Controversial Special Interest Group: Anti-Immigration Groups

Controversial Special Interest Group: Anti-Immigration Groups

Immigration has existed for a long time, and with it, anti-immigration sentiments have also persisted throughout history. A strong example of early anti-immigrant sentiment within the United States was the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798, which showed sharp hostility toward immigrants (The Anti-Immigrant Movement in the United States | Pardee Atlas Journal of Global Affairs, n.d.). The term “immigration” designates the process by which individuals enter and remain in another country; there are two primary categories of immigration: legal and illegal (Immigration, n.d.). Legal immigration is considered to happen when all forms of legal formalities by people to enter and stay in another country are fulfilled and acquiring a person’s citizenship for that country. On the contrary, illegal immigration is defined by entering a country without adhering to these legal conditions, including evading immigration law or getting across the border in hurried fashions and typically for the person to remain permanently in the United States.

Summary of Controversies
Immigration, abortion, climate change, and crimes are some of the current contentious issues dividing the United States. Most of the current contentious issues are distinguished by their ability to evoke hard feelings blocking consensus especially in communities based on polarized political issues between democratic and conservative ideas. People in such situations become eager to join camps of people who most probably share their sentiments. As the marketing manager in charge of public relations of a graphic design company, I find myself in a dilemma on whether to reject or accept an offer to design promotional materials in support of a rally against immigration in the community.

 Safety Risks and Potential Legal Consequences

The firm is based in a region where the majority of public opinion is against anti-immigrant sentiments, and there have been violent counter-demonstrations in reaction to rallies in the past. With that in mind, accepting a contract to produce imagery, logos, and promotional materials for an anti-immigration rally can be extremely dangerous to the security of the business. The business runs a very real risk of violent retaliation, such as vandalism or other forms of physical attacks, from groups opposed to the rally. The company may become a target of an attack simply for perceived sympathies with unpopular positions, other than that held by the community.

Legally, the firm may have the right to take on business from anyone; however in a situation where the project may be considered in direct conflict or violation of the perceived rights of others that also stem from hot topic issues such as immigration, it is highly recommended that one avoid becoming involved. While illegal immigration is illegal, agreeing to this type of work may be considered condoning discriminatory or exclusionary practices and can further result in other business abuses.

Decision Making and Its Consequences Regarding Current and Future Clients

If the company decides to accept the contract to produce materials for anti-immigration rally, it risks offending its present and potential clients. The community, that generally stands for immigration can also decide to withdraw their patronage from the firm. The financial losses can amount to millions and are likely to tarnish the reputation of the firm. It is likely that the business will lose its status in that community and may even be compelled to fold up due to lack of patronage. Not filling the order will keep the firm within the interest of the community through continued patronage by the clients besides maintaining good relations. With such potential consequences, the company should have to decline the offer so that the company may not see negative results from involvement with this controversial special interest group.

Public Image and Security Measures

The refusal to create promotional items would most probably serve to improve the public image for not associating with the anti-immigration rally. It, in turn, helps the business avoid all backlash that might come from counter-protests while still remaining in good books within its community. It communicates to people that the business is on the same page regarding the issue of immigration and inclusivity; hence, improves their standing while avoiding reputational damage.

Impact of the Decision on the Local Community

It is definite that refusing to take part in the anti-immigration rally by failing to produce promotional materials will have a positive impact on the local community. Since most of the citizens in that place are pro-immigration, the refusal by the firm to help in the rally will be in line with their values and ideologies. This move epitomizes the commitment of this company to the community’s all-inclusive diversity and instills mutual trust and respect between the business and the community. Because it does not align itself with an organization that would further sectarian or exclusionary messages, the firm aids in maintaining social cohesion within the community. The community is less likely to feel that the business is supporting a cause that runs in a direction opposite their unified opinions on immigration, and may prevent further polarization or unrest within the community. Secondly, it convinces the residents that the firm is sensitive to the social climate and is willing to put the well-being of the community over and above financial gain. Because of this, refusing the order would not only build stronger community bonds but also solidify the business’s position as one that is responsible and conscious of the needs of the community it serves.

Role of Law Enforcement and Private Security in Managing Potential Protests

This is where the private security agencies and local law enforcement would need to coordinate in dealing with any potential security risk that may arise from protests or counter protests. With private security, it would set up shop in and around the business to prevent protesters and secure the business. Local law enforcement would be directly concerned with crowd control measures to make sure protests did not get out of hand and no violent acts occurred. Both would have to coordinate with one another in order to secure not only the business but the community as a whole during such protests.

Conclusion

After all, the company will have nothing to fear from the counter protest and any negative community response since the firm chose not to extend support to the anti-immigration group with its promotional materials. This decision is reflective of the stand of the firm, which is never against the values of the community that accepts immigration and that are against anti-immigration movements. That means the refusal to take part in this infamous rally testifies to a commitment of this firm to maintain its public image and stay in step with its clientele. Therefore, this firm is unlikely to face any fallout, and will be able to continue operating successfully within its community. In that case, local law enforcement and private security will now become significant for the future protests in ensuring the protection of all individuals involved while making it safe both for the business and the larger community as a whole.

References

The Anti-Immigrant Movement in the United States | The Pardee Atlas Journal of Global Affairs. (n.d.). Sites.bu.edu. Retrieved from https://sites.bu.edu/pardeeatlas/advancing-human-progress-initiative/back2school/the-anti-immigrant-movement-in-the-united-states/

Immigration. (n.d.). Legal Information Institute. Retrieved from https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/immigration

CLICK HERE TO ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Controversial Special Interest Group: Anti-Immigration Groups

Marketing managers oversee organizations’ public relations to minimize any negative publicity.

Imagine that you are the marketing manager of a large graphic design firm. You have been asked, by a highly controversial leader of an anti-immigration group, to design images and logos for posters and promotional items. These items will be used in an anti-immigration rally at the state capital. Most of the public in your area strongly disagrees with this special interest group, and in the past, there have been violent counterprotests.

You must prepare a report to the company owner on what actions you believe your firm should take. In the report, summarize the positions of the opposing special interest groups. The report should also take into consideration the security risks associated with accepting the order and public image considerations about accepting/declining the order.

Write a 700- to 1050-word report.

Include the following in your report:

• Summarize the positions of the opposing special interest groups (e.g., what their goals/beliefs are considering current law and social trends).
• Identify the security risks to the firm.
• What legal ramifications are there, if any?
• Do you accept the order? Why or why not?
• How will your decision affect current or future clients?
• How will your decision affect your public image?
• How will your decision affect the citizens in your local community?
• How will your local law enforcement and/or private security agencies effectively handle a potential protest?
• Summarize by analyzing how your actions will affect citizens in your local community, law enforcement officials, and your organization.

Cite at least 2 outside references to support your assignment.

Frmat your assignment according to APA guidelines.

Review APA Sample Paper for proper format. All papers must have a title page, a reference page, and the entire paper must be double-spaced. The paper must also have properly formatted in text citations.