Assignment:Delivery Models in Health Care Essay

Assignment:Delivery Models in Health Care Essay

Assignment:Delivery Models in Health Care Essay

Question Description
Delivery Models Essay

Write a 1,250-1,500-word essay about delivery models in health care. Include the following in your essay:

Essay on Delivery Models In the United States, health care is a complicated system characterized by fragmented care, with no single institution accountable for the overall coordination and quality of patient treatment. As a result, patients typically receive the treatments for which they pay, and the predominant fee-for-service system has resulted in a situation in which vast resources are spent on acute care, testing, and procedures. As a result, actors in the health care business are increasingly under pressure to give more effective care with fewer resources. As a result, incentives for inclusive care delivery models and payment for quality and care were established in order to rebalance resource allocation and incentive systems in the health care system in favor of value rather than volume of care. The care delivery approach is based on a dyad paradigm, in which nurses and physicians work collaboratively to ensure patient quality of care, proficient service, and efficiency in health care delivery. Notably, the patient population is immersed in a variety of delivery modalities that encompass critical, acute, and progressive care (UK HealthCare, 2020). Thus, the purpose of this paper is to delve into health care delivery models by examining specific areas such as addressing the triple aim in relation to population health management and delivery models, describing current trends in health care delivery models, and examining how quality and safety affect health care delivery models.

 

Address the triple aim as it relates to population health management and delivery models.
Discuss current trends in health care delivery models.
Describe how quality and safety impact delivery models in health care.
Include at least three peer-reviewed/academic references in your essay, including the HealthyPeople website.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Resources

IHI Triple Aim Initiative

Read the “IHI Triple Aim Initiative,” located on the Institute for Healthcare Improvement website.


The Healthcare Triple Aim in the Recovery Era

Read “The Healthcare Triple Aim in the Recovery Era,” by Kerman and Kidd, from Administration and Policy in Mental Healt

… 


HealthyPeople Website Exploration

Explore the HealthyPeople.gov website from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promo

… 


The Load and Capacity Model of Healthcare Delivery: Considerations for the Crisis Management of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Read “The Load and Capacity Model of Healthcare Delivery: Considerations for the Crisis Management of the COVID-19 Pandemic,” by

… 


CMO-CNO Partnerships Can Drive Patient Safety and Quality: Formal Partnerships- Or Dyads- Between Clinical Leaders Can Break Down Leadership Silos and Result in Better Patient Outcomes

Read “CMO-CNO Partnerships Can Drive Patient Safety and Quality: Formal Partnerships- Or Dyads- Between Clinical Leaders Can Break Do

… 


Economics and Financial Management for Nurses and Nurse Leaders

Read the Chapter 2 section, “Principles of Health Insurance,” and the Chapter 3 section, “Historic Foundations of Managed Car

… 


Provider Burnout and Patient Engagement: The Quadruple and Quintuple Aims

Read “Provider Burnout and Patient Engagement: The Quadruple and Quintuple Aims,” by Epperson, Childs, and Wilhoit, from

… 

Delivery Models Essay – Rubric

Triple Aim

Criteria Description

Triple Aim

5. Target

19.2 points

The essay thoroughly and skillfully identifies the triple aim as it relates to population health management and delivery models.

4. Acceptable

17.66 points

The essay thoroughly identifies the triple aim as it relates to population health management and delivery models.

3. Approaching

16.9 points

The essay identifies the triple aim as it relates to population health management and delivery models.

2. Insufficient

15.36 points

The essay vaguely identifies the triple aim as it relates to population health management and delivery models.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The essay does not sufficiently identify the triple aim as it relates to population health management and delivery models.

Current Trends in Health Care Delivery Models

Criteria Description

Current Trends in Health Care Delivery Models

5. Target

18.4 points

The essay thoroughly and insightfully discusses current trends in health care delivery models.

4. Acceptable

16.93 points

The essay thoroughly discusses population current trends in health care delivery models.

3. Approaching

16.19 points

The essay discusses current trends in health care delivery models.

2. Insufficient

14.72 points

The essay does not clearly discuss current trends in health care delivery models.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The essay does not adequately discuss current trends in health care delivery models.

Quality and Safety

Criteria Description

Quality and Safety

5. Target

18.4 points

The essay expertly describes how quality and safety impact delivery models in health care.

4. Acceptable

16.93 points

The essay soundly describes how quality and safety impact delivery models in health care.

3. Approaching

16.19 points

The essay adequately describes how quality and safety impact delivery models in health care.

2. Insufficient

14.72 points

The essay vaguely describes how quality and safety impact delivery models in health care.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The essay does not adequately describe how quality and safety impact delivery models in health care.

Thesis, Position, or Purpose

Criteria Description

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

5. Target

5.6 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully directed to a specific audience.

4. Acceptable

5.15 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.

3. Approaching

4.93 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.

2. Insufficient

4.48 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.

Development, Structure, and Conclusion

Criteria Description

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.

5. Target

6.4 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

4. Acceptable

5.89 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

3. Approaching

5.63 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

2. Insufficient

5.12 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.

Evidence

Criteria Description

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.

5. Target

4 points

Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives are integrated effectively.

4. Acceptable

3.68 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated.

3. Approaching

3.52 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

2. Insufficient

3.2 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.

Mechanics of Writing

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

5. Target

4 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable

3.68 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

3. Approaching

3.52 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient

3.2 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

Format/Documentation

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

5. Target

4 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.

4. Acceptable

3.68 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching

3.52 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

2. Insufficient

3.2 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.
Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.
APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.
LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

 

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *