IHP 604 Healthcare Improvement Professional Working

/0 Comments/in /by

IHP 604 Healthcare Improvement Professional Working

IHP 604 Healthcare Improvement Professional Working

In your initial response, introduce yourself to your peers. Based on your professional or personal experience, explain and illustrate the divide between the ideal of patient-centered care and the actual practice of patient-centered care.

In responses to your peers, discuss if you agree or disagree with their assessments based on your experience with the divide between the ideal of patient-centered care and the actual practice of patient-centered care.

To complete this assignment, review the document.

 25

IHP 604 Journal Guidelines and Rubric Journal activities in this course are private between you and the instructor. These journal assignments will serve as a personal reflection on your knowledge and experience relating to IHP 604: Healthcare Quality and Improvement. Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Journal assignments should be approximately 3 to 4 paragraphs in length. Submit assignment as a Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Critical Elements Knowledge of the Topic Organization of the Subject Matter Articulation of Response Proficient (100%) Clearly articulates what is known about the topic that is under consideration Logically organizes the topic, offering relevant commentary on strengths and weakness; draws clear conclusions that are reflective to the topic Submission has no major errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Needs Improvement (75%) Articulates what is known about the topic but is missing clarity and detail of content Organizes the topic around strengths and weaknesses and draws conclusions but lacks logical presentation and has problems with clarity in conclusions Submission has major errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Not Evident (0%) Does not articulate what is known about the topic under consideration Does not organize the topic logically, and does not present clear conclusions Value 50 Submission has critical errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 20 Total 30 100% …

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *