Discussion: Hospital Workplace Violation
/0 Comments/in /by developerHLT313 GCU Discussion: Hospital Workplace Violation
Discussion: Hospital Workplace Violation
HLT313 Grand Canyon University Joint Commission Workplace Violation Paper. Perform an Internet search to identify and research and a situation where a health care organization or individual provider in your field of allied health was sanctioned by The Joint Commission or other regulatory body for a violation of one or more of The Joint Commission workplace safety, risk management, and quality care requirements. Discussion: Hospital Workplace Violation
Taking the role of the Chief Safety or Risk Management Officer in the organization or a provider’s office who now must deliver an accounting of the incident to the board of directors, develop a slide presentation, containing a title slide, 12-15 slides of content, and a references slide, focusing on the chosen incident. Your presentation must incorporate the following:
- A brief summary of the incident , including a description as well as the outcome.
- A summary of the applicable Joint Commission and other (e.g., local, state) regulatory standards that apply to the incident.
- A discussion of the mistakes and/or oversights made by the health care organization or individual provider that did or may have led to the incident that occurred, and an accounting of the preventive steps that could have or should have been taken to avoid them.
- A proposal outlining specific education or training the organization or provider will employ to ensure this type of incident does not occur in the future. Include concepts related to continuous quality improvement in your recommendations.
To create your presentation you can use PowerPoint or a program such as Prezi (www.prezi.com). Speaker’s notes must be included for each individual slide.
You are required to use and cite a minimum of three qualified resources from the readings or the GCU Library in order to complete this assignment successfully.
While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Rubric
Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
HLT-313V HLT-313V-O500 The Joint Commission Workplace Violation PowerPoint 150.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) Satisfactory (75.00%) Good (85.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 40.0%
Summary of Sanctioned Incident 10.0% Presentation does not provide a summary of the sanctioned incident. Presentation includes a summary of the sanctioned incident, but elements are missing or the submission is otherwise incomplete. Presentation includes a basic summary of the sanctioned incident. Minimal detail and/or support are provided. Presentation includes a complete summary of the sanctioned incident. Presentation incorporates most essential details and provides appropriate support. Presentation includes a clear and thorough summary of the sanctioned incident. Presentation analyzes supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
Summary of The Joint Commission and/or Other Applicable Regulatory Body Standards 10.0% Presentation does not provide a summary of The Joint Commission and/or other applicable regulatory body standards. Presentation includes a summary of The Joint Commission and/or other applicable regulatory body standards, but elements are missing or the submission is otherwise incomplete. Presentation includes a basic summary of The Joint Commission and/or other applicable regulatory body standards. Minimal detail and/or support are provided. Presentation includes a complete summary of The Joint Commission and/or other applicable regulatory body standards. Presentation incorporates most essential details and provides appropriate support. Presentation includes a clear and thorough summary of The Joint Commission and/or other applicable regulatory body standards. Presentation analyzes supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. Discussion: Hospital Workplace Violation
Mistakes and/or Oversights and Accounting of Preventive Steps 10.0% Presentation does not provide a discussion of the mistakes and/or oversights or of the accounting of preventive steps that could have been taken. Presentation includes a discussion of the mistakes and/or oversights or of the accounting of preventive steps that could have been taken, but elements are missing or the submission is otherwise incomplete. Presentation includes a basic discussion of the mistakes and/or oversights or of the accounting of preventive steps that could have been taken. Minimal detail and/or support are provided. Presentation includes a complete discussion of the mistakes and/or oversights or of the accounting of preventive steps that could have been taken. Presentation incorporates most essential details and provides appropriate support. Presentation includes a clear and thorough discussion of the mistakes and/or oversights or of the accounting of preventive steps that could have been taken. Presentation analyzes supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
Training or educational proposal 10.0% Proposal does not provide a training or educational proposal. Proposal includes a training or educational proposal, but elements are missing or the submission is otherwise incomplete. Proposal includes a basic training or educational proposal which includes concepts related to continuous quality improvement. Minimal detail and/or support are provided. Proposal includes a complete training or educational proposal which includes concepts related to continuous quality improvement. Proposal incorporates most essential details and provides appropriate support. Proposal includes a clear and thorough training or educational proposal which includes concepts related to continuous quality improvement. Proposal analyzes supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
Organization and Development 60.0%
Presentation of Content 40.0% The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information. The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources. The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
Layout 5.0% The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) 5.0% Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of “primer prose” indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the target audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. Writer is clearly in control of standard, written academic English.
Evaluating and Documenting Sources (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and references section listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Contains no title slide, no references section, and no correctly cited references within the body of the presentation. Title slide is incomplete or inaccurate. References section includes sources, but many citation errors. Citations are included within the body of the presentation but with many errors. Title slide has minor errors. References section includes sources, but they are not consistently cited correctly. Citations are included within the body of the presentation but with some errors. Title slide is complete. References section includes correctly cited sources with minimal errors. Correct citations are included within the body of the presentation. Title slide is complete. References section includes correctly cited sources. Correct citations are included within the body of the presentation.
Total Weightage 100%
| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | ||||||
| HLT-313V | HLT-313V-O500 | The Joint Commission Workplace Violation PowerPoint | 150.0 | ||||||
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) | Satisfactory (75.00%) | Good (85.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned | |
| Content | 40.0% | ||||||||
| Summary of Sanctioned Incident | 10.0% | Presentation does not provide a summary of the sanctioned incident. Discussion: Hospital Workplace Violation | Presentation includes a summary of the sanctioned incident, but elements are missing or the submission is otherwise incomplete. | Presentation includes a basic summary of the sanctioned incident. Minimal detail and/or support are provided. | Presentation includes a complete summary of the sanctioned incident. Presentation incorporates most essential details and provides appropriate support. | Presentation includes a clear and thorough summary of the sanctioned incident. Presentation analyzes supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. | |||
| Summary of The Joint Commission and/or Other Applicable Regulatory Body Standards | 10.0% | Presentation does not provide a summary of The Joint Commission and/or other applicable regulatory body standards. | Presentation includes a summary of The Joint Commission and/or other applicable regulatory body standards, but elements are missing or the submission is otherwise incomplete. | Presentation includes a basic summary of The Joint Commission and/or other applicable regulatory body standards. Minimal detail and/or support are provided. | Presentation includes a complete summary of The Joint Commission and/or other applicable regulatory body standards. Presentation incorporates most essential details and provides appropriate support. | Presentation includes a clear and thorough summary of The Joint Commission and/or other applicable regulatory body standards. Presentation analyzes supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. | |||
| Mistakes and/or Oversights and Accounting of Preventive Steps | 10.0% | Presentation does not provide a discussion of the mistakes and/or oversights or of the accounting of preventive steps that could have been taken. | Presentation includes a discussion of the mistakes and/or oversights or of the accounting of preventive steps that could have been taken, but elements are missing or the submission is otherwise incomplete. | Presentation includes a basic discussion of the mistakes and/or oversights or of the accounting of preventive steps that could have been taken. Minimal detail and/or support are provided. | Presentation includes a complete discussion of the mistakes and/or oversights or of the accounting of preventive steps that could have been taken. Presentation incorporates most essential details and provides appropriate support. | Presentation includes a clear and thorough discussion of the mistakes and/or oversights or of the accounting of preventive steps that could have been taken. Presentation analyzes supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. | |||
| Training or educational proposal | 10.0% | Proposal does not provide a training or educational proposal. | Proposal includes a training or educational proposal, but elements are missing or the submission is otherwise incomplete. | Proposal includes a basic training or educational proposal which includes concepts related to continuous quality improvement. Minimal detail and/or support are provided. | Proposal includes a complete training or educational proposal which includes concepts related to continuous quality improvement. Proposal incorporates most essential details and provides appropriate support. | Proposal includes a clear and thorough training or educational proposal which includes concepts related to continuous quality improvement. Proposal analyzes supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. | |||
| Organization and Development | 60.0% | ||||||||
| Presentation of Content | 40.0% | The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. | The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information. | The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. | The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources. | The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea. | |||
| Layout | 5.0% | The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. | The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. | The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. | The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. | The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text. | |||
| Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) | 5.0% | Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of “primer prose” indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. | Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. | Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. | The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the target audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. | The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope. | |||
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. | Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. | Writer is clearly in control of standard, written academic English. | |||
| Evaluating and Documenting Sources (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and references section listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Contains no title slide, no references section, and no correctly cited references within the body of the presentation. | Title slide is incomplete or inaccurate. References section includes sources, but many citation errors. Citations are included within the body of the presentation but with many errors. | Title slide has minor errors. References section includes sources, but they are not consistently cited correctly. Citations are included within the body of the presentation but with some errors. | Title slide is complete. References section includes correctly cited sources with minimal errors. Correct citations are included within the body of the presentation. | Title slide is complete. References section includes correctly cited sources. Correct citations are included within the body of the presentation. Discussion: Hospital Workplace Violation | |||
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!