Hired by a multinational firm that manufactures airplanes

/0 Comments/in /by

Hired by a multinational firm that manufactures airplanes

Hired by a multinational firm that manufactures airplanes

You have been recently hired by a multinational firm that manufactures airplanes parts. They are interested in investing in a new factory. However, the CEO is unsure of where they should invest. The CEO would like to either invest in a developed or a developing country and your input is valuable to his decision. Your focus will be on providing specific information on both a developed and developing country, providing that both countries have data for the last 20 years. You will need to provide support, through your analysis, for which country you think will be best for this factory to invest in. Do not pick a country that does not have data that is easily accessible.

Be sure to include the following items in your paper:

Select a developed and developing country.
Explain why you selected those particular countries.
Analyze four economic indicators that are important for the two countries you selected.
Describe these indicators and why you selected them.
Compare and contrast their fiscal and monetary policies during a recent economic growth and recessionary periods. How have their policies lead to economic stability?
Evaluate two recent trade policies in the countries that you have selected. Explain the impact of these policies on your investment.

Choosing one of the two countries, analyze their decision to reduce trade restrictions, such as how import tariffs affect the ability to borrow in the world capital market.
Examine the currency of each currency and explain how that will influence your investment.
Provide a conclusion, supported by academic research, for which country you would recommend to the CEO.
The paper

Must be double-spaced and eight to ten pages in length, not including title and references pages.Must be formatted, according to APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.).Must include a title page containing the following:
Title of paper
Student’s name
Course name and number
Instructor’s name
Date submitted
Must use at least five scholarly sources, in addition to the course text.
Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

CLICK HERE TO ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

NHS 6008

/0 Comments/in /by

NHS 6008

CLICK HERE TO ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

NHS 6008

To complete this discussion:

Select an initiative or issue in your current or desired
workplace that requires economic evaluation.

Conduct research on human resources, equipment, technology,
and other resources required for the proposed initiative.

Formulate the costs associated with the proposed initiative.

Post according to the Faculty Expectations Response
Guidelines. Remember to cite the readings, resources, and research that you
have used in the development of your post.

Response Guidelines

Respond to the posts of other learners according to the
Faculty Expectations Response Guidelines.

How do the costs associated with his or her proposed
initiative compare with yours?

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.

Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.

One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.

I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.

In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.

Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).

Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).

Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.

I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.

As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.

It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

Lopes Write Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.

Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.

Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?

Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.

Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.

If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.

I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.

As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:

Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.

Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

Integration of Cultural Values within an Organization

/0 Comments/in /by

Integration of Cultural Values within an Organization

CLICK HERE TO ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Company cultures align the organization’s stakeholders in achieving the set goals and objectives (Reidhead, 2021). The two countries, China and the United Kingdom have reflected organizational cultures that align with our organization. Generation of company values impacts the organizations’ interactions and venturing into different countries. Quantigration Inc.’s cultural values relate with the China and the United Kingdom business cultural values.

Employee satisfaction is a cultural value that continues to be upheld in both countries and our organization (Zajdel & Michalcewicz-Kaniowska, 2020). Thus, integrating this value during the venturing period will help the company interact and collaboratively work together with the people within both countries. Employee satisfaction and appraisal impact their contribution to manufacturing and products management.

Another cultural value is the rigid managerial structure in China. At the same time, rigidity may negatively influence the growth of an organization. China firms have developed a structure whereby they conduct business from a hierarchical point of view. To penetrate the manufacturing industry into the country, the organization must adapt to the hierarchical structures to ensure that the organizations within the country incorporate the business within their country.

The relationship aspect is also an organizational value that both countries uphold in their company cultures. The relationship between the stakeholders and the customers enables more accessible functionality within the organization. It also creates a platform where the organization interacts with its customers in acquiring platforms in the new countries. Upholding good relationships with employees, no matter their cultures, enables the organizations to acquire their goals and objectives and venture into more countries worldwide.

Culture inclusivity integrates people from different worlds while at the same time respecting their opinions, beliefs, values, and norms. Globalization has enabled organizations to integrate inclusivity and cultural practices in the management of an organization.

References

Reidhead, C. (2021). Effective Communication as a Tool for Achieving Organizational Goals and Objectives. Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Studies, 04(04). https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v4-i4-07

ZAJDEL, M., & MICHALCEWICZ-KANIOWSKA, M. (2020). Employee satisfaction within the context of an organization’s development – study results. Scientific Papers of the Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management Series, 2020(146), 559–566. https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2020.146.40

Integration of Cultural Values within an Organization

Paper details

You work for Quantigration, Inc., a semiconductor manufacturing plant headquartered in the United States. Quantigration’s main fabrication plant produces microchips used in mobile phones and laptops around the world. Capitalizing on advancements in its product, Quantigration has aggressively expanded and recently acquired two fabrication plants and workers from around the world.

Due to these acquisitions and partnerships, Quantigration must develop a plan to assist employees of different nationalities in understanding each other and working well together.

 

Yesterday, the plant supervisor, Gregory, called you into his office. He has some concerns about these cultural differences and is worried that the acquisitions might not go smoothly. The culture of a manufacturing plant in one country could be noticeably different from one in another part of the world. Gregory realizes that these differences could lead to conflict. To handle this issue, he has decided that Quantigration needs to update its company values to be more culturally inclusive.

 

Directions

Gregory would like you to begin by doing background research and analysis. He would like you to take stock of the current culture at Quantigration and then compare it to the national cultures of the two new acquisitions.

Part 1: Cultural Analysis

  1. First, examine your own national culture as a representative sample of the current Quantigration workforce. Think about how your own nationality relates to your culture. Consider the ways that your culture views interactions with others, workplace culture, teamwork, and communication.
  2. Then, select two countries different than your own. You may select two countries from the Understanding Global Cultures e-book, or, you may choose others that you have a particular interest in. You can find more information about some of the countries in the A to Z World Business resource and the Hofstede Insights Country Comparison Tool in the Supporting Materials section.
  3. Using what you have found, write a cultural analysis containing 250- to 500-word summaries of each of your selected cultures. Also include a summary of your own culture in this document. In these summaries, pay particular attention to how members of each culture interact with others, what values they consider important, and how they view work, family, and obligation.

Once you have completed your summaries of your selected countries, write a 500-word summary comparison to help Gregory understand the major difference and similarities between the cultures. In your comparison, identify three major cultural differences and three similarities between the cultures you’ve analysed. As you write, consider common cultural dimensions that these cultures share, and the ways that they differ most.

Part 2: Cultural Value Reaction

Now that you have finished your analyses, Gregory would like you to examine Quantigration’s company values. (Read the article “How to Write a Company Value Statement That Will Achieve Strategic Impact” in the Supporting Materials section for more information on how company value statements can motivate employees and reflect company objectives.)

Review the three company values Gregory has given you:

  • Family: Everyone who works here is part of the Quantigration family.
  • Process: Following processes will result in quality products.
  • Numbers: Precision engineering requires precision thinking.

 

Consider each company value from the viewpoint of each selected culture from your cultural analysis. Think about how these values relate to the cultural values you have uncovered in each of the countries you analyzed. Then, write a brief reaction for Gregory that examines the values.

For each company value, write a 200-word summary explaining whether it does or does not represent the values of the three cultures you have examined, providing specific reasons why or why not. In particular, ask yourself the following:

  • Which company values align closely with the values of the cultures?
  • Are there any values that seem directly opposed to any of your selected cultures?
  • Would any of the company’s values cause tension for an employee coming from one of your selected countries?

You should also include recommended changes to the values to better align them to your own culture and the cultures you have selected to examine, and to encourage better intercultural interaction.

 

What to Submit

Every project has a deliverable or deliverables, which are the files that must be submitted before your project can be assessed. For this project, you must submit the following:

 

  1. Cultural Analysis Using information from the e-book Understanding Global Cultures, write a cultural analysis of two cultures. This document should include:
  • 3.Company Value Reaction Write an email to Gregory with three 200-word reflections about how the company’s three value statements align with your chosen cultures.

Please see assignment from \”Order 5055\” . from part 2

 

 

School login information

Username: juanita.toefield@snhu.edu

Password: Starwood@03

 

 

Supporting Materials

The following resource(s) may help support your work on the project:

Citation Help Need help citing your sources? Use the CfA Citation Guide and Citation Maker.

Reading: How to Write a Company Value Statement That Will Achieve Strategic Impact Use this Shapiro Library article to learn how company value statements can be used to express culture.

Website: A to Z World Business This is a comprehensive country-by-country resource for success in international business and trade. Use this resource to find more information about the countries you select for your deliverables. For research assistance, contact the Shapiro Librarians on the library homepage.

Website: Hofstede Insights: Compare Countries Use this tool to learn more about the countries you will compare in your project.

Writing Guide Review the tutorials and resources in the Writing Guide document if you need help with the writing aspects of this project.

Rubric Name: HUM-20022 Project Rubric

Print Rubric

This table lists criteria and criteria group names in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. You can give feedback on each criterion by tabbing to the add feedback buttons in the table. Rubric Criteria

Mastered

Not Yet

Criterion Score

Cultural Analysis: Summarizes the cultural dimensions that most define your own identity

1 point

0 points

Score of Cultural Analysis: Summarizes the cultural dimensions that most define your own identity, / 1

Cultural Analysis: Explains similarities and differences between selected cultures

1 point

0 points

Score of Cultural Analysis: Explains similarities and differences between selected cultures, / 1

Cultural Analysis: Identifies cultural values and viewpoints regarding targeted cultural dimensions

1 point

0 points

Score of Cultural Analysis: Identifies cultural values and viewpoints regarding targeted cultural dimensions, / 1

Company Value Reaction: Compares and contrasts how company values represent cultural dimensions of selected cultures

1 point

0 points

Score of Company Value Reaction: Compares and contrasts how company values represent cultural dimensions of selected cultures, / 1

Written answers are clear; use correct grammar, sentence structure, and spelling; and show an understanding of audience and purpose

1 point

0 points

Score of Written answers are clear; use correct grammar, sentence structure, and spelling; and show an understanding of audience and purpose, / 1

Lists sources where applicable using citation methods with no major errors

1 point

0 points

Score of Lists sources where applicable using citation methods with no major errors, / 1

Rubric Total Score Total

 

MN502

/0 Comments/in /by

MN502

MN502

CLICK HERE TO ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Discussion: Details MN502 UNIT 8

Writing in the voice of your chosen theorist from your Unit 5 Assignment, describe the Conceptual-Theory-Empirical (C-T-E) structure process you used in creating your theory?

ASSIGMENT 5 WAS:

This Assignment addresses this course outcome:

MN502-2: Explain how theoretical frameworks influence advance.

Purpose

The purpose of this Assignment is to explore how a theorist explicates his or her philosophy and thoughts behind a theoretical field. As in other fields of study, nursing has a plethora of theorists and theories. These theorists have developed their paradigm over time enriching it with research and dialogue with other theorists.

MY ANSWER IN THIS ASSIGMENT IS UPLADED.

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

  • Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
  • Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
  • One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
  • I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

  • Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
  • In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
  • Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
  • Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

  • Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
  • Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
  • I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

  • I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
  • As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
  • It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

LopesWrite Policy

  • For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
  • Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
  • Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
  • Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

  • The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
  • Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
  • If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
  • I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
  • As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

  • Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
    • Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
    • Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

Civility in the workplace

/0 Comments/in /by

Civility in the workplace

Civility in the workplace

CLICK HERE TO ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Complete the Clark Workplace Civility Index Assessment for a paper on workplace civility (Links to an external : site.) External website links

After you’ve finished, read the following article:

V. D. Lachman (2015). The disruptive behaviors of incivility, bullying, and horizontal/lateral violence raise ethical concerns. 39-42 in Urologic Nursing, 35(1). URL: http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=c9h&AN=100927729&site=eds-live&scope=site (This is a link to another website.) External website links

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Then, by clicking on the link below, you can watch the video.

Video (Links to an external site.)

External website links

Transcript (Links to an external site.)

External website links

Consider what you saw in the video as you answer the following questions:

Based on your observations, what leadership skills should you model for your coworkers as Masaya’s preceptor in order to promote his acceptance into the work-group or team?

Is there any evidence of incivility in the scenario?

Describe any common themes you found in the article, video, and Civility Index.

Share your thoughts on how you can improve your index score based on what you’ve read.

Podcast Feed Topic

Paper on Workplace Civility

Important information for writing discussion questions and participation

Welcome to class

Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to

I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.

Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.

If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.

Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.

Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.

I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!

Hi Class,

Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.

Contact me if you have any questions.

Important information on Writing a Discussion Question

  • Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
  • There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
  • Include in-text citations in your response
  • Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
  • Follow APA-7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed

Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor

  • A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
  • Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
  • Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
  • Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
  • Follow APA 7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
  • Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
  • Here are some helpful links
  • The is a great resource

Gauze and Effect

/0 Comments/in /by

Gauze and Effect

Organizer

  1. Question: What is the ethical question? State the situation at hand in your own words.

To guide your response, consider the following questions:

  • What are the ethical elements of the situation?
  • Does the situation involve some basic human goods that are being denied or threatened?
  • Could this decision or situation cause damage or harm to an individual or group?
  • Does the situation involve some considerations of justice or rights?

 

The ethical question in here is why Volkswagen owner acted unethically had cheated on the air tests subjected to the company by the united states. Volkswagen failed to produce safe products with minimized pollution as required by the corporate social responsibility. Therefore the company threatened the wellbeing of people in the community since air pollution caused by road vehicles is detrimental to human health.. This decision would result to consumers losing interest in diesel vehicles.

This situation involved considerations of rights since the customers were denied the rights to buy the cars they had intended to since the company had failed to produce safe products as expected.

 

  1. Facts (Known and Unknown): What do you know about the topic? What are the relevant facts?

 

 One of the major problems of any business owner is ensuring there are no ethical issues in business. In some cases it is the business owner’s responsibility to hold the employees accountable for unethical action. Ethical issues in business today are just as widespread as ever. The ethical dilemma that Volkswagen faced was as results of claims that the company had presented false air tests subjected by the united states.

It is very important to ensure that the managers and the employees are acting ethically in every processes and procedures in the company.

 

 

 

 

 

What additional information would be helpful to know? Can I learn more about the situation? What are some questions that you have about the topic that would be useful for making a decision?

 

It is important to know that partnering with a company that is involved in ethical issues may negatively affect the organization. For instance, auto mobile maker customers lost interest in diesel cars; this affected all the companies Volkswagen was partnering with since they would not want to buy cars from them with the mentality that that would also be involved in the ethical dilemma of false information.

 

  1. Stakeholders: Who are the major stakeholders—which individuals or groups have something to lose or gain from the outcome of the situation? In the table below, identify the concerns and values associated with each. What is important to them?

 

Stakeholder: Concerns/Values
Stakeholder One: suppliers Halted production would affect the sales of the first hand suppliers of the company’s product. Such as wheels.
Stakeholder Two: the owner of the company Situations such as falsified information can negatively impact the reputation of the company owner and also the company itself.
Stakeholder Three: employees In such a situation the company may be shut down by the regulations and this would lead to loss of employment
Stakeholder Four: customers The impact caused by such ethical issues affects the company customers through anticipated loss of customer loyalty. In the case of Volkswagen dilemma, most customers lost their interest on diesel cars.
Stakeholder Five: dealers Dealers involved with the company would also be negatively affected by ethical issues since their customers would not be interested in their goods too, after losing interest.

 

  1. Options: Try to think of all your options and list them in the box. Make sure to write down at least five possibilities. The goal is to produce as many creative ideas as possible. Don’t worry about complications or drawbacks just yet. In the next step, you’ll narrow down your ideas. For now, just focus on generating an array of options. Consider the following questions:
  • What different options are available?
  • Have you identified creative options?

 

Some of the options available include;

·         Partnering with the company under conditions that incase of ethical issues then

     they will be accountable.

·         Partner with the company under maximum supervision.

·         Create a partnership that is private.

·         Avoid partnering with such a company.

·         Accept the partnership

 

 

Now, choose three of the most plausible courses of action to examine in more detail. In the table below, explain the following:

  • What are the advantages/disadvantages of each option?
  • Can the best alternative be implemented?

 

Option Description Advantages Disadvantages
Option 1: partner with them under conditions that incase of ethical issues then they will be accountable. The partnering company will be accountable for any unethical issues. In case of unethical scandal from the partner the company may ruin its reputation.
Option 2: partner with  them under maximum supervision This will help the company ensure that they are aware of any false information through evaluation. The partnering company may still have some bad reputation in the past that would affect their customers.
Option 3:avoid partnering with such a company The company remains safe and only works to avoid ethical issues within its business. The company may not be able to receive funding from this company.

 

 

  1. Decision: In the context of the options that you examined in the previous step, how do you think Gauze and Effect should proceed with the partnership? What is your recommendation for the ethical decision at hand? Explain the reason for your decision. In your rationale, relate your reasoning to an ethical concept or theory discussed in the competency readings.

 

Gauze and Effect should not proceed to partnering with Volkswagen company since ethical issues such as falsified information may negatively affect the company since individuals still have the mentality that the auto motive company may still be using false information. In this case, it is also important for Gauze and Effect should ensure that the employees are accountable for unethical behaviors. By doing this, the company may be able to avoid ethical dilemma.

The reason why l would recommend Gauze and Effects not to proceed with the partnership is because; having such ethical issues my ruin its reputation since voltzwagen has a bad reputation too. Additionally, consumers and customers will tend to associate gauze and effect company with the falsified information or false data.

It is ethically wrong to partner with a company that practices unethical behaviours.

CLICK HERE TO ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Gauze and Effect

Paper details

Scenario

You work for Gauze and Effect, a local nonprofit organization that provides emergency medical care to people in crisis. Gauze and Effect was founded less than two years ago. Its small but dynamic team of doctors, nurses, and administrators has been nationally recognized for its work helping people after natural disasters.

You are a member of Gauze and Effect’s administrative team. This team works to coordinate relief missions, plan fundraisers, and do community outreach.

Recently, several businesses have asked to collaborate with Gauze and Effect. However, you’re aware that each of these companies has been involved in some sort of ethically questionable situation in the past.

The founder of Gauze and Effect, Dr. Lee, needs you to gather some background information about one of the businesses and its past ethical issue. After you\’ve investigated the business and its controversy, you\’ll recommend whether or not Gauze and Effect should pursue the partnership.

You will need to explain your decision in an email to Dr. Lee. You\’ll also create a communication targeted to the local community.

Directions

The local community is very important to Gauze and Effect. It is a relatively new nonprofit with limited funding, so it must consider any new partnerships very carefully. Business partnerships could have a major impact on the nonprofit and the communities that it serves.

For this reason, you will need to investigate one of the businesses and its involvement in a controversy. Your work will help Gauze and Effect decide whether to move forward with the proposed partnership.

Follow these steps to develop your analysis and recommendation:

1. Organizer

Choose a business to investigate. To learn more about each company, visit the Businesses and Ethical Dilemmas List. In this project, you will select one of the following companies to investigate:

  • Facebook and the data privacy controversy
  • Mylan and the overpriced medications controversy
  • Southwest and the safety violations controversy
  • Volkswagen and the falsified data controversy

Investigate your chosen business and its ethical dilemma. Use the readings in the Businesses and Ethical Dilemmas List to learn more about each company and the ethical issues it faced.

Once you’ve read the resources, use the Organizer to guide your analysis. You’ll need to recommend whether Gauze and Effect should move forward with the proposed partnership.

You can also conduct your own research on the topic. Be sure to select authoritative resources and cite them appropriately.

Analyze the ethical dilemma you chose. Use the Organizer to guide your analysis of the ethical issue and aid in your decision making.

If you conducted any of your own research, make sure that your sources are trustworthy. Remember to cite the sources you use.

School Login Information: