Discussion Post #1- HCR 577
Discussion Post #1- HCR 577
Due Mar 22 11:59pm
Available from Mar 16 until Mar 23
40 points possible
3 Replies, 3 Unread
3 Replies, 3 Unread
Discussion Topic: Module 1: Discussion Post Module 1: Discussion Post
Instructions
For your initial post to the discussion, please do the following:
Prepare a paragraph, 4 – 5 sentences introducing yourself to the class. Please share your major at ASU, any industry experience, and a skill you would like to have.
Propose a drug that you would like to use for your CTD. Each student must have a different drug. In this course you will be creating a Common Technical Document (CTD).
Review the article The responsibility of the pharmaceutical industry.
Describe the scope and mission of regulatory authorities based upon the article (cite 3 agencies), regulations (cite 3 examples), and the roles and responsibilities of pharmaceutical industry stakeholders (identify 3). Initial post is due on Wednesday by 11:59 p.m.
Peer Responses
Respond to posts by two of your peers with additional ideas, questions, or thoughts. There is no length requirement, however responses should contribute substantially to the discussion. Make sure they are engaging by asking questions, challenging each other in a professional manner, and providing new information for others to review and think about. You are expected to communicate respectfully and practice good netiquette in all course interactions. Peer responses will be due on Sunday by 11:59 p.m.
Grading
Initial posts are worth up to a total of 20 points, and peer responses are worth up to an additional 20 points. See the grading rubric for a better understanding of how to get your best grade. To access the rubric, click on the three vertical lines at the top of the page and select “show rubric.”
Click on Reply to post to the discussion.
Module 1 Discussion Rubric
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|---|---|---|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInitial Post
|
20 ptsExcellent The post is comprehensive and fully answers the discussion prompt. Student used complete sentences, appropriate tone, and clear language.
10 ptsGoodThe post is comprehensive, but does not fully answer the discussion prompt. Student used complete sentences, appropriate tone, and mostly clear language.
0 ptsNeeds Significant Improvement The posting is not comprehensive and does not answer the discussion prompt. Student used Incomplete sentences, inappropriate tone, and/or unclear language.
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReply Post
|
20 ptsExcellent Student posted at least 1 reply to another student that was relevant to the discussion.
10 ptsGoodStudent posted one reply to another student, but it was not relevant or did not significantly contribute to the discussion.
0 ptsNeeds Significant Improvement Student did not post a reply, or reply contained incomplete sentences, inappropriate tone, and/ or unclear language.
|
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!