenced by a complex interplay of biological, psychological, and environmental factors. Understanding how these forces interact is critical to explaining the differences in individual outcomes, even among people with similar genetic makeups or early life experiences. The case study of Kalina and Yara, 22-year-old identical twin sisters raised in distinct foster environments, provides a valuable context for exploring how developmental theories explain variations in personality, behavior, and life trajectory. Despite sharing identical genetic material and early childhood adversity, the sisters’ current lifestyles diverge significantly—Kalina demonstrates academic motivation, emotional stability, and strong social ties, whereas Yara exhibits maladaptive behaviors, social instability, and poor self-regulation. These contrasts underscore the importance of examining the dynamic relationship between individual, environmental, and social influences throughout development.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW  

This essay aims to apply Erikson’s Psychosocial Theory and Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory to analyze the developmental paths of Kalina and Yara. Both frameworks offer complementary insights into how early life experiences and environmental contexts shape identity, coping mechanisms, and socio-emotional development. Erikson’s model emphasizes the progression through psychosocial stages, each involving a core conflict that contributes to personality formation and social competence. In contrast, Bronfenbrenner’s ecological perspective situates development within nested systems—ranging from immediate family and school settings to broader social and cultural structures—that interact over time to influence behavior and adjustment. Applying these theories to the case study enables a deeper understanding of how the twins’ differing environments and support systems affected their developmental outcomes.

The discussion will proceed in two main sections. The first section will provide a comparative analysis of the twins’ upbringing and environmental contexts using Erikson’s and Bronfenbrenner’s theoretical lenses. The second section will explore the impact of these differences on their developmental trajectories, examining how their early experiences contributed to their current psychosocial adjustment and lifestyle patterns. The analysis will integrate evidence-based literature from recent scholarly sources to support theoretical interpretation and demonstrate the relevance of developmental psychology in real-life contexts.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

NU 665 WEEK 1 DISCUSSION 2: GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT, BIOPSYCHOSOCIAL PROFILE AND SCREENING

NU 665 WEEK 1 DISCUSSION 2: GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT, BIOPSYCHOSOCIAL PROFILE AND SCREENING

Value: 100 points

Due: Create your initial post by Day 3 and reply to at least two of your peers by Day 7.

Grading Category: Discussions

Note: In this type of discussion, you will not see the responses of your classmates until after you have posted your own response to the following prompt.

Initial Post

Review the following PowerPoint presentation on Case Formulation (PPT)

Review the article, Biopsychosocial Model and Case Formulation (Biopsychosocial Model and Case Formulation, 2024).

Look at the chart of Erikson’s Psychosocial Stages in Table 34-16 on page 1073 in the Kaplan and Sadock Synopsis of Psychiatry (2021) textbook.

Think of a patient you have seen thus far in your clinical setting; one you have not discussed before. Describe the stage of psychosocial development the patient is expected to be in based on chronological age. Discuss how your observations during the interaction informed your assessment of whether the patient is in the expected stage. Is the patient at this stage presently? Why or why not? (1-2 paragraphs)

Next, use the PowerPoint presentation on case formulation to write up a biopsychosocial assessment. Include specific observations that guided your assessment. Use relevant patient information but be sure to exclude identifiers (1-2 paragraphs). 

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

Replies

Reply to at least two of your peers. Explain how you can use what you have learned from this post in your own practice. Explain the purpose of incorporating the evaluation of developmental vulnerabilities within the holistic, psychosocial assessment and treatment plan (1-2 paragraphs).

Use APA formatting as stated in the syllabus and grading rubric.

Please refer to the Grading Rubric for details on how this activity will be graded.

The described expectations meet the passing level of 80%. You are directed to review the Discussion Grading Rubric for criteria which exceed expectations.

Posting to the Discussion Forum

  1. Select the appropriate Thread.
  2. Select Reply.
  3. Create your post.
  4. Select Post to Forum. 

Introduction

This discussion focuses on the application of Erikson’s Psychosocial Stages of Development and the biopsychosocial model in understanding patient behavior and formulating comprehensive treatment plans. The integration of these frameworks allows psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioners (PMHNPs) to approach patient care holistically, accounting for the complex interaction between biological, psychological, and social determinants of health. In clinical practice, recognizing where a patient stands developmentally—as outlined by Erikson—provides valuable insight into their coping mechanisms, interpersonal relationships, and overall emotional functioning. This developmental perspective also informs clinical judgment about whether a patient’s current behavior aligns with their expected psychosocial stage or reflects unresolved developmental conflicts.

The biopsychosocial model, as described in the assigned readings and PowerPoint presentation, provides a structured method for case formulation by integrating observable data and subjective experiences across multiple domains. Through this model, PMHNPs can synthesize patient history, presenting symptoms, environmental stressors, and personal strengths into a cohesive understanding of the case. This process not only guides differential diagnosis and treatment planning but also fosters empathy and individualized care.

In this discussion, a patient from the clinical setting will be presented to illustrate the integration of Erikson’s developmental framework and the biopsychosocial approach. The patient’s psychosocial stage will first be identified based on chronological age and observed behaviors, followed by a concise biopsychosocial assessment guided by clinical observations. By combining these perspectives, this analysis demonstrates how developmental theory and holistic case formulation can enhance psychiatric assessment and promote recovery-oriented outcomes.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

NU 665 WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT

NU 665 WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT

Instructions

For this assignment, you will review the following case study and complete the Complicated Pregnancy Case Study Questions (Word).

Your answers should be thorough and match the complexity of the scenario. Provide resources to support your answers. You will need a minimum of two scholarly references to support your work, one of which should be from a nursing journal.

Please refer to the Grading Rubric for details on how this activity will be graded.

Introduction

This paper presents a focused analysis of a Complicated Pregnancy Case Study, applying advanced clinical reasoning to evaluate maternal and fetal risks, interpret diagnostic data, and develop an evidence-based management plan. Complicated pregnancies demand careful synthesis of obstetric, medical, and psychosocial information; timely decision-making can materially affect perinatal outcomes. Using the Complicated Pregnancy Case Study Questions as a guiding framework, this assignment will systematically address pertinent history, physical findings, laboratory and imaging results, differential diagnoses, and appropriate interventions that align with current standards of care.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

The analysis emphasizes a holistic approach that integrates physiologic considerations (e.g., hypertensive disorders, gestational diabetes, infection), obstetric risk factors (e.g., fetal growth restriction, preterm labor), and psychosocial contributors (e.g., access to care, social support, mental health). Each clinical recommendation will be supported by scholarly evidence, including at least two peer-reviewed references—one from a nursing journal—to ensure that nursing-sensitive considerations and interprofessional collaboration are highlighted. Special attention will be given to patient safety, ethical and legal implications of care decisions in pregnancy, and the importance of clear communication with the patient and family.

Outcomes of the case analysis will include prioritized differential diagnoses, monitoring parameters, immediate and longer-term management strategies, and referrals or consultations necessary for comprehensive care. The goal is to demonstrate competency in synthesizing complex clinical data into a coherent, patient-centered plan that optimizes maternal and neonatal health while respecting patient values and informed consent. This paper will thereby illustrate how evidence-based practice and interprofessional teamwork guide high-quality management of complicated pregnancies.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

NU 665 WEEK 4 ASSIGNMENT

NU 665 WEEK 4 ASSIGNMENT

Value: 100 points

Due: Day 7

Grading Category: Assignments

Instructions

The purpose of this assignment is to help familiarize you with the substance use disorder (SUD) prevention model.

Use the SAMHSA Resource to complete this assignment.

Visit this website and write up a brief synopsis of your favorite SUD prevention model and explain why you picked it. Your paper should be between one and two pages in length.

Please refer to the Grading Rubric for details on how this activity will be graded. 

Introduction

Substance Use Disorder (SUD) continues to be a significant public health challenge affecting individuals, families, and communities worldwide. The prevention of SUD is a critical component of mental and behavioral healthcare, focusing not only on reducing the incidence of substance misuse but also on promoting overall wellness and resilience. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) has developed comprehensive prevention frameworks and resources designed to guide practitioners, policymakers, and community leaders in implementing effective, evidence-based prevention strategies. These models emphasize proactive, population-focused approaches that address the underlying social, psychological, and environmental factors contributing to substance use.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

This paper explores one of SAMHSA’s prominent SUD prevention models, providing an overview of its structure, goals, and implementation strategies. The chosen model illustrates how prevention can be systematically integrated into community and clinical settings to achieve sustainable outcomes. It also highlights the importance of early intervention, public awareness, and collaborative efforts among healthcare professionals, educators, and social support systems.

The discussion will further include a personal reflection on why this specific model stands out as a preferred approach to substance use prevention. The analysis will consider factors such as its evidence-based foundation, adaptability across populations, and effectiveness in promoting behavioral health equity. Ultimately, this exploration reinforces the essential role of prevention in mitigating the long-term impacts of substance misuse and advancing holistic mental health care within diverse populations.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

NU 665B WEEK 5 DISCUSSION

NU 665B WEEK 5 DISCUSSION

Complete this assignment according to the Week 5 Pair Presentation assignment instructions.

Please refer to the Grading Rubric for details on how this activity will be graded. Please remember that you and your partner must each submit the assignment, even if it is the same file so that you both receive feedback and credit.

You may view each other’s submission and comment if you would like. Reply posts are optional for this assignment and students will only be graded on the Pair Presentation that they submit.

Primary Care of the Psychiatric Mental Health Client II

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

Week 5 Presentation Instructions

You and your partner will create a 15–30-slide PowerPoint presentation with voice over on one of the following topics:

ADHD

Social communication disorder

Oppositional defiant disorder

Gender dysphoria

Depression

Obsessive compulsive disorder

Social anxiety disorder

Reactive attachment Disorder

Autism spectrum disorder

Self-injurious behavior

Traumatic loss / grief

Bipolar disorder

Generalized anxiety disorder

Separation anxiety disorder

Movement disorder

Eating/feeding disorder

Completing this presentation will prepare you to:

Remember the diagnostic criteria of your chosen topic.

Create an evidence-based treatment plan for a patient with the chosen condition, including pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatment

options.

Summarize factors that may lead to positive and negative outcomes for patients served and how the role of the PMHNP can improve outcomes.

Create your PowerPoint presentation with the objective of teaching your peers about your chosen topic. For tips on effective preparation of PowerPoint

presentations, see standards of professional development for Microsoft PowerPoint presentations.

The assignment must include the following:

  1. Three learning objectives for the activity
  2. DSM-5 criteria
  3. Screening tools with validity and reliability
  4. Pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatment options
  5. Differences in symptoms and treatments across the lifespan, if applicable
  6. Ethical and legal considerations
  7. Potential barriers to treatment related to cultural and/or socioeconomic factors and how these impact outcomes of populations served
  8. An analysis of how the PMHNP role can serve to improve outcomes for individuals with your chosen diagnosis.

Introduction

Psychiatric disorders in children, adolescents, and adults present complex challenges that require evidence-based and individualized approaches to diagnosis and treatment. This presentation aims to provide a comprehensive overview of a selected psychiatric condition by integrating current research, diagnostic standards, and treatment strategies. The goal is to enhance understanding of the disorder’s presentation across the lifespan, explore appropriate management options, and highlight the critical role of the Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioner (PMHNP) in improving patient outcomes.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

The selected topic will be examined through a clinical and theoretical lens, beginning with a review of the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria to establish a foundation for accurate identification and assessment. Validated screening tools will be discussed, emphasizing their reliability and clinical utility. The presentation will also outline pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions, supported by the latest evidence-based guidelines. Additionally, it will explore ethical and legal considerations, along with cultural and socioeconomic factors that may influence diagnosis, treatment adherence, and overall outcomes.

By addressing variations in symptom expression and treatment response across developmental stages, this presentation underscores the importance of lifespan-informed care. Furthermore, it examines potential barriers to effective management and provides strategies to mitigate them through patient education, collaboration, and culturally competent practice. Ultimately, this presentation seeks to strengthen clinical competence and reinforce the PMHNP’s pivotal role in promoting recovery, resilience, and quality of life among individuals with psychiatric disorders.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

NU 665 WEEK 6 CASE STUDY ASSIGNMENT: PEDIATRIC CASE STUDY

NU 665 WEEK 6 CASE STUDY ASSIGNMENT: PEDIATRIC CASE STUDY

 Value: 100 points

Due: Day 7

Grading Category: Case Studies

Instructions

In this assignment, you will review the Pediatric Case Study and analyze the data to determine the health status of the patient. You will need a minimum of two scholarly references to support your work.

  • Use the NU665C Pediatric Case Study Questions (Word) document to complete the case study assignment.
  • Follow the requirements posted in the rubric.
  • Interactive case studies should be 5- to 7-pages depending on the complexity of the case. This is excluding title and references pages.

All papers must conform to the most recent APA standards.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

Please refer to the Grading Rubric for details on how this activity will be graded.

Introduction

Pediatric care requires a holistic and evidence-based approach that considers not only a child’s physical health but also their developmental, emotional, and social well-being. Early recognition of health issues in children is essential to prevent complications that can affect long-term growth and development. This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of a pediatric case study to determine the child’s current health status through clinical data interpretation, developmental assessment, and application of nursing judgment. The goal is to integrate theoretical knowledge with practical decision-making to support safe, effective, and family-centered care.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

The pediatric case study serves as a tool to evaluate the multifaceted aspects of child health, including biological, psychological, and social determinants. The analysis will follow the structured framework outlined in the NU665C Pediatric Case Study Questions to ensure a systematic and comprehensive review. Attention will be given to identifying potential differential diagnoses, interpreting assessment findings, and formulating an individualized plan of care that aligns with current pediatric guidelines.

Incorporating current research and clinical evidence, this paper will demonstrate how critical thinking and clinical reasoning contribute to identifying key health concerns and formulating an appropriate management plan. Scholarly sources from nursing and pediatric literature will be used to support all recommendations and interventions. Ultimately, this case study emphasizes the importance of holistic assessment and interprofessional collaboration in promoting the child’s optimal health outcomes and overall well-being.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW