Academic Success & Professional Development Plan Research Paper

Using the Week 4 Part 4 section of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template presented in the Resources, conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following: Points Range: 18 (18.00%) – 20 (20.00%) Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 13 (13.00%) Points Range: 14 %7B%220.00000 (14.00%) – 15 Points Range: 16 (15.00%) %7B%220.18000 The response (16.00%) – 17 %7B%220.14000 vaguely and (17.00%) inaccurately %7B%220.16000 The response The response identifies the clearly identifies vaguely identifies topic of interest the topic of The response the topic of selected, or is interest selected. partially identifies interest selected. missing. the topic of The response interest selected. The response The response accurately and vaguely or vaguely and completely The response inaccurately inaccurately provides a citation provides a partial provides a provides a of the article citation of the citation of the citation of the selected, article selected, article selected, article selected, · The topic of including an including a partial including vague including vague interest you have accurate and link or search or inaccurate and inaccurate selected. complete link or details. search details. search details, or thorough search is missing. · Correctly details. The response The response formatted APA partially identifies vaguely or The response citation of the The response and describes a inaccurately vaguely and article you clearly identifies professional identifies and inaccurately selected, along and describes in practice use of the describes a identifies and with link or search detail a theories/concepts professional describes a details. professional presented in the practice use of the professional practice use of the article. theories/concepts practice use of · Identify a theories/concepts Feedback: presented in the the professional presented in the article. theories/concepts practice use of the article. Feedback: presented in the theories/concepts Feedback: article, or is presented in the missing. article. Feedback: Analysis of the article using the Points Range: 18 Points Range: 16 Points Range: 14 Points Range: 0 Research Analysis (18.00%) – 20 (16.00%) – 17 (14.00%) – 15 (0.00%) – 13 Matrix section of (20.00%) (17.00%) (15.00%) (13.00%) the template. %7B%220.18000 %7B%220.16000 %7B%220.14000 %7B%220.00000 · Write a oneparagraph justification explaining whether or not you would recommend the use of this article to inform professional practice. Write a 2-3 paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following: The response The response The response clearly and provides a partial provides a vague accurately analysis of the or inaccurate provides a article using the analysis of the detailed analysis Research Analysis article using the of the article using Matrix section of Research the Research the template. Analysis Matrix Analysis Matrix section of the section of the The response template. template. partially explains the justification of The response The response whether or not to vaguely or clearly and recommend the inaccurately accurately use of the article explains the explains in detail to inform justification of the justification of professional whether or not to whether or not to practice. recommend the recommend the Feedback: use of the article use of the article to inform to inform professional professional practice. practice. Academic Success & Professional Development Plan Research Paper

Feedback: Feedback: The response provides a vague and inaccurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template, or is missing. The response vaguely and inaccurately explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice, or is missing. Feedback: Points Range: 41 Points Range: 36 Points Range: 32 Points Range: 0 (41.00%) – 45 (36.00%) – 40 (32.00%) – 35 (0.00%) – 31 (45.00%) (40.00%) (35.00%) (31.00%) %7B%220.41000 %7B%220.36000 The response The response clearly and partially describes accurately the approach to describes in detail identifying and the approach to analyzing peeridentifying and reviewed · Describe your analyzing peerresearch. approach to identifying and reviewed research. The response analyzing peerpartially identifies reviewed research. The response clearly identifies and describes at least two · Identify at least and accurately describes in detail strategies used to two strategies that be effective in you would use that at least two strategies used to finding peeryou found to be %7B%220.32000 %7B%220.00000 The response vaguely or inaccurately describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peerreviewed research. The response vaguely and inaccurately describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peerreviewed research, or is missing. The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies and describes at least The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies and effective in finding be effective in reviewed peer-reviewed finding peerresearch. research. reviewed research. The response · Identify at least The response provides an one resource you provides a accurate synthesis intend to use in complete, of at least one the future to find detailed, and outside resource peer-reviewed specific synthesis that may be used research. of at least one in the future to outside resource find peerthat may be used reviewed in the future to research. The find peerresponse reviewed research. integrates at least The response fully 1 outside resource integrates at least and 2-3 course 1 outside resource specific resources and 2-3 course that support the specific resources summary that fully supports provided. the summary Feedback: provided. Feedback: Written Expression and Points Range: 5 Formatting (5.00%) – 5 Paragraph (5.00%) Development and %7B%220.05000 Organization: Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. A clear and Sentences are comprehensive carefully focused– purpose neither long and statement, rambling nor introduction, and short and lacking conclusion is substance. A clear provided which Points Range: 4 (4.00%) – 4 (4.00%) %7B%220.04000 Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief two strategies used to be effective in finding peerreviewed research. The response vaguely or inaccurately synthesizes at least one outside resource that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the summary provided. Feedback: describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peerreviewed research, or is missing. The response fails to integrate any resources that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research to support the summary provided, or is missing. Feedback: Points Range: 3.5 Points Range: 0 (3.50%) – 3.5 (0.00%) – 3 (3.50%) (3.00%) %7B%220.03500 %7B%220.00000 Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. Feedback: and delineates all comprehensive required criteria. purpose statement Feedback: and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/intext citations, and reference list. Points Range: 5 (5.00%) – 5 (5.00%) %7B%220.05000 and not descriptive. Feedback: Points Range: 4 (4.00%) – 4 (4.00%) %7B%220.04000 Feedback: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 3 Points Range: 3.5 (3.00%) (3.50%) – 3.5 %7B%220.00000 (3.50%) %7B%220.03500 Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, Uses correct Contains a few (1- Contains several spelling, and grammar, 2) grammar, (3-4) grammar, punctuation spelling, and spelling, and spelling, and errors that punctuation with punctuation punctuation interfere with the no errors. Academic Success & Professional Development Plan Research Paper

errors. errors. reader’s Feedback: Feedback: Feedback: understanding. Feedback: Points Range: 5 (5.00%) – 5 (5.00%) %7B%220.05000 Uses correct APA format with no errors. Feedback: Points Range: 4 (4.00%) – 4 (4.00%) %7B%220.04000 Points Range: 3.5 Points Range: 0 (3.50%) – 3.5 (0.00%) – 3 (3.50%) (3.00%) %7B%220.03500 Contains a few (1- Contains several 2) APA format (3-4) APA format errors. errors. Feedback: Feedback: Name:NURS_6003_Module04_Week07_Assignment_Rubric Exit %7B%220.00000 Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Feedback: NURS 6003: Transition to Graduate Study for Nursing Academic and Professional Success Plan Template Prepared by: This document is to be used for NURS 6003 Transition to Graduate Study for Nursing to complete Assessments 1-6. Just as importantly the document serves to organize your thoughts about planning for your academic and professional success. For specific instructions see the weekly assessment details in the course, or ask your instructor for further guidance. Week 1 | Part 1: My Academic and Professional Network I have identified and secured the participation of the following academic (at least two) and professional (at least two) individuals and/or teams to form the basis of my network. This network will help me to clarify my vision for success and will help guide me now and in the future. Directions: Complete the information below for each member of your network. For more than four entries repeat the items below with details of your additional network member(s) in the ‘ADDITIONAL NETWORK MEMBERS’ section. NETWORK MEMBER 1 Name: Sandra Williams Title: Mrs. Organization: South University MSN student Academic or Professional: Academic Why I selected this individual and/or team and how they will support my success in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse: Notes: Mrs. Sandra Williams is a competent student with a good mastery of the nursing concepts having worked in better hospitals before joining the MSN program in the university. I believe in her intellectual capacity and better approaches she always has in the mitigation of challenges and quality understanding. As a classmate who is an extrovert and willing to share, she can be a good network and facilitate my quality learning as required for the program. NETWORK MEMBER 2 Name: Steve Smith Title: PhD Organization: Walden University Academic or Professional: Academic Why I selected this individual and/or team and how they will support my success in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse: Notes: Mr. Smith is still pursuing his doctorate program at Walden University and we are friends in the online platforms. Interaction through social media on academic matters is the best approach that we always use to communicate to one another. I believe in his experience having gained enough knowledge in the platform and implemented better approaches for reduction of the chances of failure. Since he has a good experience in MSN and the clinical practice, he automatically becomes a good person to help me pursue the program through the support that he can give in terms of academic consultations. NETWORK MEMBER 3 Name: Elizabeth Grahams. Title: Nursing Officer Organization: MediClub Georgia Academic or Professional: Professional Why I selected this individual and/or team and how they will support my success in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse: Notes: In MediClub Georgia hospital, there are quality services in a better way to reduce the risks and the challenges hence promoting quality and comprehensive measures as required. Mrs. Elizabeth has a good experience of the nursing practice and can be a good consultant when it comes to the nursing practice and required quality. I believe in her intellectual capability and effective practice that she has. As a practicing nurse, I would always want to associate with her to gain the experience and required skills. NETWORK MEMBER 4 Name: Mr. Paul Nabiso Title: Renal Nurse Organization: MediClub Georgia Hospital Academic or Professional: Professional Why I selected this individual and/or team and how they will support my success in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse: Notes: Mr. Paul is one of the competent professionals in the nursing career in the MediClub Georgia hospital. In the hospital, there are a number of takes that the professional handles especially in the renal unit. The competence of the individual is good and as a practicing nurse, he will help me go through the MSN program and pass in a successful manner. Proficiency is the goal and I believe that the individual is good enough the help in the education and as a consultant. ADDITIONAL NETWORK MEMBERS 1. Academic Success & Professional Development Plan Research Paper

Boniface Owen, Psychiatric Nurse MediClub Geirgia. 2. Cynthia Williams, MSN student Southern University. 3. Allan Kelly, Medical-Surgical nursing professional at MediClub in Georgia. Week 2 | Part 2: Academic Resources and Strategies I have identified the following academic resources and/or strategies that can be applied to success in the nursing practice in general or my specialty in particular. Directions: In the space below Identify and describe at least three academic resources or strategies that can be applied to the MSN program, and at least three professional resources that can be applied to success in the nursing practice in general or your specialty in particular. For each, explain how you intend to use these resources, and how they might benefit you academically and professionally. ACADEMIC RESOURCE/STRATEGY 1 Group discussion strategy: As an MSN student, I can use the discussion strategy to encounter difficult concepts and ensure that the group handles them appropriately. Collaboration and quality in discussing the various nursing concepts are good for quality and effective nursing discussions as required. ACADEMIC RESOURCE/STRATEGY 2 Benchmarking strategy Going to other quality institutions to benchmark on the nursing practice and the MSN program is a good way to come out and ensure that better strategies are implemented as required. Based on the benchmarking strategy, I would enquire new tactics and techniques of learning MSN program and getting to interact with the sophisticated professionals can be effectively applied in the success of the programs. ACADEMIC RESOURCE/STRATEGY 3 Avoiding procrastination Based on the necessary goals and strategies, attending all the professional meetings and other specific interventions require that procrastination is avoided. Attending classes and doing assignments in a timely manner is required for quality process through the program. PROFESSIONAL RESOURCE/STRATEGY 1 MSN textbooks Better knowledge in MSN lies in the published books that are purchased and availed in hardcopy. I will ensure that I read the books and apply quality strategies in the promotion of better approaches to gain the knowledge. PROFESSIONAL RESOURCE/STRATEGY 2 Peer reviewed MSN nursing articles and research papers. As a professional resource, I will ensure that I read the articles and follow better strategies to gain new knowledge. The peer review articles are good in the addition of knowledge and I will always read them effectively to get the required knowledge and go through the MSN program. PROFESSIONAL RESOURCE/STRATEGY 3 Online tutorials in YouTube MSN program requires that YouTube tutorials are watched since they are very informative. I will review the video tutorials and check the concepts based on whether they are favorable. The competency of the tutorials will help me gain the best and ensure that strategic knowledge is applied as required. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES/STRATEGIES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Reports from seminars. Past examination papers. Online libraries. Precision in communication. Timeliness. Week 3 | Part 3: Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity and Professional Ethics I have analyzed the relationship between academic integrity and writing, as well as the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics. I have also identified strategies I intend to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of my academic work while a student of the MSN program, as well as my professional work as a nurse throughout my career. The results of these efforts are shared below. Directions: In the space below craft your analysis/writing sample, including Part 1 (The Connection Between Academic and Professional Integrity) and Part 2 (Strategies for Maintaining Integrity of Work). Part 1: Writing Sample: The Connection Between Academic and Professional Integrity In the space below write a 2- 3-paragraph analysis that includes the following: • • Explanation for the relationship between academic integrity and writing Explanation for the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics • Cite at least 2 resources that support your arguments, being sure to use proper APA formatting. • Use Grammarly and SafeAssign to improve the product. • Explain how Grammarly, Safe Assign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity Response Academic integrity is required in writing since the content and sources are supposed to be effective in the implementation as required (Kidwell 2001). Academic writing is supposed to be genuine and not plagiarized and that is considered good and quality. Academic integrity must ensure that better strategies are followed for academic integrity. The sources authors must be acknowledged and given credits as required. Professional practices go hand in hand with scholarly ethics (McCabe & Pavela, 2000). There should be maintenance of good ethics in the professional context to ensure that strategic interventions are followed for reduction of the risks. Based on the needed approaches and governance techniques, the professional standards are supposed to observe ethics just like scholarly ethics (McCabe & Pavela, 2000). Quality is necessary in the promotion of better interventions and strategic approaches for quality and comprehensive measures (McCabe & Pavela, 2000). The law is the same and it is required that better measures are followed for quality and effective interventions as required. PART 2: Strategies for Maintaining Integrity of Work Expand on your thoughts from Part 1 by: • Identifying and describing strategies you intend to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of your 1) academic work while a student of the MSN program, and 2) professional work as a nurse throughout your career. Include a review of resources and approaches you propose to use as a student and a professional. Response While pursing MSN program, I will ensure that better strategies are applied in the control of plagiarism. Based on the strategic measures, I will always ensure that better approaches are followed and better measures are followed as necessary. I will refrain from copying of assignments and other materials to ensure that genuine processes are implemented. Strategically, I will ensure that quality is implemented and strategic approaches implemented to reduce the cases of academic irregularities. In the research program of MSN program, I will ensure that I acknowledge the good professionals who had published the sources. In the online platform, I will take the sources and cite appropriately to ensure that there is a genuine wor