PHI 413V Christian Perspective of The Nature of Spirituality and Ethics Essay

PHI 413V Christian Perspective of The Nature of Spirituality and Ethics Essay

  1. In 250-300 words, explain the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism within health care.
  2. In 250-300 words, explain what scientism is and describe two of the main arguments against it.
  3. In 750-1,000 words, answer each of the worldview questions according to your own personal perspective and worldview:
    1. What is ultimate reality?
    2. What is the nature of the universe?
    3. What is a human being?
    4. What is knowledge?
    5. What is your basis of ethics?
    6. What is the purpose of your existence?

Remember to support your reflection with the topic study materials.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

PHI 413V Christian Perspective of The Nature of Spirituality and Ethics Essay

Unformatted Attachment Preview

1-Read Chapters 1 from Practicing Dignity. URL: https://www.gcumedia.com/digital-resources/grand-canyon-university/2020/practicing-dignity_an-introductionto-christian-values-and-decision-making-in-health-care_1e.php 2- View both “Faith and Spiritual Decision-Making in Health Care Professions” video messages to RN to BSN students from Dr. Lisa Smith and Dr. Maria Quimba, from the College of Nursing and Health Care Professions. URL: https://www.gcumedia.com/lms-resources/student-success-center/?mediaElement=7285A42D-1FDE-E811-844B005056BD1ABC 3- View “Literary Styles in the Bible” on the Bible Project website (2018). URL: https://thebibleproject.com/videos/literary-styles-bible/ 4- View “The Story of the Bible” on the Bible Project website (2018). URL: https://thebibleproject.com/videos/the-story-of-the-bible/ 5- View “What Is the Bible?” on the Bible Project website (2018). URL: https://thebibleproject.com/videos/what-is-bible/ 6- Read “What Is Scientism?” by Burnett, on the American Association for the Advancement of Science website (2018). URL: https://www.aaas.org/programs/dialogue-science-ethics-and-religion/what-scientism 7- Read “10 Things You Should Know About Scientism,” by Moreland, on the Crossway website (2018). URL: https://www.crossway.org/articles/10-things-you-should-know-about-scientism/ Course Code PHI-413V Class Code PHI-413V-O501 Criteria Content Percentage 90.0% Christian Perspective of Spirituality and Ethics in Contrast to Postmodern Relativism 30.0% Scientism and Arguments 30.0% Personal Perspective and Worldview 30.0% Organization, Effectiveness, and Format 10.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is incomplete or insufficient. Explanation of scientism or the explanations of two main arguments against scientism are inaccurate. Details are not supported. Worldview questions are not fully answered. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Sources are not documented. Total Points 100.0 Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is unclear. Explanation is not supported by topic study materials. Description of scientism is accurate. Explanations of two main arguments against scientism are unclear. Details are not clearly supported by topic study materials. Each of the worldview questions is answered but is lacking a personal connection or clarity. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Satisfactory (75.00%) Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is clear. Explanation is not supported by topic study materials. Explanation of scientism is clear. Explanations of two main arguments against scientism are clear. Details are supported by topic study materials. Each of the worldview questions is answered with personal connection. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Good (85.00%) Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is clear and detailed. Explanation is supported by topic study materials. Explanation of scientism is clear and accurate. Explanations of two main arguments against scientism are clear. Details are clearly supported by topic study materials. Each of the worldview questions is answered clearly and with personal connection. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Excellent (100.00%) Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is clear, detailed, and demonstrates a deep understanding of the subject. Explanation is supported by topic study materials. Explanation of scientism is clear and accurate. Explanations of two main arguments against scientism are clear and insightful. Details are clearly supported by topic study materials. Each of the worldview questions is answered clearly and with deep personal insight. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Comments Points Earned Topic 1: Optional Study Materials The Folly of Scientism “The Folly of Scientism,” by Hughes, from New Atlantis: A Journal of Technology & Society (2012). https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h &AN=84015008&site=ehost-live&scope=site Blinded by Scientism “Blinded by Scientism,” by Feser, on the Public Ciscourse: The Journal of the Witherspoon Institute website (2010). https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2010/03/1174/ Is There Truth Beyond Science “Is There Truth Beyond Science,” by Hutchinson and the Veritas Forum (2013). http://www.veritas.org/playlist/is-there-truth-beyond-science/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtB_gnBDq5E&feature=youtu.be Time for Truth “Time for Truth,” by Guinness and the Veritas Forum (2018). http://www.veritas.org/time-for-truth-os/ © 2020. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. ..

PHI 413V Christian Perspective of The Nature of Spirituality and Ethics Essay

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *