NUR-550-RS2
NUR-550-RS2
CLICK HERE TO ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER
Translational Research Graphic Organizer
Nursing Practice Problem: Among individuals over the age of 65 who are undergoing fracture treatment (P), Is the application of fall prevention programs developed by nurses (I) compared to the routine fall prevention program(C) more effective in preventing and reducing falls and associated injuries (O) within three months of intervention(T)
Qualitative Article
| Criteria | Peer-Reviewed Translational Article and Permalink/Working Link
|
| Methodology | This article provides a qualitative analysis of nonpharmacological treatments that are targeted at reducing the risk of falls among older people. In the realm of elder care, it is of the utmost importance to recognize that medication alone cannot fully address the whole problem of falls, particularly among those who have osteoporosis. This is especially true in the case of those individuals. This essay makes a significant contribution toward understanding the larger context in which fall prevention activities are situated by providing a deeper insight into that context.
The article followed a methodological approach that was consistent with the qualitative character of the research being conducted. The researchers were influential in including material from a wide variety of sources in their study through the utilization of a scoping review (Peraza-Delgado et al., 2020). These sources included both existing literature and clinical evidence. Because it makes it easier to incorporate a wide variety of resources and points of view, using this method is of the utmost relevance in the process of acquiring a comprehensive understanding of nonpharmacological solutions for reducing the risk of falls. This is one of the reasons why its application is considered of the utmost importance. |
| Goals
|
Research objectives are clearly stated. The authors sought to research better and understand nonpharmacological therapies designed to prevent the triad of osteoporosis, fall risk, and hip fractures in people 65 years of age and older (Peraza-Delgado et al., 2020). This area of research is of significant importance because it focuses on the critical issue of preventing falls in older adults, which often lead to hip fractures and related injuries. |
| Data Collection
|
Qualitative research uses data collection methods that require the integration of information gathered from a variety of sources. This is a quality that contributes to the certainty of the scope assessment. The researchers ensured a comprehensive analysis of nonpharmacological treatments by collecting data from a variety of studies and using these studies to synthesize their results. Including a comprehensive approach would expand the scope of fall prevention programs and make them more comprehensive (Peraza-Delgado et al., 2020). |
Quantitative Article
| Criteria | Peer-Reviewed Translational Article and Permalink/Working Link
|
| Methodology
|
This quantitative investigation uses a methodology that includes a meta-analysis or comprehensive review of previous relevant research. The authors of this article needed to do a meta-analysis and survey of the past investigations that had been done in the field of wellness programs for older people to decrease the number of times that these people encounter falls (Campani et al., 2021). The investigation included doing an in-depth analysis of several different workout regimens to recognize the adequacy, practicality over the long term, and applicability of these treatments within the setting of preventing falls among the older populace. |
| Goals
|
The Research goals can be separated into three fundamental categories. The essential objective of this article was to decide the extent to which diverse workout programs decrease the chance of falls in older adults. Furthermore, the main point of this study was to see how well these interventions would work in the long term (Campani et al., 2021). This recognizes the value of stocks that may last longer. The main goal of this research is to determine how effective these interventions are in different situations and with different types of people. The primary goal is to provide data-based recommendations for developing effective, long-lasting, and modifiable exercise programs to meet the needs of other groups of older adults. |
| Data Collection
|
Empirical research procedures, known to be very rigorous and reliable means of data collection, were used as the data collection strategy for this quantitative investigation. This study shows empirical results supporting the effectiveness of exercise treatments in preventing falls by performing a direct analysis of the effects of these interventions (Campani et al., 2021). An analysis of the direct effects of these treatments supports these results. |
Comparison
Both qualitative and quantitative articles provide relevant information on fall prevention strategies for older adults. A qualitative scoping review provides a comprehensive understanding of nonpharmacological interventions, including a variety of tactics such as education, environmental modification, and assistive devices. These non-drug treatments are essential because they address complex issues that go beyond drug treatment of symptoms, such as Lifestyle and environmental factors needed to prevent falls. On the other hand, sports interventions have been the focus of quantitative research. This strategy is essential because it provides real-world data showing how exercise affects fall prevention. This study highlights the importance of sustainability and transferability and suggests that successful interventions should be able to be broadly implemented and suitable for a variety of healthcare settings.
Nurses are essential in program development and implementation. Understanding the wide range of nonpharmacological approaches highlighted within the qualitative investigation will offer assistance in creating individualized intervention methodologies that address the unique needs and dangers of elderly fracture patients. Quantitative research shows that medical practitioners can increase the viability and sustainability of fall prevention programs by utilizing evidence-based workout treatment. A multidisciplinary group for fall prevention and management can be encouraged by making a difference in patients by actualizing a workout program, observing their progress, and offering support to the patients.
Nonpharmaceutical medicines and wellness regimens are standard components of comprehensive fall avoidance efforts. Medical caretakers, as suppliers of essential care, are in a prime position to lead the creation, administration, and dissemination of such programs. Two research discoveries point to the possibility of a technique that is bound together to handle the multifaceted issue of elderly fall risk. Both findings emphasize the significance of multidisciplinary groups comprised of medical attendants, physical specialists, and other well-being experts working together to supply ideal care. Medical caretakers can effortlessly join nonpharmacological treatment and wellness schedules into care plans by empowering collaboration amongst diverse disciplines. This is often great for avoiding falls and advancing patient care. Working together, we can make more effective interventions to deal with the risk of falls among older adults by enhancing their strength, balance, coordination, and versatility.
References
Campani, D., Caristia, S., Amariglio, A., Piscone, S., Ferrara, L. I., Bortoluzzi, S., Faggiano, F., & Dal Molin, A. (2021). Effective, sustainable, and transferable physical exercise interventions for fall prevention among older people. Public Health Nursing, 38(6), 1140-1176. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12949
Peraza-Delgado, A., Sánchez-Gómez, M. B., Gómez-Salgado, J., Romero-Martín, M., Novo-Muñoz, M., & Duarte-Clíments, G. (2020). Nonpharmacological interventions towards preventing the triad osteoporosis-falls risk-hip fracture in population older than 65. Scoping review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(8), 2329. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082329
NUR-550-RS2
Assessment Description
The purpose of this assignment is to conduct a comparison on different research designs to better understand their design and application. Understanding the different types of research design is important so that nurses can effectively apply evidence-based research into practice to address issues and offer better patient care.
You will utilize your approved nursing practice problem to complete the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments for this course and NUR-590, during which you will synthesize all of the sections into a final written paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.
Review feedback from your instructor on the Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Identification of Nursing Practice Problem assignment submitted in Topic 1. If your original proposed nursing problem was outside the scope of nursing practice or not conducive to an evidence-based practice project proposal, work with your instructor to identify a new topic prior to beginning this assignment. If your proposed topic requires revision, complete this prior to beginning this assignment.
Conduct a literature search on your approved nursing practice problem. Select one qualitative translational research article and one quantitative translational research article for this assignment. Using the “Translational Research Graphic Organizer,” present your proposed topic and complete the tables.
Refer to “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview,” located in Class Resources, for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.
You are required to cite two peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This is my PICOT question. Among individuals over the age of 65 who are undergoing fracture treatment (P), Is the application of fall prevention programs developed by nurses (I) compared to the routine fall prevention program(C) more effective in preventing and reducing falls and associated injuries (O) within three monthhs of intervention(T)
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!