Nrs 433V Grand Canyon University Intro to Nursing Practice Field Research

Course Code NRS-433V Class Code NRS-433V-O504 Criteria Content Percentage 60.0% Evidence of Revision 10.0% Nursing Practice Problem and PICOT Question 5.0% Background of Studies 5.0% Method of Studies 5.0% Results of Studies 5.0% Ethical Considerations 5.0% Conclusion 5.0% PICOT Question, Research Articles, and Nursing Practice Problem Relationship 10.0% Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change 10.0% Organization and Effectiveness 30.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 10.0% Argument Logic and Construction 10.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 10.0% Format 10.0% Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Final paper does not demonstrate incorporation of feedback or evidence of revision on research critiques. A nursing practice problem is not clearly described or a PICOT question is not included. Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is incomplete. Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is incomplete. Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is incomplete. Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete. Conclusion does not summarize a critical appraisal and applicability of findings. Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is not included. The proposed evidence-based practice change is not included. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Nrs 433V Grand Canyon University Intro to Nursing Practice Field Research

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Sources are not documented. Total Points 300.0 2: Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%) Incorporation of research critique feedback or evidence of revision is incomplete. PICOT question describes a nursing practice problem but lacks reliable sources. Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. Conclusion is vague and does not discuss importance to nursing. Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is incomplete or incorrect. The proposed evidence-based practice change is incomplete or incorrect. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. 3: Satisfactory (83.00%) Incorporation of research critique feedback and evidence of revision are present. PICOT question describes a nursing practice problem and includes a few reliable sources. Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. Conclusion summarizes utility of the research and importance to nursing practice. Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is included but lacks relevant details and supporting explanation. The proposed evidence-based practice change is included but lacks supporting explanation and relevant details. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. Nrs 433V Grand Canyon University Intro to Nursing Practice Field Research

The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. 4: Good (94.00%) Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is clearly provided. PICOT question articulates a nursing practice problem using supporting information from reliable sources. Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal and the importance of the findings to nursing practice. Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is complete and includes relevant details and supporting explanation. The proposed evidence-based practice change is complete and includes supporting explanation and relevant details. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. 5: Excellent (100.00%) Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is comprehensive and thoroughly developed. PICOT question clearly articulates a nursing practice problem using substantial supporting information from numerous reliable sources. Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. Comments Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal, knowledge learned, and the importance of the findings to nursing practice. Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is extremely thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive supporting explanation. The proposed evidence-based practice change is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting explanation and numerous relevant details. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Points Earned Research Critiques and PICOT Question Guidelines – Final Draft Use this document to organize the content from your FOUR studies into your final draft. Qualitative and Quantitative Studies Background 1. Summary of studies. Include problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research question. How do these FOUR articles support the nurse practice issue you chose? 1. Discuss how these articles will be used to answer your PICOT question. 2. Describe how the interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in your PICOT question. Method of Study: 1. State the methods of the articles you are comparing and describe how they are different. 2. Consider the methods you identified in your chosen articles and state one benefit and one limitation of each method. Results of Study 1. Summarize the key findings of each of the studies into a comprehensive summary. 2. What are the implications of the four studies you chose in nursing practice? Ethical Considerations 1. Discuss two ethical consideration in conducting research. 2. Describe how the researchers in the four articles you choose took these ethical considerations into account while performing their research. Outcomes Comparison 1. What are the anticipated outcomes for your PICOT question? 2. How do the outcomes of the four articles you chose compare to your anticipated outcomes? © 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. …