PHI 413V Patients Spiritual Needs Case Analysis

All: As we begin our last week together, I want to tell you that I have enjoyed this class. Your interactions in the DQs have been thoughtful and show me that you have been processing the important principles of this course. I hope that this class has been meaningful for you. All of your readings this week should be interesting and helpful to you. Also, you might want to consider volunteering at a local church as a volunteer local church nurse/health educator. Nursing is most effective when it is done within the context of community, whether that is a hospital, assisted living facility, group practice or church. Our church has a “Health and Wellness Ministry” staffed by volunteer RNs that offer education, monthly blood pressure checks and some individual non-clinical care to church members who are unable to leave their homes. GCU has asked that I remind you to fill out your End of Course Survey (EOCS). It’s available in the student portal and can be accessed from now until one week after the course completion. All responses are confidential. Your feedback is important so that we may continue to improve your overall university experience. Just a reminder. The case study does NOT count as one of your three required references for this week’s assignment. You can always have more than three references as well! Have a great week. See you in the forums. Rev. Rick In addition to the topic study materials, use the chart you completed and questions you answered in the Topic 3 about “Case Study: Healing and Autonomy” as the basis for your responses in this assignment. Answer the following questions about a patient’s spiritual needs in light of the Christian worldview. 1. In 200-250 words, respond to the following: Should the physician allow Mike to continue making decisions that seem to him to be irrational and harmful to James, or would that mean a disrespect of a patient’s autonomy? PHI 413V Patients Spiritual Needs Case Analysis

Explain your rationale. 2. In 400-500 words, respond to the following: How ought the Christian think about sickness and health? How should a Christian think about medical intervention? What should Mike as a Christian do? How should he reason about trusting God and treating James in relation to what is truly honoring the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence in James’s care? 3. In 200-250 words, respond to the following: How would a spiritual needs assessment help the physician assist Mike determine appropriate interventions for James and for his family or others involved in his care? Remember to support your responses with the topic study materials. While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. Benchmark Information This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies: BS in Health Sciences 1.2; BS Nursing (RN to BSN ) 5.2 Assess for the spiritual needs and provide appropriate interventions for individuals, families, and groups. Course Code PHI-413V Class Code PHI-413V-O500 Criteria Content Percentage 90.0% Decision-Making and Principle of Autonomy 30.0% Decision-Making, Christian Perspective, and the Principles of Beneficence and Nonmaleficence 30.0% Spiritual Needs Assessment and Intervention (C1.2, 5.2) 30.0% Organization, Effectiveness, and Format 10.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are not analyzed according to the principle of autonomy. Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are not analyzed according to the Christian perspective and the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence. How a spiritual needs assessment would help the physician assist the father determine appropriate interventions for his son, his family, or others involved in the care of his son is not analyzed. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Sources are not documented. Total Points 200.0 Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are analyzed from both perspectives, but the analysis according to the principle of autonomy is unclear. Analysis is not supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses. Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are analyzed according to the Christian perspective and the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence, but the analysis is unclear. Analysis is not supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses. How a spiritual needs assessment would help the physician assist the father determine appropriate interventions for his son, his family, or others involved in the care of his son is analyzed, but unclear. Analysis is not supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Satisfactory (75.00%) Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are clearly analyzed from both perspectives, but the analysis according to the principle of autonomy lack details. Analysis is not supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses. Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are clearly analyzed according to the Christian perspective and the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence but lacks details. Analysis is not supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses. How a spiritual needs assessment would help the physician assist the father determine appropriate interventions for his son, his family, or others involved in the care of his son is clearly analyzed but lacks details. Analysis is not supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. PHI 413V Patients Spiritual Needs Case Analysis

Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Good (85.00%) Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are clearly analyzed from both perspectives with details according to the principle of autonomy. Analysis is supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses. Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are clearly analyzed with details according to the Christian perspective and the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence. Analysis is supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses. How a spiritual needs assessment would help the physician assist the father determine appropriate interventions for his son, his family, or others involved in the care of his son is clearly analyzed with details. Analysis is supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Excellent (100.00%) Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are analyzed from both perspectives with a deep understanding of the complexity of the principle of autonomy. Analysis is supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses. Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are analyzed with deep understanding of the complexity of the Christian perspective, as well as with the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence. Analysis is supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses. How a spiritual needs assessment would help the physician assist the father determine appropriate interventions for his son, his family, or others involved in the care of his son is clearly analyzed with a deep understanding of the connection between a spiritual needs assessment and providing appropriate interventions. Analysis is supported by the case Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Comments Points Earned Topic 5: Optional Study Materials Advance Directives “Advance Directives,” by Hanson and Doukas, from The Penn Center Guide to Bioethics (2009). https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.credoreference.com/content/entry/sppbioeth /advance_directives/0?institutionId=5865 Palliative Care “Palliative Care,” by Weigand, from The Penn Center Guide to Bioethics (2009). https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.credoreference.com/content/entry/sppbioeth /palliative_care/0?institutionId=5865 © 2020. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. …