NURS-FPX4025 Assessment 4: Presenting Your PICO(T) Process Findings to Your Professional Peers

/0 Comments/in /by

NURS-FPX4025 Assessment 4: Presenting Your PICO(T) Process Findings to Your Professional Peers

Create a 5–10 minute video of yourself, as a presenter, in which you propose an evidence-based plan to improve the outcomes for your diagnosis.

Introduction

As part of the critical role that EBP plays in nursing, professional nurses share their findings with their peers and others. A big part of research is sharing knowledge so that others can also learn. Professional nurses attend seminars and read journals specific to their practice, and they also publish and present what they have learned. This assessment prepares you to share your knowledge with others.

Place your Order Now 

Instructions

For this assessment, you are a presenter! You will create a 5–10 minute video using Kaltura or similar software. In the video and written narrative:

  • Review your findings from Assessment 3.
  • Create a poster presentation based on your findings from Assessment 3 (see the samples in the Assessment 4: Poster Template Examples reading list). Include:
    • An explanation of the diagnosis.
    • The research question you developed using PICO(T).
    • A summary of your sources.
    • The answer to your PICO(T) question based on your analysis of evidence.
  • Describe the key steps of care you are recommending based on your evidence.
  • Give a professional presentation to your peers, showing your poster with your voice narration using Kaltura or similar software.
  • Include your written narrative/script of the presentation in a Word document. Add the link to your video at the end of your written narrative.

Refer to Using Kaltura Campus resource as needed to record and upload your video.

Note: If you require the use of assistive technology or alternative communication methods to participate in this activity, please contact DisabilityServices@Capella.edu to request accommodations. If, for some reason, you are unable to record a video, please contact your faculty as soon as possible to explore options for completing the assessment.

Additional Requirements

Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:

  • Length of video: 5–10 minutes.
  • References: Cite at least three professional or scholarly sources of evidence to support the assertions you make in your video. Include additional properly cited references as necessary to support your statements.
  • APA reference page: Submit a correctly formatted APA reference page that shows all the sources you used to create and deliver your video. Be sure to format the reference page according to current APA style.
  • Video and narrative: You must submit a written narrative of all of your video content. Add the link to your video at the end of your written narrative.

Place your Order Now 

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

  • Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.
    • Explain a diagnosis in terms of outcomes, risks, and complications.
    • Summarize the content of at least three sources of evidence, including the credibility and relevance of the articles to a specific diagnosis issue.
  • Competency 4: Plan care based on the best available evidence.
    • Describe a research question developed using the PICO(T) process to address a chosen issue related to a diagnosis.
    • Explain the answer to a PICO(T) question based on an analysis of the evidence.
    • Describe key steps of care based on the evidence.
  • Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.
    • Organize content in a poster presentation and written narrative so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
    • Communicate effectively in a professional audiovisual presentation with clear light and sound.
    • Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting adherence to most aspects of APA format.

Introduction
Evidence-based practice (EBP) is not only about identifying credible research and applying it to patient care, but also about sharing findings with peers to strengthen nursing practice. Professional communication of research ensures that knowledge is disseminated, evaluated, and applied across healthcare settings to improve outcomes. In this presentation, I will review my findings from the previous assessment and translate them into an evidence-based plan of care for the selected diagnosis. Using the PICO(T) framework, I developed a focused research question, gathered and analyzed credible evidence, and identified best practices that can directly improve patient outcomes. This presentation highlights the diagnosis, the guiding PICO(T) question, a summary of the most relevant sources, and the proposed steps of care supported by the evidence. By presenting these findings, I aim to demonstrate how EBP can be used not only to guide individual decision-making but also to lead broader practice changes that support safe, effective, and patient-centered care.

Place your Order Now 

NURS-FPX4025 Assessment 3: Applying the PICO(T) Process

/0 Comments/in /by

NURS-FPX4025 Assessment 3: Applying the PICO(T) Process

Create a 3–5 page submission in which you develop a PICO(T) question for the diagnosis you worked with in the first two assessments and analyze the evidence you locate to answer the question.

Introduction

PICO(T) is an acronym that helps researchers and practitioners define aspects of a potential study or investigation.

It stands for:

  • P – Patient/population/problem.
  • I – Intervention.
  • C – Comparison (of potential interventions, typically).
  • O – Outcomes.
  • T – Time frame (if time frame is relevant).

The end goal of applying PICO(T) is to develop a question that can help guide the search for evidence (Boswell & Cannon, 2015). From this perspective, a PICO(T) question can be a valuable starting point for nurses who are beginning to apply an evidence-based model. By taking the time to precisely define the areas in which the nurse will be looking for evidence, searches become more efficient and effective. Essentially, by precisely defining the types of evidence within specific areas, the nurse will be more likely to discover relevant and useful evidence during their search. When applying the PICO(T) approach, the nurse can isolate the interventions of interest and compare to other existing interventions for the evidenced impact on the outcome of the concern.

Reference

Boswell, C., & Cannon, S. (2015). Introduction to nursing research. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Professional Context

As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for locating and identifying credible and scholarly resources to incorporate the best available evidence for the purposes of enhancing clinical reasoning and judgement skills. When reliable and relevant evidence-based findings are utilized, patients, healthcare systems, and nursing practice outcomes are positively impacted.

PICO(T) is a framework that can help you structure your definition of the issue, potential approach that you are going to use, and your predictions related to the issue. Word choice is important in the PICO(T) process because different word choices for similar concepts will lead you toward different existing evidence and research studies that would help inform the development of your initial question. When writing a PICO(T)-formatted research question, you want to focus on the impact of the intervention and the comparison on the outcome you desire.

Place your Order Now 

Scenario

For this assessment, please use the diagnosis you worked with in the first two assessments.

Instructions

After reviewing the materials you created to research a specific diagnosis in the first two assessments, apply the PICO(T) process to develop a research question and research it.

Your initial goal is to define the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome. In some cases, a time frame is relevant and you should include that as well, when writing a question you can research related to your issue of interest. After you define your question, research it, and organize your initial findings, select the two sources of evidence that seem the most relevant to your question and analyze them in more depth. Specifically, interpret each source’s specific findings and best practices related to your chosen diagnosis, and explain how the evidence would help you plan and make decisions related to your question.

If you need some structure to organize your initial thoughts and research, the PICO(T) Question and Library Search template (accessible from the Create PICO(T) Questions page) might be helpful.

In your submission, make sure you address the following:

  • Review the PICO(T) process.
  • Explain your diagnosis from Assessment 1 in terms of outcomes, risks, and complications. In your explanation, be sure to include the risks and complications for vulnerable populations or those affected by healthcare disparities and the impact of those disparities.
  • Consider your diagnosis from Assessment 1. Develop a research question using the PICO(T) process to address an issue of your choosing related to your diagnosis.
  • Properly format your PICO(T) question to guide your search of the literature.
  • Describe your search of the literature, noting search engines, key words, and credibility factors.
  • Locate evidence that explores your intervention and comparison of your PICO(T) question with an emphasis on your specific outcome (at least three diagnosis-issue-specific sources of evidence (scholarly articles)).
  • Explain the content of each of your scholarly articles.
  • Explain the credibility and relevance of each of the articles you chose to your diagnosis issue.
  • Analyze the evidence. Determine the answer to your PICO(T) question based on your analysis of the evidence.

Place your Order Now 

Additional Requirements

Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:

  • Length of submission: Create a 3–5-page submission focused on defining a research question and interpreting evidence relevant to answering it.
  • Number of references: Cite a minimum of four sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.
  • APA formatting: Format references and citations according to the current APA style.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

  • Competency 1: Interpret findings from scholarly quantitative, qualitative, and outcomes research articles and studies.
    • Describe a search of the literature noting search engines, key words, and credibility factors.
  • Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.
    • Explain a diagnosis in terms of outcomes, risks, and complications, including the risks and complications for vulnerable populations or those affected by healthcare disparities, and the impact of those disparities.
    • Explain the content of at least three sources of evidence, including the credibility and relevance of the articles to a specific diagnosis issue.
  • Competency 4: Plan care based on the best available evidence.
    • Describe a research question developed using the PICO(T) process to address a chosen issue related to a diagnosis.
    • Analyze evidence to explain the answer to a PICO(T) question.
  • Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.
    • Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
    • Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting adherence to most aspects of APA format.

Introduction
Developing clinical questions with a structured framework is essential for guiding effective evidence-based practice (EBP). The PICO(T) model, patient, intervention, comparison, outcome, and time, serves as a valuable tool for nurses to refine their focus and conduct efficient searches for scholarly evidence. By clearly defining each element, the nurse can better identify studies that directly address a patient’s condition and evaluate which interventions are most effective in improving outcomes. This process not only enhances the quality of evidence retrieved but also ensures that clinical decisions are grounded in credible research rather than tradition or assumption. Building upon the diagnosis examined in previous assessments, applying the PICO(T) framework offers an opportunity to transform a clinical issue into a focused research question. Doing so promotes the integration of reliable findings into practice, ultimately supporting safe, patient-centered care.

Place your Order Now 

NURS-FPX4025 Assessment 2: Applying an EBP Model

/0 Comments/in /by

NURS-FPX4025 Assessment 2: Applying an EBP Model

Develop a 3–5 page scholarly paper in which you explain the diagnosis you researched for Assessment 1, and then apply the steps of an EBP model to your search for evidence to address your diagnosis issue.

Introduction

The goal of using evidence-based research findings is to enhance safety and quality of patient care and ensure optimal outcomes are achieved. It is not uncommon to hear a nurse say, “why change it as we’ve always done it this way.” However, this is no longer acceptable in today’s practice environment. The profession of nursing has evolved, and the expectation is that the professional nurse has a scientific foundation to support the care that is provided. As the profession of nursing continues to evolve and engage in healthcare transformation, baccalaureate-prepared nurses are expanding, taking on leadership roles that include incorporating EBPs. To be able to do this, the nurse needs to understand the criteria that make a resource credible, as this is crucial when deciding if the research is valid and reliable for implementation into healthcare settings. The nurse will need to incorporate the use of EBP models.

Place your Order Now 

EBP models are designed to assist the nurse in developing a plan to gather evidence to answer a practice problem or question. It is a systematic approach to direct the user to incorporate scholarly findings into current practice. These EBP models lead the nurse through the decision-making process of evaluating the literature to determine the best practice evidence for the practice issue or question.

Professional Context

As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for locating and identifying credible and scholarly resources to incorporate the best available evidence for the purposes of enhancing clinical reasoning and judgement skills. When reliable and relevant evidence-based findings are utilized, patients, healthcare systems, and nursing practice outcomes are positively impacted.

Preparation

Review all resources for this assessment, as well as the scoring guide for details of how this assessment will be graded. You will use the specific diagnosis or health issue you selected for Assessment 1. You can refer to the overview of common EBP models in the Evidence-Based Practice Models media for help in choosing the most appropriate EBP model for your issue.

Instructions

Complete the following:

  • Consider your diagnosis from Assessment 1.
  • Explain an issue associated with this diagnosis that could benefit from an EBP approach.
  • Choose the EBP model you wish to implement.
  • Describe each step of the EBP model of your choice.
  • Apply the steps of the model to your search for evidence for your diagnosis issue, and describe how you applied them.
  • Locate at least three separate resources of evidence to assist with your diagnosis issue.
  • Analyze the credibility and relevance of each resource as it relates to your diagnosis.

This is a paper and should be 3–5 pages, not including the title page or reference page. The paper must be in APA format.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

  • Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.
    • Analyze the credibility and relevance of each resource as it relates to a diagnosis.
  • Competency 3: Apply an evidence-based practice model to address a practice issue.
    • Explain an issue associated with a chosen diagnosis that could benefit from an EBP approach.
    • Describe each step of a chosen EBP model.
    • Describe how the steps of a chosen EPB model were applied to search for evidence for a diagnosis issue.
  • Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.
    • Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
    • Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting adherence to most aspects of APA format.

Introduction
The use of evidence-based practice (EBP) is crucial for delivering safe, effective, and high-quality patient care. In modern nursing, clinical decisions cannot rely solely on tradition or routine, but must be guided by research findings that are both credible and relevant. EBP provides a structured process that allows nurses to evaluate evidence, integrate it with clinical expertise, and apply it to patient needs for improved outcomes. Within the context of the diagnosis selected in Assessment 1, examining an associated practice issue through an EBP lens creates an opportunity to strengthen clinical reasoning and apply research directly to patient care. EBP models play a critical role in this process by providing a systematic framework for identifying, appraising, and translating evidence into practice. By applying such a model, the professional nurse ensures that interventions are not only scientifically grounded but also aligned with the realities of patient care settings. Ultimately, this approach enhances the nurse’s ability to act as a leader and change agent in the delivery of evidence-informed care.

Place your Order Now

NURS-FPX4025 Assessment 1: Analyzing a Research Paper

/0 Comments/in /by

NURS-FPX4025 Assessment 1: Analyzing a Research Paper

Identify and write a summary of the various factors that contribute to the credibility of a research article related to a diagnosis of interest that you identified from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. In the module, there are 10 patients listed with various diagnosis. Select one diagnosis of interest to you from the simulation.

Place your Order Now

Introduction

Evidence-based practice (EBP) integrates the best evidence available to guide optimal nursing care, with a goal to enhance safety and quality. EBP is crucial to nursing practice because it incorporates the best evidence from current literature, along with the expertise of the practicing nurse. The concern for quality care that flows from EBP generates a desired outcome. Without these factors, a nurse cannot be an effective leader. It is important to lead not only from this position but from knowledge and expertise. To gain the knowledge, you require a good understanding of how to search for scholarly resources, as well as make decisions regarding the content of the scholarly resources.

Professional Context

As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for providing patient-centered, competent care based on current evidence-based best practices. You will be required to do research, analysis, and dissemination of best evidence to stay abreast of these best practices. Understanding where to go to find credible evidence, determining the type of evidence and being able to make decisions based on the findings of credible evidence is the foundation of evidence-based care.

Preparation

Review the What Is Scholarly? Campus page. Specifically, look at the following two items on the page:

  • What Are Peer-Reviewed Articles?
  • Anatomy of a Scholarly Article.

These will give you the factors that contribute to credibility, which you will need to identify in the article you choose for this assessment.

Also, look at the “Find EPB Articles” section of the Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Health Sciences library guide (found in the guide’s left-hand menu). This may help you locate an article to use for this assessment.

Instructions

Write a 2-page analysis of a scholarly research article, demonstrating your ability to locate credible, useful evidence related to a diagnosis of interest selected from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. There are 10 patients, each with a different medical diagnosis. Select one patient with a diagnosis of interest to you.

Once you have chosen your diagnosis of interest from the Sentinel U simulation, complete the following:

  • Use a credible search engine to locate a research article on your topic.
  • Review the article for the following criteria:
    • Type of study (quantitative or qualitative, the level on the pyramid of evidence, methodology).
    • Credibility factors.
    • Importance of content to selected diagnosis.
    • The ability to apply the content in your current workplace or patient population.
  • Take a screenshot of the abstract and paste it into a Word document (see the Example of Screenshot [PDF] document). You can refer to the instructions in the Taking Screenshots [PDF] document.
  • Create a table or series of text boxes next to or below the screenshot and use that to label each criterion.
  • Also take a screenshot of the patient and the diagnosis from Sentinel U simulation you used.
  • Write up a summary of your findings on the second page. Note what information is important to your specified diagnosis. How credible is the article you’ve found and how useful is it related to your specified diagnosis and your ability to apply it?
  • Include a link to your article.
  • Include a reference to your article in APA format.

Review the Analyzing a Research Paper scoring guide for specific details of grading prior to submission.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

  • Competency 1: Interpret findings from scholarly quantitative, qualitative, and outcomes research articles and studies.
    • Determine the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence.
    • Identify the credibility factors of an article.
    • Summarize the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis.
  • Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.
    • Summarize the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population.
  • Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.
    • Provide an APA-formatted reference and link to an article.

Introduction
Evidence-based practice (EBP) is the cornerstone of quality nursing care, combining current best evidence, clinical expertise, and patient values to improve health outcomes. For nurses, the ability to identify credible research is critical, as decisions must be grounded in reliable evidence that directly informs patient care. Within the Sentinel U Patient Management & Delegation simulation, each diagnosis presents unique challenges that require careful evaluation of supporting research to guide practice. Selecting a diagnosis of interest and analyzing the credibility of a related research article provides an opportunity to strengthen skills in evaluating scholarly sources. Factors such as peer review, study design, methodology, and alignment with clinical needs all contribute to determining whether evidence can be trusted and applied in practice. By understanding and applying these elements, nurses can ensure that the care they deliver is not only competent but also based on the most credible and relevant evidence available.

Place your Order Now

Clinical and Counseling Cases

/0 Comments/in /by

Clinical and Counseling Cases

CLICK HERE TO ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Clinical and Counseling Cases

Prepare.png Prepare: Prior to completing this discussion, be certain that you have completed the required readings in Chapters 1 and 2 of your required text, the Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct on the APA website, the article by Fishman and Messer (2013) and that you have reviewed the Applied Psychology learning object for this week and the Week One Instructor Guidance.

Reflect.png Reflect: In this discussion, you will examine the uses of applied behavioral science through clinical and counseling cases. This discussion has three options from which you will choose one to complete. After selecting one of the options, indicate which one you chose in your response.

Option A:

Karen confides in you that she feels “down” all the time. She feels hopeless, finds no enjoyment in life (sleep, food, sex, friends, etc.), and is having thoughts of suicide. Karen goes to see her family doctor who diagnoses her with major depressive disorder. Her doctor prescribes an antidepressant and recommends Karen seek professional mental health services. Based on your study this week, address each of the following:

Identify how a clinical psychologist, counseling psychologist, and counselor might approach working with Karen.

Defend your position with support from the reading, noting definitions and key features.

Indicate at least one major approach to psychotherapy which would be appropriate for Karen based on the literature.

Identify at least one type of assessment procedure or psychological test that would be useful to administer to Karen to aid in diagnosis and treatment planning.

Examine how you, as a mental health professional, would respond to Karen and what your ethical duties are.

Option B:

Chris can often be found around the house laughing loudly at inappropriate jokes he is telling. When he is not laughing, he is singing or whistling and making non-stop noise, as he feels like he has boundless energy. When his daughter gets home, he calls her names and accuses her of plotting to harm him. The next day, Chris calls the police to report that his daughter is a spy sent from another planet to obtain military intelligence that will be used to take over the United States government.

Based on your study this week, address each of the following:

Identify how a clinical psychologist, counseling psychologist, and counselor might approach working with Chris.

Defend your position with support from the reading, noting definitions and key features.

Indicate at least one major approach to psychotherapy which would be appropriate for Chris based on the literature.

Identify at least one type of assessment procedure or psychological test that would be useful to administer to Chris to aid in diagnosis and treatment planning.

Examine how you, as a mental health professional, would respond to Chris and what your ethical duties are.

Option C:

Maria and David are having difficulty adjusting to being new parents. Although they both adore their two-month-old son and are grateful to have him, they both have experienced a decrease in marital satisfaction since Davito was born. Maria and David report fatigue, increased irritability, disrupted sleeping and eating patterns, and decreased interest in sex. They deny thoughts of divorce. They attended a new parent fellowship meeting at their church and learned several other couples were having similar concerns. One couple discussed how counseling helped them with adjusting to being new parents.

Based on your study this week, address each of the following:

Identify how a clinical psychologist, counseling psychologist, and counselor might approach working with Maria and David.

Defend your position with support from the reading, noting definitions and key features.

Indicate at least one major approach to psychotherapy which would be appropriate for Maria and David based on the literature.

Identify at least one type of assessment procedure or psychological test that would be useful to administer to Maria and David to aid in diagnosis and treatment planning.

Examine how you, as a mental health professional, would respond to Maria and David and what your ethical duties are.

Write.png Write: Your initial post must be a minimum of 200 words. You must utilize at least one scholarly source (e.g., professional web source) and include in-text citations and a reference list that are in accordance with APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. For further assistance in researching scholarly sources, be sure to access the tutorials page on the Ashford University Library website.

Top Aviation Planning Coursework Questions and Answers (2026 Guide)

/0 Comments/in /by

Top Aviation Planning Coursework Questions and Answers (2026 Guide)

 Please refer to attached files for work

APA style formatting as needed

All references listed in APA forma

CLICK HERE TO ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

 

When Should a Z-Test Be Used Instead of a T-Test? Explained

/0 Comments/in /by

When Should a Z-Test Be Used Instead of a T-Test? Explained

CLICK HERE TO ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Describe when a z-test should be performed as opposed to a t-test? Which (if any) can we use all the time? Why or why not?

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.

Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.

One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.

I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.

In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.

Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).

Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).

Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.

I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.

As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.

It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.

Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.

Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?

Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.

Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.

If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.

I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.

As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:

Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.

Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

 

How to Create an Assignment Discussion Board in an E-Poster

/0 Comments/in /by

How to Create an Assignment Discussion Board in an E-Poster

How to Create an Assignment Discussion Board in an E-Poster

CLICK HERE TO ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Assignment: Discussion Board in E-Poster

Read Chapter 13, APA Style, Attached one example of E-
Poster.

You have to create an E-Poster on what you see as the future of nursing practice and the role of nursing in the emerging health-care environment. You need to predict the future based on present evidence.

The E-Poster needs to include the following:

1. Introduction

2. Statement of the issue

3. Evidence supporting the issue

4. Prediction of the future role of the nurse

5. Conclusion

6. References: minimum of three references from peer-reviewed nursing journals (encourage the use of international journals). Articles need to be within the last 3years unless historical.

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

  • Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
  • Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
  • One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
  • I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

  • Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
  • In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
  • Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
  • Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

  • Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
  • Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
  • I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

  • I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
  • As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
  • It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

LopesWrite Policy

  • For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
  • Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
  • Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
  • Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

  • The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
  • Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
  • If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
  • I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
  • As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

  • Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
    • Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
    • Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

NTC 320

/0 Comments/in /by

NTC 320

CLICK HERE TO ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

NTC 320

To support the growth expansion plan and proposal of West Consulting, this week you will create the IP Addressing Schema.

Refer to the West Consulting Network Design Summary document and previous individual assignments to complete this week’s assignment.

Create recommendations for both IPv4 and IPv6 schemas at the China location.

Include the following:

• An IPv4 table that includes the Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR) notation, subnets, and number of hosts used at each site/subnet

• An IPv6 scheme to integrate the two sites

• Selected IP routing protocol(s) and your rationale for either maintaining or changing West Consulting’s current protocol

• Summary of how your routing protocol recommendations address network convergence and maximize performance

Document your recommendation as either of the following:

• A 1- to 2-page Microsoft® Word document

• A 6- to 8-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation with detailed speaker notes

Note: You will use this completed assignment in the Week Four Individual Assignment titled, “West Consulting Data Center Design.”

NTC 320: Comprehensive Network Design

/0 Comments/in /by

NTC 320: Comprehensive Network Design

CLICK HERE TO ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

NTC 320: Comprehensive Network Design

Complete an 8- to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation that represents a comprehensive network design, based upon Weeks One through Four Individual TestOut Assignments. The presentation should represent an organization’s network, including WAN, LAN, and Home User designs.

You will combine your topology for the Home User, Company Data Center, Office WAN solution, IP Address schema, and protocols being used.

Scenario: You are a Network Engineer. You have been tasked with a new project for Company X, to evaluate current network solutions and provide recommendations to the Chief Technology Officer (CTO) on how he should design the LAN and WAN and make use of wireless solutions. In addition, Company X has hundreds of virtual workers. You

are to make recommendations for those users to ensure they have an efficient home network setup. Consider buildings, distance, and range of network solutions needed.

Ensure the presentation includes:

• Wired LAN Design

• WAN Design

• Protocols Implemented

• Wireless LAN

The presentation should include speaker notes that provide explanation for all design considerations, including topology choices for WAN and LAN, IP addressing, and protocols.

In addition, a 2- to 3-page Executive Summary is required. The Executive Summary should include an explanation of your solution, justification behind architecture decisions, and a Reference page with a minimum of 4 sources in APA format.

Submit your assignment using the Assignment Files tab.