NUR 621 Implementing Meaningful Use Essay

NUR 621 Implementing Meaningful Use Essay

Implementing Meaningful Use

The use of health information technologies has gained considerable popularity in the modern world. Health information technologies have been shown to result in outcomes that include reduction in medical errors; provision of efficient care, lowering of costs incurred in healthcare, and enhanced sharing of information among healthcare providers. The Federal Government has embraced interventions that include the provision of incentives through the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act to increase the use of health information technologies in health. The concept of Meaningful Use was also developed to encourage the safe use of healthcare technologies in health. The goals of Meaningful Use include improvement in the health of the population and public, adequacy in the security of personal health information, enhancement in care coordination, quality, efficiency safety, and reduction in health disparities alongside patient and family engagement in health issues affecting them. Therefore, this essay examines the three stages of Meaningful Use and their measures and challenges and barriers experienced by facilities in implementing each stage of the Meaningful Use.

Stages of Meaningful Use

The implementation of the meaningful use of health information technologies was set to occur in three phases. The first stage aimed at setting the foundation for the use of health information technologies. The focus was developing the foundation for the standards and requirements for the collection of clinical data alongside the provision of patients with their copies of their electronic health information. The measures that were used to evaluate success in this phase were varied. One of them was the utilization of computerized provider order entry in health organizations for medication orders alongside implementation of drug-allergy and drug-drug allergy check. The measures also focus on the creation of systems to enable the electronic transmission of prescriptions, updating of problem list of the patients and active diagnoses, recording of demographic information, and implementation of the clinical decision support rule. The additional measures that were used to evaluate the incorporation of laboratory results into electronic health records system, use of systems to send reminders to patients, provision of patients’ access to their electronic health information, and submit electronic data on immunization as per the law and practice (Penner, 2017).

The second step in the Meaningful Use focused on expanding the uses of the electronic health records and health information technologies from those listed in phase one. The focus was placed on advancing the clinical processes in data use to promote the use of electronic health records to support the priorities and aims of the National Quality Strategy. The criteria used for measurement in stage 2 aimed at ensuring continuous quality improvement in the points of care provision and exchange of electronic health information in the most effective and structured manner as possible. Core objectives and menu objectives were used to evaluate the realization of goals of electronic health records use in stage 2. The examples of measures of core objectives include the use of computerized provider order entry for laboratory, medication and radiology orders, development and transmission of electronically permissible drug prescriptions for more than 50% of the prescriptions, and recording of more than 80% of demographic data using electronic health formats. The menu objectives for evaluating the step include submission of surveillance data electronically, inclusion of imaging results and explanations to the CEHRT, and recording of patient data on health history in the form of structured data (Wani & Malhotra, 2018).

The third step in the Meaningful Use focuses on the use of CEHRT to enhance health-related outcomes. The aim of stage 3 is to ease the reporting process alongside aligning it with the existing CMS programs used in health. The realization of the goals of stage 3 is based on a number of measures. The measures include the ability of health organizations to protect their electronic health information in the CEHRT with physical, technical and administrative safeguards, generate alongside transmit prescriptions that permissible electronically using CEHRT, implementing the use of clinical decision support rules, and utilizing CEHRT to engage their patients (Penner, 2017). The other measures include provision of timely access to electronic health data to patients, active engagement with the public health agencies and submission of electronic health records of the patient populations utilizing certified electronic health records technologies.

Assessment Description

In NUR 621 Implementing Meaningful Use Essay, write a 1,200-1,500-word essay describing the electronic health records incentive programs, also known as meaningful use. It offers financial incentives and was designed to improve quality, safety, and efficiency of care through the use of electronic health records

  1. Describe the three stages of meaningful use and their measures.
  2. Explain the challenges and barriers faced by facilities in implementing each stage of meaningful use.

Include three to five references, including your textbook.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Resources

Seven Years After Meaningful Use: Physicians’ and Nurses’ Experiences With Electronic Health Records

Read “Seven Years After Meaningful Use: Physicians’ and Nurses’ Experiences With Electronic Health Records,” by Rathert et al., f

… 


Documenting Stage 1 and 2 Meaningful Use Criteria: A Comparison of Clinical Pharmacists With Other Healthcare Providers

Read “Documenting Stage 1 and 2 Meaningful Use Criteria: A Comparison of Clinical Pharmacists With Other Healthcare Providers,” b

… 


Moving From Quality Measurement to Quality Improvement: Applying Meaningful Use Lessons to the Quality Payment Program

Read “Moving From Quality Measurement to Quality Improvement: Applying Meaningful Use Lessons to the Quality Payment Program,” by

… 


Economics and Financial Management for Nurses and Nurse Leaders

Read Chapter 15 in Economics and Financial Management for Nurses and Nurse Leaders.


Meaningful Healthcare Security: Does Meaningful-Use Attestation Improve Information Security Performance?

Read “Meaningful Healthcare Security: Does Meaningful-Use Attestation Improve Information Security Performance?” by Kwon and John

… 

Implementing Meaningful Use – Rubric

Three Stages

Criteria Description

Three Stages

5. Target

28 points

The essay substantially and thoughtfully describes the three stages of meaningful use and their measures.

4. Acceptable

25.76 points

The essay clearly and thoughtfully describes the three stages of meaningful use and their measures.

3. Approaching

24.64 points

The essay clearly describes the three stages of meaningful use and their measures.

2. Insufficient

22.4 points

The essay vaguely describes the three stages of meaningful use and their measures.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The essay does not adequately describe the three stages of meaningful use and their measures.

Implementing Meaningful Use

Criteria Description

Implementing Meaningful Use

5. Target

28 points

The essay skillfully and thoughtfully explains the challenges and barriers faced by facilities in implementing each stage of meaningful use.

4. Acceptable

25.76 points

The essay clearly and thoughtfully explains the challenges and barriers faced by facilities in implementing each stage of meaningful use.

3. Approaching

24.64 points

The essay clearly explains the challenges and barriers faced by facilities in implementing each stage of meaningful use.

2. Insufficient

22.4 points

The essay vaguely explains the challenges and barriers faced by facilities in implementing each stage of meaningful use.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The essay does not explain the challenges and barriers faced by facilities in implementing each stage of meaningful use.

Thesis, Position, or Purpose

Criteria Description

Thesis, Position, or Purpose

5. Target

5.6 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully directed to a specific audience.

4. Acceptable

5.15 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.

3. Approaching

4.93 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.

2. Insufficient

4.48 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.

Development, Structure, and Conclusion

Criteria Description

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.

5. Target

6.4 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

4. Acceptable

5.89 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

3. Approaching

5.63 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

2. Insufficient

5.12 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.

Evidence

Criteria Description

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.

5. Target

4 points

Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives are integrated effectively.

4. Acceptable

3.68 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated.

3. Approaching

3.52 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

2. Insufficient

3.2 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.

Mechanics of Writing

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

5. Target

4 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable

3.68 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

3. Approaching

3.52 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient

3.2 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

Format/Documentation

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

5. Target

4 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.

4. Acceptable

3.68 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching

3.52 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

2. Insufficient

3.2 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Total 80 points
Topic 4 DQ 1

Jan 68, 2022

One of the aspects of meaningful use is the implementation of the electronic health record (EHR). How has the EHR impacted your health care organization? What were the positives, and are there any negative issues with any aspects of EHR?

Electronic health care records have a lot of benefits in healthcare. One of the main benefits of EHR is having security of data. By having most data in computer system that require the use of password to access, it is easy to track anyone who logs in any healthcare system and accesses patients’ private health data. EHR has made it easy for healthcare providers to share and access patients’ healthcare records in real-time without necessarily having patients carry paper documents physically whenever they go to see their providers. All what healthcare providers need to do is to access the health information online and find about their patients. EHR has helped in reducing medical error among patients. Different healthcare providers can access medical records of their patients online, that way they are able to see what type of medication they are on. By doing this they wouldn’t overprescribe or under prescribe their patients meds. EHR has gone a long way in improving the environment, since a lot of documents are saved electronically which eliminates the use of paper documents thus saving a lot of trees in the process. EHR has also reduced the cost of doing business, since most records can be sent online without necessarily using postage or mail.  Some of the downside of EHR is that when the system goes down, patient records are no longer accessible, which may result in delay of care. There is a risk that private healthcare information may end up in the wrong hands, especially if healthcare information system is breached. It may cost a lot of money for any healthcare institution to constantly update the security of software on their system. Some healthcare providers may find it difficult to adopt using EHR which may hinder use of IT in the highest capacity (Patterson,2004).

Reference:

Patterson, K. D. (2004). Healing Health Care: Fixing a Broken System with Information Technology. Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy, 14(1), 193–220.

NUR 621 Implementing Meaningful Use Essay

NUR 621 Implementing Meaningful Use Essay

Implementing Meaningful Use

The use of health information technologies has gained considerable popularity in the modern world. Health information technologies have been shown to result in outcomes that include reduction in medical errors; provision of efficient care, lowering of costs incurred in healthcare, and enhanced sharing of information among healthcare providers. The Federal Government has embraced interventions that include the provision of incentives through the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act to increase the use of health information technologies in health. The concept of Meaningful Use was also developed to encourage the safe use of healthcare technologies in health. The goals of Meaningful Use include improvement in the health of the population and public, adequacy in the security of personal health information, enhancement in care coordination, quality, efficiency safety, and reduction in health disparities alongside patient and family engagement in health issues affecting them. Therefore, this essay examines the three stages of Meaningful Use and their measures and challenges and barriers experienced by facilities in implementing each stage of the Meaningful Use.

Stages of Meaningful Use

The implementation of the meaningful use of health information technologies was set to occur in three phases. The first stage aimed at setting the foundation for the use of health information technologies. The focus was developing the foundation for the standards and requirements for the collection of clinical data alongside the provision of patients with their copies of their electronic health information. The measures that were used to evaluate success in this phase were varied. One of them was the utilization of computerized provider order entry in health organizations for medication orders alongside implementation of drug-allergy and drug-drug allergy check. The measures also focus on the creation of systems to enable the electronic transmission of prescriptions, updating of problem list of the patients and active diagnoses, recording of demographic information, and implementation of the clinical decision support rule. The additional measures that were used to evaluate the incorporation of laboratory results into electronic health records system, use of systems to send reminders to patients, provision of patients’ access to their electronic health information, and submit electronic data on immunization as per the law and practice (Penner, 2017).

The second step in the Meaningful Use focused on expanding the uses of the electronic health records and health information technologies from those listed in phase one. The focus was placed on advancing the clinical processes in data use to promote the use of electronic health records to support the priorities and aims of the National Quality Strategy. The criteria used for measurement in stage 2 aimed at ensuring continuous quality improvement in the points of care provision and exchange of electronic health information in the most effective and structured manner as possible. Core objectives and menu objectives were used to evaluate the realization of goals of electronic health records use in stage 2. The examples of measures of core objectives include the use of computerized provider order entry for laboratory, medication and radiology orders, development and transmission of electronically permissible drug prescriptions for more than 50% of the prescriptions, and recording of more than 80% of demographic data using electronic health formats. The menu objectives for evaluating the step include submission of surveillance data electronically, inclusion of imaging results and explanations to the CEHRT, and recording of patient data on health history in the form of structured data (Wani & Malhotra, 2018).

The third step in the Meaningful Use focuses on the use of CEHRT to enhance health-related outcomes. The aim of stage 3 is to ease the reporting process alongside aligning it with the existing CMS programs used in health. The realization of the goals of stage 3 is based on a number of measures. The measures include the ability of health organizations to protect their electronic health information in the CEHRT with physical, technical and administrative safeguards, generate alongside transmit prescriptions that permissible electronically using CEHRT, implementing the use of clinical decision support rules, and utilizing CEHRT to engage their patients (Penner, 2017). The other measures include provision of timely access to electronic health data to patients, active engagement with the public health agencies and submission of electronic health records of the patient populations utilizing certified electronic health records technologies.

Assessment Description

In NUR 621 Implementing Meaningful Use Essay, write a 1,200-1,500-word essay describing the electronic health records incentive programs, also known as meaningful use. It offers financial incentives and was designed to improve quality, safety, and efficiency of care through the use of electronic health records

  1. Describe the three stages of meaningful use and their measures.
  2. Explain the challenges and barriers faced by facilities in implementing each stage of meaningful use.

Include three to five references, including your textbook.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Resources

Seven Years After Meaningful Use: Physicians’ and Nurses’ Experiences With Electronic Health Records

Read “Seven Years After Meaningful Use: Physicians’ and Nurses’ Experiences With Electronic Health Records,” by Rathert et al., f

… 


Documenting Stage 1 and 2 Meaningful Use Criteria: A Comparison of Clinical Pharmacists With Other Healthcare Providers

Read “Documenting Stage 1 and 2 Meaningful Use Criteria: A Comparison of Clinical Pharmacists With Other Healthcare Providers,” b

… 


Moving From Quality Measurement to Quality Improvement: Applying Meaningful Use Lessons to the Quality Payment Program

Read “Moving From Quality Measurement to Quality Improvement: Applying Meaningful Use Lessons to the Quality Payment Program,” by

… 


Economics and Financial Management for Nurses and Nurse Leaders

Read Chapter 15 in Economics and Financial Management for Nurses and Nurse Leaders.


Meaningful Healthcare Security: Does Meaningful-Use Attestation Improve Information Security Performance?

Read “Meaningful Healthcare Security: Does Meaningful-Use Attestation Improve Information Security Performance?” by Kwon and John

… 

Implementing Meaningful Use – Rubric

Three Stages

Criteria Description

Three Stages

5. Target

28 points

The essay substantially and thoughtfully describes the three stages of meaningful use and their measures.

4. Acceptable

25.76 points

The essay clearly and thoughtfully describes the three stages of meaningful use and their measures.

3. Approaching

24.64 points

The essay clearly describes the three stages of meaningful use and their measures.

2. Insufficient

22.4 points

The essay vaguely describes the three stages of meaningful use and their measures.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The essay does not adequately describe the three stages of meaningful use and their measures.

Implementing Meaningful Use

Criteria Description

Implementing Meaningful Use

5. Target

28 points

The essay skillfully and thoughtfully explains the challenges and barriers faced by facilities in implementing each stage of meaningful use.

4. Acceptable

25.76 points

The essay clearly and thoughtfully explains the challenges and barriers faced by facilities in implementing each stage of meaningful use.

3. Approaching

24.64 points

The essay clearly explains the challenges and barriers faced by facilities in implementing each stage of meaningful use.

2. Insufficient

22.4 points

The essay vaguely explains the challenges and barriers faced by facilities in implementing each stage of meaningful use.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The essay does not explain the challenges and barriers faced by facilities in implementing each stage of meaningful use.

Thesis, Position, or Purpose

Criteria Description

Thesis, Position, or Purpose

5. Target

5.6 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully directed to a specific audience.

4. Acceptable

5.15 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.

3. Approaching

4.93 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.

2. Insufficient

4.48 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.

Development, Structure, and Conclusion

Criteria Description

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.

5. Target

6.4 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

4. Acceptable

5.89 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

3. Approaching

5.63 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

2. Insufficient

5.12 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.

Evidence

Criteria Description

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.

5. Target

4 points

Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives are integrated effectively.

4. Acceptable

3.68 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated.

3. Approaching

3.52 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

2. Insufficient

3.2 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.

Mechanics of Writing

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

5. Target

4 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable

3.68 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

3. Approaching

3.52 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient

3.2 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

Format/Documentation

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

5. Target

4 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.

4. Acceptable

3.68 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching

3.52 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

2. Insufficient

3.2 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Total 80 points
Topic 4 DQ 1

Jan 68, 2022

One of the aspects of meaningful use is the implementation of the electronic health record (EHR). How has the EHR impacted your health care organization? What were the positives, and are there any negative issues with any aspects of EHR?

Electronic health care records have a lot of benefits in healthcare. One of the main benefits of EHR is having security of data. By having most data in computer system that require the use of password to access, it is easy to track anyone who logs in any healthcare system and accesses patients’ private health data. EHR has made it easy for healthcare providers to share and access patients’ healthcare records in real-time without necessarily having patients carry paper documents physically whenever they go to see their providers. All what healthcare providers need to do is to access the health information online and find about their patients. EHR has helped in reducing medical error among patients. Different healthcare providers can access medical records of their patients online, that way they are able to see what type of medication they are on. By doing this they wouldn’t overprescribe or under prescribe their patients meds. EHR has gone a long way in improving the environment, since a lot of documents are saved electronically which eliminates the use of paper documents thus saving a lot of trees in the process. EHR has also reduced the cost of doing business, since most records can be sent online without necessarily using postage or mail.  Some of the downside of EHR is that when the system goes down, patient records are no longer accessible, which may result in delay of care. There is a risk that private healthcare information may end up in the wrong hands, especially if healthcare information system is breached. It may cost a lot of money for any healthcare institution to constantly update the security of software on their system. Some healthcare providers may find it difficult to adopt using EHR which may hinder use of IT in the highest capacity (Patterson,2004).

Reference:

Patterson, K. D. (2004). Healing Health Care: Fixing a Broken System with Information Technology. Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy, 14(1), 193–220.

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *