Palliative and End Of Life Care in Stroke Scope and Practice Homework

Palliative and End Of Life Care in Stroke Scope and Practice Homework

Please answer using clinical guideline provided. Attached is example of PowerPoint with section 4 domain. please make similar with reference to what page sourced.

(clincial guideline)

please refer to this web page on how to answer questions for domain 4

questions below need to be answered so they can be used for speaker notes. please see how example power point was written

15. The recommendations are specific and unambiguous.

  • Statement of the recommended action

• identification of the intent or purpose of the recommended action (e.g., to improve quality of life, to decrease side effects)

  • identification of the relevant population (e.g., patients, public)

16. The different options for management of the condition or health issue are clearly presented.

  • description of options
  • description of population or clinical situation most appropriate to each option

17. Key recommendations are easily identifiable.

  • description of recommendations in a summarized box, typed in bold, underlined, or presented as flow charts or algorithms
  • specific recommendations are grouped together in one section

Palliative and End Of Life Care in Stroke Scope and Practice Homework

Unformatted Attachment Preview

PALLIATIVE AND END-OF LIFE CARE IN STROKE: A GUIDANCE STATEMENT Clinical Guideline Appraisal Christian Bledsoe RN Shona Cook RN Jeanette Jaffe RN Shari Palmer RN College of Central Florida, BSN DOMAIN 1. SCOPE AND PRACTICE • Deals with potential health impact of guideline on society/populations of patients or individuals • Agree II score: 88% • 1. Are overall objectives specifically described? • 2. Are health questions clearly defined? • 3. Is population specifically described? Creator(s) initials: __sp___ DOMAIN 2. STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT • Refers to Professionals involved in development process of guideline; excluding external reviewers • Agree II score: 84% • 4. Is the development group relevant to the guideline? • 5. Are views and preferences of population sought? • 6. Are guideline users clearly defined? Creator(s) initials: __sp___ DOMAIN 3. RIGOUR OF DEVELOPMENT • Refers to the evidence, research, and methods used to develop recommendations • Agree II score 81% • Endorsed guideline by multiple experts, search words included • Inclusion criteria clear exclusion criteria inferred • Bias control discussed but limited and uncertain • Level of evidence and class recommendations available • Supporting data clear and need for further research addressed • Recommendations for discussion revisits but no timeframe given • Purpose and intent clear, expert clinicians endorsed guideline • Recommended further research but no plan visited creator CB DOMAIN 4. CLARITY OF PRESENTATION ● Assesses the language, structure, and format of the guideline ● Agree II score: 72% ● The guideline should be written such that: ● The recommendations are specific and unambiguous ● Many were overly broad with unclear intended population ● The different options for management if the issue are clearly presented ● Different options were presented for this complex issue, but had some issues with clarity ● Key recommendations are easily identifiable ● Typed in bold and followed each corresponding evidence section creator JJ DOMAIN 5. APPLICABILITY • Refers to how the guideline of end of life care and palliative care is applied to patients suffering from strokes in the real world practice • Agree II score- 54.1% • Facilitators are the patients and healthcare staff • Communication techniques are discussed • Criteria for inclusion is ICH, SAH, and ischemic strokes Creator(s) initials: ___sc__ DOMAIN 6. EDITORIAL INDEPENDENCE • Refers to the editorial and governing bodies in reflection to funding for the research guideline • Agree II score 40% • No definite statement supporting or disclosing the use of external funds • No definitive statement made disclosing competing interests. Creator(s) initials: ___sc__ OVERALL GUIDELINE ASSESSMENT ● Overall rating: 5.5 out of 7 ● 1 group member would recommend this guideline for use. ● 3 group members would recommend this guideline for use with modifications. ● Recommendations for practice ○ include practical strategies for implementing general recommendations ○ a more delineated plan for further research and education creator JJ REFERENCES • Holloway RG, Arnold RM, Creutzfeldt CJ, Lewis EF, Lutz BJ, McCann RM, Rabinstein AA, Saposnik G, Sheth, KN, Zahuranec DB, Zipfel GJ, Zorowitz RD; on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, and Council on Clinical Cardiology. Palliative and end-of-life care in stroke: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014; 45:1887-1916. …

Palliative and End Of Life Care in Stroke Scope and Practice Homework

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *