Analyzing Intelligence-achievement Report Assignment

/0 Comments/in /by

Analyzing Intelligence-achievement Report Assignment

You will analyze and consider a diagnosis based on the results of the intelligence and achievement tests in order to complete this brief paper.Consider how viewing results from both tests can assist a practitioner in better understanding the test-functioning. taker’s  It may also assist him in making a more comprehensive recommendation.
Assign a diagnosis to Bob Schmoe from the Sample Intelligence Achievement Report based on your understanding of intelligence and achievement testing. 
(Attached)
Analyzing the requirements for intelligence-achievement reports
Write about Bob’s abilities and weaknesses in relation to intelligence and achievement testing. 
Consider the following inquiries:
What areas of Bob’s Wide Range Achievement Test 4 (WRAT-4) and Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence 2 (WASI-2) scores would be considered strengths? 
What about his flaws?
Evaluate Bob’s strengths and weaknesses, as well as how they affect his overall functioning.
Finally, what suggestions or recommendations do you have for Bob based on his identified areas of limitation?
Review the Module Five Short Paper Guidelines and Rubric document to complete this assignment. 
(Attached)

Important information for writing discussion questions and participation

Welcome to class

Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to

I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.

Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.

If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.

Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.

Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.

I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!

Hi Class,

Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.

Contact me if you have any questions.

Important information on Writing a Discussion Question

  • Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
  • There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
  • Include in-text citations in your response
  • Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
  • Follow APA-7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed

Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor

  • A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
  • Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
  • Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
  • Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
  • Follow APA 7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
  • Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
  • Here are some helpful links
  • The is a great resource

CLASSROOM ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS

https://www..com/analyzing-intelligence-achievement-report/

Questions for Discussion (DQ)

 

Initial responses to the DQ should be at least 250 words long and address all aspects of the questions posed, including a minimum of one scholarly source.

 

Successful responses are substantive (i.e., they add something new to the discussion, they engage others in the discussion, they have a well-developed idea), and they include at least one scholarly source.

 

Responses of one or two sentences, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and off-topic responses will not be considered substantive. 
Substantive responses must be at least 150 words in length.

 

I encourage you to incorporate the week’s readings (if applicable) into your responses.

 

Participation every week

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ are graded separately and do not count toward participation.

Analyzing Intelligence-achievement Report Assignment

 

Along with the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.

 

A scholarly source/citation is not required for participation posts (unless you cite someone else’s work).

 

Viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments is part of your weekly participation. 
These announcements are made to ensure that you are aware of everything that is due this week.

 

The APA Format and the Writing Quality

 

Learn how to use APA format and practice using it correctly. 
It is used for the majority of your degree’s writing assignments. 
For APA paper templates, citation examples, and tips, go to the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, which can be found under the Resources tab in LoudCloud. 
Points will be deducted if the APA format is not used correctly or if the APA format is not used at all (if required).

 

Cite all information sources! 
Cite the source whenever possible. 
A citation is also required when paraphrasing.

 

I strongly advise you to use the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

 

Utilization of Direct Quotes

 

At the Masters’ level, I discourage the use of direct quotes in DQs and assignments and deduct points accordingly.

 

As Masters students, you must be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other sources. 
Simply repeating someone else’s words does not demonstrate comprehension or critical analysis of the content.

 

It is preferable to paraphrase and cite your sources.

 

Policy LopesWrite

 

Please make sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me for assignments that must be submitted to LopesWrite.

 

Please review your report once you have received it. 
This report will highlight grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that are simple to correct. 
Instead of being counted off for these errors, spend a few extra minutes reviewing.

 

Examine your similarities. 
Did you forget to include a citation? 
Did you not paraphrase correctly? 
Is your paper dominated by someone else’s ideas rather than your own?

 

Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, which can be found under the Resources tab in LoudCloud, for advice on how to improve your paper and SI score.

 

Policy on Arrival Late

 

The university’s late assignment policy is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. 
This also holds true for late DQ responses.

 

If you anticipate having to submit an assignment late, please contact me. 
With advance notice, I am happy to be flexible. 
Due to extenuating circumstances, we may be able to work out an extension.

 

If you do not contact me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will apply.

 

Unless we have worked out an extension, I will not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late.

 

No assignments are accepted after the last day of class, per policy. 
Any assignment submitted after midnight on the final day of class will not be graded.

 

Communication

 

The importance of communication cannot be overstated. 
You can contact me in a variety of ways, including:

 

Questions to the Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask questions about course content or assignments. 
If you have a question, chances are that one of your colleagues does as well. 
This is the class’s public forum.

 

Individual Forum: This is a private forum where you can ask me questions or leave messages for me. 
At least once every 24 hours, this will be checked.

Name:  Discussion Rubric

  Excellent

90–100

 Good

80–89

 Fair

70–79

 Poor

0–69
Main Posting:

Response to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Thoroughly responds to the Discussion question(s).

Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least three current credible sources.

 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to most of the Discussion question(s).

Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least three credible references.

 31 (31%) – 34 (34%)

Responds to some of the Discussion question(s).

One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Cited with fewer than two credible references.

 0 (0%) – 30 (30%)

Does not respond to the Discussion question(s).

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Contains only one or no credible references.
Main Posting:

Writing

 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Written clearly and concisely.

Contains no grammatical or spelling errors.

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Written concisely.

May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors.

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Written somewhat concisely.

May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Contains some APA formatting errors.

 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Not written clearly or concisely.

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Main Posting:

Timely and full participation

 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts main Discussion by due date.

 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts main Discussion by due date.

 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Posts main Discussion by due date.

 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post main Discussion by due date.
First Response:

Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Responds to questions posed by faculty.

The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
First Response:

Writing

 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.

Response is written in standard, edited English.

 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Few or no credible sources are cited.

 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.

Response to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.
First Response:

Timely and full participation

 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts by due date.

 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts by due date.

 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Posts by due date.

 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post by due date.
Second Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.		 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Responds to questions posed by faculty.

The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Second Response:
Writing		 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.

Response is written in standard, edited English.

 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Few or no credible sources are cited.

 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.

Response to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.
Second Response:
Timely and full participation		 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts by due date.

 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts by due date.

 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Posts by due date.

 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post by due date.
Total Points: 100

Name:  Discussion Rubric

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *