Productive Conflict

Productive Conflict

For this assignment, it is especially important to differentiate between constructive and destructive conflict within groups. Substantive conflict deals with disagreements on ideas and issues, while affective conflict looks into personal relationships among group members. If the conflict evolves into personality-based, people may utilize such tactics as avoidance or escalate tensions through hostile behaviors like name-calling and sarcasm. This poisonous atmosphere causes a decrease in teamwork commitment, shying away from the in-depth discussion of problems and disconnection from the decision-making process that results in inferior and sometimes unethical solutions.

In the same way, constructive conflict can result in positive outcomes, but it may turn into affective conflict when people perceive disagreements as personal attacks that lead to anger and defensiveness. Also, unresolved conflicts may lead to some members getting frustrated.

From the options provided, the three major outcomes of a substantive conflict selected are improved self-understanding and self-improvement, stronger and deeper relationships, and increased group cohesion and cooperation.

First, meaningful conflict leads to looking inside one’s self and at the positions of others, which develops self-awareness and self-growth. This results in increased self-understanding and helps individuals to grow within the group (Coleman et al., 2014).

Secondly, members can have in-depth conversations, eventually leading to the establishment of stronger and deeper relationships. Respectful dialogue and cooperation are a foundation for the development of trust and mutual respect, which improves group dynamics (Coleman et al., 2014).

Besides that, a substantive conflict also creates stronger cohesion and cooperation among the members. As the group resolves the conflicts constructively and works toward common goals, members of the group develop a sense of purpose and commitment that is shared among them. Such collective action, as per Coleman et al. (2014), leads to easier communication, cooperation, and problem-solving, which, in turn, results in better outcomes for the group.

Lastly, a well-managed substantive conflict can result in the positive outcomes of self-awareness, better relationships, and group cohesion, which contribute to the overall success and effectiveness of the group. In addition, when groups are effective at resolving conflicts, they also become better at dealing with difficult circumstances in the future. It is this which helps them to grow and develop. It shows how solving conflicts in a positive way can make the team work together better and achieve more.

Reference

Coleman, P. T., Deutsch, M., and Marcus, E. C. (Eds.). (2014). The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice. John Wiley & Sons.

CLICK HERE TO ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Productive Conflict

Paper details

Start Assignment

  • Its important to differentiate between substantive conflict and affective (destructive) conflict, which is centered on the personal relationships between group members. Those caught in personality-based conflicts find themselves either trying to avoid the problem or, when the conflict can’t be ignored, escalating hostilities through name-calling, sarcasm, threats, and verbally aggressive behaviors. In this poisoned environment, members aren’t as committed to the group process, sacrifice in-depth discussion of the problem to get it done as soon as possible, and distance themselves from the decision. The result? A decline in reasoning that produces an unpopular, low-quality, and often unethical solution.

Sometimes constructive conflict degenerates into effective conflict. This occurs when a disagreement about ideas is seen as an insult or a threat and members display anger because they feel their self-concepts are threatened. Others respond in kind. Members can also become frustrated when task-oriented conflicts seem to drag on and on without resolution.

For this assignment, review pages 295-296, Substantive conflict( constructive conflict) produces several positive outcomes; they are listed below, Please choose three of these and explain how these outcomes can produce positive outcomes for a group:

Guided Response: Please choose three of the following; your paper should be 150 words in length.

An accurate understanding of the arguments and positions of others in the groups higherreasoning reasoning through analysis improvedhigher reasoningthrough analysisimproved higherreasoning reasoning through analysis improvedhigher reasoningthrough through analysis improved higherreasoning reasoning through analysis and improved-level moral reasoningThorough problem analysisImproved self-understanding and self-improvementStronger, deeper relationshipsCreativity and changeGreater motivation to solve the problemImproved mastery and retention of informationDeeper commitment to the outcome of the discussionIncreased group cohesion and cooperation.

 

Personality and Perspectives in Education

Personality and Perspectives in Education

CLICK HERE TO ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

The assigned readings for the first module of the course “Selected Questions and Issues in Education” have illuminated key ideas on inclusiveness, equity, diversity among educators, and the importance of Indigenous views. “Positionality” is one of these ideas that has a special resonance. Positional awareness focuses on how our backgrounds in society and culture affect our opinions, prejudices, and presumptions. Recognizing how we approach the problems of inclusion, equity, and diversity within education is largely based on this concept.

Sensoy and DiAngelo’s reading from 2017 contains a critical phrase that, in my opinion, best captures the concept of positionality: “Our positions in society shape our perspectives and the perspectives of others.” This quotation effectively conveys the core of positionality by highlighting that our roles in society and origins influence our perspectives and how other people view us. (Sensoy & DiAngelo  2017)

Let us now explore the connections between the texts and the idea of positionality:

Firstly, Sensoy and DiAngelo (2017): Sensoy & DiAngelo integrate the ideas of critical social justice and post-colonial theory in their reading. They emphasize the importance of recognizing our specific positions while talking about equity and justice. The authors contend that comprehending where we stand is essential for effective participation in social justice discourse. This reading encourages us to consider our positions in society and their effects as a starting point for understanding the idea of positionality (Sensoy & DiAngelo (2017).

Secondly, McIntosh (1989) explores the concept of privilege and how it frequently goes unnoticed by people who enjoy it in his article on white privilege. It highlights how crucial it is to acknowledge one’s privilege as a component of positionality. This article challenges readers to examine their sociocultural positions and how they influence their experiences and opinions, particularly those who might have never thought much about their privileges (Mcintosh, 1989).

Thirdly, in their 2018 work, “Potlatch as Pedagogy,” Davidson Davidson explains Traditional learning methods and the significance of comprehending Indigenous views. By encouraging readers to think about how their cultural upbringings and presumptions might vary from Indigenous points of view, this reading connects to positionality (Davidson & Davidson, 2018). It emphasizes the importance of awareness of one’s positionality when interacting with indigenous knowledge and viewpoints.

These texts above emphasize the importance of self-awareness of our cultural positions and backgrounds, which helps us better grasp positionality. Sensoy and DiAngelo establish the foundation for the idea, McIntosh emphasizes the part privilege plays in it, and Davidson and Davidson stress the significance of taking cultural differences in positionality into account. The concept of positionality was exciting to me as I responded to these readings. It got me thinking about how my experiences and background affect how I engage with others of all backgrounds and viewpoints in educational environments. I understand the importance of being conscious of my positionality to promote an inclusive and equitable learning environment.

As I progress through this course, I intend to self-evaluate my positionality regularly to analyze how it influences my relationships and what I think about them. Because of my improved self-awareness, I will be able to contribute more meaningfully to discussions taking place in the classroom regarding issues of inclusivity, equity, and diversity. In addition, it will enable me to comprehend better the myriad of perspectives stemming from various cultural foundations.

In conclusion, the concept of positionality serves as an essential prism through which we may observe how the societal duties and experiences we have had influence the perspectives we hold and the interactions we have with other people working in the field of education. When taken as a whole, the readings by Sensoy and DiAngelo, McIntosh, and Davidson and Davidson underscore how important it is to be aware of our positionality in making the educational environment more accessible and equitable. As I embark on my educational journey, I am resolute in making this concept a part of my approach since doing so is necessary to have meaningful exchanges with the various facets of education.

References

Davidson, & Davidson. (2018). Potlatch as Pedagogy, Introduction and Chapter 1.

Mcintosh,p. (1989). White Privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack.

Sensoy & DiAngelo (2017), “What is Critical Social Justice” (pp. xix-xxi) and “Prologue: A Parable” (pp. xxv-xxvii).

Personality and Perspectives in Education

Reading Response

The task

  1. Choose one core idea from the assigned texts that were important to you. It may seem like the most central idea, or one that has led to an “aha!” moment for you or one that you find problematic.
  2. Choose a key quote from one of the readings that illustrate this idea for you and explain why.
  3. Then discuss how each of the readings connects to this idea.  Do the authors say similar or different things?  How do they provide different insights on it?

A reading response asks you to examine, explain and reflect on your personal reactions to the reading. Your response is not an opinion piece and should not simply summarize content, but rather are brief reflective educational analyses that question your readings critically As you do this over and over, you will develop stronger critical thinking skills, approach educational sources with greater awareness, and understand how educators use such sources to construct educational prompts.

You will be thinking about your positionality throughout this course.  So, in this first reading response, take your first steps at acknowledging that positionality as part of your response.

There is no right or wrong answer to a reader’s response. Nonetheless, it is important that you demonstrate an understanding of the reading and clearly explain and support your reactions.

Submission format

A reading response is a full 2 pages long (double-spaced) and thoroughly proofread for spelling and grammar.

Give your paper a catchy title, i.e. not “Reading response.”

Evaluation

  • Reflection: your ability to meaningfully reflect and examine your own position, relationships, feelings, and responses to the reading[s]
  • Engagement with readings:Your ability to articulate and critique core ideas from the reading[s] as well as make connections and comparisons to other readings

Approaches to Defining Family Graphic Organizer

Approaches to Defining Family Graphic Organizer

CLICK HERE TO ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Structural Approach

The structural Approach is the most common in the definition of family in the United States. It defines family as a group of people related by blood and legal adoption. According to research studies, most families in the United States define family using the structural Approach.

The strength of the Structural family approach is that all the family members are privileged due to the legal ties of a family. Family gives one the value of belonging, and the law protects the right to equality of resources among the members of the structural family. A drawback of being in a structural family is that it limits people from having contradicting beliefs as those of the family members. For example, a married couple is likely to be upheld within a family compared to a cohabiting couple. Thus, a structural family provides its members with the privilege of belonging.

  1. Household Based

According to Burgess and Locke (1945), a family functions from a specific household where resources are distributed equally, and every family member must contribute equally to acquiring the resources. This structure portrays children as the core of the family, whereby parents are responsible for provision despite their differences as a family. The advantage of this setup is that children can choose who they want to spend more time. The drawback of this structure is commitment. One parent may choose to neglect their duties, thus overloading one parent.

  1. Role-Based Approach

The role-based family structure is defined as how the family members interact and behave toward each other. Role-based Approach allows every family member to relate according to their roles as a father, mother, or child. For example, it portrays parents as the family providers, while children undertake their roles of helping their family in every way possible. The advantages of this structure are that while every undertakes their role, the family is deemed fit. But when a member of the family is not available, the family is considered not as a whole.

  1. Interactionist Approach

The interactionist defines family as a social entity that symbolizes the interaction, communication, emotional attachment, and shared activities that make a family. It is a representation of how people relate and how they constantly reciprocate family expectations.  Unlike other family structures, the interactionist approach values the value of love and care tendered in a group of two or more people, except for the legal families tied by blood. This approach is achieved by identifying the people who show up and their value to the relationship.

The drawback of this setup is that no legal privileges are acquired in case the family breaks up. Thus, the need for family security.

The modern definition of family varies from the different setups we grow up. Any approach may define everyone’s type of family regardless of race, ethnicity, and sexuality.

Reference

Saunders, J.M., Dickenson, G.E. and Leming, M.R. (1996) “Understanding families: Diversity, continuity, and change,” Teaching Sociology, 24(3), p. 344. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1318759.

Klaiss, D.S. (1946) “The family: From institution to companionship. by Ernest W. Burgess and Harvey J. Locke. New York: The American Book Company, 1945. 800 pp. $4.25,” Social Forces, 24(4), pp. 480–481. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2572240.

Approaches to Defining Family Graphic Organizer

Paper details

As you complete this assignment, keep in mind that the 4 approaches to defining family presented on Pp. 21-26 in your textbook can be considered complimentary. If you defined family using a single approach you would end up excluding many types of families. Also keep in mind Ciabattari\’s statement that there are symbolic (related to how others see families, and how families see themselves) and practical (related to issues like custody, inheritance, and healthcare) implications to how we define family. Keep these implications in mind as you think about the strengths and drawbacks to each approach.

To complete this assignment, download the attached document. It consists of a graphic organizer in which you should fill in a definition, strength, and drawback to each of the 4 approaches to defining family described in chapter 2. Do your best to re-state the ideas from this chapter in your own words.

Critical Thinking/Research Critique

Critical Thinking/Research Critique

CLICK HERE TO ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Critical Thinking/Research Critique

Hi,

I need the attached table to be filled out based on the article i provided. PLEASE answer all questions very carefully, be concise and make sure your answer perfectly cover the question. I had problem to attach article, if you copy and paste the link below in google, you will be able to to see the article, instruction is in the attached table, this assignment is really important and has lots of points, please make sure you can handle it well, before accepting the deal.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tpGg5VUQEI8zxcAkGUwUGiW4vyng1RwB/view?usp=sharing

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

  • Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
  • Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
  • One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
  • I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

  • Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
  • In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
  • Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
  • Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

  • Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
  • Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
  • I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

  • I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
  • As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
  • It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

 

LopesWrite Policy

  • For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
  • Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
  • Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
  • Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

  • The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
  • Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
  • If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
  • I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
  • As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

  • Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: 
    • Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
    • Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

Discussion:Critical Thinking/Research Critique

Research & PICOT Statement

Research & PICOT Statement

CLICK HERE TO ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Research & PICOT Statement

Prepare this assignment as a 1,500-1,750 word paper using the instructor feedback from the previous course assignments and the guidelines below.

PICOT Question

Revise the PICOT question you wrote in the Topic 1 assignment using the feedback you received from your instructor.

The final PICOT question will provide a framework for your capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study).

Research Critiques

In the Topic 2 and Topic 3 assignments, you completed a qualitative and quantitative research critique on two articles for each type of study (4 articles total). Use the feedback you received from your instructor on these assignments to finalize the critical analysis of each study by making appropriate revisions.

The completed analysis should connect to your identified practice problem of interest that is the basis for your PICOT question.

Refer to “Research Critiques and PICOT Guidelines – Final Draft.” Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative in the structure of a formal paper.

Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change

Discuss the link between the PICOT question, the research articles, and the nursing practice problem you identified. Include relevant details and supporting explanation and use that information to propose evidence-based practice changes.

General Requirements

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is not required.

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

  • Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
  • Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
  • One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
  • I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

  • Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
  • In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
  • Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
  • Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

  • Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
  • Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
  • I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

  • I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
  • As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
  • It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

 

LopesWrite Policy

  • For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
  • Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
  • Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
  • Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

  • The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
  • Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
  • If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
  • I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
  • As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

  • Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: 
    • Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
    • Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

NURS-FPX4035 Assessment 4: Improvement Plan Tool Kit

NURS-FPX4035 Assessment 4: Improvement Plan Tool Kit

For this assessment, you will develop a Word document or an online resource repository of at least 12 annotated professional or scholarly resources that you consider critical for the audience of your safety improvement plan to understand or implement to ensure the success of the plan.

Introduction

Communication in the healthcare environment consists of an information-sharing experience whether through oral or written messages (Chard & Makary, 2015). As healthcare organizations and nurses strive to create a culture of safety and quality care, the importance of interprofessional collaboration, the development of tool kits, and the use of wikis become more relevant and vital. In addition to the dissemination of information and evidence-based findings and the development of tool kits, continuous support for and availability of such resources are critical. Among the most popular methods to promote ongoing dialogue and information sharing are blogs, wikis, websites, and social media. Nurses know how to support people in time of need or crisis and how to support one another in the workplace; wikis in particular enable nurses to continue that support beyond the work environment. Here they can be free to share their unique perspectives, educate others, and promote healthcare wellness at local and global levels (Kaminski, 2016).

You are encouraged to complete the Determining the Relevance and Usefulness of Resources activity prior to developing the repository. This activity will help you determine which resources or research will be most relevant to address a particular need. This may be useful as you consider how to explain the purpose and relevance of the resources you are assembling for your tool kit. The activity is for your own practice and self-assessment, and demonstrates course engagement.

References

Chard, R., & Makary, M. A. (2015). Transfer-of-care communication: Nursing best practices. AORN Journal, 102(4), 329–342.

Kaminski, J. (2016). Why all nurses can/should be authors. Canadian Journal of Nursing Informatics, 11(4), 1–7.

Overview

Nurses are often asked to implement processes, concepts, or practices—sometimes with little preparatory communication or education. One way to encourage sustainability of quality and process improvements is to assemble an accessible, user-friendly tool kit for knowledge and process documentation. Creating a resource repository or tool kit is also an excellent way to follow up an education or in-service session, as it can help to reinforce attendees’ new knowledge as well as the understanding of its value. By practicing creating a simple online tool kit, you can develop valuable technology skills to improve your competence and efficacy. This technology is easy to use and resources are available to guide you.

For this assessment, build on the work done in your first three assessments and create an online tool kit or resource repository that will help the audience of your in-service understand the research behind your safety improvement plan pertaining to a specific patient safety issue and put the plan into action.

Preparation

Google Sites is recommended for this assessment; the tools are free to use and should offer you a blend of flexibility and simplicity as you create your online tool kit. Please note that this requires a Google account; use your Gmail or Google Docs login, or create an account following the directions under the “Create Account” menu. Visit Wiki Resources for help.

Instructions

Using Google Sites, assemble an online resource tool kit containing at least 12 annotated resources that you consider critical to the success of your safety improvement initiative. These resources should enable nurses and others to implement and maintain the safety improvement you have developed.

It is recommended that you focus on the three or four most critical categories or themes with respect to your safety improvement initiative. For example, if your initiative concerns improving workplace safety for practitioners, you might choose broad themes such as general organizational safety and quality best practices; environmental safety and quality risks; individual strategies to improve personal and team safety; and process best practices for reporting and improving environmental safety issues.

Following the recommended scheme, you would collect at least three resources on average for each of the four categories. ;Each resource listing should include the following:

  • An APA-formatted citation of the resource with a working link.
  • A description of the information, skills, or tools provided by the resource.
  • A brief explanation of how the resource can help nurses better understand or implement the safety improvement initiative.
  • A description of how nurses can use this resource and when its use may be appropriate.

Remember that you must make your site public so that your faculty can access it. Check out the Google Sites resources in the Wiki Resources above for more information.

Here is an example entry:

  • Ko, S., Hsieh, M., & Huang, R. (2023). Human error analysis and modeling of medication-related adverse events in Taiwan using the human factors analysis and classification system regression. Healthcare, 11(14), 2063. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11142063
    • Nurses have a crucial responsibility in preventing medication errors. They should follow the “five rights of medication” to reduce the risk of such errors. These include the “right patient,” “right medication,” “right time,” “right dose,” and “right documentation.” By understanding these rights, nurses can manage medication administration effectively and ensure patient safety.

Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the rubric. Please study the rubric carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

  • Identify necessary resources to support the implementation and sustainability of a safety improvement initiative.
  • Analyze the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements.
  • Analyze the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk.
  • Present reasons and relevant situations for use of resource tool kit by its target audience.
  • Communicate resource tool kit in a Word document or Google Sites in a clear, logically structured, and professional manner that partially follows APA style and formatting.

Example Assessment: You may use the following example to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like but keep in mind that your tool kit will focus on promoting safety with the quality issue you selected in Assessment 1. Note that you do not have to submit your bibliography in addition to the Google Site; the example bibliography is merely for your reference.

To submit your online tool kit assessment, paste the link to your Google Site in the assessment submission box.

Example Google Site: You may use the example Google Site found in Assessment 4: Improved Heparin Infusion Safety to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the rubric would look like for this assessment but keep in mind that your tool kit will focus on promoting safety with the quality issue you selected in Assessment 1.

Note: If you experience technical or other challenges in completing this assessment, please contact your faculty member.

Place your Order Now

Additional Requirements

  • Number of resources: Your tool kit must include at least 12 professional or academically relevant resources that support the continued learning and implementation of knowledge and processes related to a safety improvement initiative. See the BSN Nursing Program Library Guide as needed.
  • APA format: Use proper APA formatting for in-text citations and each annotated resource. See the APA Module.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

  • Competency 1: Analyze the elements of a successful quality improvement initiative.
    • Analyze the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements.
    • Present reasons and relevant situations for resource tool kit use by its target audience.
  • Competency 2: Analyze factors that lead to patient safety risks.
    • Analyze the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk or improve quality.
  • Competency 3: Identify organizational interventions to promote patient safety.
    • Identify necessary resources to support the implementation and continued sustainability of a safety improvement initiative pertaining to a specific patient safety issue.
  • Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to communicate in a manner that supports safe and effective patient care.
    • Communicate resource tool kit in a Word document or Google Sites in a clear, logically structured, and professional manner that partially follows APA style and formatting.

Safety Improvement Resource Repository

Introduction

This resource repository has been developed to support nurses and other healthcare professionals in implementing and sustaining the Medication Error Reduction Plan. Each resource has been carefully selected to provide evidence-based knowledge, practical strategies, and professional guidance. By engaging with these resources, staff will strengthen their skills, reduce safety risks, and promote a culture of high-quality care.

Place your Order Now 

NURS-FPX4035 Assessment 3: Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation

NURS-FPX4035 Assessment 3: Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation 

For this assessment, you will develop an 8–14 slide PowerPoint presentation with thorough speaker’s notes designed for a hypothetical in-service session related to the improvement plan you developed in Assessment 2.

Introduction

As a practicing professional, you are likely to present educational in-services or training to staff pertaining to quality improvement (QI) measures of safety improvement interventions. Such in-services and training sessions should be presented in a creative and innovative manner to hold the audience’s attention and promote knowledge acquisition and skill application that changes practice for the better. The teaching sessions may include a presentation, audience participation via simulation or other interactive strategy, audiovisual media, and participant learning evaluation.

The use of in-services and/or training sessions has positive implications for nursing practice by increasing staff confidence when providing care to specific patient populations. It also allows for a safe and nonthreatening environment where staff nurses can practice their skills prior to a real patient event. Participation in learning sessions fosters a team approach, collaboration, patient safety, and greater patient satisfaction rates in the healthcare environment (Patel & Wright, 2018).

As you prepare to complete the assessment, consider the impact of in-service training on patient outcomes as well as practice outcomes for staff nurses. Be sure to support your thoughts on the effectiveness of educating and training staff to increase the quality of care provided to patients by examining the literature and established best practices.

You are encouraged to explore the AONL (American Organization of Nursing Leadership) Nurse Executive Competencies Review activity before you develop the Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation. This activity will help you review your understanding of the AONL Nurse Executive Competencies—especially those related to competencies relevant to developing an effective training session and presentation. This is for your own practice and self-assessment, and demonstrates your engagement in the course.

Reference

Patel, S., & Wright, M. (2018). Development of interprofessional simulation in nursing education to improve teamwork and collaboration in maternal child nursing. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 47(3), s16–s17.

Overview

As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will often find yourself in a position to lead and educate other nurses. This colleague-to-colleague education can take many forms, from mentoring to informal explanations on best practices to formal in-service training. In-services are an effective way to train a large group. Preparing to run an in-service may be daunting, as the facilitator must develop their message around the topic while designing activities to help the target audience learn and practice. By improving understanding and competence around designing and delivering in-service training, a BSN practitioner can demonstrate leadership and prove to be a valuable resource to others.

For this assessment, build on the work that you have done in your first two assessments and create an agenda and PowerPoint of an educational in-service session that would help a specific staff audience learn, provide feedback, and understand their roles and practice new skills related to the safety improvement plan you created.

Place your Order Now 

Instructions

Develop a PowerPoint presentation with detailed speaker’s notes representing the material you would deliver at a one-hour in-service session to raise awareness of your chosen safety improvement initiative and explain the need for it. Additionally, you must educate the audience as to their role and importance to the success of the initiative. This includes providing examples and practice opportunities to test out new ideas or practices related to the safety improvement initiative.

Be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the rubric. Please study the rubric carefully so that you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

  • Describe the purpose and at least three goals of an in-service session for nurses.
    • Include a one-line purpose statement followed by the goals.
    • Start each goal with a verb, such as 1) Explain reasons for medication administration errors, 2) Discuss the importance of preventing medication errors, and 3) Describe strategies to prevent medication errors.
  • Explain the need for and process to improve safety outcomes related to a specific patient-safety issue.
  • Explain to the audience their role and the importance of making the improvement plan successful.
  • Create resources or activities to encourage skill development and process understanding related to a safety improvement initiative.
    • Create a resource slide OR do an activity with the audience to assist them in learning and applying a new skill. A resource slide could consist of in-house materials, posters, or credible websites. An activity slide may include a quiz, simulation, group work, a case study, and so forth.
  • Communicate with nurses in a respectful and informative way that clearly presents expectations and solicits feedback on communication strategies for future improvement.

There are various ways to structure an in-service session; below is just one example:

  • Part 1: Agenda and Outcomes.
    • Explain to your audience what they are going to learn or do, and what they are expected to take away.
  • Part 2: Safety Improvement Plan.
    • Give an overview of the current problem, the proposed plan, and what the improvement plan is trying to address.
    • Explain why it is important for the organization to address the current situation.
  • Part 3: Audience’s Role and Importance.
    • Discuss how the staff audience will be expected to help implement and drive the improvement plan.
    • Explain why they are critical to the success of the improvement plan.
    • Describe how their work could benefit from embracing their role in the plan.
  • Part 4: New Process and Skills Practice.
    • Explain new processes or skills.
    • Develop an activity that allows the staff audience to practice and ask questions about these.
    • In the notes section, brainstorm potential responses to likely questions or concerns.
  • Part 5: Soliciting Feedback.
    • Describe how you would solicit feedback from the audience on the improvement plan and the in-service.
    • Explain how you might integrate this feedback for future improvements.

Remember to account for activity and discussion time.

Additional Requirements

  • Presentation length: There is no required length; use just enough slides to address all the necessary elements. Remember to use short, concise bullet points on the slides and expand on your points in the speaker’s notes. If you use 2 or 3 slides to address each of the parts in the above example, your presentation would be at least 10 slides and no more than 15 slides (not including the title, conclusion, or references slide).
  • Speaker notes: Speaker notes (located under each slide) should reflect what you would actually say if you were delivering the presentation to an audience. This presentation does NOT require audio or a transcript. Another presenter would be able to use the presentation by following the speaker’s notes.
  • APA format: Use APA formatting for in-text citations. Include an APA-formatted reference slide at the end of your presentation. See APA Module.
  • Number of references: Cite a minimum of three sources of scholarly or professional evidence to support your assertions. Resources should be no more than five years old. Use the BSN Nursing Program Library Guide as needed to guide your research in the Capella library.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

  • Competency 1: Analyze the elements of a successful quality improvement initiative.
    • Explain the need for and process to improve safety outcomes related to a specific patient safety issue.
    • Create resources or activities to encourage skill development and process understanding related to a safety improvement initiative.
  • Competency 4: Explain the nurse’s role in coordinating care to enhance quality and reduce costs.
    • Describe the purpose and at least three goals of an in-service session on a specific patient safety issue.
    • Explain to an audience its role and importance of making an improvement plan successful.
  • Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to communicate in a manner that supports safe and effective patient care.
    • Slides are easy to read and error free. Detailed speaker notes are provided. Speaker notes are clear, organized, and professionally presented.
    • Organize content with clear purpose and goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources published within the last five years.

Place your Order Now

Empowering Nurses Through Education: Advancing Patient Safety with Evidence-Based Improvement Strategies 

Introduction

In-service training is an essential tool for strengthening nursing practice and advancing patient safety. These sessions allow nurses to learn about current quality improvement (QI) initiatives, practice new skills in a supportive environment, and engage in collaboration that promotes better outcomes. When delivered effectively, in-services not only increase staff confidence but also foster teamwork and patient-centered care (Patel & Wright, 2018). By connecting education to practice, nurses become active participants in reducing risks, improving safety, and creating a culture of accountability. This presentation is designed to introduce a safety improvement plan, explain the need for change, and guide nurses in their roles as key drivers of success. 

Place your Order Now

NURS-FPX4035 Assessment 2: Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan

NURS-FPX4035 Assessment 2: Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan

For this assessment, you must use the supplied template to conduct a root-cause analysis. The completed assessment will be the template, focusing on the specific safety concern identified in your previous assessment.

Introduction

As patient safety concerns continue to be addressed in healthcare settings, nurses can play an active role in implementing safety improvement measures and plans. Often root-cause analyses are conducted and safety improvement plans are created to address sentinel or adverse events such as medication errors, patient falls, wrong-site surgery events, and hospital-acquired infections. Performing a root-cause analysis offers a systematic approach for identifying causes of problems, including process and system-check failures. Once the causes of failures have been determined, a safety improvement plan can be developed to prevent recurrences. The baccalaureate nurse’s role as a leader is to create safety improvement plans as well as disseminate vital information to staff nurses and other healthcare professionals to protect patients and improve outcomes.

Place your Order Now 

As you prepare for this assessment, it would be an excellent choice to complete the Quality and Safety Improvement Plan Knowledge Base activity and to review the various assessment resources, all of which will help you build your knowledge of key concepts and terms related to quality and safety improvement. The terms and concepts will be helpful as you prepare your Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan. Activities are not graded and demonstrate course engagement.

Overview

Nursing practice is governed by healthcare policies and procedures as well as state and national regulations developed to prevent problems. It is critical for nurses to participate in gathering and analyzing data to determine causes of patient safety issues, in solving problems, and in implementing quality improvements.

For this assessment, use the specific safety concern identified in your previous assessment as the subject of a root-cause analysis and safety improvement plan.

Instructions

The purpose of this assessment is to demonstrate your understanding of and ability to analyze a root cause of a specific safety concern in a healthcare setting. You will create a plan to improve the safety of patients related to the safety quality issue presented in your Assessment Supplement PDF in Assessment 1. Based on the results of your analysis, using the literature and professional best practices as well as the existing resources at your chosen healthcare setting, provide a rationale for your plan.

Use the Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan [DOCX] template to complete the assessment.

Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

  • Analyze the root cause of a patient safety issue or a specific sentinel event in an organization.
  • Apply evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address the safety issue or sentinel event.
  • Create a viable, evidence-based safety improvement plan.
  • Identify existing organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve your plan.
  • Communicate in writing that is clear, logical, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.

Additional Requirements

  • Length of submission: Use the provided template to create a root-cause analysis and safety improvement plan. There is no page limit. A title page is not required but you must include a reference list as per the template.
  • Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old. Use the BSN Nursing Program Library Guide as needed.
  • APA formatting: Format references and citations according to current APA style. See the APA Module.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

  • Competency 1: Analyze the elements of a successful quality improvement initiative.
    • Apply evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address a safety issue or sentinel event.
    • Create a feasible, evidence-based safety improvement plan to address a specific patient safety issue.
  • Competency 2: Analyze factors that lead to patient safety risks.
    • Analyze the root cause of a specific sentinel event or a patient safety issue in an organization.
  • Competency 3: Identify organizational interventions to promote patient safety.
    • Identify existing organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve a plan.
  • Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to communicate in a manner that supports safe and effective patient care.
    • Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar or punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
    • Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

Place your Order Now 

Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan: Strengthening Patient Safety Through Evidence-Based Strategies

Patient safety remains a central concern in healthcare, with adverse events such as medication errors, patient falls, wrong-site surgeries, and hospital-acquired infections continuing to challenge clinical practice. Root-cause analysis (RCA) provides a structured way to uncover underlying factors that contribute to these issues, often revealing gaps in processes, communication, or system design. By identifying these causes, healthcare professionals can create targeted improvement plans that prevent recurrence and promote a culture of safety. The role of the baccalaureate-prepared nurse extends beyond direct care to include leadership in safety initiatives, development of evidence-based strategies, and collaboration with interdisciplinary teams. In this capacity, nurses are positioned to design, implement, and disseminate safety improvement measures that not only protect patients but also reduce costs and strengthen organizational performance. This assessment will focus on applying RCA to a specific patient safety concern, using evidence-based practices and existing organizational resources to develop a practical and sustainable improvement plan.

Place your Order Now

NURS-FPX4035 Assessment 1: Enhancing Quality and Safety

NURS-FPX4035 Assessment 1: Enhancing Quality and Safety

This course has been completed and no further assessments may be submitted.

For this assessment, you will develop a 3–5 page paper that examines a safety quality issue in a healthcare setting. You will analyze the issue and examine potential evidence-based and best-practice solutions from the literature as well as the role of nurses and other stakeholders in addressing the issue.

Introduction

The role of the baccalaureate nurse includes identifying and explaining specific patient risk factors, incorporating evidence-based solutions to improving patient safety and coordinating care. A solid foundation of knowledge and understanding of safety organizations such as Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN), the Institute of Medicine (IOM), and The Joint Commission and its National Patient Safety Goals (NPSGs) program is vital to practicing nurses with regard to providing and promoting safe and effective patient care.

You are encouraged to complete the Identifying Safety Risks and Solutions activity. This activity offers an opportunity to review a case study and practice identifying safety risks and possible solutions. We have found that learners who complete course activities and review resources are more successful with first submissions. Completing course activities is also a way to demonstrate course engagement.

References

Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J., & Donaldson, M. S. (Eds.). (2000). To err is human: Building a safer health system. National Academy Press.

Overview

As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for implementing quality improvement (QI) and patient safety measures in healthcare settings. Effective quality improvement measures result in systemic and organizational change, ultimately leading to the development of a patient safety culture.

Consider the hospital-acquired conditions that are not reimbursed under Medicare/Medicaid, some of which are specific safety issues such as infections, falls, medication errors, and other concerns that could have been prevented or alleviated with the use of evidence-based guidelines.

Place your Order Now 

The purpose of this assessment is to better understand the role of the baccalaureate-prepared nurse in enhancing quality improvement (QI) measures to address patient safety risk at a healthcare setting of your choice. You will do this by exploring the professional guidelines and best practices for improving and maintaining patient safety in healthcare settings from organizations such as QSEN (Quality and Safety Education for Nurses) and the IOM (Institute of Medicine). Looking through the lens of these professional best practices to examine the current policies and procedures in place at your chosen organization and the impact on safety measures for patients, you will consider the role of the nurse in driving quality and safety improvements. You will identify stakeholders in QI improvement and safety measures as well as consider evidence-based strategies to enhance quality of care and promote safety in your chosen healthcare setting.

See Nursing Competencies for more information.

Instructions

Select one of the safety quality issues presented in the Assessment 01 Supplement: Enhancing Quality and Safety [PDF] Download Assessment 01 Supplement: Enhancing Quality and Safety [PDF]resource and incorporate evidence-based strategies to support communication and ensure safe and effective care.

For this assessment, be sure to focus on an organizational setting. This could be a primary care office, urgent care, mobile clinic, hospital ED, rural clinic, etc. Then use the literature to support the problem and solution in the organization. Reflect on costs to that organization/setting and what nurses can do to coordinate the care within the setting. Reflect on stakeholders who may be involved.

Be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the rubric. Please study the rubric carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

  • Explain factors leading to a specific patient safety risk.
  • Explain evidence-based and best-practice solutions to improve patient safety related to a specific patient-safety risk and reduce costs.
  • Explain how nurses can help coordinate care to increase patient safety and reduce costs.
  • Identify stakeholders with whom nurses would need to coordinate to drive safety enhancements.
  • Communicate using writing that is clear, logical, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.

Additional Requirements

  • Length of submission: 3–5 pages of content plus title and reference pages.
  • Number of references: Cite a minimum of 4 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old. Use the Capella University Library and BSN Nursing Program Library Guide as needed.
  • APA formatting: References and citations are formatted according to current APA style. See the APA Module.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

  • Competency 1: Analyze the elements of a successful quality improvement initiative.
    • Explain evidence-based and best-practice solutions to improve patient safety related to a specific patient safety risk and reduce costs.
  • Competency 2: Analyze factors that lead to patient safety risks.
    • Explain factors leading to a specific patient-safety risk in a healthcare setting.
  • Competency 4: Explain the nurse’s role in coordinating care to enhance quality and reduce costs.
    • Explain how nurses can help coordinate care to increase patient safety and reduce costs.
    • Identify stakeholders with whom nurses would coordinate to drive safety enhancements with a specific safety quality issue.
  • Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to communicate in a manner that supports safe and effective patient care.
    • Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar or punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
    • Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

Place your Order Now

Advancing Patient Safety Through Quality Improvement: The Role of Nurses in Addressing Healthcare Risks

Introduction

Patient safety is at the heart of quality healthcare delivery. Despite advances in medicine and technology, preventable safety risks such as hospital-acquired infections, medication errors, and patient falls remain common challenges that threaten outcomes and increase costs. The Institute of Medicine’s landmark report To Err is Human (Kohn, Corrigan, & Donaldson, 2000) highlighted that system-level failures, rather than individual mistakes, are often the root cause of adverse events. This insight led to the development of national initiatives and safety frameworks such as the Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) competencies and The Joint Commission’s National Patient Safety Goals (NPSGs). These initiatives emphasize evidence-based practice, communication, and system redesign as key strategies for reducing harm. Baccalaureate-prepared nurses are uniquely positioned to drive these changes by identifying patient risk factors, coordinating interdisciplinary care, and applying evidence-based solutions to improve outcomes. In today’s healthcare environment, the ability to recognize safety issues, engage stakeholders, and lead quality improvement (QI) efforts is not just a professional responsibility but also a moral imperative.

Place your Order Now 

Module 5: Assignment: Paper – Drug Recalls 

Module 5: Assignment: Paper – Drug Recalls

  • Due Sep 24 by 11:59pm
  • Points 100
  • Submitting a file upload
  • Available Aug 20 at 12am – Sep 25 at 11:59pm

Place your Order Now

A drug recall is the most effective way to protect the public from a defective or potentially harmful product. A recall is a voluntary action taken by a company at any time to remove a defective drug product from the market. FDA, https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/drug-recallsLinks to an external site.

 

Prepare a 4 page paper including the following:

Identify a recent drug recall action.

Describe steps required by FDA for recalling a drug.

How you would lead recall preparations and communications in your company for this recall activity?

Paper is 4 pages, double spaced, Times 12 font, paragraphs, where a paragraph is 5-6 sentences, APA style, 5 references – at least 1 from ASU library.  Add a cover page and a separate page for references for a total of 6 pages.

Place your Order Now

FOOD STUDENTS

Prepare a paper on a food recall.  Follow the instructions above.

Rubric

Drug Recalls Paper
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Paper
Overall content
20 pts Full Marks Paper is clear, convincing and describes leadership.
0 pts No Marks Does not meet criteria.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content
50 pts Full Marks Organized and clear; presents strategies, provides justification, solid reasons and data to support choice. Addresses the complexities and expectations of leading an organization in the development stages. Identifies and describes leadership qualities, organizational style and impact of culture.
0 pts No Marks Does not do minimal and or does not data to support leadership.
50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Support (References & Regulations)
15 pts Full Marks Provides at least 3 references (outside of course materials) plus at least 1 from ASU library to support leadership.
0 pts No Marks References used are from course materials, no outside references; little or no information on US or country regulations.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Spelling, grammar, format
Spelling, grammar and formatting are complete and without errors.
15 pts Full Marks
0 pts No Marks
15 pts
Total Points: 100

Drug recalls happen when a medication is pulled from the market because it is unsafe, defective, or mislabeled. A major example is Vioxx, a painkiller made by Merck. It was popular for treating arthritis and chronic pain, but studies later showed it increased the risk of heart attacks and strokes. In 2004, Merck voluntarily withdrew Vioxx, making it one of the largest recalls in history and showing why strict monitoring and transparent research are vital for public safety.