NURS 6052 Assignment Evidence Based Practice and the Quadruple Aim

EBP has a strong dependency on the healthcare empirical data existence in the decision-making of a community. EBP has continued to develop in the fields of management, public policy formation, education, and nursing practice since its formal introduction in the 1990s (Lavenberg, Cacchione, & Jayakumar, 2019). according to NURS 6052 Assignment Evidence Based Practice and the Quadruple Aim, EBP is the most operative technique of solving problems in a medical atmosphere and includes the best available evidence from well-designed systematic studies, values, and patient preferences as well as the ability of clinicians to choose on patient care. EBP holds a cross-professional model for great probabilities of achievement, in which joint decision-making is solid.

Likewise, the acceptance and application of EVP depend upon the dissimilar actors at the federal, nation-wide, and native levels. The fourfold objective is mainly aimed at improving patient experience, population health, healthcare providers’ working lives, and reducing the costs associated with healthcare (Bodenheimer & Sinsky, 2014). The fourfold objective is the redesign of healthcare facilities to achieve the above objectives. However, a major setback in achieving these goals in the wider health sector is to improve public health while simultaneously containing or reducing the cost of health care.

Healthcare organizations continually seek to optimize healthcare performance. For years, this approach was a three-pronged one known as the Triple Aim, with efforts focused on improved population health, enhanced patient experience, and lower healthcare costs.

More recently, this approach has evolved to a Quadruple Aim by including a focus on improving the work life of healthcare providers. Each of these measures are impacted by decisions made at the organizational level, and organizations have increasingly turned to EBP to inform and justify these decisions.

To Prepare:

Read the articles by Sikka, Morath, & Leape (2015); Crabtree, Brennan, Davis, & Coyle (2016); and Kim et al. (2016) provided in the Resources.
Reflect on how EBP might impact (or not impact) the Quadruple Aim in healthcare.
Consider the impact that EBP may have on factors impacting these quadruple aim elements, such as preventable medical errors or healthcare delivery.

To Complete:

Write a brief analysis (no longer than 2 pages) of the connection between EBP and the Quadruple Aim.

Your analysis should address how EBP might (or might not) help reach the Quadruple Aim, including each of the four measures of:

Patient experience
Population health
Costs
Work life of healthcare providers

Rubrics:

Write a brief analysis of the connection between evidence-based practice and the Quadruple Aim. Your analysis should address how evidence-based practice might (or might not) help reach the Quadruple Aim, including each of the four measures of:

·   Patient experience
·   Population health
·   Costs
·   Work life of healthcare providers–

as stated in NURS 6052 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice and the Quadruple Aim, more recently, this approach has evolved to a Quadruple Aim by including a focus on improving the work life of healthcare providers. Each of these measures are impacted by decisions made at the organizational level, and organizations have increasingly turned to EBP to inform and justify these decisions.

To Prepare:

Read the articles by Sikka, Morath, & Leape (2015); Crabtree, Brennan, Davis, & Coyle (2016); and Kim et al. (2016) provided in the Resources.
Reflect on how EBP might impact (or not impact) the Quadruple Aim in healthcare.
Consider the impact that EBP may have on factors impacting these quadruple aim elements, such as preventable medical errors or healthcare delivery.

To Complete:

Write a brief analysis (no longer than 2 pages) of the connection between EBP and the Quadruple Aim.

Your analysis should address how EBP might (or might not) help reach the Quadruple Aim, including each of the four measures of:

Patient experience
Population health
Costs
Work life of healthcare providers

By Day 7 of Week 1

Submit your anaylsis.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK1Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Week 1 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Week 1 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK1Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
Click on the Submit button to complete your submission. Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice and the Quadruple Aim

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 1 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 1 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 1

To submit your Assignment:

Week 1 Assignment

To go to the next module:

Module 2

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 77 (77%) – 85 (85%) Good 68 (68%) – 76 (76%) Fair 60 (60%) – 67 (67%) Poor 0 (0%) – 59 (59%)

Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Written Expression and Formatting—The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

RE: Discussion – Week 1

Good Evening D

American Association of Nurse Anesthetists (AANA) is a website designed to provide healthcare professionals with the latest and most updated information based on evidence-based practices. according to NURS 6052 Assignment Evidence Based Practice and the Quadruple Aim, AANA adopted the definition, “based on the work of Sackett et al. (2000), the AANA adopted the definition of evidence-based nurse anesthesia practice as “integration and synthesis of the best research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values” in order to optimize the care of patients receiving anesthesia services” (American Association of Nurse Anesthetists, 2020).

The CDC uses EBP in collaboration with other agencies. “One-stop shop for guidelines or recommendations developed by CDC (and CDC collaborations with other organizations and agencies), or by CDC federal advisory committees; includes recommendations, strategies, and information to help decision makers choose courses of action in specific situations (Center for Disease Control, 2019).

This definition appeared in the tab labeled evidenced- based practices within the website. The AANA is grounded in evidenced-based practices because they provide primary sources, first-hand information and information based on research. “Duke University Medical Center defines evidenced-based practices as the integration of clinical expertise, patient values and the best research evidence into the decision-making process for patient care” (“Why choose evidence-based practice?,” 2018). Therefore, we are able to care for our patients properly and effectively with the most innovative technology and medical practices that are available. This information has not changed my perception of the organization, matter of fact it has given me some insight on the duties and responsibilities of the Nurse Anesthetists.

References

American Association of Nurse Anesthetists. (2020). Evidence-based practice. (n.d.). AANA. Retrieved from

Why choose evidence-based practice? (2018). American Association of Nurse Practitioners.

Evidence-based practices. (2019, April 5). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6052_Module01_Week01_Assignment_Rubric

Grid View
List View

Excellent Good Fair Poor
Write a brief analysis of the connection between evidence-based practice and the Quadruple Aim. Your analysis should address how evidence-based practice might (or might not) help reach the Quadruple Aim, including each of the four measures of:

· Patient experience
· Population health
· Costs
· Work life of healthcare providers
Points Range: 77 (77%) – 85 (85%)
The analysis clearly and accurately addresses in detail how evidence-based practice either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim.

The analysis accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the four measures of patient experience, population health, costs, and work-life of healthcare providers either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim.

according to NURS 6052 Assignment Evidence Based Practice and the Quadruple Aim, the analysis provides a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources reviewed on the four measures supporting or not supporting the Quadruple Aim. The response fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the analysis provided with credible and detailed examples.

Points Range: 68 (68%) – 76 (76%)
The analysis accurately addresses how evidence-based practice either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim.

The analysis accurately explains how the four measures of patient experience, population health, and work life of healthcare providers either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim.

The analysis provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource reviewed on the four measures supporting or not supporting the Quadruple Aim. The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support the analysis provided and may include some detailed examples.

Points Range: 60 (60%) – 67 (67%)
The analysis inaccurately or vaguely addresses how evidence-based practice either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim.

The analysis inaccurately or vaguely explains how the four measures of patient experience, population health, and work life of healthcare providers either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim.

The analysis provides an inaccurate or vague analysis of the four measures supporting or not supporting the Quadruple Aim with a vague or inaccurate analysis of outside resources. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the analysis provided and may include vague or inaccurate examples.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 59 (59%)
The analysis inaccurately and vaguely addresses how evidence-based practice either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim or is missing.

The analysis inaccurately and vaguely explains how the four measures of patient experience, population health, and work life of healthcare providers either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim or is missing.

The analysis provides a vague and inaccurate analysis of the four measures supporting or not supporting the Quadruple Aim with a vague and inaccurate analysis of outside resources. The response fails to integrate any resources to support the analysis provided or is missing.
Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice and the Quadruple Aim
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated yet is brief and not descriptive.

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.
Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting—The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors.

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (three or four) APA format errors.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (five or more) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6052_Module01_Week01_Assignment_Rubric

NURS 6052 Assignment Evidence Based Practice and the Quadruple Aim