HCR577 Discussion post 2
HCR577 Discussion post 2
Module 2 Discussion Post
Instructions
For your initial post to the discussion, please do the following:
Review the steps for The Device Development Process on the FDA webpage, https://www.fda.gov/
Medical Product Development Process in the United States
- Step 1: Device discovery and concept
- Step 2: Preclinical research; Prototype
- Step 3: Pathway to approval
- Step 4: FDA approval
- Step 5: FDA Post-Market Safety Monitoring
Select one of the five steps to write about.
Write an initial post describing 3 key concepts from the selected step. Initial posts should be at least 3 paragraphs, with each paragraph being at least 4-5 sentences in length. Due on Wednesday.
Include APA-style references if applicable in your post. The discussion board submission process does not allow indentation of references. Therefore, no points will be deducted for not following this APA style requirement.
Reminders
- Students are strongly encouraged to research the questions posed in the discussion board and synthesize their opinions in postings. It is highly recommended students include other sources of information to support their responses, not just the course textbook/reading assignments.
- Wikipedia is NOT an acceptable reference.
- Citations/references for any work or thoughts that are not your own are required.
Peer Responses
Respond to posts by three of your peers with additional ideas, questions, or thoughts. There is no length requirement, however responses should contribute substantially to the discussion. Make sure posts are engaging by asking questions, challenging each other in a professional manner, and providing new information for others to review and think about. You are expected to communicate respectfully and practice good netiquetteLinks to an external site. in all course interactions. Remember that APA-style citations/references for any work or thoughts that are not your own are required. Due on Sunday.
Grading
Initial posts are worth up to a total of 20 points, and peer responses are worth up to an additional 20 points. See the grading rubric for a better understanding of how to get your best grade. To access the rubric, click on the three vertical lines at the top of the page and select “show rubric.”
Due Mar 29 11:59pm
Available from Mar 15 until Mar 30
40 points possible
Module 2 Discussion Rubric
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Points
|
|
Initial Post
|
ExcellentThe post is comprehensive and fully answers the discussion prompt. Student used complete sentences, appropriate tone, and clear language.20 pts
GoodThe post is comprehensive, but does not fully answer the discussion prompt. Student used complete sentences, appropriate tone, and mostly clear language.10 pts
Needs Significant ImprovementThe posting is not comprehensive and does not answer the discussion prompt. Student used Incomplete sentences, inappropriate tone, and/or unclear language.0 pts
|
Criterion Score
/20 pts |
|
Reply Post
|
ExcellentStudent posted required number of relevant peer responses, meeting all requirements.20 pts
GoodStudent posted a response or responses, but it was not relevant or did not significantly contribute to the discussion.10 pts
Needs Significant ImprovementStudent did not post a reply, or reply contained incomplete sentences, inappropriate tone, and/ or unclear language.0 pts
|
|
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!