ACA Ethics of Improved Equity Paper
ACA Ethics of Improved Equity Paper
ACA Ethics of Improved Equity Paper Example Approach
ACA Ethics of Improved Equity
After the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was ratified in 2010, one of its top-most priorities according to the law’s list of provisions was healthcare access. The provision promised to increase Americans’ number with healthcare insurance and direct access to qualified medical services to 32 million (PubMed Central, 2010). Using national medical services and healthcare schemes such as Medicaid, the US government sought to expand its healthcare services’ impact and benefits to the citizens. However, several pitfalls and challenges, such as stigma-related barriers and more than 23 million uninsured Americans, existed.
Courtemanche et al. (2018) published a detailed report outlining their findings after researching the ACA’s effects on access to healthcare services and self-assessed healthcare services for three years. The findings stated that American states that participated in the Medicaid expansion program implemented under the ACA reported up to 9.5 percent in healthcare insurance rate. Concurrently, the same states seemed to have benefited from a 5.6 percent reduction in healthcare costs, a barrier to healthcare access, and a 3.4 percent increase in access to primary care health services(Courtemanche et al., 2018). These statistics, which covered the period between 2012 and 2014, demonstrated that the ACA achieved its promises of increased access to healthcare services and insurance.
Based on Courtemanche et al.’s (2018) findings, the research findings confirm that the ACA increased access to healthcare and health insurance among Americans. Although the ACA has failed in some of its mandates, the promise of increased healthcare access and insurance cover in 2016 seemed to have been kept.Therefore, the ACA seemed to be keeping its promise to increase access to healthcare and health insurance to Americans according to the scholarly article chosen.
References
Courtemanche, C., Marton, J., Ukert, B., Yelowitz, A., & Zapata, D. (2018). Effects of the Affordable Care Act on health care access and self-assessed health after 3 years. INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, 55, 004695801879636.
PubMed Central. (2010). Health care reform and equity: Promise, pitfalls, and prescriptions. PubMed Central (PMC).
the assignment
Health care reform is a major topic in our country currently as we continue to view equity disparities in light of the Coronavirus pandemic. Chapter 11 discusses health care reform in a broader timeline throughout the US history, focusing on equity and disparities. This week’s discussion board will critically examine the 2010 Affordable Care Act based on the reform promises of equity and the actual outcome of the specific goals of the policy. Please consider the following in your discussion board post:
View this table from the National Institute of Health discussing specific promises of equity within the ACA 2010: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3022050/table/t1/?report=objectonly.
Choose one of the provisions in the left column of the table to research further.
Find 1 scholarly source that either defends or reputes the listed pitfall of the provision on the table.
Create a discussion board post discussing your research and how it confirms or disputes the NIH’s view of the equity provision within the ACA 2010. Be sure to cite your source in APA format.


Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!