For this assignment, it is especially important to differentiate between constructive and destructive conflict within groups. Substantive conflict deals with disagreements on ideas and issues, while affective conflict looks into personal relationships among group members. If the conflict evolves into personality-based, people may utilize such tactics as avoidance or escalate tensions through hostile behaviors like name-calling and sarcasm. This poisonous atmosphere causes a decrease in teamwork commitment, shying away from the in-depth discussion of problems and disconnection from the decision-making process that results in inferior and sometimes unethical solutions.

In the same way, constructive conflict can result in positive outcomes, but it may turn into affective conflict when people perceive disagreements as personal attacks that lead to anger and defensiveness. Also, unresolved conflicts may lead to some members getting frustrated.

From the options provided, the three major outcomes of a substantive conflict selected are improved self-understanding and self-improvement, stronger and deeper relationships, and increased group cohesion and cooperation.

First, meaningful conflict leads to looking inside one’s self and at the positions of others, which develops self-awareness and self-growth. This results in increased self-understanding and helps individuals to grow within the group (Coleman et al., 2014).

Secondly, members can have in-depth conversations, eventually leading to the establishment of stronger and deeper relationships. Respectful dialogue and cooperation are a foundation for the development of trust and mutual respect, which improves group dynamics (Coleman et al., 2014).

Besides that, a substantive conflict also creates stronger cohesion and cooperation among the members. As the group resolves the conflicts constructively and works toward common goals, members of the group develop a sense of purpose and commitment that is shared among them. Such collective action, as per Coleman et al. (2014), leads to easier communication, cooperation, and problem-solving, which, in turn, results in better outcomes for the group.

Lastly, a well-managed substantive conflict can result in the positive outcomes of self-awareness, better relationships, and group cohesion, which contribute to the overall success and effectiveness of the group. In addition, when groups are effective at resolving conflicts, they also become better at dealing with difficult circumstances in the future. It is this which helps them to grow and develop. It shows how solving conflicts in a positive way can make the team work together better and achieve more.

Reference

Coleman, P. T., Deutsch, M., and Marcus, E. C. (Eds.). (2014). The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice. John Wiley & Sons.

CLICK HERE TO ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Productive Conflict

Paper details

Start Assignment

• Its important to differentiate between substantive conflict and affective (destructive) conflict, which is centered on the personal relationships between group members. Those caught in personality-based conflicts find themselves either trying to avoid the problem or, when the conflict can’t be ignored, escalating hostilities through name-calling, sarcasm, threats, and verbally aggressive behaviors. In this poisoned environment, members aren’t as committed to the group process, sacrifice in-depth discussion of the problem to get it done as soon as possible, and distance themselves from the decision. The result? A decline in reasoning that produces an unpopular, low-quality, and often unethical solution.

Sometimes constructive conflict degenerates into effective conflict. This occurs when a disagreement about ideas is seen as an insult or a threat and members display anger because they feel their self-concepts are threatened. Others respond in kind. Members can also become frustrated when task-oriented conflicts seem to drag on and on without resolution.

For this assignment, review pages 295-296, Substantive conflict( constructive conflict) produces several positive outcomes; they are listed below, Please choose three of these and explain how these outcomes can produce positive outcomes for a group:

Guided Response: Please choose three of the following; your paper should be 150 words in length.

An accurate understanding of the arguments and positions of others in the groups higherreasoning reasoning through analysis improvedhigher reasoningthrough analysisimproved higherreasoning reasoning through analysis improvedhigher reasoningthrough through analysis improved higherreasoning reasoning through analysis and improved-level moral reasoningThorough problem analysisImproved self-understanding and self-improvementStronger, deeper relationshipsCreativity and changeGreater motivation to solve the problemImproved mastery and retention of informationDeeper commitment to the outcome of the discussionIncreased group cohesion and cooperation.