NU 665 WEEK 7 DISCUSSION POST 1: EVALUATING A TREATMENT PLAN FOR A PATIENT WITH POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER (PTSD)

NU 665 WEEK 7 DISCUSSION POST 1: EVALUATING A TREATMENT PLAN FOR A PATIENT WITH POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER (PTSD)

Value: 100 points

Due: Create your initial post by Day 3 and reply to at least two of your peers by Day 7.

Grading Category: Discussions

Note: In this type of discussion, you will not see the responses of your classmates until after you have posted your own response to the following prompt.

This is an exercise intended to help you identify the benefits and shortcomings of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) use in healthcare and education settings.

The following prompt was entered into ChatGPT™: “Create a PMHNP treatment plan for a 49-year-old female Latinx patient with a diagnosis of PTSD and alcohol use disorder”.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

Initial Post

Critique the Treatment Plan for PTSD developed by ChatGPT™ by creating a video up to five minutes long answering any two of the following prompts.

  • Please provide a brief rationale for each test in the diagnostic tools section. Are they appropriate?
  • Establishing treatment goals: Are the short-term and long-term goals appropriate?
    • Brief reflection: do you set clear treatment goals in clinical?
  • Please describe the treatment plan you would choose for this patient.
    • Pharmacologic option for PTSD
    • Pharmacologic option for alcohol use disorder
    • Type of therapy and why
  • Please briefly describe the strengths and shortcomings of
    • The non-pharmacologic treatment options for this patient
    • The patient education section
    • The follow up plan
    • Addressing of the patient’s cultural needs

You will need to cite at least two research-based resources for this discussion.

To create your video, follow the instructions for Zoom Tutorial and create an unlisted YouTube video. The following tools can be used to create your video: Zoom or your personal preference.

You will need to submit the YouTube video URL for this discussion. The best way to do this is to copy and paste the hyperlink URL for the YouTube video into a Word document. Your faculty will access your video via the link. Do not upload a video file (mp4).

Replies

Reply to at least two of your peers. In each of your reply posts, write a maximum of two paragraphs (with two to three sentences each). Describe what you would do differently than your peer. Also explain something new you learned from your peer’s post. These paragraphs should synthesize one to two pieces of research.

Please make certain that your initial and reply posts are in APA format. Please refer to the Grading Rubric for details on how this activity will be graded.

The described expectations meet the passing level of 80%. You are directed to review the Discussion Grading Rubric for criteria which exceed expectations.

Introduction

For this discussion, you will review and critique a ChatGPT-generated treatment plan developed for a 49-year-old Latinx female diagnosed with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD). The purpose of this exercise is to critically evaluate the strengths and limitations of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) in formulating psychiatric treatment plans, particularly in the context of cultural sensitivity, diagnostic accuracy, and clinical applicability. As artificial intelligence tools become increasingly integrated into healthcare and education, it is essential for psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioners (PMHNPs) to understand both their potential and their shortcomings in clinical decision-making.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

PTSD and AUD often coexist, creating complex challenges for treatment planning, adherence, and recovery. This case invites reflection on how GAI models conceptualize trauma-informed care, pharmacologic management, and evidence-based psychotherapy. It also encourages a closer look at whether AI-generated plans appropriately address cultural identity, language considerations, and the patient’s lived experiences, all of which are vital components of holistic and ethical mental health care.

In this discussion, I will focus on two key areas: (1) evaluating the appropriateness and rationale of the diagnostic tools used in the AI-generated treatment plan, and (2) examining the strengths and weaknesses of the non-pharmacologic and patient education components. The goal is to determine how well ChatGPT aligns with current clinical practice guidelines and to identify areas where human clinical judgment, empathy, and cultural competence remain irreplaceable.

By analyzing this AI-generated treatment plan through a professional nursing lens, this discussion aims to highlight how PMHNPs can responsibly integrate GAI tools into practice—leveraging their efficiency while maintaining critical thinking, cultural sensitivity, and evidence-based care.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

NU 665 WEEK 8 DISCUSSION POST

NU 665 WEEK 8 DISCUSSION POST

Initial Post

For this discussion, you will complete the Eating/Feeding Disorders Case Study. You will need a minimum of two scholarly references to support your work, one of which should be from a nursing journal.

Create a video up to five minutes long addressing the following prompts:

  • Create a case formulation/biopsychosocial assessment for this patient.
  • Create a list of differential diagnoses.
  • What is your primary diagnosis?
  • What are the pharmacologic, non-pharmacologic, and lifestyle modifications that can be addressed with Alice and her mother on this visit?
  • Describe any plans you would have for interprofessional collaboration on this case.

To create your video, follow the instructions for Zoom Tutorial and create an unlisted YouTube video. The following tools can be used to create your video: Zoom or your personal preference.

You will need to submit the YouTube video URL for this discussion. The best way to do this is to copy and paste the hyperlink URL for the YouTube video into a Word document. Your faculty will access your video via the link. Do not upload a video file (mp4).

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

Primary Care of the Psychiatric Mental Health Client II

Eating Feeding Disorders Case Study

Alice is a 10-year-old girl in a gifted and talented school who you, the PMHNP, assume care for following a referral from her PCP for suspected anxiety symptoms. The PCP was concerned that anxiety symptoms may be interfering with her appetite, as it was also reported that Alice had drifted below the

10th percentile for weight. During the initial interview, Alice’s mother states that Alice’s eating difficulties started at age 9, when she began refusing to eat and reporting a fear that she would vomit. At that time, her parents sought treatment from her pediatrician, who continued to evaluate her yearly, explaining that it was normal for children to go through phases. At age 9, Alice was above the 25th percentile for both height and weight (52 inches, 58 pounds), but by age 10, she had essentially stopped growing and had dropped to the 5th percentile on her growth curves (52.5 inches, 55 pounds). The only child of two professional parents who had divorced 5 years earlier, Alice lived with her mother on weekdays and with her nearby father on weekends. Her medical history was significant for her premature birth at 34 weeks’ gestation. She was slow to achieve her initial milestones but by age 2 was developmentally normal. Yearly physical examinations had been unremarkable except for the recent decline of her growth trajectory. Alice had always been petite, but her height and weight had never fallen below the 25th percentile for stature and weight for age on the growth chart. Alice was a talented student who was well liked by her teachers. She had never had more than a few friends, but recently she had stopped socializing entirely and had been coming directly home after school, reporting that her stomach felt calmer when she was in her own home. For the prior year, Alice had eaten only very small amounts of food over very long durations of time. Her parents had tried to pique her interest by experimenting with foods from different cultures and of different colors and textures. None of this seemed effective in improving her appetite. They also tried to let her pick restaurants to try, but Alice had gradually refused to eat outside of either parent’s home. Both parents reported a similar mealtime pattern: Alice would agree to sit at the table but then spent her time rearranging food on her plate, cutting food items into small pieces, and crying if urged to eat another bite. When asked more about her fear of vomiting, Alice remembered one incident, at age 4, when she ate soup, and her stomach became upset and then she subsequently vomited. More recently, Alice had developed fear of eating in public and ate no food during the school day. She denied any concerns about her appearance and said that she had first become aware of her low weight at her most recent visit to the pediatrician. When educated about the dangers of low body weight, Alice became tearful and expressed a clear desire to gain weight.

Introduction

For this discussion, you will review the Eating/Feeding Disorders Case Study, focusing on Alice, a 10-year-old girl presenting with significant changes in eating behavior, weight loss, and social withdrawal. Eating and feeding disorders in children are complex and multifactorial, often influenced by biological, psychological, and social factors that interact over time. Early recognition and intervention are essential to prevent long-term nutritional deficits, emotional distress, and developmental complications.

Alice’s case highlights how anxiety-related behaviors and conditioned fears can significantly disrupt a child’s normal eating patterns. Despite having no concerns about body image, she demonstrates intense fear of vomiting, avoidance of eating outside her home, and consistent food restriction resulting in slowed growth and weight loss. These symptoms suggest the possibility of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID), a diagnosis distinct from anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa, where food avoidance stems from fear or sensory sensitivities rather than a drive for thinness.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

In this discussion, a biopsychosocial assessment will be used to explore how Alice’s medical history, developmental background, family dynamics, and emotional state contribute to her current symptoms. A list of differential diagnoses will be developed to guide diagnostic clarity, followed by identification of the primary diagnosis. The presentation will also outline appropriate non-pharmacologic, and lifestyle interventions aimpharmacologic, ed at restoring healthy eating behaviors and addressing underlying anxiety. Finally, the discussion will emphasize the importance of interprofessional collaboration, involving pediatricians, nutritionists, therapists, and family members to ensure comprehensive care and long-term recovery.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW 

NU 665 WEEK 9 DISCUSSION 1: SLEEP DISORDERS

NU 665 WEEK 9 DISCUSSION 1: SLEEP DISORDERS

Dashboard My courses NU-665C-02-25PCSP Week 9: Sleep Disorders

Week 9 Discussion 1: Sleep Disorders

Value: 100 points

Due: Create your initial post Day 3 and

reply to at least one of your peers by Day

7.

Grading Category: Discussions

Note: In this type of discussion, you will

not see the responses of your classmates

until after you have posted your own

response to the following prompts.

Place your Order Now 

Initial Post

Please choose one of the patient

scenarios below and answer the

associated prompts.

Scenario 1

Mrs. Jones is an 85-year-old female,

widowed patient who lives alone in her

own one-story home. She has strong

family support in her children, and a strong

tie to her Christian faith. She tries to keep

busy but recognizes how dicult getting

older is, with the loss of many family

members and friends she once had. Other

than this loneliness and grief, she feels

well. She denies depressive symptoms,

states anxiety and panic symptoms are

well managed with her current medication

regimen. Her chief complaint today is

insomnia. She states despite her current

medication regimen, she still cannot

initiate or maintain sleep. Mrs. Jones

states, “I’ve just never been a good

sleeper!” Her current medications include:

Week 9 Discussion 1: Sleep Disorders

Dashboard My courses NU-665C-02-25PCSP Week 9: Sleep Disorders

Week 9 Discussion 1: Sleep Disorders

 

To do: Make forum posts: 1

 

Mirtazapine 7.5 mg PO QHS –

insomnia

Doxepin 10 mg PO QHS – insomnia

Gabapentin 100 mg PO TID – mild

idiopathic neuropathy

Zolpidem 5 mg PO QHS

Xanax 0.5 mg PO BID

Venlafaxine 225 mg PO daily

Answer the following prompts using 2-3

scholarly references:

  1. Write an original patient education

script explaining Mrs. Jones’ current

medication regimen. (1–2

paragraphs)

  1. Is there any further evaluation or

testing you would order? (1–2

paragraphs)

  1. Are there any changes to her

medication regimen you would

make? If so, what would your

changes be? (1–2 paragraphs).

Scenario 2

James is a 15-year-old patient who

identi

es as male. James presents today

with his mother, who provides collateral

information. James has a diagnosis of

autism spectrum disorder. He is currently

prescribed:

Oxcarbazepine 300 mg PO BID – off

label for mood swings and irritability

Paroxetine 20 mg PO daily in the PM

– social anxiety

James states that he feels sluggish during

the day and has trouble waking up for

school. He states that if he had his way, he

would stay in bed and sleep all day. His

mother laughs and states, “You’d never

know it! He sure sounds like he’s sleeping,

with the way he snores!”

Upon interview, James reports the

following symptoms as positive when the

PMHNP screens for depression:

Depressed mood – some days

Insomnia or poor sleep – nearly

every day

Appetite – Intact

Suicidal ideation – None

 

Concentration – Impaired nearly

every day

Hobbies/Interests/Pleasure: Video

games (online gaming with friends)

– intact

Guilt/worthlessness/hopelessness:

None

Energy: Low nearly every day

This information was corroborated by the

patient’s mother.

Answer the following prompts using 2-3

scholarly references:

  1. Write an original dialogue between

yourself and James and his mother,

including additional questions you

have for them. (1–2 paragraphs)

  1. List the three most likely causes of

James’ current symptoms with brief

rationale. (1–2 paragraphs)

  1. Given your differentials, what is your

next step in this case? How would

you explain the reasoning for this

step to James and his mother? (1–2

paragraphs)

Use the appropriate APA formatting as

listed in the syllabus.

Replies

Reply to at least one of your peers who

wrote about the opposite prompt. In your

reply post, respond with scholarly

discourse and an evidence-based

framework. Does your peers’ post follow

the current evidence? What might you do

differently in practice? Your assertions

should be backed by evidence that

references at least two scholarly sources.

Please refer to the Grading Rubric for

details on how this activity will be graded.

The described expectations meet the

passing level of 80%. You are directed to

review the Discussion Grading Rubric for

criteria which exceed expectations.

Introduction

For this discussion, you will review the Week 9 Sleep Disorders case, focusing on Scenario 1: Mrs. Jones, an 85-year-old female patient presenting with chronic insomnia despite multiple prescribed sleep medications. Sleep disorders are especially prevalent among older adults and can significantly impact both physical and mental health. In geriatric populations, sleep disturbances are often multifactorial—arising from physiological changes of aging, comorbid medical conditions, polypharmacy, grief, and psychosocial stressors such as loneliness or reduced social interaction. Understanding these contributing factors is essential for accurate diagnosis and the development of an effective, individualized treatment plan.

Place your Order Now 

Mrs. Jones’ case highlights the complexity of managing insomnia in elderly patients, particularly when several sedative and antidepressant medications are already in use. The overlapping pharmacologic effects, potential for drug interactions, and age-related alterations in metabolism must be carefully considered when evaluating her symptoms. Beyond the pharmacologic dimension, psychological factors such as bereavement and lifestyle adjustments may also play a role in her difficulty initiating and maintaining sleep.

This discussion will analyze Mrs. Jones’ medication regimen, explore appropriate diagnostic evaluations, and propose evidence-based treatment adjustments. By integrating pharmacologic principles with a holistic, patient-centered approach, the goal is to improve her sleep quality, minimize medication burden, and enhance her overall quality of life.

Place your Order Now 

NU 665 WEEK 9 Assignment 1: Sleep Disturbances and Medical Comorbidities

NU 665 WEEK 9

ASSIGNMENT 1: SLEEP DISTURBANCES AND MEDICAL COMORBIDITIES 

Value: 100 points

Due: Day 7

Grading Category: Assignments

Instructions

Log in to Symptom Media using the following credentials:

Username: RegisNursing
Password: Regis0908

After logging in, view the Insomnia Due to a Medical Condition video (10:00 minutes).

Answer the following prompts in a one- to two-page paper:

  • Write a mental status examination on this patient.
  • Write a case formulation/biopsychosocial assessment for the patient.
  • Create an individualized treatment plan for the patient, including pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatment options.

Place your Order Now  

All papers must conform to the most recent APA standards.

Please refer to the Grading Rubric for details on how this activity will be graded.

Introduction

For this discussion, you will review the case presented in the Symptom Media video, “Insomnia Due to a Medical Condition. The video provides a realistic clinical portrayal of a patient experiencing significant sleep disturbances associated with an underlying medical condition. Sleep disturbances are common among individuals with chronic health issues and can greatly affect mood, cognitive function, and overall quality of life. Understanding the interplay between medical comorbidities and sleep is therefore essential for developing an effective, patient-centered care plan.

Place your Order Now  

This paper will begin with a comprehensive mental status examination (MSE) to assess the patient’s general appearance, behavior, mood, thought processes, and cognitive functioning. The MSE provides a structured framework for understanding the patient’s current psychological and emotional state.

Next, a case formulation and biopsychosocial assessment will be presented to explore how biological, psychological, and social factors contribute to the patient’s insomnia. This section integrates clinical observations with relevant contextual factors such as medical history, lifestyle, stressors, and support systems.

Finally, an individualized treatment plan will be developed, combining both pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions. This plan will focus on improving sleep quality, managing comorbid conditions, and promoting long-term wellness through evidence-based strategies.

Through this analysis, the goal is to demonstrate a holistic understanding of insomnia within the context of medical comorbidity and to outline an approach that aligns with best practices in psychiatric-mental health care.

Place your Order Now  

NU 665 WEEK 10 DISCUSSION POST

NU 665 WEEK 10 DISCUSSION POST

For this discussion, you will review the Geriatric Case Study.

Create a video up to five minutes long addressing any two of the following prompts:

  • Describe the factors influencing social determinants of health and how these might impact Midge’s care.
  • Describe Midge through the lens of one of the developmental theorists (Erikson, Piaget, Kohlberg).
  • Provide your list of differential diagnoses with rationales.
  • Describe three evidence-based screening tools and why they would be appropriate here.
  • What are some non-pharmacologic treatment options that might be helpful for Midge?
  • What are some pharmacologic treatment options that might be helpful for Midge?
  • Pretend Midge is your patient, and you are providing patient education for her on your decided-upon treatment plan.

Place your Order Now  

To create your video, follow the instructions for Zoom Tutorial and create an unlisted YouTube video. The following tools can be used to create your video: Zoom or your personal preference.

You will need to submit the YouTube video URL for this discussion. The best way to do this is to copy and paste the hyperlink URL for the YouTube video into a Word document. Your faculty will access your video via the link. Do not upload a video file (mp4).

Place your Order Now  

Introduction

Hello everyone,

For this discussion, you will review the Geriatric Case Study focusing on Midge, an older adult whose health, lifestyle, and social circumstances highlight many of the key challenges faced by the aging population. In this presentation, I will be addressing two prompts that are central to understanding her overall well-being and care needs.

First, I will describe the factors influencing the social determinants of health and discuss how these may impact Midge’s access to care, treatment outcomes, and quality of life. Social determinants such as income, living environment, social support, and access to healthcare services play a critical role in shaping health disparities among older adults. Understanding these factors allows healthcare providers to develop a more comprehensive, person-centered care plan.

Next, I will examine Midge through the lens of Erik Erikson’s psychosocial development theory, particularly focusing on the stage of Ego Integrity versus Despair. This framework helps explain how Midge’s experiences, reflections, and sense of purpose in later life influence her emotional and psychological health. By applying Erikson’s theory, we can better understand her behaviors, attitudes toward aging, and potential coping mechanisms.

Through this discussion, I aim to integrate theory with practical application—exploring how Midge’s social context and developmental stage intersect to shape her care approach. By reviewing the Geriatric Case Study, I hope to emphasize the importance of holistic and empathetic care strategies for elderly patients like Midge.

Place your Order Now  

NU 665 Week 11 Assignment 2: Personal Assumptions

NU 665 Week 11 Assignment 2: Personal Assumptions

Value: 100 points

Due: Day 7

Grading Category: Assignments

Instructions

Working with individuals with personality disorders or paraphilic disorders can be a challenge for the PMHNP. The thoughts and opinions you have about clients will influence your treatment of them, so it is important to confront these thoughts and learn how to manage them ahead of seeing patients independently.

To discover your assumptions about those with these specific mental health disorders, review the Assignment 11.1 Personal Assumptions document and choose three of the prompts to respond to. This paper should be one to two pages in length, and references are not required.

Please refer to the Grading Rubric for details on how this activity will be graded.

Introduction

Working with individuals diagnosed with personality or paraphilic disorders presents a unique set of emotional, ethical, and professional challenges for the Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioner (PMHNP). These disorders often evoke strong personal reactions because they are associated with complex behaviors that can test a clinician’s boundaries, empathy, and therapeutic objectivity. Personality disorders, characterized by enduring patterns of maladaptive behavior and interpersonal difficulty, and paraphilic disorders, involving atypical sexual interests that may cause distress or harm, frequently elicit societal stigma and moral judgment. For this reason, it is essential that PMHNPs engage in ongoing self-reflection to identify and manage their own biases, assumptions, and emotional responses before providing independent clinical care.

This assignment encourages such reflection by inviting an honest examination of personal attitudes toward individuals living with these challenging conditions. By responding to three selected prompts from the Personal Assumptions guide, I aim to explore how my perceptions have been shaped by cultural, professional, and personal influences, and how these views might affect the therapeutic alliance. Through this process, I will also identify strategies to maintain compassion, uphold ethical practice, and provide trauma-informed, nonjudgmental care to all patients.

Understanding and confronting one’s assumptions is a crucial step in developing cultural humility, emotional resilience, and professional integrity as a mental health provider. As I prepare for autonomous practice, this reflection will serve as both a personal and professional checkpoint—helping me ensure that every client, regardless of diagnosis, receives respectful, evidence-based, and empathetic care.

Place your Order Now 

NU 665 WEEK 11 Assignment 1: Personality Disorders

NU 665 WEEK 11 Assignment 1: Personality Disorders

Value: 100 points

Due: Day 7

Grading Category: Assignments

Instructions

Using your clinical experience, choose a patient you have seen diagnosed with a personality disorder.

  • Download the Biopsychosocial Template (Word) to write about that client for this assignment.
  • Use the template to create an evidence-based treatment plan using all the components within the template. Include the Personality Disorder Cluster in the DSM-5-TR. Follow HIPAA guidelines to avoid providing information that identifies the patient.

Place your Order Now 

Criteria for this paper:

  • Answer template questions, integrating resources to provide rationale for all decisions.
  • Use APA formatting for all components of your paper.
  • Your paper should be two to three pages in length not including the reference page.
  • Use at least one nursing journal reference from CINAHL (available through the Regis library) to support your rationale.

Please refer to the Grading Rubric for details on how this activity will be graded.

Introduction

Personality disorders represent some of the most complex and challenging conditions encountered in psychiatric–mental health nursing practice. These disorders are characterized by enduring patterns of inner experience and behavior that deviate markedly from cultural expectations, are pervasive and inflexible, and lead to significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other areas of functioning (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2022). The DSM-5-TR classifies personality disorders into three clusters based on descriptive similarities: Cluster A (odd or eccentric behaviors), Cluster B (dramatic, emotional, or erratic behaviors), and Cluster C (anxious or fearful behaviors). Understanding these clusters provides a foundation for targeted assessment and individualized intervention planning.

In this paper, I will discuss a patient from my clinical experience diagnosed with a Borderline Personality Disorder, using the biopsychosocial model as the guiding framework for assessment and treatment. This model emphasizes the interaction between biological predispositions, psychological dynamics, and sociocultural influences that contribute to the development and maintenance of personality pathology (Paris, 2021). By applying this holistic approach, clinicians can better understand the complexity of each patient’s experience and design evidence-based interventions that address both symptom management and interpersonal functioning.

The purpose of this assignment is to develop a comprehensive, evidence-based treatment plan that integrates pharmacologic and psychotherapeutic strategies while maintaining a trauma-informed, recovery-oriented approach. The discussion will include a review of DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria, relevant clinical features, and treatment rationales supported by scholarly nursing literature. All identifying information has been removed in accordance with HIPAA guidelines to ensure confidentiality and ethical integrity.

Place your Order Now 

NU 665 WEEK 12 DISCUSSION POST 1: LGBTQIA+ Topic Presentation

NU 665 WEEK 12 DISCUSSION POST 1: LGBTQIA+ Topic Presentation

Value: 100 points

Due: Create your initial post by Day 3, and reply to at least two of your peers by Day 7.

Grading Category: Discussions

Initial Post

Using your chosen topic, your group should develop a five- to 10-minute creative, informational presentation which you will record and upload to this discussion. You may use PowerPoint, Prezi, or another type of presentation medium as desired, and you may insert videos or other media.

Record your group presentation using the Zoom Tutorial; your presentation should include voice-over or audio from all group members. Once you have recorded your presentation, Create an Unlisted YouTube video. You will need to submit the YouTube video URL to this discussion. The best way to do this is to copy and paste the website/URL for the YouTube video into a Word document and upload your Word document. Do not upload a video file (mp4).

Introduction

Hello everyone, and welcome to our presentation on Mental Health Impacts of Stigma Among LGBTQIA+ Individuals.  As future Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioners, understanding the unique behavioral and mental health challenges faced by LGBTQIA+ populations is essential to delivering competent and compassionate care. Despite progress in social acceptance and legal protections, sexual and gender minority individuals continue to experience disproportionate rates of anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, substance use, and suicide compared to their heterosexual and cisgender peers (Hatzenbuehler & Pachankis, 2021).

These disparities are deeply rooted in the concept of minority stress, which describes the chronic strain caused by stigma, discrimination, and internalized prejudice (Meyer, 2015). When combined with systemic barriers such as limited access to affirming healthcare, fear of disclosure, and societal rejection, these stressors contribute to profound emotional distress and poor mental health outcomes. Addressing this issue is not only a matter of clinical skill but also of ethical responsibility, cultural humility, and advocacy for equitable treatment.

In today’s presentation, we will:

  1. Introduce the key aspects of our chosen topic and how it contributes to mental distress among LGBTQIA+ individuals.

  2. Review epidemiological data and highlight the public health and economic impacts.

  3. Discuss evidence-based assessment tools aligned with DSM-5-TR criteria.

  4. Present a comprehensive plan of care that includes pharmacologic, psychotherapeutic, and holistic interventions designed to promote resilience and healing.

Our goal is to increase awareness and understanding while equipping future practitioners with strategies to provide safe, inclusive, and effective mental health support for LGBTQIA+ clients.

Place your Order Now 

NU 665 Week 12 Assignment 1: Care Plan for LGBTQIA+ Client

NU 665 Week 12 Assignment 1: Care Plan for LGBTQIA+ Client

Value: 100 points

Due: Day 7

Grading Category: Assignments

After you complete the readings, choose a topic related to LGBTQIA+ behavioral/mental health. Examples include stigma, trauma, domestic violence, homelessness, bullying, or bipolar disorder.

Place your Order Now

In a Word document, write a synthesis paper that addresses the following sections:

  • Introduction to topic: How does this topic contribute to mental distress and diagnoses?
  • Epidemiology and economic costs to society
  • Overview of the assessment/tools to assess for DSM-5-TR disorder
  • Pharmacological interventions plan of care to include holistic interventions and psychotherapeutic options.

Your paper should be two to three pages long not including the cover sheet or APA references list and it should follow APA formatting for all components.

Please refer to the Grading Rubric for details on how this activity will be graded.

To Submit Your Assignment

  1. Select the Add Submissions button.
  2. Drag or upload your file to the File Picker.
  3. Select Save Changes.

Introduction

Mental health disparities among LGBTQIA+ populations remain a critical and persistent concern within contemporary behavioral healthcare. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, and other sexual or gender-diverse individuals continue to experience significantly higher rates of psychological distress, trauma exposure, and mental health diagnoses compared to their heterosexual and cisgender peers (Meyer, 2015). These disparities are largely shaped by the cumulative effects of minority stress, which encompasses experiences of discrimination, stigma, social rejection, and internalized prejudice (Hatzenbuehler & Pachankis, 2021). Such social and structural inequities create barriers to accessing safe, affirming, and culturally responsive mental health services, further exacerbating vulnerability to anxiety, depression, substance use disorders, and suicidal ideation.

This paper focuses on the impact of stigma on the mental health of transgender individuals, examining how the issue contributes to mental distress, diagnostic challenges, and broader public health consequences. The discussion will synthesize current evidence regarding the epidemiology and economic burden of the problem, highlighting its implications for individuals, healthcare systems, and society. A review of assessment approaches and validated tools aligned with DSM-5-TR criteria will then be presented to guide accurate diagnosis and culturally competent evaluation. The final section will outline a comprehensive plan of care that integrates pharmacological management, psychotherapeutic interventions, and holistic strategies aimed at promoting mental wellness and resilience within LGBTQIA+ populations.

By approaching this topic through an intersectional and affirming lens, this paper underscores the critical role of the Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioner (PMHNP) in providing inclusive, evidence-based care that addresses both clinical symptoms and the systemic injustices that sustain mental health inequities.

Place your Order Now 

Week 13 Assignment 1: Crisis Case Study

Week 13 Assignment 1: Crisis Case Study

Value: 100 points

Due: Day 7

Grading Category: Case Studies

Instructions

In this assignment, you will review the Crisis Case Study and analyze the data to determine the health status of the patient. You will need a minimum of two scholarly references to support your work.

  • Use the NU665C Crisis Case Study Questions (Word) document to complete the case study assignment.
  • Follow the requirements posted in the rubric.
  • Interactive case studies should be five to seven pages depending on the complexity of the case. This is excluding title and references pages.

All papers must conform to the most recent APA standards.

Please refer to the Grading Rubric for details on how this activity will be graded.

Place your Order Now 

Introduction

The NU 665 Week 13 Crisis Case Study provides an opportunity to apply advanced psychiatric–mental health nursing competencies in the assessment and management of a patient experiencing an acute psychological crisis. Crisis situations represent pivotal moments in mental health care, where timely intervention can prevent further deterioration and promote recovery. As defined by Roberts (2021), a crisis occurs when an individual’s usual coping mechanisms are overwhelmed by stressors, resulting in a temporary state of disequilibrium. Understanding the nature of the crisis, the client’s perception of the event, and available supports are essential steps in determining an effective intervention plan.

This paper will analyze the provided Crisis Case Study using a systematic, evidence-based approach to identify the patient’s current health status, immediate needs, and priority nursing interventions. The assessment will incorporate biopsychosocial, environmental, and cultural dimensions influencing the client’s presentation. Special attention will be given to identifying risk factors for self-harm or violence, safety concerns, and appropriate de-escalation strategies. The analysis will also align with recognized theoretical models such as Aguilera’s Crisis Theory and Roberts’ Seven-Stage Crisis Intervention Model, which provide structured frameworks for understanding and responding to crises in clinical practice (James & Gilliland, 2020).

Furthermore, this paper will integrate clinical reasoning, ethical considerations, and professional standards consistent with the American Psychiatric Nurses Association (APNA) guidelines and the ANA Code of Ethics. The goal is to demonstrate critical thinking, diagnostic accuracy, and patient-centered care while emphasizing the PMHNP’s role in crisis stabilization, therapeutic communication, and interdisciplinary collaboration. The discussion will conclude with recommendations for ongoing management, safety planning, and follow-up care, ensuring holistic and sustainable recovery for the patient.

Place your Order Now